*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
This started as an effort to change StringExtractor to store a
StringRef internally instead of a std::string. I got that working
locally with just 1 test failure which I was unable to figure out the
cause of. But it was also a massive changelist due to a trickle
down effect of changes.
So I'm starting over, using what I learned from the first time to
tackle smaller, more isolated changes hopefully leading up to
a full conversion by the end.
At first the changes (such as in this CL) will seem mostly
a matter of preference and pointless otherwise. However, there
are some places in my larger CL where using StringRef turned 20+
lines of code into 2, drastically simplifying logic. Hopefully
once these go in they will illustrate some of the benefits of
thinking in terms of StringRef.
llvm-svn: 279917
Summary:
This is a preparatory commit for D22914, where I'd like to replace this mutex by an R/W lock
(which is also not recursive). This required a couple of changes:
- The only caller of Read/WriteRegister, GDBRemoteRegisterContext class, was already acquiring
the mutex, so these functions do not need to. All functions which now do not take a lock, take
an lock argument instead, to remind the caller of this fact.
- GetThreadSuffixSupported() was being called from locked and unlocked contexts (including
contexts where the process was running, and the call would fail if it did not have the result
cached). I have split this into two functions, one which computes the thread suffix support and
caches it (this one always takes the lock), and another, which returns the cached value (and
never needs to take the lock). This feels quite natural as ProcessGdbRemote was already
pre-caching this value at the start.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23802
llvm-svn: 279725
Summary:
The tricky part here was that the exisiting implementation of WriteAllRegisters was expecting
hex-encoded data (as that was what the first implementation I replaced was using, but here we had
binary data to begin with. I thought the read/write register functions would be more useful if
they handled the hex-encoding themselves (all the other client functions provide the responses in
a more-or-less digested form). The read functions return a DataBuffer, so they can allocate as
much memory as they need to, while the write functions functions take an llvm::ArrayRef, as that
can be constructed from pretty much anything.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23659
llvm-svn: 279232
This change adds the Process/gdb-remote gtests to the Xcode
build. It also adds a virtual method impl to the continuation
delegate that I added with the StructuredDataPlugin change.
llvm-svn: 279203
Summary:
Before this, each function had a copy of the code which handled appending of the thread suffix to
the packet (or using $Hg instead). I have moved that code into a single function and made
everyone else use that. The function takes the partial packet as a StreamString rvalue reference,
to avoid a copy and to remind the users that the packet will have undeterminate contents after
the call.
This also fixes the incorrect formatting of the QRestoreRegisterState packet in case thread
suffix is not supported.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23604
llvm-svn: 279040
Apparently clang will happily capture a const variable in a lambda without it being specified in
the capture clause. MSVC does not like that.
llvm-svn: 278925
Summary:
When saving/restoring registers the GDBRemoteRegisterContext class was manually constructing
the register save/restore packets. This creates appropriate helper functions in
GDBRemoteCommunicationClient, and switches the class to use those. It also removes what a
duplicate packet send in some of those functions, a thing that I can only attribute to a bad
merge artefact.
I also add a test framework for testing gdb-remote client functionality and add tests for the new
functions I introduced. I'd like to be able to test the register context changes in isolation as
well, but currently there doesn't seem to be a way to reasonably construct a standalone register
context object, so we'll have to rely on the end-to-end tests to verify that.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23553
llvm-svn: 278915
Despite its comment, the function is only used in the Client class, and its presence was merely
complicating mock implementation in unit tests.
llvm-svn: 278785
Resumbitting the commit after fixing the following problems:
- broken unit tests on windows: incorrect gtest usage on my part (TEST vs. TEST_F)
- the new code did not correctly handle the case where we went to interrupt the process, but it
stopped due to a different reason - the interrupt request would remain queued and would
interfere with the following "continue". I also added a unit test for this case.
This reapplies r277156 and r277139.
llvm-svn: 278118
This reverts commit r277139, because:
- broken unittest on windows (likely typo on my part)
- seems to break TestCallThatRestart (needs investigation)
llvm-svn: 277154
SendContinuePacketAndWaitForResponse was huge function with very complex interactions with
several other functions (SendAsyncSignal, SendInterrupt, SendPacket). This meant that making any
changes to how packet sending functions and threads interact was very difficult and error-prone.
This change does not add any functionality yet, it merely paves the way for future changes. In a
follow-up, I plan to add the ability to have multiple query packets in flight (i.e.,
request,request,response,response instead of the usual request,response sequences) and use that
to speed up qModuleInfo packet processing.
Here, I introduce two special kinds of locks: ContinueLock, which is used by the continue thread,
and Lock, which is used by everyone else. ContinueLock (atomically) sends a continue packet, and
blocks any other async threads from accessing the connection. Other threads create an instance of
the Lock object when they want to access the connection. This object, while in scope prevents the
continue from being send. Optionally, it can also interrupt the process to gain access to the
connection for async processing.
Most of the syncrhonization logic is encapsulated within these two classes. Some of it still
had to bleed over into the SendContinuePacketAndWaitForResponse, but the function is still much
more manageable than before -- partly because of most of the work is done in the ContinueLock
class, and partly because I have factored out a lot of the packet processing code separate
functions (this also makes the functionality more easily testable). Most importantly, there is
none of syncrhonization code in the async thread users -- as far as they are concerned, they just
need to declare a Lock object, and they are good to go (SendPacketAndWaitForResponse is now a
very thin wrapper around the NoLock version of the function, whereas previously it had over 100
lines of synchronization code). This will make my follow up changes there easy.
I have written a number of unit tests for the new code and I have ran the test suite on linux and
osx with no regressions.
Subscribers: tberghammer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22629
llvm-svn: 277139
Kate Stone