When BugReporter tracks C++ references involved in a null pointer violation, we
want to differentiate between a null reference and a reference to a null pointer. In the
first case, we want to track the region for the reference location; in the second, we want
to track the null pointer.
In addition, the core creates CXXTempObjectRegion to represent the location of the
C++ reference, so teach FindLastStoreBRVisitor about it.
This helps null pointer suppression to kick in.
(Patch by Anna and Jordan.)
llvm-svn: 176969
Officially in the C++ standard, a null reference cannot exist. However,
it's still very easy to create one:
int &getNullRef() {
int *p = 0;
return *p;
}
We already check that binds to reference regions don't create null references.
This patch checks that we don't create null references by returning, either.
<rdar://problem/13364378>
llvm-svn: 176601
Most map types have an operator[] that inserts a new element if the key
isn't found, then returns a reference to the value slot so that you can
assign into it. However, if the value type is a pointer, it will be
initialized to null. This is usually no problem.
However, if the user /knows/ the map contains a value for a particular key,
they may just use it immediately:
// From ClangSACheckersEmitter.cpp
recordGroupMap[group]->Checkers
In this case the analyzer reports a null dereference on the path where the
key is not in the map, even though the user knows that path is impossible
here. They could silence the warning by adding an assertion, but that means
splitting up the expression and introducing a local variable. (Note that
the analyzer has no way of knowing that recordGroupMap[group] will return
the same reference if called twice in a row!)
We already have logic that says a null dereference has a high chance of
being a false positive if the null came from an inlined function. This
patch simply extends that to references whose rvalues are null as well,
silencing several false positives in LLVM.
<rdar://problem/13239854>
llvm-svn: 176371
The expression 'a->b.c()' contains a call to the 'c' method of 'a->b'.
We emit an error if 'a' is NULL, but previously didn't actually track
the null value back through the 'a->b' expression, which caused us to
miss important false-positive-suppression cases, including
<rdar://problem/12676053>.
llvm-svn: 173547
Jordan Rose