lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelLowering.{h,cpp}
Rename LowerFormalArguments_Darwin to LowerFormalArguments_Darwin_Or_64SVR4.
Rename LowerFormalArguments_SVR4 to LowerFormalArguments_32SVR4.
Receive small structs right-justified in LowerFormalArguments_Darwin_Or_64SVR4.
Rename LowerCall_Darwin to LowerCall_Darwin_Or_64SVR4.
Rename LowerCall_SVR4 to LowerCall_32SVR4.
Pass small structs right-justified in LowerCall_Darwin_Or_64SVR4.
test/CodeGen/PowerPC/structsinregs.ll
New test.
llvm-svn: 164228
- BlockAddress has no support of BA + offset form and there is no way to
propagate that offset into machine operand;
- Add BA + offset support and a new interface 'getTargetBlockAddress' to
simplify target block address forming;
- All targets are modified to use new interface and X86 backend is enhanced to
support BA + offset addressing.
llvm-svn: 163743
[Tobias von Koch] What's happening here is that the CR6SET/CR6UNSET is breaking the chain of register copies glued to the function call (BL_SVR4 node). The scheduler then moves other instructions in between those and the function call, which isn't good!
Right. That's the case where there is no chain of register copies before the call, so InFlag == 0... Attached is a new revision of the patch which should fix this for good.
llvm-svn: 162916
The 32-bit ABI requires CR bit 6 to be set if the call has fp arguments and
unset if it doesn't. The solution up to now was to insert a MachineNode to
set/unset the CR bit, which produces a CR vreg. This vreg was then copied
into CR bit 6. When the register allocator saw a bunch of these in the same
function, it allocated the set/unset CR bit in some random CR register (1
extra instruction) and then emitted CR moves before every vararg function
call, rather than just setting and unsetting CR bit 6 directly before every
vararg function call. This patch instead inserts a PPCcrset/PPCcrunset
instruction which are then matched by a dedicated instruction pattern.
Patch by Tobias von Koch.
llvm-svn: 162725
On PPC64, this can be done with a simple TableGen pattern.
To enable this, I've added the (otherwise missing) readcyclecounter
SDNode definition to TargetSelectionDAG.td.
llvm-svn: 161302
Over the entire test-suite, this has an insignificantly negative average
performance impact, but reduces some of the worst slowdowns from the
anti-dep. change (r158294).
Largest speedups:
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Quicksort - 28%
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Towers - 24%
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix - 23%
MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2 - 19%
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-bitcount/automotive-bitcount - 15%
(matrix and automotive-bitcount were both in the top-5 slowdown list from the
anti-dep. change)
Largest slowdowns:
MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/03-testtrie/testtrie - 28%
MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/gsm/toast/toast - 26%
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan/automotive-susan - 21%
SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/lpbench - 20%
MultiSource/Applications/d/make_dparser - 16%
llvm-svn: 158296
It seems that this no longer causes test suite failures on PPC64 (after r157159),
and often gives a performance benefit, so it can be enabled by default.
llvm-svn: 157911
to pass around a struct instead of a large set of individual values. This
cleans up the interface and allows more information to be added to the struct
for future targets without requiring changes to each and every target.
NV_CONTRIB
llvm-svn: 157479
(load only has one operand) and smuggle in some whitespace changes too
NB: I am obviously testing the water here, and believe that the unguarded
cast is still wrong, but why is the getZExtValue of the load's operand
tested against zero here? Any review is appreciated.
llvm-svn: 155190
This allows us to keep passing reduced masks to SimplifyDemandedBits, but
know about all the bits if SimplifyDemandedBits fails. This allows instcombine
to simplify cases like the one in the included testcase.
llvm-svn: 154011
Dynamic linking on PPC64 has had problems since we had to move the top-down
hazard-detection logic post-ra. For dynamic linking to work there needs to be
a nop placed after every call. It turns out that it is really hard to guarantee
that nothing will be placed in between the call (bl) and the nop during post-ra
scheduling. Previous attempts at fixing this by placing logic inside the
hazard detector only partially worked.
This is now fixed in a different way: call+nop codegen-only instructions. As far
as CodeGen is concerned the pair is now a single instruction and cannot be split.
This solution works much better than previous attempts.
The scoreboard hazard detector is also renamed to be more generic, there is currently
no cpu-specific logic in it.
llvm-svn: 153816
The PPC64 SVR4 ABI requires integer stack arguments, and thus the var. args., that
are smaller than 64 bits be zero extended to 64 bits.
llvm-svn: 153373
the processor keeps a return addresses stack (RAS) which stores the address
and the instruction execution state of the instruction after a function-call
type branch instruction.
Calling a "noreturn" function with normal call instructions (e.g. bl) can
corrupt RAS and causes 100% return misprediction so LLVM should use a
unconditional branch instead. i.e.
mov lr, pc
b _foo
The "mov lr, pc" is issued in order to get proper backtrace.
rdar://8979299
llvm-svn: 151623
undefined result. This adds new ISD nodes for the new semantics,
selecting them when the LLVM intrinsic indicates that the undef behavior
is desired. The new nodes expand trivially to the old nodes, so targets
don't actually need to do anything to support these new nodes besides
indicating that they should be expanded. I've done this for all the
operand types that I could figure out for all the targets. Owners of
various targets, please review and let me know if any of these are
incorrect.
Note that the expand behavior is *conservatively correct*, and exactly
matches LLVM's current behavior with these operations. Ideally this
patch will not change behavior in any way. For example the regtest suite
finds the exact same instruction sequences coming out of the code
generator. That's why there are no new tests here -- all of this is
being exercised by the existing test suite.
Thanks to Duncan Sands for reviewing the various bits of this patch and
helping me get the wrinkles ironed out with expanding for each target.
Also thanks to Chris for clarifying through all the discussions that
this is indeed the approach he was looking for. That said, there are
likely still rough spots. Further review much appreciated.
llvm-svn: 146466
Bill Wendling