Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kate Stone b9c1b51e45 *** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style.  This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort.  Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit.  The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):

    find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
    find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;

The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.

Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit.  There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit.  YMMV.

llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-06 20:57:50 +00:00
Saleem Abdulrasool 16ff860469 remove use of Mutex in favour of std::{,recursive_}mutex
This is a pretty straightforward first pass over removing a number of uses of
Mutex in favor of std::mutex or std::recursive_mutex. The problem is that there
are interfaces which take Mutex::Locker & to lock internal locks. This patch
cleans up most of the easy cases. The only non-trivial change is in
CommandObjectTarget.cpp where a Mutex::Locker was split into two.

llvm-svn: 269877
2016-05-18 01:59:10 +00:00
Jim Ingham 151c032c86 This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends.
Before we had:

ClangFunction
ClangUtilityFunction
ClangUserExpression

and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression 
base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds:

FunctionCaller
UtilityFunction
UserExpression

You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. 
The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches 
the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it.

Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, 
I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper 
that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. 
Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs.

The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller 
to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a 
FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions.

Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common 
JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency 
but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary.

llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-15 21:13:50 +00:00
Greg Clayton a1e5dc86a6 ClangASTType is now CompilerType.
This is more preparation for multiple different kinds of types from different compilers (clang, Pascal, Go, RenderScript, Swift, etc).

llvm-svn: 244689
2015-08-11 22:53:00 +00:00
Jason Molenda 2fd83355a8 Change the Mac OS X SystemRuntime plugin from using the placeholder
libldi library to collect extended backtrace information; switch
to the libBacktraceRecording library and its APIs.  Complete the
work of adding QueueItems to Queues and allow for the QueueItems
to be interrogated about their extended backtraces in turn.

There's still cleanup and documentation to do on this code but the
code is functional and I it's a good time to get the work-in-progress 
checked in.  
<rdar://problem/15314027> 

llvm-svn: 200822
2014-02-05 05:44:54 +00:00