This changes IRCE to optimize uses, and not branches. This change is
NFCI since the uses we do inspect are in practice only ever going to be
the condition use in conditional branches; but this flexibility will
later allow us to analyze more complex expressions than just a direct
branch on a range check.
llvm-svn: 270500
Summary:
This patch turns on LoopUnrollAnalyzer by default. To mitigate compile
time regressions, I chose very conservative thresholds for now. Later we
can make them more aggressive, but it might require being smarter in
which loops we're optimizing. E.g. currently the biggest issue is that
with more agressive thresholds we unroll many cold loops, which
increases compile time for no performance benefit (performance of those
loops is improved, but it doesn't matter since they are cold).
Test results for compile time(using 4 samples to reduce noise):
```
MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes 5.19%
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/medley/reg_detect/reg_detect 4.19%
MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/fourinarow/fourinarow 3.39%
MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod 1.47%
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Fhourstones-3_1/fhourstones3_1 -6.06%
```
I didn't see any performance changes in the testsuite, but it improves
some internal tests.
Reviewers: hfinkel, chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20482
llvm-svn: 270478
The InductiveRangeCheck struct is only five words long; so passing these
around value is fine. The allocator makes the code look more complex
than it is.
llvm-svn: 270309
I had used `std::remove_if` under the assumption that it moves the
predicate matching elements to the end, but actaully the elements
remaining towards the end (after the iterator returned by
`std::remove_if`) are indeterminate. Fix the bug (and make the code
more straightforward) by using a temporary SmallVector, and add a test
case demonstrating the issue.
llvm-svn: 270306
Sequences of range checks expressed using guards, like
guard((I - 2) u< L)
guard((I - 1) u< L)
guard((I + 0) u< L)
guard((I + 1) u< L)
guard((I + 2) u< L)
can sometimes be combined into a smaller sequence:
guard((I - 2) u< L AND (I + 2) u< L)
if we can prove that (I - 2) u< L AND (I + 2) u< L implies all of checks
expressed in the previous sequence.
This change teaches GuardWidening to do this kind of merging when
feasible.
llvm-svn: 270151
Summary:
Implement guard widening in LLVM. Description from GuardWidening.cpp:
The semantics of the `@llvm.experimental.guard` intrinsic lets LLVM
transform it so that it fails more often that it did before the
transform. This optimization is called "widening" and can be used hoist
and common runtime checks in situations like these:
```
%cmp0 = 7 u< Length
call @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp0) [ "deopt"(...) ]
call @unknown_side_effects()
%cmp1 = 9 u< Length
call @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp1) [ "deopt"(...) ]
...
```
to
```
%cmp0 = 9 u< Length
call @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp0) [ "deopt"(...) ]
call @unknown_side_effects()
...
```
If `%cmp0` is false, `@llvm.experimental.guard` will "deoptimize" back
to a generic implementation of the same function, which will have the
correct semantics from that point onward. It is always _legal_ to
deoptimize (so replacing `%cmp0` with false is "correct"), though it may
not always be profitable to do so.
NB! This pass is a work in progress. It hasn't been tuned to be
"production ready" yet. It is known to have quadriatic running time and
will not scale to large numbers of guards
Reviewers: reames, atrick, bogner, apilipenko, nlewycky
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20143
llvm-svn: 269997
This is assertion is no longer necessary since we never record
constants in the live set anyway. (They are never recorded in
the initial live set, and constant bases are removed near line 2119)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20293
llvm-svn: 269764
TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass is a dependency of
SCCP but it's not listed as such. Chandler pointed
out this is an easy mistake to make which only
surfaces in weird crashes with some flag combinations.
This code will go away anyway at some point in the
future, but as long as it's (still) exercised, try
to make it correct.
llvm-svn: 269589
Summary: This change fix the bug in isProfitableToUseMemset() where MaxIntSize shoule be in byte, not bit.
Reviewers: arsenm, joker.eph, mcrosier
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20176
llvm-svn: 269433
Summary:
...loop after the last iteration.
This is really hard to do correctly. The core problem is that we need to
model liveness through the induction PHIs from iteration to iteration in
order to get the correct results, and we need to correctly de-duplicate
the common subgraphs of instructions feeding some subset of the
induction PHIs. All of this can be driven either from a side effect at
some iteration or from the loop values used after the loop finishes.
This patch implements this by storing the forward-propagating analysis
of each instruction in a cache to recall whether it was free and whether
it has become live and thus counted toward the total unroll cost. Then,
at each sink for a value in the loop, we recursively walk back through
every value that feeds the sink, including looping back through the
iterations as needed, until we have marked the entire input graph as
live. Because we cache this, we never visit instructions more than twice
-- once when we analyze them and put them into the cache, and once when
we count their cost towards the unrolled loop. Also, because the cache
is only two bits and because we are dealing with relatively small
iteration counts, we can store all of this very densely in memory to
avoid this from becoming an excessively slow analysis.
The code here is still pretty gross. I would appreciate suggestions
about better ways to factor or split this up, I've stared too long at
the algorithmic side to really have a good sense of what the design
should probably look at.
Also, it might seem like we should do all of this bottom-up, but I think
that is a red herring. Specifically, the simplification power is *much*
greater working top-down. We can forward propagate very effectively,
even across strange and interesting recurrances around the backedge.
Because we use data to propagate, this doesn't cause a state space
explosion. Doing this level of constant folding, etc, would be very
expensive to do bottom-up because it wouldn't be until the last moment
that you could collapse everything. The current solution is essentially
a top-down simplification with a bottom-up cost accounting which seems
to get the best of both worlds. It makes the simplification incremental
and powerful while leaving everything dead until we *know* it is needed.
Finally, a core property of this approach is its *monotonicity*. At all
times, the current UnrolledCost is a conservatively low estimate. This
ensures that we will never early-exit from the analysis due to exceeding
a threshold when if we had continued, the cost would have gone back
below the threshold. These kinds of bugs can cause incredibly hard to
track down random changes to behavior.
We could use a techinque similar (but much simpler) within the inliner
as well to avoid considering speculated code in the inline cost.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: sanjoy, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11758
llvm-svn: 269388
Ported DA to the new PM by splitting the former DependenceAnalysis Pass
into a DependenceInfo result type and DependenceAnalysisWrapperPass type
and adding a new PM-style DependenceAnalysis analysis pass returning the
DependenceInfo.
Patch by Philip Pfaffe, most of the review by Justin.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18834
llvm-svn: 269370
Shifts beyond the bitwidth are undef but SCCP resolved them to zero.
Instead, DTRT and resolve them to undef.
This reimplements the transform which caused PR27712.
llvm-svn: 269269
Sort of the BB-local equivalent to idiom-recognizer: if we have a basic-block
that really implements a memcpy operation, backends can benefit from seeing
this.
llvm-svn: 269125
Before r268509, Clang would disable the loop unroll pass when optimizing
for size. That commit enabled it to be able to support unroll pragmas
in -Os builds. However, this regressed binary size in one of Chromium's
DLLs with ~100 KB.
This restores the original behaviour of no unrolling at -Os, but doing it
in LLVM instead of Clang makes more sense, and also allows the pragmas to
keep working.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20115
llvm-svn: 269124
This patch extend loopreroll to allow the instruction chain
of loop control only IV has sext.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19820
llvm-svn: 269121
Loop rotation clones instruction from the old header into the preheader. If
there were uses of values produced by these instructions that were outside
the loop, we have to insert PHI nodes to merge the two values. If the values
are used by DbgIntrinsics they will be used as a MetadataAsValue of a
ValueAsMetadata of the original values, and iterating all of the uses of the
original value will not update the DbgIntrinsics. The new code checks if the
values are used by DbgIntrinsics and if so, updates them using essentially
the same logic as the original code.
The attached testcase demonstrates the issue. Without the fix, the
DbgIntrinic outside the loop uses values computed inside the loop, even
though these values do not dominate the DbgIntrinsic.
Author: Thomas Jablin (tjablin)
Reviewers: dblaikie aprantl kbarton hfinkel cycheng
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19564
llvm-svn: 269034
Again, fairly simple. Only change is ensuring that we actually copy the property of the load correctly. The aliasing legality constraints were already handled by the FRE patches. There's nothing special about unorder atomics from the perspective of the PRE algorithm itself.
llvm-svn: 268804
You'll note there are essentially no code changes here. Cross block FRE heavily reuses code from the block local FRE. All of the tricky parts were done as part of the previous patch and the refactoring that removed the original code duplication.
llvm-svn: 268775
This patch is the first in a small series teaching GVN to optimize unordered loads aggressively. This change just handles block local FRE because that's the simplest thing which lets me test MDA, and the AvailableValue pieces. Somewhat suprisingly, MDA appears fine and only a couple of small changes are needed in GVN.
Once this is in, I'll tackle non-local FRE and PRE. The former looks like a natural extension of this, the later will require a couple of minor changes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19440
llvm-svn: 268770
Summary: We need to clean up CFG before assigning discriminator to minimize the impact of optimization on debug info.
Reviewers: davidxl, dblaikie, dnovillo
Subscribers: dnovillo, danielcdh, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19926
llvm-svn: 268675
Goal of this change is to guarantee stable ordering of the statepoint arguments and other
newly inserted values such as gc.relocates. Previously we had explicit sorting in a couple
of places. However for unnamed values ordering was partial and overall we didn't have any
strong invariant regarding it. This change switches all data structures to use SetVector's
and MapVector's which provide possibility for deterministic iteration over them.
Explicit sorting is now redundant and was removed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19669
llvm-svn: 268502
pointing to the same addr space. This can prevent SROA from creating a bitcast
between pointers with different addr spaces.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19697
llvm-svn: 268424
SCEV caches whether SCEV expressions are loop invariant, variant or
computable. LICM breaks this cache, almost by definition; so clear the
SCEV disposition cache if LICM changed anything.
llvm-svn: 268408
`Loop::makeLoopInvariant` can hoist instructions out of loops, so loop
dispositions for the loop it operated on may need to be cleared. We can
be smarter here (especially around how `forgetLoopDispositions` is
implemented), but let's be correct first.
Fixes PR27570.
llvm-svn: 268406
A few benchmarks with lots of accesses to global variables in the hot
loops regressed a lot since r266399, which added the
SpeculativeExecution pass to the default pipeline. The problem is that
this pass doesn't mark Globals Alias Analysis as preserved. Globals
Alias Analysis is computed in a module pass, whereas
SpeculativeExecution is a function pass, and a lot of passes dependent
on the Globals Alias Analysis to optimize these benchmarks are also
function passes. As such, the Globals Alias Analysis information cannot
be recomputed between SpeculativeExecution and the following function
passes needing that information.
SpeculativeExecution doesn't invalidate Globals Alias Analysis, so mark
it as such to fix those performance regressions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19806
llvm-svn: 268370
We were overly cautious in our analysis of loops which have invokes
which unwind to EH pads. The loop unroll transform is safe because it
only clones blocks in the loop body, it does not try to split critical
edges involving EH pads. Instead, move the necessary safety check to
LoopUnswitch.
N.B. The safety check for loop unswitch is covered by an existing test
which fails without it.
llvm-svn: 268357
If a guard call being lowered by LowerGuardIntrinsics has the
`!make.implicit` metadata attached, then reattach the metadata to the
branch in the resulting expanded form of the intrinsic. This allows us
to implement null checks as guards and still get the benefit of implicit
null checks.
llvm-svn: 268148
support multiple induction variables
This patch enable loop reroll for the following case:
for(int i=0; i<N; i += 2) {
S += *a++;
S += *a++;
};
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16550
llvm-svn: 268147
This moves some logic added to EarlyCSE in rL268120 into
`llvm::isInstructionTriviallyDead`. Adds a test case for DCE to
demonstrate that passes other than EarlyCSE can now pick up on the new
information.
llvm-svn: 268126
Summary:
This change teaches EarlyCSE some basic properties of guard intrinsics:
- Guard intrinsics read all memory, but don't write to any memory
- After a guard has executed, the condition it was guarding on can be
assumed to be true
- Guard intrinsics on a constant `true` are no-ops
Reviewers: reames, hfinkel
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19578
llvm-svn: 268120
Summary:
Historically, we had a switch in the Makefiles for turning on "expensive
checks". This has never been ported to the cmake build, but the
(dead-ish) code is still around.
This will also make it easier to turn it on in buildbots.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: jyknight, mzolotukhin, RKSimon, gberry, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19723
llvm-svn: 268050
I closely followed the precedents set by the vectorizer:
* With -Rpass-missed, the loop is reported with further details pointing
to -Rpass--analysis.
* -Rpass-analysis reports the details why distribution has failed.
* Regardless of -Rpass*, when distribution fails for a loop where
distribution was forced with the pragma, a warning is produced according
to -Wpass-failed. In this case the analysis info is also printed even
without -Rpass-analysis.
llvm-svn: 267952
The next patch will start using these for -Rpass-analysis so they won't
be internal-only anymore.
Move the 'Skipping; ' prefix that some of the message are using into the
'fail' function. We don't want to include this prefix in
the -Rpass-analysis report.
llvm-svn: 267951
"inferattrs" will deduce the attribute, but it will be too late for
many optimizations. Set it ourselves when creating the call.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17598
llvm-svn: 267762
This is required to use this function from isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16231
llvm-svn: 267692
Summary:
D19403 adds a new pragma for loop distribution. This change adds
support for the corresponding metadata that the pragma is translated to
by the FE.
As part of this I had to rethink the flag -enable-loop-distribute. My
goal was to be backward compatible with the existing behavior:
A1. pass is off by default from the optimization pipeline
unless -enable-loop-distribute is specified
A2. pass is on when invoked directly from opt (e.g. for unit-testing)
The new pragma/metadata overrides these defaults so the new behavior is:
B1. A1 + enable distribution for individual loop with the pragma/metadata
B2. A2 + disable distribution for individual loop with the pragma/metadata
The default value whether the pass is on or off comes from the initiator
of the pass. From the PassManagerBuilder the default is off, from opt
it's on.
I moved -enable-loop-distribute under the pass. If the flag is
specified it overrides the default from above.
Then the pragma/metadata can further modifies this per loop.
As a side-effect, we can now also use -enable-loop-distribute=0 from opt
to emulate the default from the optimization pipeline. So to be precise
this is the new behavior:
C1. pass is off by default from the optimization pipeline
unless -enable-loop-distribute or the pragma/metadata enables it
C2. pass is on when invoked directly from opt
unless -enable-loop-distribute=0 or the pragma/metadata disables it
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: joker.eph, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19431
llvm-svn: 267672
In the case where isLegalAddressingMode is used for cases
not related to addressing modes, such as pure adds and muls,
it should not be using address space 0. LSR already passes -1
as the address space in these cases.
llvm-svn: 267645
This splits out the per-loop functionality from the Pass class.
With this the fact whether the loop is forced-distribute with the new
metadata/pragma can be cached in the per-loop class rather than passed
around.
llvm-svn: 267643
We need the default ratio to be sufficiently large that it triggers transforms
based on block frequency info (BFI) and plays well with the recently introduced
BranchProbability used by CGP.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19435
llvm-svn: 267615
The original commit was reverted because of a buildbot problem with LazyCallGraph::SCC handling (not related to the OptBisect handling).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172
llvm-svn: 267231
Summary: This change will shorten memset if the beginning of memset is overwritten by later stores.
Reviewers: hfinkel, eeckstein, dberlin, mcrosier
Subscribers: mgrang, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18906
llvm-svn: 267197
We take the intersection of overflow flags while CSE'ing.
This permits us to consider two instructions with different overflow
behavior to be replaceable.
llvm-svn: 267153
EarlyCSE had inconsistent behavior with regards to flag'd instructions:
- In some cases, it would pessimize if the available instruction had
different flags by not performing CSE.
- In other cases, it would miscompile if it replaced an instruction
which had no flags with an instruction which has flags.
Fix this by being more consistent with our flag handling by utilizing
andIRFlags.
llvm-svn: 267111
This patch implements a optimization bisect feature, which will allow optimizations to be selectively disabled at compile time in order to track down test failures that are caused by incorrect optimizations.
The bisection is enabled using a new command line option (-opt-bisect-limit). Individual passes that may be skipped call the OptBisect object (via an LLVMContext) to see if they should be skipped based on the bisect limit. A finer level of control (disabling individual transformations) can be managed through an addition OptBisect method, but this is not yet used.
The skip checking in this implementation is based on (and replaces) the skipOptnoneFunction check. Where that check was being called, a new call has been inserted in its place which checks the bisect limit and the optnone attribute. A new function call has been added for module and SCC passes that behaves in a similar way.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172
llvm-svn: 267022
"Into" was misleading. I am also planning to use this helper to look
for loop metadata and return the argument, so find seems like a better
name.
llvm-svn: 267013
This patch improves SimplifyCFG to catch cases like:
if (a < b) {
if (a > b) <- known to be false
unreachable;
}
Phabricator Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18905
llvm-svn: 266767
Removed some unused headers, replaced some headers with forward class declarations.
Found using simple scripts like this one:
clear && ack --cpp -l '#include "llvm/ADT/IndexedMap.h"' | xargs grep -L 'IndexedMap[<]' | xargs grep -n --color=auto 'IndexedMap'
Patch by Eugene Kosov <claprix@yandex.ru>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19219
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266595
Apparently there isn't test coverage for all of these. I'd appreciate
if someone with could reproduce and send me something to reduce, but for
now I've just looked for users of RemapInstruction and MapValue and
ensured they don't accidentally insert nullptr. Here is one of the
bootstraps that caught:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x64-ninja-win7/builds/11494
llvm-svn: 266567
Summary:
This lets us add this pass to the IR pass manager unconditionally; it
will simply not do anything on targets without branch divergence.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jingyue, rnk, chandlerc
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18625
llvm-svn: 266398
Summary:
This fully solves the problem where the StructurizeCFG pass does not
consider the same branches as uniform as the SIAnnotateControlFlow pass.
The patch in D19013 helps with this problem, but is not sufficient
(and, interestingly, causes a "regression" with one of the existing
test cases).
No tests included here, because tests in D19013 already cover this.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19018
llvm-svn: 266346
At some point, ARM stopped getting any benefit from ConstantHoisting because
the pass called a different variant of getIntImmCost. Reimplementing the
correct variant revealed some problems, however:
+ ConstantHoisting was modifying switch statements. This is simply invalid,
the cases must remain integer constants no matter the notional cost.
+ ConstantHoisting was mangling alloca instructions in the entry block. These
should be handled by FrameLowering, so constants actually have a cost of 0.
Worse, the resulting bitcasts meant they became dynamic allocas.
rdar://25707382
llvm-svn: 266260
LLVM optimization passes may reduce a profiled target expression
to a constant. Removing runtime calls at such instrumentation points
would help speedup the runtime of the instrumented program.
llvm-svn: 266229
Summary:
Fixes PR26774.
If you're aware of the issue, feel free to skip the "Motivation"
section and jump directly to "This patch".
Motivation:
I define "refinement" as discarding behaviors from a program that the
optimizer has license to discard. So transforming:
```
void f(unsigned x) {
unsigned t = 5 / x;
(void)t;
}
```
to
```
void f(unsigned x) { }
```
is refinement, since the behavior went from "if x == 0 then undefined
else nothing" to "nothing" (the optimizer has license to discard
undefined behavior).
Refinement is a fundamental aspect of many mid-level optimizations done
by LLVM. For instance, transforming `x == (x + 1)` to `false` also
involves refinement since the expression's value went from "if x is
`undef` then { `true` or `false` } else { `false` }" to "`false`" (by
definition, the optimizer has license to fold `undef` to any non-`undef`
value).
Unfortunately, refinement implies that the optimizer cannot assume
that the implementation of a function it can see has all of the
behavior an unoptimized or a differently optimized version of the same
function can have. This is a problem for functions with comdat
linkage, where a function can be replaced by an unoptimized or a
differently optimized version of the same source level function.
For instance, FunctionAttrs cannot assume a comdat function is
actually `readnone` even if it does not have any loads or stores in
it; since there may have been loads and stores in the "original
function" that were refined out in the currently visible variant, and
at the link step the linker may in fact choose an implementation with
a load or a store. As an example, consider a function that does two
atomic loads from the same memory location, and writes to memory only
if the two values are not equal. The optimizer is allowed to refine
this function by first CSE'ing the two loads, and the folding the
comparision to always report that the two values are equal. Such a
refined variant will look like it is `readonly`. However, the
unoptimized version of the function can still write to memory (since
the two loads //can// result in different values), and selecting the
unoptimized version at link time will retroactively invalidate
transforms we may have done under the assumption that the function
does not write to memory.
Note: this is not just a problem with atomics or with linking
differently optimized object files. See PR26774 for more realistic
examples that involved neither.
This patch:
This change introduces a new set of linkage types, predicated as
`GlobalValue::mayBeDerefined` that returns true if the linkage type
allows a function to be replaced by a differently optimized variant at
link time. It then changes a set of IPO passes to bail out if they see
such a function.
Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel, dexonsmith, joker.eph, rnk
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18634
llvm-svn: 265762
As suggested by Chandler in his review comments for D18662, this
follow-on patch renames some variables in GetLoadValueForLoad and
CoerceAvailableValueToLoadType to hopefully make it more obvious
which variables hold value sizes and which hold load/store sizes.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 265687
When GVN wants to re-interpret an already available value in a smaller
type, it needs to right-shift the value on big-endian systems to ensure
the correct bytes are accessed. The shift value is the difference of
the sizes of the two types.
This is correct as long as both types occupy multiples of full bytes.
However, when one of them is a sub-byte type like i1, this no longer
holds true: we still need to shift, but only to access the correct
*byte*. Accessing bits within the byte requires no shift in either
endianness; e.g. an i1 resides in the least-significant bit of its
containing byte on both big- and little-endian systems.
Therefore, the appropriate shift value to be used is the difference of
the *storage* sizes of the two types. This is already handled correctly
in one place where such a shift takes place (GetStoreValueForLoad), but
is incorrect in two other places: GetLoadValueForLoad and
CoerceAvailableValueToLoadType.
This patch changes both places to use the storage size as well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18662
llvm-svn: 265684
Clarify what this RemapFlag actually means.
- Change the flag name to match its intended behaviour.
- Clearly document that it's not supposed to affect globals.
- Add a host of FIXMEs to indicate how to fix the behaviour to match
the intent of the flag.
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals should only affect the behaviour of
RemapInstruction for function-local operands; namely, for operands of
type Argument, Instruction, and BasicBlock. Currently, it is *only*
passed into RemapInstruction calls (and the transitive MapValue calls
that it makes).
When I split Metadata from Value I didn't understand the flag, and I
used it in a bunch of places for "global" metadata.
This commit doesn't have any functionality change, but prepares to
cleanup MapMetadata and MapValue.
llvm-svn: 265628
Summary:
In the context of http://wg21.link/lwg2445 C++ uses the concept of
'stronger' ordering but doesn't define it properly. This should be fixed
in C++17 barring a small question that's still open.
The code currently plays fast and loose with the AtomicOrdering
enum. Using an enum class is one step towards tightening things. I later
also want to tighten related enums, such as clang's
AtomicOrderingKind (which should be shared with LLVM as a 'C++ ABI'
enum).
This change touches a few lines of code which can be improved later, I'd
like to keep it as NFC for now as it's already quite complex. I have
related changes for clang.
As a follow-up I'll add:
bool operator<(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator<=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
This is separate so that clang and LLVM changes don't need to be in sync.
Reviewers: jyknight, reames
Subscribers: jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18775
llvm-svn: 265602
1. Add FullUnrollMaxCount option that works like MaxCount, but also limits
the unroll count for fully unrolled loops. So if a loop has an iteration
count over this, it won't fully unroll.
2. Add CLI options for MaxCount and the new option, so they can be tested
(plus a test).
3. Make partial unrolling obey MaxCount.
An example use-case (the out of tree one this is originally designed for) is
a target’s TTI can analyze a loop and decide on a max unroll count separate
from the size threshold, e.g. based on register pressure, then constrain
LoopUnroll to not exceed that, regardless of the size of the unrolled loop.
llvm-svn: 265562
Don't emit a gc.result for a statepoint lowered from
@llvm.experimental.deoptimize since the call into __llvm_deoptimize is
effectively noreturn. Instead follow the corresponding gc.statepoint
with an "unreachable".
llvm-svn: 265485
Summary:
As discussed on llvm-dev[1].
This change adds the basic boilerplate code around having this intrinsic
in LLVM:
- Changes in Intrinsics.td, and the IR Verifier
- A lowering pass to lower @llvm.experimental.guard to normal
control flow
- Inliner support
[1]: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-February/095523.html
Reviewers: reames, atrick, chandlerc, rnk, JosephTremoulet, echristo
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18527
llvm-svn: 264976
Widening a PHI requires us to insert a trunc.
The logical place for this trunc is in the same BB as the PHI.
This is not possible if the BB is terminated by a catchswitch.
This fixes PR27133.
llvm-svn: 264926
This is effectively NFC, minus the renaming of the options
(-cyclone-prefetch-distance -> -prefetch-distance).
The change was requested by Tim in D17943.
llvm-svn: 264806
During ADCE, track which debug info scopes still have live references
from the code, and delete debug info intrinsics for the dead ones.
These intrinsics describe the locations of variables (in registers or
stack slots). If there's no code left corresponding to a variable's
scope, then there's no way to reference the variable in the debugger and
it doesn't matter what its value is.
I add a DEBUG printout when the described location in an SSA register,
in case it helps some trying to track down why locations get lost.
However, we still delete these; the scope itself isn't attached to any
real code, so the ship has already sailed.
llvm-svn: 264800
When eliminating or merging almost empty basic blocks, the existence of non-trivial PHI nodes
is currently used to recognize potential loops of which the block is the header and keep the block.
However, the current algorithm fails if the loops' exit condition is evaluated only with volatile
values hence no PHI nodes in the header. Especially when such a loop is an outer loop of a nested
loop, the loop is collapsed into a single loop which prevent later optimizations from being
applied (e.g., transforming nested loops into simplified forms and loop vectorization).
The patch augments the existing PHI node-based check by adding a pre-test if the BB actually
belongs to a set of loop headers and not eliminating it if yes.
llvm-svn: 264697
When eliminating or merging almost empty basic blocks, the existence of non-trivial PHI nodes
is currently used to recognize potential loops of which the block is the header and keep the block.
However, the current algorithm fails if the loops' exit condition is evaluated only with volatile
values hence no PHI nodes in the header. Especially when such a loop is an outer loop of a nested
loop, the loop is collapsed into a single loop which prevent later optimizations from being
applied (e.g., transforming nested loops into simplified forms and loop vectorization).
The patch augments the existing PHI node-based check by adding a pre-test if the BB actually
belongs to a set of loop headers and not eliminating it if yes.
llvm-svn: 264596
This changes RS4GC to lower calls to ``@llvm.experimental.deoptimize``
to gc.statepoints wrapping ``__llvm_deoptimize``, and changes
``callsGCLeafFunction`` to recognize ``@llvm.experimental.deoptimize``
as a non GC leaf function.
I've had to hard code the ``"__llvm_deoptimize"`` name in
RewriteStatepointsForGC; since ``TargetLibraryInfo`` is available only
during codegen. This isn't without precedent in the codebase, so I'm
not overtly concerned.
llvm-svn: 264456
We try to hoist the insertion point as high as possible to encourage
sharing. However, we must be careful not to hoist into a catchswitch as
it is both an EHPad and a terminator.
llvm-svn: 264344
isDependenceDistanceOfOne asserts that the store and the load access
through the same type. This function is also used by
removeDependencesFromMultipleStores so we need to make sure we filter
out mismatching types before reaching this point.
Now we do this when the initial candidates are gathered.
This is a refinement of the fix made in r262267.
Fixes PR27048.
llvm-svn: 264313
It's a bug fix.
For rerolled loops SE trip count remains unchanged. It leads to incorrect work of the next passes.
My patch just resets SE info for rerolled loop forcing SE to re-evaluate it next time it requested.
I also added a verifier call in the exisitng test to be sure no invalid SE data remain. Without my fix this test would fail with -verify-scev.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18316
llvm-svn: 264051
Summary:
It can hurt performance to prefetch ahead too much. Be conservative for
now and don't prefetch ahead more than 3 iterations on Cyclone.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17949
llvm-svn: 263772
Summary:
And use this TTI for Cyclone. As it was explained in the original RFC
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/92758), the HW
prefetcher work up to 2KB strides.
I am also adding tests for this and the previous change (D17943):
* Cyclone prefetching accesses with a large stride
* Cyclone not prefetching accesses with a small stride
* Generic Aarch64 subtarget not prefetching either
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17945
llvm-svn: 263771
Summary:
If we decide to version a loop to benefit a transformation, it makes
sense to record the now non-aliasing accesses in the newly versioned
loop. This allows non-aliasing information to be used by subsequent
passes.
One example is 456.hmmer in SPECint2006 where after loop distribution,
we vectorize one of the newly distributed loops. To vectorize we
version this loop to fully disambiguate may-aliasing accesses. If we
add the noalias markers, we can use the same information in a later DSE
pass to eliminate some dead stores which amounts to ~25% of the
instructions of this hot memory-pipeline-bound loop. The overall
performance improves by 18% on our ARM64.
The scoped noalias annotation is added in LoopVersioning. The patch
then enables this for loop distribution. A follow-on patch will enable
it for the vectorizer. Eventually this should be run by default when
versioning the loop but first I'd like to get some feedback whether my
understanding and application of scoped noalias metadata is correct.
Essentially my approach was to have a separate alias domain for each
versioning of the loop. For example, if we first version in loop
distribution and then in vectorization of the distributed loops, we have
a different set of memchecks for each versioning. By keeping the scopes
in different domains they can conveniently be defined independently
since different alias domains don't affect each other.
As written, I also have a separate domain for each loop. This is not
necessary and we could save some metadata here by using the same domain
across the different loops. I don't think it's a big deal either way.
Probably the best is to review the tests first to see if I mapped this
problem correctly to scoped noalias markers. I have plenty of comments
in the tests.
Note that the interface is prepared for the vectorizer which needs the
annotateInstWithNoAlias API. The vectorizer does not use LoopVersioning
so we need a way to pass in the versioned instructions. This is also
why the maps have to become part of the object state.
Also currently, we only have an AA-aware DSE after the vectorizer if we
also run the LTO pipeline. Depending how widely this triggers we may
want to schedule a DSE toward the end of the regular pass pipeline.
Reviewers: hfinkel, nadav, ashutosh.nema
Subscribers: mssimpso, aemerson, llvm-commits, mcrosier
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16712
llvm-svn: 263743
This splits out the logic that maps the `"statepoint-id"` attribute into
the actual statepoint ID, and the `"statepoint-num-patch-bytes"`
attribute into the number of patchable bytes the statpeoint is lowered
into. The new home of this logic is in IR/Statepoint.cpp, and this
refactoring will support similar functionality when lowering calls with
deopt operand bundles in the future.
llvm-svn: 263685
Summary:
Fix LSRInstance::HoistInsertPosition() to check the original insert
position block first for a canonical insertion point that is dominated
by all inputs. This leads to SCEV being able to reuse more instructions
since it currently tracks the instructions it creates for reuse by
keeping a table of <Value, insert point> pairs.
Reviewers: atrick
Subscribers: mcrosier, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18001
llvm-svn: 263644
Summary:
Specifically, when we perform runtime loop unrolling of a loop that
contains a convergent op, we can only unroll k times, where k divides
the loop trip multiple.
Without this change, we'll happily unroll e.g. the following loop
for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) {
if (i == 0) convergent_op();
foo();
}
into
int i = 0;
if (N % 2 == 1) {
convergent_op();
foo();
++i;
}
for (; i < N - 1; i += 2) {
if (i == 0) convergent_op();
foo();
foo();
}.
This is unsafe, because we've just added a control-flow dependency to
the convergent op in the prelude.
In general, runtime unrolling loops that contain convergent ops is safe
only if we don't have emit a prelude, which occurs when the unroll count
divides the trip multiple.
Reviewers: resistor
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17526
llvm-svn: 263509
Summary: This now try to reorder instructions in order to help create the optimizable pattern.
Reviewers: craig.topper, spatel, dexonsmith, Prazek, chandlerc, joker.eph, majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16523
llvm-svn: 263503
The motivating example is this
for (j = n; j > 1; j = i) {
i = j / 2;
}
The signed division is safely to be changed to an unsigned division (j is known
to be larger than 1 from the loop guard) and later turned into a single shift
without considering the sign bit.
llvm-svn: 263406
commit ae14bf6488e8441f0f6d74f00455555f6f3943ac
Author: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
Date: Fri Mar 11 17:15:50 2016 +0000
Remove PreserveNames template parameter from IRBuilder
Summary:
Following r263086, we are now relying on a flag on the Context to
discard Value names in release builds.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18023
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263258
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
until we can figure out what to do about clang and Release build testing.
This reverts commit 263258.
llvm-svn: 263321
Summary:
Following r263086, we are now relying on a flag on the Context to
discard Value names in release builds.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18023
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 263258
Summary:
Following r263086, we are replacing this by a runtime check.
More cleanup will follow on the IRBuilder itself, but I submitted
this patch separately as SROA has a fancy "prefixInserter" class
that needs extra-love.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18022
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 263256
member type.
Because of how this type is used by the ValueTable, it cannot actually
have hidden visibility. GCC actually nicely warns about this but Clang
just silently ... I don't even know. =/ We should do a better job either
way though.
This should resolve a bunch of the GCC warnings about visibility that
the port of GVN triggered and make the visibility story a bit more
correct.
llvm-svn: 263250
much to my horror, so use variables to fix it in place.
This terrifies me. Both basic-aa and memdep will provide more precise
information when the domtree and/or the loop info is available. Because
of this, if your pass (like GVN) requires domtree, and then queries
memdep or basic-aa, it will get more precise results. If it does this in
the other order, it gets less precise results.
All of the ideas I have for fixing this are, essentially, terrible. Here
I've just caused us to stop having unspecified behavior as different
implementations evaluate the order of these arguments differently. I'm
actually rather glad that they do, or the fragility of memdep and
basic-aa would have gone on unnoticed. I've left comments so we don't
immediately break this again. This should fix bots whose host compilers
evaluate the order of arguments differently from Clang.
llvm-svn: 263231
This was originally a pointer to support pass managers which didn't use
AnalysisManagers. However, that doesn't realistically come up much and
the complexity of supporting it doesn't really make sense.
In fact, *many* parts of the pass manager were just assuming the pointer
was never null already. This at least makes it much more explicit and
clear.
llvm-svn: 263219
tests to run GVN in both modes.
This is mostly the boring refactoring just like SROA and other complex
transformation passes. There is some trickiness in that GVN's
ValueNumber class requires hand holding to get to compile cleanly. I'm
open to suggestions about a better pattern there, but I tried several
before settling on this. I was trying to balance my desire to sink as
much implementation detail into the source file as possible without
introducing overly many layers of abstraction.
Much like with SROA, the design of this system is made somewhat more
cumbersome by the need to support both pass managers without duplicating
the significant state and logic of the pass. The same compromise is
struck here.
I've also left a FIXME in a doxygen comment as the GVN pass seems to
have pretty woeful documentation within it. I'd like to submit this with
the FIXME and let those more deeply familiar backfill the information
here now that we have a nice place in an interface to put that kind of
documentaiton.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18019
llvm-svn: 263208
The code assumed that we always had a preheader without making the pass
dependent on LoopSimplify.
Thanks to Mattias Eriksson V for reporting this.
llvm-svn: 263173
of, and I misdiagnosed for months and months.
Andrea has had a patch for this forever, but I just couldn't see how
it was fixing the root cause of the problem. It didn't make sense to me,
even though the patch was perfectly good and the analysis of the actual
failure event was *fantastic*.
Well, I came back to it today because the patch has sat for *far* too
long and needs attention and decided I wouldn't let it go until I really
understood what was going on. After quite some time in the debugger,
I finally realized that in fact I had just missed an important case with
my previous attempt to fix PR22093 in r225149. Not only do we need to
handle loads that won't be split, but stores-of-loads that we won't
split. We *do* actually have enough logic in the presplitting to form
new slices for split stores.... *unless* we decided not to split them!
I'm so sorry that it took me this long to come to the realization that
this is the issue. It seems so obvious in hind sight (of course).
Anyways, the fix becomes *much* smaller and more focused. The fact that
we're left doing integer smashing is related to the FIXME in my original
commit: fundamentally, we're not aggressive about pre-splitting for
loads and stores to the same alloca. If we want to get aggressive about
this, it'll need both what Andrea had put into the proposed fix, but
also a *lot* more logic to essentially iteratively pre-split the alloca
until we can't do any more. As I said in that commit log, its really
unclear that this is the right call. Instead, the integer blending and
letting targets lower this to narrower stores seems slightly better. But
we definitely shouldn't really go down that path just to fix this bug.
Again, tons of thanks are owed to Andrea and others at Sony for working
on this bug. I really should have seen what was going on here and
re-directed them sooner. =////
llvm-svn: 263121
We already have the instruction extracted into 'I', just cast that to
a store the way we do for loads. Also, we don't enter the if unless SI
is non-null, so don't test it again for null.
I'm pretty sure the entire test there can be nuked, but this is just the
trivial cleanup.
llvm-svn: 263112
need to be changed for porting to the new pass manager.
Also sink the comment on the ValueTable class back to that class instead
of it dangling on an anonymous namespace.
No functionality changed.
llvm-svn: 263084
This is a fairly straightforward port to the new pass manager with one
exception. It removes a very questionable use of releaseMemory() in
the old pass to invalidate its caches between runs on a function.
I don't think this is really guaranteed to be safe. I've just used the
more direct port to the new PM to address this by nuking the results
object each time the pass runs. While this could cause some minor malloc
traffic increase, I don't expect the compile time performance hit to be
noticable, and it makes the correctness and other aspects of the pass
much easier to reason about. In some cases, it may make things faster by
making the sets and maps smaller with better locality. Indeed, the
measurements collected by Bruno (thanks!!!) show mostly compile time
improvements.
There is sadly very limited testing at this point as there are only two
tests of memdep, and both rely on GVN. I'll be porting GVN next and that
will exercise this heavily though.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17962
llvm-svn: 263082
This patch teaches LICM's implementation of store promotion to exploit the fact that the memory location being accessed might be provable thread local. The fact it's thread local weakens the requirements for where we can insert stores since no other thread can observe the write. This allows us perform store promotion even in cases where the store is not guaranteed to execute in the loop.
Two key assumption worth drawing out is that this assumes a) no-capture is strong enough to imply no-escape, and b) standard allocation functions like malloc, calloc, and operator new return values which can be assumed not to have previously escaped.
In future work, it would be nice to generalize this so that it works without directly seeing the allocation site. I believe that the nocapture return attribute should be suitable for this purpose, but haven't investigated carefully. It's also likely that we could support unescaped allocas with similar reasoning, but since SROA and Mem2Reg should destroy those, they're less interesting than they first might seem.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16783
llvm-svn: 263072
I somehow missed this. The case in GCC (global_alloc) was similar to
the new testcase except it had an array of structs rather than a two
dimensional array.
Fixes RP26885.
llvm-svn: 263058
This lets select sub-targets enable this pass. The patch implements the
idea from the recent llvm-dev thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/94925
The goal is to enable the LoopDataPrefetch pass for the Cyclone
sub-target only within Aarch64.
Positive and negative tests will be included in an upcoming patch that
enables selective prefetching of large-strided accesses on Cyclone.
llvm-svn: 262844
merged into a loop that was subsequently unrolled (or otherwise nuked).
In this case it can't merge in the ASTs for any remaining nested loops,
it needs to re-add their instructions dircetly.
The fix is very isolated, but I've pulled the code for merging blocks
into the AST into a single place in the process. The only behavior
change is in the case which would have crashed before.
This fixes a crash reported by Mikael Holmen on the list after r261316
restored much of the loop pass pipelining and allowed us to actually do
this kind of nested transformation sequenc. I've taken that test case
and further reduced it into the somewhat twisty maze of loops in the
included test case. This does in fact trigger the bug even in this
reduced form.
llvm-svn: 262108
Summary: Check that we're using SCEV for the same loop we're simulating. Otherwise, we might try to use the iteration number of the current loop in SCEV expressions for inner/outer loops IVs, which is clearly incorrect.
Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17632
llvm-svn: 261958
Summary:
Since this is an IR pass it's nice to be able to write tests without
llc. This is the counterpart of the llc test under
CodeGen/PowerPC/loop-data-prefetch.ll.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17464
llvm-svn: 261578
This flag was part of a migration to a new means of handling vectors-of-points which was described in the llvm-dev thread "FYI: Relocating vector of pointers". The old code path has been off by default for a while without complaints, so time to cleanup.
llvm-svn: 261569
This change reverts "246133 [RewriteStatepointsForGC] Reduce the number of new instructions for base pointers" and a follow on bugfix 12575.
As pointed out in pr25846, this code suffers from a memory corruption bug. Since I'm (empirically) not going to get back to this any time soon, simply reverting the problematic change is the right answer.
llvm-svn: 261565
I missed == and != when I removed implicit conversions between iterators
and pointers in r252380 since they were defined outside ilist_iterator.
Since they depend on getNodePtrUnchecked(), they indirectly rely on UB.
This commit removes all uses of these operators. (I'll delete the
operators themselves in a separate commit so that it can be easily
reverted if necessary.)
There should be NFC here.
llvm-svn: 261498
routine.
We were getting this wrong in small ways and generally being very
inconsistent about it across loop passes. Instead, let's have a common
place where we do this. One minor downside is that this will require
some analyses like SCEV in more places than they are strictly needed.
However, this seems benign as these analyses are complete no-ops, and
without this consistency we can in many cases end up with the legacy
pass manager scheduling deciding to split up a loop pass pipeline in
order to run the function analysis half-way through. It is very, very
annoying to fix these without just being very pedantic across the board.
The only loop passes I've not updated here are ones that use
AU.setPreservesAll() such as IVUsers (an analysis) and the pass printer.
They seemed less relevant.
With this patch, almost all of the problems in PR24804 around loop pass
pipelines are fixed. The one remaining issue is that we run simplify-cfg
and instcombine in the middle of the loop pass pipeline. We've recently
added some loop variants of these passes that would seem substantially
cleaner to use, but this at least gets us much closer to the previous
state. Notably, the seven loop pass managers is down to three.
I've not updated the loop passes using LoopAccessAnalysis because that
analysis hasn't been fully wired into LoopSimplify/LCSSA, and it isn't
clear that those transforms want to support those forms anyways. They
all run late anyways, so this is harmless. Similarly, LSR is left alone
because it already carefully manages its forms and doesn't need to get
fused into a single loop pass manager with a bunch of other loop passes.
LoopReroll didn't use loop simplified form previously, and I've updated
the test case to match the trivially different output.
Finally, I've also factored all the pass initialization for the passes
that use this technique as well, so that should be done regularly and
reliably.
Thanks to James for the help reviewing and thinking about this stuff,
and Ben for help thinking about it as well!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17435
llvm-svn: 261316
This patch is part of the work to make PPCLoopDataPrefetch
target-independent
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/92758).
Obviously the pass still only used from PPC at this point. Subsequent
patches will start driving this from ARM64 as well.
Due to the previous patch most lines should show up as moved lines.
llvm-svn: 261265
LICM starts with an *empty* AST, and then merges in each sub-loop. While the
add code is appropriate for sub-loop 2 and up, it's utterly unnecessary for
sub-loop 1. If the AST starts off empty, we can just clone/move the contents
of the subloop into the containing AST.
Reviewed-by: Philip Reames <listmail@philipreames.com>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16753
llvm-svn: 260892
Summary:
Calls to convergent functions can be duplicated, but only if the
duplicates are not control-flow dependent on any additional values.
Loop rotation doesn't meet the bar.
Reviewers: jingyue
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits, arsenm, joker.eph, resistor, tra, hfinkel, broune
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17127
llvm-svn: 260729
The attached patch removes all of the block local code for performing X-load forwarding by reusing the code used in the non-local case.
The motivation here is to remove duplication and in the process increase our test coverage of some fairly tricky code. I have some upcoming changes I'll be proposing in this area and wanted to have the code cleaned up a bit first.
Note: The review for this mostly happened in email which didn't make it to phabricator on the 258882 commit thread.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16608
llvm-svn: 260711
In short, before r252926 we were comparing an unsigned (StoreSize) against an a
APInt (Stride), which is fine and well. After we were zero extending the Stride
and then converting to an unsigned, which is not the same thing. Obviously,
Stides can also be negative. This commit just restores the original behavior.
AFAICT, it's not possible to write a test case to expose the issue because
the code already has checks to make sure the StoreSize can't overflow an
unsigned (which prevents the Stride from overflowing an unsigned as well).
llvm-svn: 260706
It looks like clang has a couple of test cases which caught the fact LVI was not slightly more precise after 260439. When looking at the failures, it struck me as wasteful to be querying nullness of a constant via LVI, so instead of tweaking the clang tests, let's just stop querying constants from this source.
llvm-svn: 260451
Summary:
Tests for this will be added once the AMDGPU backend enables this
option.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16602
llvm-svn: 260336
Summary:
Unrolling Analyzer is already pretty complicated, and it becomes harder and harder to exercise it with usual IR tests, as with them we can only check the final decision: whether the loop is unrolled or not. This change factors this framework out from LoopUnrollPass to analyses, which allows to use unit tests.
The change itself is supposed to be NFC, except adding a couple of tests.
I plan to add more tests as I add new functionality and find/fix bugs.
Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel, sanjoy
Subscribers: zzheng, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16623
llvm-svn: 260169
Change a return statement of ComputeValueKnownInPredecessors() to be the same as
the rest return statements of the function. Otherwise, it might return true with
an empty Result when the current basic block has no predecessors and trigger the
first assert of JumpThreading::ProcessThreadableEdges().
llvm-svn: 260110
Summary:
When alias analysis is uncertain about the aliasing between any two accesses,
it will return MayAlias. This uncertainty from alias analysis restricts LICM
from proceeding further. In cases where alias analysis is uncertain we might
use loop versioning as an alternative.
Loop Versioning will create a version of the loop with aggressive aliasing
assumptions in addition to the original with conservative (default) aliasing
assumptions. The version of the loop making aggressive aliasing assumptions
will have all the memory accesses marked as no-alias. These two versions of
loop will be preceded by a memory runtime check. This runtime check consists
of bound checks for all unique memory accessed in loop, and it ensures the
lack of memory aliasing. The result of the runtime check determines which of
the loop versions is executed: If the runtime check detects any memory
aliasing, then the original loop is executed. Otherwise, the version with
aggressive aliasing assumptions is used.
The pass is off by default and can be enabled with command line option
-enable-loop-versioning-licm.
Reviewers: hfinkel, anemet, chatur01, reames
Subscribers: MatzeB, grosser, joker.eph, sanjoy, javed.absar, sbaranga,
llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9151
llvm-svn: 259986
Summary:
Passing the rematerialized values map to insertRematerializationStores by
value looks to be a simple oversight; update it to pass by reference.
Reviewers: reames, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16911
llvm-svn: 259867
Bail out if we have a PHI on an EHPad that gets a value from a
CatchSwitchInst. Because the CatchSwitchInst cannot be split, there is
no good place to stick any instructions.
This fixes PR26373.
llvm-svn: 259702
Summary:
LoopVersioning is a transform utility that transform passes can use to
run-time disambiguate may-aliasing accesses. I'd like to also expose as
pass to allow it to be unit-tested.
I am planning to add support for non-aliasing annotation in
LoopVersioning and I'd like to be able to write tests directly using
this pass.
(After that feature is done, the pass could also be used to look for
optimization opportunities that are hidden behind incomplete alias
information at compile time.)
The pass drives LoopVersioning in its default way which is to fully
disambiguate may-aliasing accesses no matter how many checks are
required.
Reviewers: hfinkel, ashutosh.nema, sbaranga
Subscribers: zzheng, mssimpso, llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16612
llvm-svn: 259610
Loop transformations can sometimes fail because the loop, while in
valid rotated LCSSA form, is not in a canonical CFG form. This is
an extremely simple pass that just merges obviously redundant
blocks, which can be used to fix some known failure cases. In the
future, it may be enhanced with more cases (and have code shared with
SimplifyCFG).
This allows us to run LoopSimplifyCFG -> LoopRotate -> LoopUnroll,
so that SimplifyCFG cleans up the loop before Rotate tries to run.
Not currently used in the pass manager, since this pass doesn't do
anything unless you can hook it up in an LPM with other loop passes.
It'll be added once Chandler cleans up things to allow this.
Tested in a custom pipeline out of tree to confirm it works in
practice (in addition to the included trivial test).
llvm-svn: 259256
- Locally declare struct, and call it BaseDerivedPair
- Use a lambda to compare, instead of a singleton with uninitialized
fields
- Add a constructor to BaseDerivedPair and use SmallVector::emplace_back
llvm-svn: 259208
The full diff for the test directory may be hard to read because of the
filename clash; so here's all that happened as far as the tests are
concerned:
```
cd test/Transforms/RewriteStatepointsForGC
git rm *ll
git mv deopt-bundles/* ./
rmdir deopt-bundles
find . -name '*.ll' | xargs gsed -i 's/-rs4gc-use-deopt-bundles //g'
```
llvm-svn: 259129
These changes are aimed at bringing PlaceSafepoints up to code with the
LLVM coding guidelines:
- Fix variable naming
- Use DenseSet instead of std::set
- Remove dead code
- Minor local code simplifications
llvm-svn: 259112
This change permanently clamps -spp-no-statepoints to true (the code
deletion will come later). Tests that specifically tested
PlaceSafepoint's ability to wrap calls in gc.statepoint have been moved
to RS4GC's test suite.
llvm-svn: 259096
Summary:
If the instruction we're hoisting out of a loop into its preheader is
guaranteed to have executed in the loop, then the metadata associated
with the instruction (e.g. !range or !dereferenceable) is valid in the
preheader. This is because once we're in the preheader, we know we're
eventually going to reach the location the metadata was valid at.
This change makes LICM smarter around this, and helps it recognize cases
like these:
```
do {
int a = *ptr; !range !0
...
} while (i++ < N);
```
to
```
int a = *ptr; !range !0
do {
...
} while (i++ < N);
```
Earlier we'd drop the `!range` metadata after hoisting the load from
`ptr`.
Reviewers: igor-laevsky
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16669
llvm-svn: 259053
Summary:
This is a revised version of D13974, and the following quoted summary are from D13974
"This patch adds support to check if a loop has loop invariant conditions which lead to loop exits. If so, we know that if the exit path is taken, it is at the first loop iteration. If there is an induction variable used in that exit path whose value has not been updated, it will keep its initial value passing from loop preheader. We can therefore rewrite the exit value with
its initial value. This will help remove phis created by LCSSA and enable other optimizations like loop unswitch."
D13974 was committed but failed one lnt test. The bug was that we only checked the condition from loop exit's incoming block was a loop invariant. But there could be another condition from loop header to that incoming block not being a loop invariant. This would produce miscompiled code.
This patch fixes the issue by checking if the incoming block is loop header, and if not, don't perform the rewrite. The could be further improved by recursively checking all conditions leading to loop exit block, but I'd like to check in this simple version first and improve it with future patches.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16570
llvm-svn: 258912
AvailableValue is the part that represents the potential rematerialization. AvailableValueInBlock is simply a pair of an AvailableValue and a BB which we might materialize it in.
This is motivated by http://reviews.llvm.org/D16608. The intent is that we'll have a single function which handles the local case which both local and non-local will use to identify available values. Once that's done, the local case can rematerialize at the use site and the non-local case can do the SSA construction as it does currently.
llvm-svn: 258882
Summary:
This patch is provided in preparation for removing autoconf on 1/26. The proposal to remove autoconf on 1/26 was discussed on the llvm-dev thread here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-January/093875.html
"I felt a great disturbance in the [build system], as if millions of [makefiles] suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something [amazing] has happened."
- Obi Wan Kenobi
Reviewers: chandlerc, grosbach, bob.wilson, tstellarAMD, echristo, whitequark
Subscribers: chfast, simoncook, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, jfb, danalbert, srhines, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dsanders, joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16471
llvm-svn: 258861
Previously the RedoInsts was processed at the end of the block.
However it was possible that it left behind some instructions that
were not canonicalized.
This should guarantee that any previous instruction in the basic
block is canonicalized before we process a new instruction.
llvm-svn: 258830
This is a recommit of r258620 which causes PR26293.
The original message:
Now LIR can turn following codes into memset:
typedef struct foo {
int a;
int b;
} foo_t;
void bar(foo_t *f, unsigned n) {
for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
f[i].a = 0;
f[i].b = 0;
}
}
void test(foo_t *f, unsigned n) {
for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; i += 2) {
f[i] = 0;
f[i+1] = 0;
}
}
llvm-svn: 258777
We had the same code duplicated for each type of Def. We also have the entire block duplicated between the local and non-local case, but let's start with local cleanup.
llvm-svn: 258740
SCCP has code identical to changeToUnreachable's behavior, switch it
over to just call changeToUnreachable.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 258654
InstCombine and SCCP both want to remove dead code in a very particular
way but using identical means to do so. Share the code between the two.
No functionality change is intended.
llvm-svn: 258653
Summary:
This change adds a `-spp-no-statepoints` flag to PlaceSafepoints that
bypasses the code that wraps newly introduced polls and existing calls
in gc.statepoint. With `-spp-no-statepoints` enabled, PlaceSafepoints
effectively becomes a safpeoint **poll** insertion pass.
The eventual goal is to "constant fold" this option, along with
`-rs4gc-use-deopt-bundles` to `true`, once clients using gc.statepoint
are okay doing so.
Reviewers: pgavlin, reames, JosephTremoulet
Subscribers: sanjoy, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16439
llvm-svn: 258551
Summary:
This adds a new kind of operand bundle to LLVM denoted by the
`"gc-transition"` tag. Inputs to `"gc-transition"` operand bundle are
lowered into the "transition args" section of `gc.statepoint` by
`RewriteStatepointsForGC`.
This removes the last bit of functionality that was unsupported in the
deopt bundle based code path in `RewriteStatepointsForGC`.
Reviewers: pgavlin, JosephTremoulet, reames
Subscribers: sanjoy, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16342
llvm-svn: 258338
Summary:
GEPOperator: provide getResultElementType alongside getSourceElementType.
This is made possible by adding a result element type field to GetElementPtrConstantExpr, which GetElementPtrInst already has.
GEP: replace get(Pointer)ElementType uses with get{Source,Result}ElementType.
Reviewers: mjacob, dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16275
llvm-svn: 258145
This commit changes the default on our lowering of vectors-of-pointers from splitting in RS4GC to reporting them in the final stack map. All of the changes to do so are already in place and tested. Assuming no problems are unearthed in the next week, we will be deleting the old code entirely next Monday.
llvm-svn: 258111
I mentioned the issue here in code review way back in September and
was sure we'd fixed it, but apparently we forgot:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150921/301850.html
In any case, as soon as you try to use this pass in anything but the
most basic pipeline everything falls apart. Fix the condition.
llvm-svn: 257935
Summary: If SROA creates only one piece (e.g. because the other is not needed),
it still needs to create a bit_piece expression if that bit piece is smaller
than the original size of the alloca.
Reviewers: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16187
llvm-svn: 257795
The layering of where the various loop unroll parameters are
initialized and overridden here was very confusing, making it pretty
difficult to tell just how the various sources interacted. Instead, we
put all of the initialization logic together in a single function so
that it's obvious what overrides what.
llvm-svn: 257426
Currently we're unrolling loops more in minsize than in optsize, which
means -Oz will have a larger code size than -Os. That doesn't make any
sense.
This resolves the FIXME about this in LoopUnrollPass and extends the
optsize test to make sure we use the smaller threshold for minsize as
well.
llvm-svn: 257402
JumpThreading's runOnFunction is supposed to return true if it made any
changes. JumpThreading has a call to removeUnreachableBlocks which may
result in changes to the IR but runOnFunction didn't appropriate account
for this possibility, leading to badness.
While we are here, make sure to call LazyValueInfo::eraseBlock in
removeUnreachableBlocks; JumpThreading preserves LVI.
This fixes PR26096.
llvm-svn: 257279
Summary:
This is analogous to r256079, which removed an overly strong assertion, and
r256812, which simplified the code by replacing three conditionals by one.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16019
llvm-svn: 257250
This patch teaches rewrite-statepoints-for-gc to relocate vector-of-pointers directly rather than trying to split them. This builds on the recent lowering/IR changes to allow vector typed gc.relocates.
The motivation for this is that we recently found a bug in the vector splitting code where depending on visit order, a vector might not be relocated at some safepoint. Specifically, the bug is that the splitting code wasn't updating the side tables (live vector) of other safepoints. As a result, a vector which was live at two safepoints might not be updated at one of them. However, if you happened to visit safepoints in post order over the dominator tree, everything worked correctly. Weirdly, it turns out that post order is actually an incredibly common order to visit instructions in in practice. Frustratingly, I have not managed to write a test case which actually hits this. I can only reproduce it in large IR files produced by actual applications.
Rather than continue to make this code more complicated, we can remove all of the complexity by just representing the relocation of the entire vector natively in the IR.
At the moment, the new functionality is hidden behind a flag. To use this code, you need to pass "-rs4gc-split-vector-values=0". Once I have a chance to stress test with this option and get feedback from other users, my plan is to flip the default and remove the original splitting code. I would just remove it now, but given the rareness of the bug, I figured it was better to leave it in place until the new approach has been stress tested.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15982
llvm-svn: 257244
Look for PHI/Select in the same BB of the form
bb:
%p = phi [false, %bb1], [true, %bb2], [false, %bb3], [true, %bb4], ...
%s = select p, trueval, falseval
And expand the select into a branch structure. This later enables
jump-threading over bb in this pass.
Using the similar approach of SimplifyCFG::FoldCondBranchOnPHI(), unfold
select if the associated PHI has at least one constant. If the unfolded
select is not jump-threaded, it will be folded again in the later
optimizations.
llvm-svn: 257198
It's strange that LoopInfo mostly owns the Loop objects, but that it
defers deleting them to the loop pass manager. Instead, change the
oddly named "updateUnloop" to "markAsRemoved" and have it queue the
Loop object for deletion. We can't delete the Loop immediately when we
remove it, since we need its pointer identity still, so we'll mark the
object as "invalid" so that clients can see what's going on.
llvm-svn: 257191
This remove the need for locking when deleting a function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15988
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 257139
We marked values which are 'undef' as constant instead of undefined
which violates SCCP's invariants. If we can figure out that a
computation results in 'undef', leave it in the undefined state.
This fixes PR16052.
llvm-svn: 257102
The fix for PR23999 made us mark loads of null as producing the constant
undef which upsets the lattice. Instead, keep the load as "undefined".
This fixes PR26044.
llvm-svn: 257087
At the moment, this is essentially a diangostic option so that I can start collecting failing test cases, but we will eventually migrate to removing the vector splitting code entirely.
llvm-svn: 257015
Summary: As per title. This will allow the optimizer to pick up on it.
Reviewers: craig.topper, spatel, dexonsmith, Prazek, chandlerc, joker.eph, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15923
llvm-svn: 256969
Summary: It turns out that if we don't try to do it at the store location, we can do it before any operation that alias the load, as long as no operation alias the store.
Reviewers: craig.topper, spatel, dexonsmith, Prazek, chandlerc, joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15903
llvm-svn: 256923
Summary:
Most of the tool chain is able to optimize scalar and memcpy like operation effisciently while it isn't that good with aggregates. In order to improve the support of aggregate, we try to change aggregate manipulation into either scalar or memcpy like ones whenever possible without loosing informations.
This is one such opportunity.
Reviewers: craig.topper, spatel, dexonsmith, Prazek, chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15894
llvm-svn: 256868
Summary:
Previously there were three conditionals, checking for global
variables, undef values and everything constant except these two, all three
returning the same value. This commit replaces them by one conditional.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15818
llvm-svn: 256812
Summary:
This commit renames GCRelocateOperands to GCRelocateInst and makes it an
intrinsic wrapper, similar to e.g. MemCpyInst. Also, all users of
GCRelocateOperands were changed to use the new intrinsic wrapper instead.
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames
Subscribers: reames, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15762
llvm-svn: 256811
r256763 had promoteLoopAccessesToScalars check for the existence of a
catchswitch when the exit blocks were populated but
promoteLoopAccessesToScalars may be called with a prepopulated set of
exit blocks which would also need to be checked.
This fixes PR26019.
llvm-svn: 256788
This is a resubmission of r256336 which was reverted in r256361. The issue was the lack of the invariant check of the memset value in processLooMemSet().
The original message:
Move several checks into isLegalStores. Also, delineate between those stores that are memset-able and those that are memcpy-able.
llvm-svn: 256783
Before reevaluating instructions, iterate over all instructions
to be reevaluated and remove trivially dead instructions and if
any of it's operands become trivially dead, mark it for deletion
until all trivially dead instructions have been removed
llvm-svn: 256773
We had two bugs here:
- We might try to sink into a catchswitch, causing verifier failures.
- We will succeed in sinking into a cleanuppad but we didn't update the
funclet operand bundle.
This fixes PR26000.
llvm-svn: 256728
If running the PlaceSafepoints pass on a module which doesn't have the
gc.safepoint_poll function without disabling entry and backedge safepoints,
previously the pass crashed with an obscure error because of a null pointer.
Now it fails the assert instead.
llvm-svn: 256580
The code that was meant to adjust the duplication cost based on the
terminator opcode was not being executed in cases where the initial
threshold was hit inside the loop.
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15536
llvm-svn: 256568
Summary:
Previously, only the outer (last) bitcast was rematerialized, resulting in a
use of the unrelocated inner (first) bitcast after the statepoint. See the
test case for an example.
Reviewers: igor-laevsky, reames
Subscribers: reames, alex, llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15789
llvm-svn: 256520
Summary: This patch changes gc.statepoint intrinsic's return type to token type instead of i32 type. Using token types could prevent LLVM to merge different gc.statepoint nodes into PHI nodes and cause further problems with gc relocations. The patch also changes the way on how gc.relocate and gc.result look for their corresponding gc.statepoint on unwind path. The current implementation uses the selector value extracted from a { i8*, i32 } landingpad as a hook to find the gc.statepoint, while the patch directly uses a token type landingpad (http://reviews.llvm.org/D15405) to find the gc.statepoint.
Reviewers: sanjoy, JosephTremoulet, pgavlin, igor-laevsky, mjacob
Subscribers: reames, mjacob, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15662
llvm-svn: 256443
Move several checks into isLegalStores. Also, delineate between those stores
that are memset-able and those that are memcpy-able.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15683
Patch by Haicheng Wu <haicheng@codeaurora.org>!
llvm-svn: 256336
Reasons:
1) The existing form was a form of false generality. None of the implemented GCStrategies use anything other than a type. Its becoming more and more clear we're going to need some type of strong GC pointer in the type system and we shouldn't pretend otherwise at this point.
2) The API was awkward when applied to vectors-of-pointers. The old one could have been made to work, but calling isGCManagedPointer(Ty->getScalarType()) is much cleaner than the Value alternatives.
3) The rewriting implementation effectively assumes the type based predicate as well. We should be consistent.
llvm-svn: 256312
Previously, "%" + name of the value was printed for each derived and base
pointer. This is correct for instructions, but wrong for e.g. globals.
llvm-svn: 256305
This patch removes all weight-related interfaces from BPI and replace
them by probability versions. With this patch, we won't use edge weight
anymore in either IR or MC passes. Edge probabilitiy is a better
representation in terms of CFG update and validation.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15519
llvm-svn: 256263
Summary:
These were deprecated 11 months ago when a generic
llvm.experimental.gc.result intrinsic, which works for all types, was added.
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames
Subscribers: sanjoy, chenli, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15719
llvm-svn: 256262
Summary:
Previously, RS4GC crashed in CreateGCRelocates() because it assumed
that every base is also in the array of live variables, which isn't true if a
live variable has a constant base.
This change fixes the crash by making sure CreateGCRelocates() won't try to
relocate a live variable with a constant base. This would be unnecessary
anyway because anything with a constant base won't move.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15556
llvm-svn: 256252
As shown by the included test case, it's reasonable to end up with constant references during base pointer calculation. The code actually handled this case just fine, we only had the assert to help isolate problems under the belief that constant references shouldn't be present in IR generated by managed frontends. This turned out to be wrong on two fronts: 1) Manual Jacobs is working on a language with constant references, and b) we found a case where the optimizer does create them in practice.
llvm-svn: 256079
Summary:
If Candiadte may have a different type from GEP, we should bitcast or
pointer cast it to GEP's type so that the later RAUW doesn't complain.
Added a test in nary-gep.ll
Reviewers: tra, meheff
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15618
llvm-svn: 256035
Inspired by the bug reported in 25846. Whatever we end up doing about that one, the value handle change is a generally good one since it will help catch this type of mistake more quickly.
Patch by: Manuel Jacob
llvm-svn: 255984
The rules for removing trivially dead stores are a lot less complicated than loads. Since we know the later store post dominates the former and the former dominates the later, unless the former has side effects other than the actual store, we can remove it. One slightly surprising thing is that we can freely remove atomic stores, even if the later one isn't atomic. There's no guarantee the atomic one was every visible.
For the moment, we don't handle DSE of ordered atomic stores. We could extend the same chain of reasoning to them, but the catch is we'd then have to model the ordering effect without a store instruction. Since our fences are a stronger than our operation orderings, simple using a fence isn't an obvious win. This arguable calls for a refinement in our fence specification, but that's (much) later work.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15352
llvm-svn: 255914
As of r255720, the loop pass manager will DTRT when passes update the
loop info for removed loops, so they no longer need to reach into
LPPassManager APIs to do this kind of transformation. This change very
nearly removes the need for the LPPassManager to even be passed into
loop passes - the only remaining pass that uses the LPM argument is
LoopUnswitch.
llvm-svn: 255797
Extend EarlyCSE with an additional style of dead store elimination. If we write back a value just read from that memory location, we can eliminate the store under the assumption that the value hasn't changed.
I'm implementing this mostly because I noticed the omission when looking at the code. It seemed strange to have InstCombine have a peephole which was more powerful than EarlyCSE. :)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15397
llvm-svn: 255739
A large number of loop utility functions take a `Pass *` and reach
into it to find out which analyses to preserve. There are a number of
problems with this:
- The APIs have access to pretty well any Pass state they want, so
it's hard to tell what they may or may not do.
- Other APIs have copied these and pass around a `Pass *` even though
they don't even use it. Some of these just hand a nullptr to the API
since the callers don't even have a pass available.
- Passes in the new pass manager don't work like the current ones, so
the APIs can't be used as is there.
Instead, we should explicitly thread the analysis results that we
actually care about through these APIs. This is both simpler and more
reusable.
llvm-svn: 255669
This moves the actual work to do loop rotation into standalone
functions with the analysis results they need passed in as arguments,
leaving the class itself as a relatively simple shim. This will make
the functions easy to reuse when we're ready to port this
transformation to the new pass manager.
llvm-svn: 255574
This just moves some callers after their callees. My next patch will
convert some of these methods to stand alone functions, and that diff
is more obviously NFC if I move these first. That change, in turn,
will make it much easier to port this pass to the new pass manager
once the loop pass manager is in place.
llvm-svn: 255573
While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on
top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies:
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design
but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM
experts.
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot
be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes.
This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation.
- catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward.
It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other
funclets.
- The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of
control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully
analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal
nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when
they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a
representation which forbade them upfront.
Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following:
- Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control
flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable.
- Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model
the constraints of funclet oriented EH.
- Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume
the token produced by the funclet which contains them.
- Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred
implicitly using coloring information.
N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the
veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a
look to make sure the results are reasonable.
Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139
llvm-svn: 255422
Revert "[DSE] Disable non-local DSE to see if the bots go green."
Revert "[DeadStoreElimination] Use range-based loops. NFC."
Revert "[DeadStoreElimination] Add support for non-local DSE."
llvm-svn: 255354
GlobalsAA's assumptions that passes do not escape globals not previously
escaped is not violated by AlignmentFromAssumptions and SLPVectorizer. Marking
them as such allows GlobalsAA to be preserved until GVN in the LTO pipeline.
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-December/092972.html
Patch by Vaivaswatha Nagaraj!
llvm-svn: 255348
We extend the search for redundant stores to predecessor blocks that
unconditionally lead to the block BB with the current store instruction. That
also includes single-block loops that unconditionally lead to BB, and
if-then-else blocks where then- and else-blocks unconditionally lead to BB.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13363
Patch by Ivan Baev <ibaev@codeaurora.org>!
llvm-svn: 255247
Summary:
LAA uses the PredicatedScalarEvolution interface, so it can produce
forward/backward dependences having SCEVs that are AddRecExprs only after being
transformed by PredicatedScalarEvolution.
Use PredicatedScalarEvolution to get the expected expressions.
Reviewers: anemet
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15382
llvm-svn: 255241
ScalarEvolution.h, in order to avoid cyclic dependencies between the Transform
and Analysis modules:
[LV][LAA] Add a layer over SCEV to apply run-time checked knowledge on SCEV expressions
Summary:
This change creates a layer over ScalarEvolution for LAA and LV, and centralizes the
usage of SCEV predicates. The SCEVPredicatedLayer takes the statically deduced knowledge
by ScalarEvolution and applies the knowledge from the SCEV predicates. The end goal is
that both LAA and LV should use this interface everywhere.
This also solves a problem involving the result of SCEV expression rewritting when
the predicate changes. Suppose we have the expression (sext {a,+,b}) and two predicates
P1: {a,+,b} has nsw
P2: b = 1.
Applying P1 and then P2 gives us {a,+,1}, while applying P2 and the P1 gives us
sext({a,+,1}) (the AddRec expression was changed by P2 so P1 no longer applies).
The SCEVPredicatedLayer maintains the order of transformations by feeding back
the results of previous transformations into new transformations, and therefore
avoiding this issue.
The SCEVPredicatedLayer maintains a cache to remember the results of previous
SCEV rewritting results. This also has the benefit of reducing the overall number
of expression rewrites.
Reviewers: mzolotukhin, anemet
Subscribers: jmolloy, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14296
llvm-svn: 255122
Summary:
This change creates a layer over ScalarEvolution for LAA and LV, and centralizes the
usage of SCEV predicates. The SCEVPredicatedLayer takes the statically deduced knowledge
by ScalarEvolution and applies the knowledge from the SCEV predicates. The end goal is
that both LAA and LV should use this interface everywhere.
This also solves a problem involving the result of SCEV expression rewritting when
the predicate changes. Suppose we have the expression (sext {a,+,b}) and two predicates
P1: {a,+,b} has nsw
P2: b = 1.
Applying P1 and then P2 gives us {a,+,1}, while applying P2 and the P1 gives us
sext({a,+,1}) (the AddRec expression was changed by P2 so P1 no longer applies).
The SCEVPredicatedLayer maintains the order of transformations by feeding back
the results of previous transformations into new transformations, and therefore
avoiding this issue.
The SCEVPredicatedLayer maintains a cache to remember the results of previous
SCEV rewritting results. This also has the benefit of reducing the overall number
of expression rewrites.
Reviewers: mzolotukhin, anemet
Subscribers: jmolloy, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14296
llvm-svn: 255115
This patch teaches the fully redundant load part of EarlyCSE how to forward from atomic and volatile loads and stores, and how to eliminate unordered atomics (only). This patch does not include dead store elimination support for unordered atomics, that will follow in the near future.
The basic idea is that we allow all loads and stores to be tracked by the AvailableLoad table. We store a bit in the table which tracks whether load/store was atomic, and then only replace atomic loads with ones which were also atomic.
No attempt is made to refine our handling of ordered loads or stores. Those are still treated as full fences. We could pretty easily extend the release fence handling to release stores, but that should be a separate patch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15337
llvm-svn: 255054
Summary:
Also add a stricter post-condition for IndVarSimplify.
Fixes PR25578. Test case by Michael Zolotukhin.
Reviewers: hfinkel, atrick, mzolotukhin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15059
llvm-svn: 254977
254950 ended up being not NFC. The previous code was overriding the flags for whether an instruction read or wrote memory using the target specific flags returned via TTI. I'd missed this in my refactoring. Since I mistakenly built only x86 and didn't notice the number of unsupported tests, I didn't catch that before the original checkin.
This raises an interesting issue though. Given we have function attributes (i.e. readonly, readnone, argmemonly) which describe the aliasing of intrinsics, why does TTI have this information overriding the instruction definition at all? I see no reason for this, but decided to preserve existing behavior for the moment. The root issue might be that we don't have a "writeonly" attribute.
Original commit message:
[EarlyCSE] Simplify and invert ParseMemoryInst [NFCI]
Restructure ParseMemoryInst - which was introduced to abstract over target specific load and stores instructions - to just query the underlying instructions. In theory, this could be slightly slower than caching the results, but in practice, it's very unlikely to be measurable.
The simple query scheme makes it far easier to understand, and much easier to extend with new queries. Given I'm about to need to add new query types, doing the cleanup first seemed worthwhile.
Do we still believe the target specific intrinsic handling is worthwhile in EarlyCSE? It adds quite a bit of complexity and makes the code harder to read. Being able to delete the abstraction entirely would be wonderful.
llvm-svn: 254957
Restructure ParseMemoryInst - which was introduced to abstract over target specific load and stores instructions - to just query the underlying instructions. In theory, this could be slightly slower than caching the results, but in practice, it's very unlikely to be measurable.
The simple query scheme makes it far easier to understand, and much easier to extend with new queries. Given I'm about to need to add new query types, doing the cleanup first seemed worthwhile.
Do we still believe the target specific intrinsic handling is worthwhile in EarlyCSE? It adds quite a bit of complexity and makes the code harder to read. Being able to delete the abstraction entirely would be wonderful.
llvm-svn: 254950
When the notion of target specific memory intrinsics was introduced to EarlyCSE, the commit confused the notions of volatile and simple memory access. Since I'm about to start working on this area, cleanup the naming so that patches aren't horribly confusing. Note that the actual implementation was always bailing if the load or store wasn't simple.
Reminder:
- "volatile" - C++ volatile, can't remove any memory operations, but in principal unordered
- "ordered" - imposes ordering constraints on other nearby memory operations
- "atomic" - can't be split or sheared. In LLVM terms, all "ordered" operations are also atomic so the predicate "isAtomic" is often used.
- "simple" - a load which is none of the above. These are normal loads and what most of the optimizer works with.
llvm-svn: 254805
time.
The new overloaded function is used when an attribute is added to a
large number of slots of an AttributeSet (for example, to function
parameters). This is much faster than calling AttributeSet::addAttribute
once per slot, because AttributeSet::getImpl (which calls
FoldingSet::FIndNodeOrInsertPos) is called only once per function
instead of once per slot.
With this commit, clang compiles a file which used to take over 22
minutes in just 13 seconds.
rdar://problem/23581000
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15085
llvm-svn: 254491
Terrifyingly, one of them is a mishandling of floating point vectors
in Constant::isZero(). How exactly this issue survived this long
is beyond me.
llvm-svn: 253655
Optimizations like LoadPRE in GVN will insert new instructions.
If the insertion point is in a already processed BB, they should
get a value number explicitly. If the insertion point is after
current instruction, then just leave it. However, current GVN framework
has no support for it.
In this patch, we just bail out if a VN can't be found.
Dfferential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14670
A test/Transforms/GVN/pr25440.ll
M lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp
llvm-svn: 253536
This bug would manifest in some very specific cases where all the following
conditions are fullfilled:
- GVN didn't remove block
- The regular GVN iteration didn't change the IR
- PRE is enabled
- PRE will not split critical edge
- The last instruction processed by PRE didn't change the IR
Because the CallGraph PassManager relies on this returned value to decide
if it needs to recompute a node after the execution of Function passes,
not returning the right value can lead to unexpected results.
Fix for: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24715
Patch by Wenxiang Qiu <vincentqiuuu@gmail.com>
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 253518
Note, this was reviewed (and more details are in) http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html
These intrinsics currently have an explicit alignment argument which is
required to be a constant integer. It represents the alignment of the
source and dest, and so must be the minimum of those.
This change allows source and dest to each have their own alignments
by using the alignment attribute on their arguments. The alignment
argument itself is removed.
There are a few places in the code for which the code needs to be
checked by an expert as to whether using only src/dest alignment is
safe. For those places, they currently take the minimum of src/dest
alignments which matches the current behaviour.
For example, code which used to read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* %dest, i8* %src, i32 500, i32 8, i1 false)
will now read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* align 8 %dest, i8* align 8 %src, i32 500, i1 false)
For out of tree owners, I was able to strip alignment from calls using sed by replacing:
(call.*llvm\.memset.*)i32\ [0-9]*\,\ i1 false\)
with:
$1i1 false)
and similarly for memmove and memcpy.
I then added back in alignment to test cases which needed it.
A similar commit will be made to clang which actually has many differences in alignment as now
IRBuilder can generate different source/dest alignments on calls.
In IRBuilder itself, a new argument was added. Instead of calling:
CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
you now call
CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, SrcAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
There is a temporary class (IntegerAlignment) which takes the source alignment and rejects
implicit conversion from bool. This is to prevent isVolatile here from passing its default
parameter to the source alignment.
Note, changes in future can now be made to codegen. I didn't change anything here, but this
change should enable better memcpy code sequences.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 253511
We sometimes create intermediate subtract instructions during
reassociation. Adding these to the worklist to revisit exposes many
additional reassociation opportunities.
Patch by Aditya Nandakumar.
llvm-svn: 253240
We tried to move the insertion point beyond instructions like landingpad
and cleanuppad.
However, we *also* tried to move past catchpad. This is problematic
because catchpad is also a terminator.
This fixes PR25541.
llvm-svn: 253238
Summary: Moving landingpads into successor basic blocks makes the
verifier sad. Teach Sink that much like PHI nodes and terminator
instructions, landingpads (and cleanuppads, etc.) may not be moved
between basic blocks.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14475
llvm-svn: 253182
This allows us to transform the below loop into a memcpy.
void test(unsigned *__restrict__ a, unsigned *__restrict__ b) {
for (int i = 2047; i >= 0; --i) {
a[i] = b[i];
}
}
This is the memcpy version of r251518, which added support for memset with
negative strided loops.
llvm-svn: 253091
First create a list of candidates, then transform. This simplifies the code in
that you have don't have to worry that you may be using an invalidated
iterator.
Previously, each time we created a memset/memcpy we would reevaluate the entire
loop potentially resulting in lots of redundant work for large basic blocks.
llvm-svn: 252817
This is fix for PR24059.
When we are hoisting instruction above some condition it may turn out
that metadata on this instruction was control dependant on the condition.
This metadata becomes invalid and we need to drop it.
This patch should cover most obvious places of speculative execution (which
I have found by greping isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute). I think there are more
cases but at least this change covers the severe ones.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14398
llvm-svn: 252604
Sanjoy Das