Parse pragma intrinsic, display warning if the function isn't a builtin
function in clang and suggest including intrin.h.
Patch by Albert Gutowski!
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rnk
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23944
llvm-svn: 280825
Some Windows SDK classes, for example
Windows::Storage::Streams::IBufferByteAccess, use the ATL way of spelling
attributes:
[uuid("....")] class IBufferByteAccess {};
To be able to use __uuidof() to grab the uuid off these types, clang needs to
support uuid as a Microsoft attribute. There was already code to skip Microsoft
attributes, extend that to look for uuid and parse it. Use the new "Microsoft"
attribute type added in r280575 (and r280574, r280576) for this.
Final part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23895
llvm-svn: 280578
There was already a function that moved attributes off the declspec into
an attribute list for attributes applying to the type, teach that function to
also move Microsoft attributes around and rename it to match its new broader
role.
Nothing uses Microsoft attributes yet, so no behavior change.
Part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23895
llvm-svn: 280576
into ParseDeclOrFunctionDefInternal() (which is called by
MaybeParseMicrosoftAttributes()), so that the attributes can be stored in
the DeclSpec. No behavior change yet, part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23895
llvm-svn: 280574
The comment starting with "ParseDeclarationOrFunctionDefinition -" is above
a function called ParseDeclOrFunctionDefInternal. Fix the comment by not
mentioning a function name, like the style guide requests nowadays. No behavior
change.
llvm-svn: 280572
r280133. Original commit message:
C++ Modules TS: driver support for building modules.
This works as follows: we add --precompile to the existing gamut of options for
specifying how far to go when compiling an input (-E, -c, -S, etc.). This flag
specifies that an input is taken to the precompilation step and no further, and
this can be specified when building a .pcm from a module interface or when
building a .pch from a header file.
The .cppm extension (and some related extensions) are implicitly recognized as
C++ module interface files. If --precompile is /not/ specified, the file is
compiled (via a .pcm) to a .o file containing the code for the module (and then
potentially also assembled and linked, if -S, -c, etc. are not specified). We
do not yet suppress the emission of object code for other users of the module
interface, so for now this will only work if everything in the .cppm file has
vague linkage.
As with the existing support for module-map modules, prebuilt modules can be
provided as compiler inputs either via the -fmodule-file= command-line argument
or via files named ModuleName.pcm in one of the directories specified via
-fprebuilt-module-path=.
This also exposes the -fmodules-ts cc1 flag in the driver. This is still
experimental, and in particular, the concrete syntax is subject to change as
the Modules TS evolves in the C++ committee. Unlike -fmodules, this flag does
not enable support for implicitly loading module maps nor building modules via
the module cache, but those features can be turned on separately and used in
conjunction with the Modules TS support.
llvm-svn: 280134
This works as follows: we add --precompile to the existing gamut of options for
specifying how far to go when compiling an input (-E, -c, -S, etc.). This flag
specifies that an input is taken to the precompilation step and no further, and
this can be specified when building a .pcm from a module interface or when
building a .pch from a header file.
The .cppm extension (and some related extensions) are implicitly recognized as
C++ module interface files. If --precompile is /not/ specified, the file is
compiled (via a .pcm) to a .o file containing the code for the module (and then
potentially also assembled and linked, if -S, -c, etc. are not specified). We
do not yet suppress the emission of object code for other users of the module
interface, so for now this will only work if everything in the .cppm file has
vague linkage.
As with the existing support for module-map modules, prebuilt modules can be
provided as compiler inputs either via the -fmodule-file= command-line argument
or via files named ModuleName.pcm in one of the directories specified via
-fprebuilt-module-path=.
This also exposes the -fmodules-ts cc1 flag in the driver. This is still
experimental, and in particular, the concrete syntax is subject to change as
the Modules TS evolves in the C++ committee. Unlike -fmodules, this flag does
not enable support for implicitly loading module maps nor building modules via
the module cache, but those features can be turned on separately and used in
conjunction with the Modules TS support.
llvm-svn: 280035
from p0273r0 approved by EWG). We'll eventually need to handle this from the
lexer as well, in order to disallow preprocessor directives preceding the
module declaration and to support macro import.
llvm-svn: 279196
This reverts commit r279003 as it breaks some of our buildbots (e.g.
clang-cmake-aarch64-quick, clang-x86_64-linux-selfhost-modules).
The error is in OpenMP/teams_distribute_simd_ast_print.cpp:
clang: /home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-aarch64-quick/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h:527:
bool llvm::DenseMapBase<DerivedT, KeyT, ValueT, KeyInfoT, BucketT>::LookupBucketFor(const LookupKeyT&, const BucketT*&) const
[with LookupKeyT = clang::Stmt*; DerivedT = llvm::DenseMap<clang::Stmt*, long unsigned int>;
KeyT = clang::Stmt*; ValueT = long unsigned int;
KeyInfoT = llvm::DenseMapInfo<clang::Stmt*>;
BucketT = llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<clang::Stmt*, long unsigned int>]:
Assertion `!KeyInfoT::isEqual(Val, EmptyKey) && !KeyInfoT::isEqual(Val, TombstoneKey) &&
"Empty/Tombstone value shouldn't be inserted into map!"' failed.
llvm-svn: 279045
This patch is to implement sema and parsing for 'teams distribute simd’ pragma.
This patch is originated by Carlo Bertolli.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23528
llvm-svn: 279003
Functions of Sema that work with building of nested name specifiers have too
many parameters (BuildCXXNestedNameSpecifier already expects 10 arguments).
With this change the information about identifier and its context is packed
into a structure, which is then passes to the semantic functions.
llvm-svn: 277976
The recent change implementing __final forgot to initialize a variable.
This was caught by the Memory Sanitizer.
Properly initialize the value to nullptr to ensure proper memory reads.
Patch by Erich Keane!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22970
llvm-svn: 277206
As reported in bug 28473, GCC supports "final" functionality in pre-C++11 code using the __final keyword. Clang currently supports the "final" keyword in accordance with the C++11 specification, however it ALSO supports it in pre-C++11 mode, with a warning.
This patch adds the "__final" keyword for compatibility with GCC in GCC Keywords mode (so it is enabled with existing flags), and issues a warning on its usage (suggesting switching to the C++11 keyword). This patch also adds a regression test for the functionality described. I believe this patch has minimal impact, as it simply adds a new keyword for existing behavior.
This has been validated with check-clang to avoid regressions. Patch is created in reference to revisions 276665.
Patch by Erich Keane.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22919
llvm-svn: 277134
decomposition declarations.
There are a couple of things in the wording that seem strange here:
decomposition declarations are permitted at namespace scope (which we partially
support here) and they are permitted as the declaration in a template (which we
reject).
llvm-svn: 276492
Sema actions on ObjCDictionaryLiteral and ObjCArryLiteral are currently
done as a side-effect of Sema upon parent expressions, which incurs of
delayed typo corrections for such literals to be performed by TypoTransforms
upon the ObjCDictionaryLiteral and ObjCArryLiteral themselves instead of
its elements individually.
This is specially bad because it was not designed to act on several
elements; searching through all possible combinations of corrections for
several elements is very expensive. Additionally, when one of the
elements has no correction candidate, we still explore all options and
at the end emit no typo corrections whatsoever.
Do the proper sema actions by acting on each element alone during appropriate
literal parsing time to get proper diagonistics and decent compile time
behavior.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22183
rdar://problem/21046678
llvm-svn: 276020
This patch adds a new AST node: ObjCAvailabilityCheckExpr, and teaches the
Parser and Sema to generate it. This node represents an availability check of
the form:
@available(macos 10.10, *);
Which will eventually compile to a runtime check of the host's OS version. This
is the first patch of the feature I proposed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2016-July/049851.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22171
llvm-svn: 275654
This patch is to implement sema and parsing for 'target parallel for simd' pragma.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22096
llvm-svn: 275365
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21904
This patch is similar to the implementation of 'private' clause: it adds a list of private pointers to be used within the target data region to store the device pointers returned by the runtime.
Please refer to the following document for a full description of what the runtime witll return in this case (page 10 and 11):
https://github.com/clang-omp/OffloadingDesign
I am happy to answer any question related to the runtime interface to help reviewing this patch.
llvm-svn: 275271
Summary: This patch is an implementation of sema and parsing for the OpenMP composite pragma 'distribute simd'.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22007
llvm-svn: 274604
Summary: This patch is an implementation of sema and parsing for the OpenMP composite pragma 'distribute parallel for simd'.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21977
llvm-svn: 274530
No semantic analysis yet.
This is a pain to disambiguate correctly, because the parsing rules for the
declaration form of a condition and of an init-statement are quite different --
for a token sequence that looks like a declaration, we frequently need to
disambiguate all the way to the ')' or ';'.
We could do better here in some cases by stopping disambiguation once we've
decided whether we've got an expression or not (rather than keeping going until
we know whether it's an init-statement declaration or a condition declaration),
by unifying our parsing code for the two types of declaration and moving the
syntactic checks into Sema; if this has a measurable impact on parsing
performance, I'll look into that.
llvm-svn: 274169
We continue accepting "macosx" but canonicalize it to "macos", When emitting
diagnostics, we use "macOS" instead of "OS X".
The PlatformName in TargetInfo is changed from "macosx" to "macos" so we can
directly compare the Platform in AvailabilityAttr with the PlatformName
in TargetInfo.
rdar://26795172
rdar://26800775
llvm-svn: 274064
[OpenMP] Initial implementation of parse and sema for composite pragma 'distribute parallel for'
This patch is an initial implementation for #distribute parallel for.
The main differences that affect other pragmas are:
The implementation of 'distribute parallel for' requires blocking of the associated loop, where blocks are "distributed" to different teams and iterations within each block are scheduled to parallel threads within each team. To implement blocking, sema creates two additional worksharing directive fields that are used to pass the team assigned block lower and upper bounds through the outlined function resulting from 'parallel'. In this way, scheduling for 'for' to threads can use those bounds.
As a consequence of blocking, the stride of 'distribute' is not 1 but it is equal to the blocking size. This is returned by the runtime and sema prepares a DistIncrExpr variable to hold that value.
As a consequence of blocking, the global upper bound (EnsureUpperBound) expression of the 'for' is not the original loop upper bound (e.g. in for(i = 0 ; i < N; i++) this is 'N') but it is the team-assigned block upper bound. Sema creates a new expression holding the calculation of the actual upper bound for 'for' as UB = min(UB, PrevUB), where UB is the loop upper bound, and PrevUB is the team-assigned block upper bound.
llvm-svn: 273884
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21564
This patch is an initial implementation for #distribute parallel for.
The main differences that affect other pragmas are:
The implementation of 'distribute parallel for' requires blocking of the associated loop, where blocks are "distributed" to different teams and iterations within each block are scheduled to parallel threads within each team. To implement blocking, sema creates two additional worksharing directive fields that are used to pass the team assigned block lower and upper bounds through the outlined function resulting from 'parallel'. In this way, scheduling for 'for' to threads can use those bounds.
As a consequence of blocking, the stride of 'distribute' is not 1 but it is equal to the blocking size. This is returned by the runtime and sema prepares a DistIncrExpr variable to hold that value.
As a consequence of blocking, the global upper bound (EnsureUpperBound) expression of the 'for' is not the original loop upper bound (e.g. in for(i = 0 ; i < N; i++) this is 'N') but it is the team-assigned block upper bound. Sema creates a new expression holding the calculation of the actual upper bound for 'for' as UB = min(UB, PrevUB), where UB is the loop upper bound, and PrevUB is the team-assigned block upper bound.
llvm-svn: 273705
-Wfor-loop-analysis warnings for a for-loop with a condition variable. In such
a case, the loop condition variable is modified on each iteration of the loop
by definition.
Original commit message:
Rearrange condition handling so that semantic checks on a condition variable
are performed before the other substatements of the construct are parsed,
rather than deferring them until the end. This allows better error recovery
from semantic errors in the condition, improves diagnostic order, and is a
prerequisite for C++17 constexpr if.
llvm-svn: 273600
are performed before the other substatements of the construct are parsed,
rather than deferring them until the end. This allows better error recovery
from semantic errors in the condition, improves diagnostic order, and is a
prerequisite for C++17 constexpr if.
llvm-svn: 273548
- In functions with try { } catch { }, only the try block would be
skipped, not the catch blocks
- The template functions would still be parsed.
- The initializers within a constructor would still be parsed.
- The inline functions within class would still be stored, only to be
discared later.
- Invalid code with try would assert (as in "int foo() try assert_here")
This attempt to do even less while skipping function bodies.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20821
llvm-svn: 272963
classes.
MSVC actively uses unqualified lookup in dependent bases, lookup at the
instantiation point (non-dependent names may be resolved on things
declared later) etc. and all this stuff is the main cause of
incompatibility between clang and MSVC.
Clang tries to emulate MSVC behavior but it may fail in many cases.
clang could store lexed tokens for member functions definitions within
ClassTemplateDecl for later parsing during template instantiation.
It will allow resolving many possible issues with lookup in dependent
base classes and removing many already existing MSVC-specific
hacks/workarounds from the clang code.
llvm-svn: 272774
Summary:
This is similar to other loop pragmas like 'vectorize'. Currently it
only has state values: distribute(enable) and distribute(disable). When
one of these is specified the corresponding loop metadata is generated:
!{!"llvm.loop.distribute.enable", i1 true/false}
As a result, loop distribution will be attempted on the loop even if
Loop Distribution in not enabled globally. Analogously, with 'disable'
distribution can be turned off for an individual loop even when the pass
is otherwise enabled.
There are some slight differences compared to the existing loop pragmas.
1. There is no 'assume_safety' variant which makes its handling slightly
different from 'vectorize'/'interleave'.
2. Unlike the existing loop pragmas, it does not have a corresponding
numeric pragma like 'vectorize' -> 'vectorize_width'. So for the
consistency checks in CheckForIncompatibleAttributes we don't need to
check it against other pragmas. We just need to check for duplicates of
the same pragma.
Reviewers: rsmith, dexonsmith, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: bob.wilson, cfe-commits, hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19403
llvm-svn: 272656
Support certain MS pragmas right after the closing curly brace of a
class. Clang did not expect __pragma in this position.
This fixes PR28094.
llvm-svn: 272628
Richard Smith