Summary:
This packet is necessary to make lldb work with the remote-gdb stub in
user mode qemu when running position-independent binaries. It reports
the relative position (load bias) of the loaded executable wrt. the
addresses in the file itself.
Lldb needs to know this information in order to correctly set the load
address of the executable. Normally, lldb would be able to find this out
on its own by following the breadcrumbs in the process auxiliary vector,
but we can't do this here because qemu does not support the
qXfer:auxv:read packet.
This patch does not implement full scope of the qOffsets packet (it only
supports packets with identical code, data and bss offsets), because it
is not fully clear how should the different offsets be handled and I am
not aware of a producer which would make use of this feature (qemu will
always
<https://github.com/qemu/qemu/blob/master/linux-user/elfload.c#L2436>
return the same value for code and data offsets). In fact, even gdb
ignores the offset for the bss sections, and uses the "data" offset
instead. So, until the we need more of this packet, I think it's best
to stick to the simplest solution possible. This patch simply rejects
replies with non-uniform offsets.
Reviewers: clayborg, jasonmolenda
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74598
- reduce indentation by removing the defensive
GetID()!=INVALID_PROCESS_ID check -- this function is only called when
an attach or launch succeeds
- replace LLDB_LOGF with LLDB_LOG
This is a step towards making the initialize and terminate calls be
generated by CMake, which in turn is towards making it possible to
disable plugins at configuration time.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74245
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
When running the test suite with always capture on, a handful of tests
are failing because they have multiple targets and therefore multiple
GDB remote connections. The current reproducer infrastructure is capable
of dealing with that.
This patch reworks the GDB remote provider to support multiple GDB
remote connections, similar to how the reproducers support shadowing
multiple command interpreter inputs. The provider now keeps a list of
packet recorders which deal with a single GDB remote connection. During
replay we rely on the order of creation to match the number of packets
to the GDB remote connection.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71105
Summary:
Previously the ABI plugin exposed some "register infos" and the
gdb-remote code used those to fill in the missing bits. Now, the
"filling in" code is in the ABI plugin itself, and the gdb-remote code
just invokes that.
The motivation for this is two-fold:
a) the "augmentation" logic is useful outside of process gdb-remote. For
instance, it would allow us to avoid repeating the register number
definitions in minidump code.
b) It gives more implementation freedom to the ABI classes. Now that
these "register infos" are essentially implementation details, classes
can use other methods to obtain dwarf/eh_frame register numbers -- for
instance they can consult llvm MC layer.
Since the augmentation code was not currently tested anywhere, I took
the opportunity to create a simple test for it.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg, tatyana-krasnukha
Subscribers: aprantl, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70906
Following up on https://reviews.llvm.org/D62221, this change introduces
the settings plugin.process.gdb-remote.use-g-packet-for-reading. When
they are on, 'g' packets are used for reading registers.
Using 'g' packets can improve performance by reducing the number of
packets exchanged between client and server when a large number of
registers needs to be fetched.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62931
This patch replaces the hand-rolled JSON emission in StructuredData with
LLVM's JSON library.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68248
llvm-svn: 373359
Summary:
It uses the new ability of ABI plugins to vend llvm::MCRegisterInfo
structs (which is what is needed to turn dwarf register numbers into
strings).
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, jasonmolenda
Subscribers: tatyana-krasnukha, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67966
llvm-svn: 373208
Summary:
This patch converts FileSystem::Open from this prototype:
Status
Open(File &File, const FileSpec &file_spec, ...);
to this one:
llvm::Expected<std::unique_ptr<File>>
Open(const FileSpec &file_spec, ...);
This is beneficial on its own, as llvm::Expected is a more modern
and recommended error type than Status. It is also a necessary step
towards https://reviews.llvm.org/D67891, and further developments
for lldb_private::File.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67996
llvm-svn: 373003
Originally the idea was for providers to be defined close to where they
are used. While this helped designing the providers in such a way that
they don't depend on each other, it also means that it's not possible to
access them from a central place. This proved to be a problem for some
providers and resulted in them living in the reproducer class.
The ProcessGDBRemote provider is the last remaining exception. This
patch makes things consistent and moves it into the reproducer like the
other providers.
llvm-svn: 371685
This removes the CleanUp class and replaces its usages with llvm's
ScopeExit, which has similar semantics.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67378
llvm-svn: 371474
plugin.
Unfortunately the test is currently XFAILed because of missing changes
to the clang driver.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67124
llvm-svn: 370931
This patch removes the two variant of StringExtractor::GetStringRef that
return (non-)const references to std::string. The non-const one was
being abused to reinitialize the StringExtractor and its uses are
replaced by calls to the copy asignment operator. The const variant was
refactored to return an actual llvm::StringRef.
llvm-svn: 369493
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368933
This function is not portable, and there are only a handful of usages of
it anyway. Replacing it with std::this_thread::sleep_for enables us to
get rid of the compatibility code in PosixApi.h.
llvm-svn: 367814
Summary:
This is a bit more explicit, and makes it possible to build LLDB without
varying the -I lines per-directory.
(The latter is useful because many build systems only allow this to be
configured per-library, and LLDB is insufficiently layered to be split into
multiple libraries on stricter build systems).
(My comment on D65185 has some more context)
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath, chandlerc, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65397
Patch by Sam McCall!
llvm-svn: 367241
Right now our Properties.inc only generates the initializer for the
options list but not the array declaration boilerplate around it. As the
array definition is identical for all arrays, we might as well also let
the Properties.inc generate it alongside the initializers.
Unfortunately we cannot do the same for enums, as there's this magic
ePropertyExperimental, which needs to come at the end to be interpreted
correctly. Hopefully we can get rid of this in the future and do the
same for the property enums.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65353
llvm-svn: 367238
Property definitions are currently defined in a PropertyDefinition array
and have a corresponding enum to index in this array. Unfortunately this
is quite error prone. Indeed, just today we found an incorrect merge
where a discrepancy between the order of the enum values and their
definition caused the test suite to fail spectacularly.
Tablegen can streamline the process of generating the property
definition table while at the same time guaranteeing that the enums stay
in sync. That's exactly what this patch does. It adds a new tablegen
file for the properties, building on top of the infrastructure that
Raphael added recently for the command options. It also introduces two
new tablegen backends: one for the property definitions and one for
their corresponding enums.
It might be worth mentioning that I generated most of the tablegen
definitions from the existing property definitions, by adding a dump
method to the struct. This seems both more efficient and less error
prone that copying everything over by hand. Only Enum properties needed
manual fixup for the EnumValues and DefaultEnumValue fields.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65185
llvm-svn: 367058
Summary:
Here's a replacement for D62504. I thought I could use LoadModules to implement this but in reality I can't because there are at few issues with it:
* The LoadModules assumes that the list returned by GetLoadedModuleList is comprehensive in the sense that reflects all the mapped segments, however, this is not true, for instance VDSO entry is not there since it's loaded manually by LoadVDSO using GetMemoryRegionInfo and it doesn't represent a specific shared object in disk. Because of this LoadModules will unload the VDSO module.
* The loader (interpreter) module might have also been loaded using GetMemoryRegionInfo, this is true when we launch the process and the rendezvous structure is not yet available (done through LoadInterpreterModule()). The problem here is that this entry will point to the same file name as the one found in /proc/pid/maps, however, when we read the same module from the r_debug.link_map structure it might be under a different name. This is true at least on CentOS where the loader is a symlink. Because of this LoadModules will unload and load the module in a way where the rendezvous breakpoint is unresolved but not resolved again (because we add the new module first and remove the old one after).
The symlink issue might be fixable by first unloading the old and loading the news (but sounds super brittle), however, I'm not sure how to fix the VDSO issue.
Since I can't trust it I'm just going to use GetLoadedModuleList directly with the same logic that we use today for when we read the linked list in lldb. The only safe thing to do here is to only calculate differences between different snapshots of the svr4 packet itself. This will also cut the dependency this plugin has from LoadModules.
I separated the 2 logics into 2 different functions (remote and not remote) because I don't like mixing 2 different logics in the same function with if/else's. Two different functions makes it easier to reason with I believe. However, I did abstract away the logic that decides if we should take a snapshot or add/remove modules so both functions could reuse it.
The other difference between the two is that on the UpdateSOEntriesFromRemote I take the snapshot only once when state = Consistent because I didn't find a good reason to always update that, as we already got the list from state = Add | Remove. I probably should use the same logic on UpdateSOEntries though I don't see a reason not to since it's really using the same data, just read in different places. Any thoughts here?
It might also be worthwhile to add a test to make sure we don't unload modules that were not actually "unloaded" like the vdso. I haven't done this yet though.
This diff is also missing the option for svr4 like proposed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D62503#1564296, I'll start working on this but wanted to have this up first.
Reviewers: labath, jankratochvil, clayborg, xiaobai
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: srhines, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64013
llvm-svn: 367020
This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF
macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style format
strings, instead of formatv-style format strings.
So instead of writing:
if (log)
log->Printf("%s\n", str);
You'd write:
LLDB_LOG(log, "%s\n", str);
This change was done mechanically with the command below. I replaced the
spurious if-checks with vim, since I know how to do multi-line
replacements with it.
find . -type f -name '*.cpp' -exec \
sed -i '' -E 's/log->Printf\(/LLDB_LOGF\(log, /g' "{}" +
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65128
llvm-svn: 366936
Change the interface to return an expected, instead of taking a Status
pointer.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64163
llvm-svn: 365226
Summary:
This option allow the toggling of the libraries-svr4 usage in ProcessGDBRemote. It's a follow up of https://reviews.llvm.org/D62503#1564296 and it's meant to test / tweak this new packet with, hopefully, minimum impact and in a faster way.
Enable it with `settings set plugin.process.gdb-remote.use-libraries-svr4 true`. For now, by default it's false.
I didn't put tests up for this but I did test it manually.
Reviewers: labath, jankratochvil
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64112
llvm-svn: 365059
on a thread. When talking to some older gdb-remote stubs, We were getting
a stop reason from the stop reply packet and setting it on the relevant
thread before we updated the full stop list. That would get discarded when
the full list was updated.
Also, if you already have a thread list when you go to see if there is an
Operating System plugin, and you do indeed load a new OS plugin, you have to
re-fetch the thread list or it will only show the raw threads.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62887
llvm-svn: 364666
The qemu x86_64 target returns a target.xml register definition file which
includes other xml files and they include others, etc. Also, the registers
are not put in register groups like lldb wants to see.
This patch (1) puts registers that aren't in a register group in a "general"
register group, (2) change ProcessGDBRemote::GetGDBServerRegisterInfo to
be a method that starts the parsing, asking a recurisve function to fetch
and parse target.xml, (3) adds
ProcessGDBRemote::GetGDBServerRegisterInfoXMLAndProcess which can recusively
call itself to read and parse included xml files, (4) in addition to expecting
the top-level <target> element (which only happens in the top level xml file),
also an xml file that consists of a <feature> node - read the register
defintions and includes from that <feature> element.
<rdar://problem/49537922>
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63802
llvm-svn: 364484
This replaces the `info` typedef with a nested struct named Info. This
means we now have FooProvider and FooProvider::Info, instead of two
related but separate classes FooProvider and FooInfo. This change is
mostly cosmetic.
llvm-svn: 363211
Summary:
This is the second patch to improve module loading in a series that started here (where I explain the motivation and solution): https://reviews.llvm.org/D62499
I need to read the aux vector to know where the r_debug map with the loaded libraries are.
The AuxVector class was made generic so it could be reused between the POSIX-DYLD plugin and NativeProcess*. The class itself ended up in the ProcessUtility plugin.
Reviewers: clayborg, xiaobai, labath, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: clayborg, labath, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: emaste, JDevlieghere, mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62500
llvm-svn: 363098
Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]
This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using
`nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html
for more information.
This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base:
```
run-clang-tidy.py \
-header-filter='.*' \
-checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \
-fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \
-format \
-style LLVM \
-p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc
```
NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not
include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in
isolation somehow.
NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most
parts.
Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847
llvm-svn: 361484
Summary:
According to [C128] "Virtual functions should specify exactly one
of `virtual`, `override`, or `final`", I've added override where a
virtual function is overriden but the explicit `override` keyword
was missing. Whenever both `virtual` and `override` were specified,
I removed `virtual`. As C.128 puts it:
> [...] writing more than one of these three is both redundant and
> a potential source of errors.
I anticipate a discussion about whether or not to add `override` to
destructors but I went for it because of an example in [ISOCPP1000].
Let me repeat the comment for you here:
Consider this code:
```
struct Base {
virtual ~Base(){}
};
struct SubClass : Base {
~SubClass() {
std::cout << "It works!\n";
}
};
int main() {
std::unique_ptr<Base> ptr = std::make_unique<SubClass>();
}
```
If for some odd reason somebody removes the `virtual` keyword from the
`Base` struct, the code will no longer print `It works!`. So adding
`override` to destructors actively protects us from accidentally
breaking our code at runtime.
[C128]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#c128-virtual-functions-should-specify-exactly-one-of-virtual-override-or-final
[ISOCPP1000]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/issues/1000#issuecomment-476951555
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, davide, shafik
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: kwk, arphaman, kadircet, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61440
llvm-svn: 359868
This is part two of the change started in r359330. This patch moves the
ownership of the script interpreter from the command interpreter into
the debugger. I would've preferred to remove the lazy initialization,
however the fact that the scripting language is set after the debugger
is created makes that tricky. So for now this does exactly the same
thing as when it was under the command interpreter. The result is that
this patch is fully NFC.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61211
llvm-svn: 359354
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
This is a follow-up to r357829 (https://reviews.llvm.org/D60340) to
see whether increasing the packet timeout for non-asan builds could
also positively affect the stability of non-asan bots.
llvm-svn: 357954
Since these timeouts guard against catastrophic error in debugserver,
I also increased all of them to the maximum value among them.
The motivation for this test was the observation that an asanified
LLDB would often exhibit seemingly random test failures that could be
traced back to debugserver packets getting out of sync. With this path
applied I can no longer reproduce the one particular failure mode that
I was investigating.
rdar://problem/49441261
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60340
llvm-svn: 357829
Yesterday I noticed a reproducer test failing after making a local
change. Removing the reproducer directory solved the issue. Add a test
case that detects this.
llvm-svn: 355941
My apologies for the large patch. With the exception of ConstString.h
itself it was entirely produced by sed.
ConstString has exactly one const char * data member, so passing a
ConstString by reference is not any more efficient than copying it by
value. In both cases a single pointer is passed. But passing it by
value makes it harder to accidentally return the address of a local
object.
(This fixes rdar://problem/48640859 for the Apple folks)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59030
llvm-svn: 355553
Given that we have a target named Symbols, one wonders why a
file named Symbols.cpp is not in this target. To be clear,
the functions exposed from this file are really focused on
*locating* a symbol file on a given host, which is where the
ambiguity comes in. However, it makes more sense conceptually
to be in the Symbols target. While some of the specific places
to search for symbol files might change depending on the Host,
this is not inherently true in the same way that, for example,
"accessing the file system" or "starting threads" is
fundamentally dependent on the Host.
PDBs, for example, recently became a reality on non-Windows platforms,
and it's theoretically possible that DSYMs could become a thing on non
MacOSX platforms (maybe in a remote debugging scenario). Other types of
symbol files, such as DWO, DWP, etc have never been tied to any Host
platform anyway.
After this patch, there is only one remaining dependency from
Host to Target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58730
llvm-svn: 355032
Kazuaki Ishizaki