CPlusPlusNameParser is used in several places on of them is during IR execution and setting breakpoints to pull information C++ like the basename, the context and arguments.
Currently it does not handle templated operator< properly, because of idiosyncrasy is how clang generates debug info for these cases.
It uses clang::Lexer which will tokenize operator<<A::B> into:
tok::kw_operator
tok::lessless
tok::raw_identifier
Later on the parser in ConsumeOperator() does not handle this case properly and we end up failing to parse.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76168
This adds a formatter for libc++ std::unique_ptr.
I also refactored GetValueOfCompressedPair(...) out of LibCxxList.cpp since I need the same functionality and it made sense to share it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76476
(This is D68010 but I also set the new parameter in LibStdcpp.cpp to fix
the Debian tests).
Summary:
Printing a summary for an empty NSPathStore2 string currently prints random bytes behind the empty string pointer from memory (rdar://55575888).
It seems the reason for this is that the SourceSize parameter in the `ReadStringAndDumpToStreamOptions` - which is supposed to contain the string
length - actually uses the length 0 as a magic value for saying "read as much as possible from the buffer" which is clearly wrong for empty strings.
This patch adds another flag that indicates if we have know the string length or not and makes this behaviour dependent on that (which seemingly
was the original purpose of this magic value).
Reviewers: aprantl, JDevlieghere, shafik
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: christof, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68010
Summary:
Currently when printing data types we include implicit scopes such as inline namespaces or anonymous namespaces.
This leads to command output like this (for `std::set<X>` with X being in an anonymous namespace):
```
(lldb) print my_set
(std::__1::set<(anonymous namespace)::X, std::__1::less<(anonymous namespace)::X>, std::__1::allocator<(anonymous namespace)::X> >) $0 = size=0 {}
```
This patch removes all the implicit scopes when printing type names in TypeSystemClang::GetDisplayTypeName
so that our output now looks like this:
```
(lldb) print my_set
(std::set<X, std::less<X>, std::allocator<X> >) $0 = size=0 {}
```
As previously GetDisplayTypeName and GetTypeName had the same output we actually often used the
two as if they are the same method (they were in fact using the same implementation), so this patch also
fixes the places where we actually want the display type name and not the actual type name.
Note that this doesn't touch the `GetTypeName` class that for example the data formatters use, so this patch
is only changes the way we display types to the user. The full type name can also still be found when passing
'-R' to see the raw output of a variable in case someone is somehow interested in that.
Partly fixes rdar://problem/59292534
Reviewers: shafik, jingham
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: christof, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74478
Summary:
Currently the data formatter is treating `std::atomic` variables as transparent wrappers
around their underlying value type. This causes that when printing `std::atomic<A *>`, the data
formatter will forward all requests for the children of the atomic variable to the `A *` pointer type
which will then return the respective members of `A`. If `A` in turn has a member that contains
the original atomic variable, this causes LLDB to infinitely recurse when printing an object with
such a `std::atomic` pointer member.
We could implement a workaround similar to whatever we do for pointer values but this patch
just implements the `std::atomic` formatter in the same way as we already implement other
formatters (e.g. smart pointers or `std::optional`) that just model the contents of the as a child
"Value". This way LLDB knows when it actually prints a pointer and can just use its normal
workaround if "Value" is a recursive pointer.
Fixes rdar://59189235
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jingham, shafik
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: shafik, christof, jfb, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74310
LLDB has a few different styles of header guards and they're not very
consistent because things get moved around or copy/pasted. This patch
unifies the header guards across LLDB and converts everything to match
LLVM's style.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74743
m_size can only be 1 or 0 and indicates if the optional has a value. Calling
it 'm_size', giving it a size_t data type and then also comparing indices against
'size' is very confusing. Let's just make this a bool.
This is a step towards making the initialize and terminate calls be
generated by CMake, which in turn is towards making it possible to
disable plugins at configuration time.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74245
Summary:
lldb-forward.h is convenient in many ways, but having clang-based
class forward declarations in there makes it easy to proliferate uses of clang
outside of plugins. Removing them makes you much more conscious of when
you're using something from clang and marks where we're using things
from clang in non-plugins.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73935
Summary:
This change represents the move of ClangASTImporter, ClangASTMetadata,
ClangExternalASTSourceCallbacks, ClangUtil, CxxModuleHandler, and
TypeSystemClang from lldbSource to lldbPluginExpressionParserClang.h
This explicitly removes knowledge of clang internals from lldbSymbol,
moving towards a more generic core implementation of lldb.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, aprantl, teemperor, clayborg, labath, jingham, shafik
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73661
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Target is one of the classes responsible for vending ClangASTImporter.
Target doesn't need to know anything about ClangASTImporter, so if we
instead have ClangPersistentVariables vend it, we can preserve
existing behavior while improving layering and removing dependencies
from non-plugins to plugins.
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
Summary:
This commit renames ClangASTContext to TypeSystemClang to better reflect what this class is actually supposed to do
(implement the TypeSystem interface for Clang). It also gets rid of the very confusing situation that we have both a
`clang::ASTContext` and a `ClangASTContext` in clang (which sometimes causes Clang people to think I'm fiddling
with Clang's ASTContext when I'm actually just doing LLDB work).
I also have plans to potentially have multiple clang::ASTContext instances associated with one ClangASTContext so
the ASTContext naming will then become even more confusing to people.
Reviewers: #lldb, aprantl, shafik, clayborg, labath, JDevlieghere, davide, espindola, jdoerfert, xiaobai
Reviewed By: clayborg, labath, xiaobai
Subscribers: wuzish, emaste, nemanjai, mgorny, kbarton, MaskRay, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, jingham, xiaobai, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72684
Target doesn't really need to know about ClangASTContext more than any
other TypeSystem. We can create a method ClangASTContext::GetScratch for
anything who needs a ClangASTContext specifically instead of just a
generic TypeSystem.
Summary:
This patch adds code which will substitute references to the full object
constructors/destructors with their base object versions.
Like all substitutions in this category, this operation is not really
sound, but doing this in a more precise way allows us to get rid of a
much larger hack -- matching function according to their demangled
names, which effectively does the same thing, but also much more.
This is a (very late) follow-up to D54074.
Background: clang has an optimization which can eliminate full object
structors completely, if they are found to be equivalent to their base
object versions. It does this because it assumes they can be regenerated
on demand in the compile unit that needs them (e.g., because they are
declared inline). However, this doesn't work for the debugging scenario,
where we don't have the structor bodies available -- we pretend all
constructors are defined out-of-line as far as clang is concerned. This
causes clang to emit references to the (nonexisting) full object
structors during expression evaluation.
Fun fact: This is not a problem on darwin, because the relevant
optimization is disabled to work around a linker bug.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70721
Performance issues lead to the libc++ std::function formatter to be disabled. We addressed some of those performance issues by adding caching see D67111
This PR fixes the first lookup performance by not using FindSymbolsMatchingRegExAndType(...) and instead finding the compilation unit the std::function wrapped callable should be in and then searching for the callable directly in the CU.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69913
The lifetime of a ValueObject and all its derivative ValueObjects (children, clones, etc.) is managed by a ClusterManager. These objects are only destroyed when every shared pointer to any of the managed objects in the cluster is destroyed. This means that no object in the cluster can store a shared pointer to another object in the cluster without creating a memory leak of the entire cluster. However, some of the synthetic children front-end implementations do exactly this; this patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68641
llvm-svn: 374195
There is now std::shared_ptr passed around which is expensive for manycore
CPUs. Most of the times (except for 3 cases) it is now just std::moved with no
CPU locks needed. It also makes it possible to sort the keys (which is now not
needed much after D66398).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67049
llvm-svn: 370863
Since D66174 I see failures of TestDataFormatterStdList in about 50% of runs on
Fedora 30 x86_64 libstdc++. I have found out that LLDB internally expects these
RegularExpressions to be matched in their alphabetical order:
^std::(__cxx11::)?list<.+>(( )?&)?$
^std::__[[:alnum:]]+::list<.+>(( )?&)?$
But since D66174 they are sometimes matched in reverse order. In fact it was
only some luck it worked before as there is internally
std::map<lldb::RegularExpressionSP, FormatterImpl> (FormattersContainer).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66398
llvm-svn: 369655
Summary: We have been seeing increased reports of performance issue around large project and formatting std::function variables especially in functions signatures in back traces. There are some possible fixes but exploring those fixes may take time and it is better to temporarily disable the formatter due to its impact and re-enable it once we have a fix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65666
llvm-svn: 367701
Summary:
This commit achieves the following:
- Functions used to return a `TypeSystem *` return an
`llvm::Expected<TypeSystem *>` now. This means that the result of a call
is always checked, forcing clients to move more carefully.
- `TypeSystemMap::GetTypeSystemForLanguage` will either return an Error or a
non-null pointer to a TypeSystem.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, compnerd
Subscribers: jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65122
llvm-svn: 367360
Summary: This seems better suited to be in a plugin.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, jingham, compnerd, labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64599
llvm-svn: 365951
This is a followup to rL362981, in which I moved GetObjCLanguageRuntime
from Process to ObjCLanguageRuntime, renaming it to Get along the way.
llvm-svn: 362984
Summary:
I want to remove this method because I think that Process should be
language agnostic, or at least, not have knowledge about specific language
runtimes. There is "GetLanguageRuntime()" which should be used instead. If the
caller a CPPLanguageRuntime, they should cast it as needed. Ideally, this
should only happen in plugins that need C++ specific knowledge.
The next step I would like to do is remove "GetObjCLanguageRuntime()" as well.
There are a lot more instances of that function being used, so I wanted to
upload this one first to get the general reception to this idea.
Reviewers: compnerd, davide, JDevlieghere, jingham, clayborg, labath, aprantl
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62755
llvm-svn: 362544
There is likely also an underlying bug in all code that calls
CPlusPlusNameParser with nullptrs, but this patch can also stand for
itself.
rdar://problem/49072829
llvm-svn: 362177
Summary:
According to [C128] "Virtual functions should specify exactly one
of `virtual`, `override`, or `final`", I've added override where a
virtual function is overriden but the explicit `override` keyword
was missing. Whenever both `virtual` and `override` were specified,
I removed `virtual`. As C.128 puts it:
> [...] writing more than one of these three is both redundant and
> a potential source of errors.
I anticipate a discussion about whether or not to add `override` to
destructors but I went for it because of an example in [ISOCPP1000].
Let me repeat the comment for you here:
Consider this code:
```
struct Base {
virtual ~Base(){}
};
struct SubClass : Base {
~SubClass() {
std::cout << "It works!\n";
}
};
int main() {
std::unique_ptr<Base> ptr = std::make_unique<SubClass>();
}
```
If for some odd reason somebody removes the `virtual` keyword from the
`Base` struct, the code will no longer print `It works!`. So adding
`override` to destructors actively protects us from accidentally
breaking our code at runtime.
[C128]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#c128-virtual-functions-should-specify-exactly-one-of-virtual-override-or-final
[ISOCPP1000]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/issues/1000#issuecomment-476951555
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, davide, shafik
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: kwk, arphaman, kadircet, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61440
llvm-svn: 359868
Summary:
When we want to compare a ConstString against a string literal (or any other non-ConstString),
we currently have to explicitly turn the other string into a ConstString. This makes sense as
comparing ConstStrings against each other is only a fast pointer comparison.
However, currently we (rather incorrectly) use in several places in LLDB temporary ConstStrings when
we just want to compare a given ConstString against a hardcoded value, for example like this:
```
if (extension != ConstString(".oat") && extension != ConstString(".odex"))
```
Obviously this kind of defeats the point of ConstStrings. In the comparison above we would
construct two temporary ConstStrings every time we hit the given code. Constructing a
ConstString is relatively expensive: we need to go to the StringPool, take a read and possibly
an exclusive write-lock and then look up our temporary string in the string map of the pool.
So we do a lot of heavy work for essentially just comparing a <6 characters in two strings.
I initially wanted to just fix these issues by turning the temporary ConstString in static variables/
members, but that made the code much less readable. Instead I propose to add a new overload
for the ConstString comparison operator that takes a StringRef. This comparison operator directly
compares the ConstString content against the given StringRef without turning the StringRef into
a ConstString.
This means that the example above can look like this now:
```
if (extension != ".oat" && extension != ".odex")
```
It also no longer has to unlock/lock two locks and call multiple functions in other TUs for constructing
the temporary ConstString instances. Instead this should end up just being a direct string comparison
of the two given strings on most compilers.
This patch also directly updates all uses of temporary and short ConstStrings in LLDB to use this new
comparison operator. It also adds a some unit tests for the new and old comparison operator.
Reviewers: #lldb, JDevlieghere, espindola, amccarth
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, amccarth
Subscribers: amccarth, clayborg, JDevlieghere, emaste, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60667
llvm-svn: 359281
Summary:
This previous fix 5469bda296 did not have a test since we did not have a reproducer.
This is related to how formatters deal with pointers and references. The added tests both the new behavior and covers the previous bug fix as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60588
llvm-svn: 359118
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
There's a single report of a crash coming from this current_sp being NULL. I don't
have a repro case, and I couldn't get it to happen by hand-corrupting a list. We
always get an error instead. So I don't have a test case. But checking for null
is clearly right here.
<rdar://problem/48503320>
llvm-svn: 355957
My apologies for the large patch. With the exception of ConstString.h
itself it was entirely produced by sed.
ConstString has exactly one const char * data member, so passing a
ConstString by reference is not any more efficient than copying it by
value. In both cases a single pointer is passed. But passing it by
value makes it harder to accidentally return the address of a local
object.
(This fixes rdar://problem/48640859 for the Apple folks)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59030
llvm-svn: 355553
Kazuaki Ishizaki