Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sanjay Patel b5999f17d4 [InstCombine] change 'tmp' variable names; NFC
I don't think there was anything going wrong here,
but the auto-generating CHECK line script is known
to have problems with 'TMP' because it uses that
to match nameless values.

This is a retry of rL364452.

llvm-svn: 364477
2019-06-26 21:19:31 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 46a3dbf9a6 Revert [InstCombine] change 'tmp' variable names; NFC
This reverts r364452 (git commit 6083ae0b4a)

llvm-svn: 364455
2019-06-26 18:06:51 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 6083ae0b4a [InstCombine] change 'tmp' variable names; NFC
I don't think there was anything going wrong here,
but the auto-generating CHECK line script is known
to have problems with 'TMP' because it uses that
to match nameless values.

llvm-svn: 364452
2019-06-26 17:43:30 +00:00
Sanjay Patel dfdee7bc15 [InstCombine] regenerate test checks; NFC
llvm-svn: 364437
2019-06-26 15:24:08 +00:00
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Florian Hahn b992feee13 [InstCombine] Fold insert sequence if first ins has multiple users.
Summary:
If the first insertelement instruction has multiple users and inserts at
position 0, we can re-use this instruction when folding a chain of
insertelement instructions. As we need to generate the first
insertelement instruction anyways, this should be a strict improvement.

We could get rid of the restriction of inserting at position 0 by
creating a different shufflemask, but it is probably worth to keep the
first insertelement instruction with position 0, as this is easier to do
efficiently than at other positions I think.

Reviewers: grosser, mkuper, fpetrogalli, efriedma

Reviewed By: fpetrogalli

Subscribers: gareevroman, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37064

llvm-svn: 312110
2017-08-30 10:54:21 +00:00
Michael Kuperstein cd7ad7130f [InstCombine] Canonicalize insert splat sequences into an insert + shuffle
This adds a combine that canonicalizes a chain of inserts which broadcasts
a value into a single insert + a splat shufflevector.

This fixes PR31286.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27992

llvm-svn: 290641
2016-12-28 00:18:08 +00:00