This re-lands commit r196876, which was reverted in r196879.
The tests have been fixed to pass on platforms with a stack alignment
larger than 4.
Update to clang side tests will land shortly.
llvm-svn: 196939
For stack frames requiring realignment, three pointers may be needed:
- ebp to address incoming arguments
- esi (could be any callee-saved register) to address locals
- esp to address outgoing arguments
We would use esi unconditionally without verifying that it did not
conflict with inline assembly.
This change doesn't do the verification, it simply emits a fatal error
on functions that use stack realignment, dynamic SP adjustments, and
inline assembly.
Because stack realignment is common on Windows, we also no longer assume
that MS inline assembly clobbers esp. Instead, we analyze the inline
instructions for implicit definitions and check if esp is there. If so,
we require the use of a base pointer and consider it in the condition
above.
Mostly fixes PR16830, but we could try harder to find a non-conflicting
base pointer.
Reviewers: sunfish
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1317
llvm-svn: 196876
This update was done with the following bash script:
find test/CodeGen -name "*.ll" | \
while read NAME; do
echo "$NAME"
if ! grep -q "^; *RUN: *llc.*debug" $NAME; then
TEMP=`mktemp -t temp`
cp $NAME $TEMP
sed -n "s/^define [^@]*@\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\)(.*$/\1/p" < $NAME | \
while read FUNC; do
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)\([A-Za-z0-9_-]*\):\( *\)$FUNC: *\$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3$FUNC:/g" $TEMP
done
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)-LABEL-LABEL:/;\1-LABEL:/" $TEMP
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)-NEXT-LABEL:/;\1-NEXT:/" $TEMP
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)-NOT-LABEL:/;\1-NOT:/" $TEMP
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)-DAG-LABEL:/;\1-DAG:/" $TEMP
mv $TEMP $NAME
fi
done
llvm-svn: 186280
MS-style inline assembly.
This is a follow-on to r175334. Forcing a FP to be emitted doesn't ensure it
will be used. Therefore, force the base pointer as well. We now treat MS
inline assembly in the same way we treat functions with dynamic stack
realignment and VLAs. This guarantees the BP will be used to reference
parameters and locals.
rdar://13218191
llvm-svn: 175576
If the frame pointer is omitted, and any stack changes occur in the inline
assembly, e.g.: "pusha", then any C local variable or C argument references
will be incorrect.
I pass no judgement on anyone who would do such a thing. ;)
rdar://13218191
llvm-svn: 175334
in the Intel syntax.
The MC layer supports emitting in the Intel syntax, but this would require the
inline assembly MachineInstr to be lowered to an MCInst before emission. This
is potential future work, but for now emitting directly from the MachineInstr
suffices.
llvm-svn: 165173
Reid Kleckner