Before:
someFunction(() =>
{
doSomething(); // break
})
.doSomethingElse( // break
);
After:
someFunction(() => {
doSomething(); // break
})
.doSomethingElse( // break
);
This is still bad, but at least it is consistent with what we do for other
function literals. Added corresponding tests.
llvm-svn: 238736
A definintion like this could not be formatted at all:
constructor({aa}: {
aa?: string,
aaaaaaaa?: string,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa?: boolean,
aaaaaa?: List<string>
}) {
}
llvm-svn: 238291
instead of BinPackParameters. Braced lists are used as constructor
calls in many places and so the bin-packing should follow what is done
for other calls and not what is done for function declarations.
llvm-svn: 238184
Before:
ASSERT("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa")
<< aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
<< bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb;
After:
ASSERT("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa") << aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
<< bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb;
Also cleanup implementation a bit and only mark closing parenthesis of
these annotations.
llvm-svn: 237567
before binary/ternary operators.
Basically, it doesn't seem right to indent a nested block aligned to a
binary or ternary operator.
Before:
int i = aaaaaa ? 1 //
: [] {
return 2; //
}();
llvm::errs() << "number of twos is "
<< std::count_if(v.begin(), v.end(), [](int x) {
return x == 2; // force break
});
After:
int i = aaaaaa ? 1 //
: [] {
return 2; //
}();
llvm::errs() << "number of twos is "
<< std::count_if(v.begin(), v.end(), [](int x) {
return x == 2; // force break
});
llvm-svn: 237263
Before:
[aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:
aaaaaaaa aaa:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa];
After:
[aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:aaaaaaaa
aaa:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa];
Note that this might now violate the column limit and we probably need an
alternative way of indenting these then. However, that is still strictly better
than the messy formatting that clang-format did before.
llvm-svn: 236598
There was already a TODO to double-check whether the extra indenation
makes sense. A slightly different case reveals that it is actively harmful:
for (int i = 0; i < aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ||
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb < ccccccccccccccc;
++i) {
}
Here (and it is probably not a totally infrequent case, it just works out that
"i < " is four spaces and so the four space extra indentation makes the
operator precedence confusing. So, this will now instead be formatted
as:
for (int i = 0; i < aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ||
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb < ccccccccccccccc;
++i) {
}
llvm-svn: 231461
Before:
Aaaa aaaaaaaaaaa{
{
a, // +1 indent weird.
b, // trailing comma signals one per line.
}, // trailing comma signals one per line.
};
After:
Aaaa aaaaaaaaaaa{
{
a, // better!?
b, // trailing comma signals one per line.
}, // trailing comma signals one per line.
};
Interesting that this apparently was entirely untested :-(.
llvm-svn: 230627
The proper way to break string literals in these languages is by inserting a "+"
between parts which we don't support yet. So we disable string literal breaking
until then.
llvm-svn: 224120
This only applies when not aligning after the return itself (which is
commonly done for C++.
Before:
return aaaaaaaaaa
? bbbbbbbbbb(
bbbbbb) // This is indented relative to aaaaaaaaaa.
: b;
After:
return aaaaaaaaaa
? bbbbbbbbbb(
bbbbbb)
: b;
llvm-svn: 223694
With alignment:
int aaaaaa = aa
+ bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
* cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc;
Without alignment:
int aaaaaa = aa
+ bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
* cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc;
This fixes llvm.org/PR21666.
llvm-svn: 223117
Previously this was only used for JavaScript.
Before:
functionCall({
int i;
int j;
},
aaaa, bbbb, cccc);
After:
functionCall({
int i;
int j;
}, aaaa, bbbb, cccc);
llvm-svn: 222531
Doesn't seem to be common practice in Java.
Before:
return aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
&& bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
&& ccccccccccccccccccc;
After:
return aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
&& bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
&& ccccccccccccccccccc;
Patch by Harry Terkelsen.
llvm-svn: 222424
Apparently, people are very much divided on what the "correct"
indentation is. So, best to give them a choice.
The new flag is called ObjCBlockIndentWidth and the default is now set
to the same value as IndentWidth for the pre-defined styles.
llvm-svn: 220784
Before:
void
SomeFunction(int parameter);
After:
void SomeFunction(
int parameter);
(Unless AlwaysBreakAfterDefinitionReturnType after type is set).
llvm-svn: 220686
Before:
auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa =
new (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa))
typename aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa();
After:
auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa =
new (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa))
typename aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa();
llvm-svn: 214964
Now, this can be properly formatted:
static_cast<A< //
B> *>( //
);
Before, clang-format could end up, not formatting the code at all.
llvm-svn: 213055
Though not completely identical, make former
IndentFunctionDeclarationAfterType change this flag for backwards
compatibility (it is somewhat close in meaning and better the err'ing on
an unknown config flag).
llvm-svn: 212597
Key changes:
- Correctly (well ...) distinguish function declarations and variable
declarations with ()-initialization.
- Don't indent when breaking function declarations/definitions after the
return type.
- Indent variable declarations and typedefs when breaking after the
type.
This fixes llvm.org/PR17999.
llvm-svn: 212591
These are commonly used to structure things like enums or long braced
lists. There doesn't seem to be a good reason to have the behavior in
such structures be different from the behavior between statements.
llvm-svn: 210183
definition below all of the header #include lines, clang edition.
If you want more details about this, you can see some of the commits to
Debug.h in LLVM recently. This is just the clang section of a cleanup
I've done for all uses of DEBUG_TYPE in LLVM.
llvm-svn: 206849
With BinPackParameters=false and Cpp11BracedListStyle=true (i.e. mostly
for Chromium):
Before:
const Aaaaaa aaaaa = {aaaaa, bbbbb, ccccc, ddddd, eeeee, ffffff,
ggggg, hhhhhh, iiiiii, jjjjjj, kkkkkk};
After:
const Aaaaaa aaaaa = {aaaaa,
bbbbb,
ccccc,
ddddd,
eeeee,
ffffff,
ggggg,
hhhhhh,
iiiiii,
jjjjjj,
kkkkkk};
This fixes llvm.org/PR19359. I am not sure we'll want this in all cases
in the long run, but I'll guess we'll get feedback on that.
llvm-svn: 206458
This is similar to how we treat assignments and seems to be generally
desirable.
Before:
llvm::errs() << aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
After:
llvm::errs() << aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
llvm-svn: 206384
Also removed spaces before colons as they don't seem to be used
frequently.
Before:
optional int32 b = 2
[(foo_options) = {aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa : 123 bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb :
"baz"}];
After:
optional int32 b = 2 [(foo_options) = {aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa: 123,
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb:"baz"}];
llvm-svn: 206269
Before:
if (aaaaaaaa && bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb // need to wrap
== cccccccccccccc) ...
After:
if (aaaaaaaa
&& bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb // need to wrap
== cccccccccccccc) ...
The same rule has already be implemented for BreakBeforeBinaryOperators
set to false in r205527.
llvm-svn: 206159
Before AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine could either be true, merging
all functions, or false, merging no functions. This patch adds a third
value "Inline", which can be used to only merge short functions defined
inline in a class, i.e.:
void f() {
return 42;
}
class C {
void f() { return 42; }
};
llvm-svn: 205760
Don't allow the RHS of an operator to be split over multiple
lines unless there is a line-break right after the operator.
Before:
if (aaaa && bbbbb || // break
cccc) {
}
After:
if (aaaa &&
bbbbb || // break
cccc) {
}
In most cases, this seems to increase readability.
llvm-svn: 205527
Daniel Jasper