I got a report recently that a user was having trouble interpreting the
meaning of the error message. Hopefully this is more readable; produces
something like the following:
error: No such file or directory: Could not read profile data!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76796
Try again with an up-to-date version of D69471 (99317124 was a stale
revision).
---
Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:
1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.
This shrinks the size of llc's coverage segment by 82% (334MB -> 62MB)
and speeds up end-to-end single-threaded report generation by 10%. For
reference the compressed name data in llc is 81MB (__llvm_prf_names).
Rationale for changes to the format:
- With the current format, most coverage function records are discarded.
E.g., more than 97% of the records in llc are *duplicate* placeholders
for functions visible-but-not-used in TUs. Placeholders *are* used to
show under-covered functions, but duplicate placeholders waste space.
- We reached general consensus about giving (1) a try at the 2017 code
coverage BoF [1]. The thinking was that using `linkonce_odr` to merge
duplicates is simpler than alternatives like teaching build systems
about a coverage-aware database/module/etc on the side.
- Revising the format is expensive due to the backwards compatibility
requirement, so we might as well compress filenames while we're at it.
This shrinks the encoded filenames in llc by 86% (12MB -> 1.6MB).
See CoverageMappingFormat.rst for the details on what exactly has
changed.
Fixes PR34533 [2], hopefully.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118428.html
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34533
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69471
Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:
1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.
This shrinks the size of llc's coverage segment by 82% (334MB -> 62MB)
and speeds up end-to-end single-threaded report generation by 10%. For
reference the compressed name data in llc is 81MB (__llvm_prf_names).
Rationale for changes to the format:
- With the current format, most coverage function records are discarded.
E.g., more than 97% of the records in llc are *duplicate* placeholders
for functions visible-but-not-used in TUs. Placeholders *are* used to
show under-covered functions, but duplicate placeholders waste space.
- We reached general consensus about giving (1) a try at the 2017 code
coverage BoF [1]. The thinking was that using `linkonce_odr` to merge
duplicates is simpler than alternatives like teaching build systems
about a coverage-aware database/module/etc on the side.
- Revising the format is expensive due to the backwards compatibility
requirement, so we might as well compress filenames while we're at it.
This shrinks the encoded filenames in llc by 86% (12MB -> 1.6MB).
See CoverageMappingFormat.rst for the details on what exactly has
changed.
Fixes PR34533 [2], hopefully.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118428.html
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34533
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69471
Summary:
This flag was added for the json format to exclude functions from the
output. This mirrors that behavior in lcov (where it was previously
accepted but ignored). This makes the output file smaller which can be
beneficial depending on how you consume it, especially if you don't use
this data anyways.
Patch by Keith Smiley (@keith).
Reviewers: kastiglione, Dor1s, vsk, allevato
Reviewed By: Dor1s, allevato
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73160
Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:
1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.
This shrinks the size of llc's coverage segment by 82% (334MB -> 62MB)
and speeds up end-to-end single-threaded report generation by 10%. For
reference the compressed name data in llc is 81MB (__llvm_prf_names).
Rationale for changes to the format:
- With the current format, most coverage function records are discarded.
E.g., more than 97% of the records in llc are *duplicate* placeholders
for functions visible-but-not-used in TUs. Placeholders *are* used to
show under-covered functions, but duplicate placeholders waste space.
- We reached general consensus about giving (1) a try at the 2017 code
coverage BoF [1]. The thinking was that using `linkonce_odr` to merge
duplicates is simpler than alternatives like teaching build systems
about a coverage-aware database/module/etc on the side.
- Revising the format is expensive due to the backwards compatibility
requirement, so we might as well compress filenames while we're at it.
This shrinks the encoded filenames in llc by 86% (12MB -> 1.6MB).
See CoverageMappingFormat.rst for the details on what exactly has
changed.
Fixes PR34533 [2], hopefully.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118428.html
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34533
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69471
Add the `-whitelist-filename-regex` option to restrict coverage
reporting to file paths that match a whitelist regex.
Patch by Michael Daniels!
rdar://56720320
Before this change, if multiple binary files were presented, all of them must have been instrumented or the load would fail with coverage_map_error::no_data_found.
Patch by Dean Sturtevant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66763
llvm-svn: 370257
Support loading code coverage data from regular archives, thin archives,
and from MachO universal binaries which contain archives.
Testing: check-llvm, check-profile (with {A,UB}San enabled)
rdar://51538999
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63232
llvm-svn: 363325
Summary:
Triple components in `XFAIL` lines are tested against the target triple.
Various tests that are expected to fail on big-endian hosts are marked
as being `XFAIL` for big-endian targets. This patch corrects these tests
by having them test against a new `host-byteorder-big-endian` feature.
Reviewers: xingxue, sfertile, jasonliu
Reviewed By: xingxue
Subscribers: jvesely, nhaehnle, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60551
llvm-svn: 359689
Summary:
CoverageExporterJson::renderFiles accounts for most of the execution time given a large profdata file with multiple binaries.
Proposed solution is to generate JSON for each file in parallel and sort at the end to preserve deterministic output. Also added flags to skip generating parts of the output to trim the output size.
Patch by Sajjad Mirza (@sajjadm).
Reviewers: Dor1s, vsk
Reviewed By: Dor1s, vsk
Subscribers: liaoyuke, mgrang, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59277
llvm-svn: 356178
The patch adds support for --hash-filenames to llvm-cov. This option adds md5
hash of the source path to the name of the generated .gcov file. The option is
crucial for cases where you have multiple files with the same name but can't
use --preserve-paths as resulting filenames exceed the limit.
from gcov(1):
```
-x
--hash-filenames
By default, gcov uses the full pathname of the source files to to
create an output filename. This can lead to long filenames that
can overflow filesystem limits. This option creates names of the
form source-file##md5.gcov, where the source-file component is
the final filename part and the md5 component is calculated from
the full mangled name that would have been used otherwise.
```
Patch by Igor Ignatev!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58370
llvm-svn: 354379
Summary:
lcov tracefiles are used by various coverage reporting tools and build
systems (e.g., Bazel). It is a simple text-based format to parse and
more convenient to use than the JSON export format, which needs
additional processing to map regions/segments back to line numbers.
It's a little unfortunate that "text" format is now overloaded to refer
specifically to JSON for export, but I wanted to avoid making any
breaking changes to the UI of the llvm-cov tool at this time.
Patch by Tony Allevato (@allevato).
Reviewers: Dor1s, vsk
Reviewed By: Dor1s, vsk
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54266
llvm-svn: 346506
Summary:
The goal of this patch is to have the same behaviour than gcc-gcov.
Currently the hit counts for a line is the sum of the counts for each block on that line.
The idea is to detect the cycles in the graph of blocks in using the algorithm by Hawick & James.
The count for a cycle is the min of the counts for each edge in the cycle.
Once we've the count for each cycle, we can sum them and add the transition counts of those cycles.
Fix both https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38065 and https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38066
Reviewers: marco-c, davidxl
Reviewed By: marco-c
Subscribers: vsk, lebedev.ri, sylvestre.ledru, dblaikie, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49659
llvm-svn: 342657
Summary:
The issue with the python path is that the path to python on Windows can contain spaces. To make the tests always work, the path to python needs to be surrounded by quotes.
This change updates several configuration files which specify the path to python as a substitution and also remove quotes from existing tests.
Reviewers: asmith, zturner, alexshap, jakehehrlich
Reviewed By: zturner, alexshap, jakehehrlich
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, nemanjai, eraman, kbarton, jakehehrlich, steven_wu, dexonsmith, stella.stamenova, delcypher, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50206
llvm-svn: 339073
Summary:
Don't skip functions with the same name but from different files.
That change makes it possible to generate code coverage reports from
different binaries compiled from different sources even if there are functions
with non-unique names. Without that change, code coverage for such functions is
missing except of the first function processed.
Reviewers: vsk, morehouse
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46478
llvm-svn: 331801
Summary:
The option is helpful for large projects where it's not feasible to specify sources which
user would like to see in the report. Instead, it allows to black-list specific sources via
regular expressions (e.g. now it's possible to skip all files that have "test" in its name).
This also partially fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34277
Reviewers: vsk, morehouse, liaoyuke
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: kcc, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43907
llvm-svn: 329581
Add powerpc- (32-bit) as XFAIL for tests that are documented either in-
line or via commit messages as expected to fail on big-endian systems.
Tests not documented in-line are documented in commit messages as
follows:
r211172 - test/tools/llvm-cov/llvm-cov.test
r247920 - test/Transforms/SampleProfile/gcc-simple.ll
llvm-svn: 322114
Summary:
That would allow to recursively compare directories in tests using
"diff -r" on Windows in a similar way as it can be done on Linux or Mac.
Reviewers: zturner, morehouse, vsk
Reviewed By: zturner
Subscribers: kcc, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41776
llvm-svn: 322102
Summary: The test is failing because Windows do not support "diff -r".
Reviewers: Dor1s
Reviewed By: Dor1s
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41768
llvm-svn: 321876
Summary:
Local testing has demonstrated a great speed improvement, compare the following:
1) Existing version:
```
$ time llvm-cov show -format=html -output-dir=report -instr-profile=... ...
The tool has been launched: 00:00:00
Loading coverage data: 00:00:00
Get unique source files: 00:00:33
Creating an index out of the source files: 00:00:34
Going into prepareFileReports: 00:00:34
Going to emit summary information for each file: 00:28:55 <-- 28:21 min!
Going to emit links to files with no function: 00:28:55
Launching 32 threads for generating HTML files: 00:28:55
real 37m43.651s
user 112m5.540s
sys 7m39.872s
```
2) Multi-threaded version with 32 CPUs:
```
$ time llvm-cov show -format=html -output-dir=report -instr-profile=... ...
The tool has been launched: 00:00:00
Loading coverage data: 00:00:00
Get unique source files: 00:00:38
Creating an index out of the source files: 00:00:40
Going into prepareFileReports: 00:00:40
Preparing file reports using 32 threads: 00:00:40
# Creating thread tasks for the following number of files: 16422
Going to emit summary information for each file: 00:01:57 <-- 1:17 min!
Going to emit links to files with no function: 00:01:58
Launching 32 threads for generating HTML files: 00:01:58
real 11m2.044s
user 134m48.124s
sys 7m53.388s
```
Reviewers: vsk, morehouse
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: Dor1s, llvm-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41206
llvm-svn: 321871
Summary:
That allows to get the same data as produced by "llvm-cov report",
but in JSON format, which is better for further processing by end users.
Reviewers: vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41085
llvm-svn: 320435
This is a fix for the coverage segment builder.
If multiple regions must be popped off the active stack at once, and
more than one of them end at the same location, emit a segment using the
count from the most-recent completed region.
Fixes PR35437, rdar://35760630
Testing: invoked llvm-cov on a stage2 build of clang, additional unit
tests, check-profile
llvm-svn: 319391
We've worked around bugs in the frontend by ignoring the count from
wrapped segments when a line has at least one region entry segment.
Those frontend bugs are now fixed, so it's time to regenerate the
checked-in covmapping files and remove the workaround.
llvm-svn: 317761
llvm-cov tends to highlight too many regions because its policy is to
highlight all region entry segments. This can look confusing to users:
not all region entry segments are interesting and deserve highlighting.
Emitting these highlights only when the region count differs from the
line count is a more user-friendly policy.
llvm-svn: 316109
llvm-cov typically doesn't highlight gap segments, but it should if the
gap occurs after an uncovered region in order to preserve continuity.
llvm-svn: 316107
In r315960, I accidentally assumed that the first line segment is
guaranteed to be the non-gap region entry segment (given that one is
present). It can actually be any segment on the line, and the test I
checked in demonstrates that.
llvm-svn: 315963
Gap areas make it possible to correctly determine when to use counts
from deferred regions. Before gap areas were introduced, llvm-cov needed
to use a heuristic to do this: it ignored counts from segments that
start, but do not end, on a line. This heuristic breaks down on a simple
example (see PR34962).
This patch removes the heuristic and picks counts from any region entry
segment which isn't a gap area.
llvm-svn: 315960
Summary: This version of tests should be working properly.
Reviewers: vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38889
llvm-svn: 315714
Eli Friedman