*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
Summary:
CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName was not correctly parsing templated functions whose demangled name
included the return type -- the space before the function name was included in the "context" and
the context itself was not terminated correctly due to a misuse of the substr function (second
argument is length, not the end position). Fix that and add a regression test.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23608
llvm-svn: 279038
This introduces basic support for debugging OCaml binaries.
Use of the native compiler with DWARF emission support (see
https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/574) is required.
Available variables are considered as 64 bits unsigned integers,
their interpretation will be left to a OCaml-made debugging layer.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22132
llvm-svn: 277443
- if a synthetic child comes from the same hierarchy as its parent object, then it can't be cached by SharedPointer inside the synthetic provider, or it will cause a reference loop;
- but, if a synthetic child is made from whole cloth (e.g. from an expression, a memory region, ...), then it better be cached by SharedPointer, or it will be cleared out and cause an assert() to fail if used at a later point
For most cases of self-rooted synthetic children, we have a flag we set "IsSyntheticChildrenGenerated", but we were not using it to track caching. So, what ended up happening is each provider would set up its own cache, and if it got it wrong, a hard to diagnose crash would ensue
This patch fixes that by centralizing caching in ValueObjectSynthetic - if a provider returns a self-rooted child (as per the flag), then it gets cached centrally by the ValueObject itself
This cache is used only for lifetime management and not later retrieval of child values - a different cache handles that (because we might have a mix of self-rooted and properly nested child values for the same parent, we can't trivially use this lifetime cache for retrieval)
Fixes rdar://26480007
llvm-svn: 274683
The libc++ shipped with the android NDK is shipped using a different
internal namespace then the upstream libc++ (__ndk1 vs. __1) to avoid
an ODR violation between the platform and the user application. This
change fixes our pretty printers to be able to work with the types
from the android NDK libc++.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21680
llvm-svn: 274489
Summary: Fix missing return after checking that m_backend is not a pointer or reference type.
Reviewers: clayborg, tberghammer
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20875
llvm-svn: 271453
T x;
U y;
doing
x = *((T*)y)
is undefined behavior, even if sizeof(T) == sizeof(U), due to pointer aliasing rules
Fix up a couple of places in LLDB that were doing this, and transform them into a defined and safe memcpy() operation
Also, add a test case to ensure we didn't regress by doing this w.r.t. tagged pointer NSDate instances
llvm-svn: 270793
The function only avaibleble when python is enabled. Guard the new call
in the Java plugin with LLDB_DISABLE_PYTHON until we can change
AddCXXSynthetic to be available in all case to get the build bots green
again.
llvm-svn: 268626
Also added a data formatter that presents them as structs if you use frame
variable to look at their contents. Now the blocks testcase works.
<rdar://problem/15984431>
llvm-svn: 268307
This patch fixes a bunch of issues that show up on big-endian systems:
- The gnu_libstdcpp.py script doesn't follow the way libstdc++ encodes
bit vectors: it should identify the enclosing *word* and then access
the appropriate bit within that word. Instead, the script simply
operates on bytes. This gives the same result on little-endian
systems, but not on big-endian.
- lldb_private::formatters::WCharSummaryProvider always assumes wchar_t
is UTF16, even though it could also be UTF8 or UTF32. This is mostly
not an issue on little-endian systems, but immediately fails on BE.
Fixed by checking the size of wchar_t like WCharStringSummaryProvider
already does.
- ClangASTContext::GetChildCompilerTypeAtIndex uses uint32_t to access
the virtual base offset stored in the vtable, even though the size
of this field matches the target pointer size according to the C++
ABI. Again, this is mostly not visible on LE, but fails on BE.
- Process::ReadStringFromMemory uses strncmp to search for a terminator
consisting of multiple zero bytes. This doesn't work since strncmp
will stop already at the first zero byte. Use memcmp instead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18983
llvm-svn: 266313
(lldb) b ~Foo
(lldb) b Foo::~Foo
(lldb) b Bar::Foo::~Foo
Improved out C++ breakpoint locations tests as well to cover this issue.
<rdar://problem/25577252>
llvm-svn: 266139
This can cause differences in which bit patterns end up meaning YES or NO. In general, however, 0 == NO and 1 == YES.
To keep it simple, LLDB will now show "YES" and "NO" only for 1 and 0 respectively, and format other values as the plain numeric value instead.
Fixes rdar://24809994
llvm-svn: 263604
The purpose of these plugins is to make LLDB capable of debugging java
code JIT-ed by the android runtime.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17616
llvm-svn: 262015
On libc++ std::atomic is a fairly simple data type (layout wise, at least), wrapping actual contents in a member variable named "__a_"
All the formatters are doing is "peel away" this intermediate layer and exposing user data as direct children or values of the std::atomic root variable
Fixes rdar://24329405
llvm-svn: 260752
However, they also contain fallback logic that - in cases where LLDB can't recognize the specific subclass - actually does run code in order to inspect those objects.
The argument for this logic was that these data types are critical enough that the risk of getting it wrong is outweighed by the advantage of always providing accurate child information.
Practical experience however shows that "po" - a code running data-inspection command - is quite frequently used, and not considered burdensome by users.
As such, this makes the code-running fallback in the data formatters a risk that carries very little actual reward. Also, unlike the time this code was originally written, we now have accurate class information for Objective-C, and thus we are less likely to improperly identify classes.
This commit removes support for the code-running fallback, and aligns the data formatters for NSArray, NSDictionary and NSSet to the general no-code-running behavior of other data formatters.
While it is possible for us to add support for some subclasses that are now no longer covered by static inspection alone, this is beyond the scope of this commit.
llvm-svn: 260664
Summary:
This change is relevant for inferiors compiled with GCC. GCC does not
emit complete debug info for std::basic_string<...>, and consequently, Clang
(the LLDB compiler) does not generate correct mangled names for certain
functions.
This change removes the hard-coded alternate names in
ItaniumABILanguageRuntime.cpp.
Before the hard-coded names were put in ItaniumABILanguageRuntime.cpp, one could
not evaluate std::string methods (ex. std::string::length). After putting in
the hard-coded names, one could evaluate them. However, it did not still
enable one to call methods on, say for example, std::vector<string>.
This change makes that possible.
There is some amount of incompleteness in this change. Consider the
following example:
std::string hello("hello"), world("world");
std::map<std::string, std::string> m;
m[hello] = world;
One can still not evaluate the expression "m[hello]" in LLDB. Will
address this issue in another pass.
Reviewers: jingham, vharron, evgeny777, spyffe, dawn
Subscribers: clayborg, dawn, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12809
llvm-svn: 257113
This brings the timings down for 1500 elements from 166 to 2 seconds on my machine - if I can math correctly, that is a 98% improvement
llvm-svn: 254781
If memory turns out to be a problem, which I don't think it will in practice because all these ValueObjects, we'd be keeping alive anyway, I can always resort to caching the farthest-most iterator only
This gains us an order of magnitude in my benchmark, cutting the time to traverse a 1500-elements list from 22 seconds down to 2
llvm-svn: 254762
This latter determination may or may not be possible on a per-language basis; and neither is mandatory to implement for any language
Use this knowledge in the ValueObjectPrinter to generalize the notion of IsObjCNil() and the respective printout
llvm-svn: 252663
Kate Stone