ActOnStartCXXMemberDeclaration. We haven't started the field collector on this
class yet, so don't stop it. Fixes a crash in the VS buildbot and a memory error
on all the others.
llvm-svn: 98760
on unqualified declarations.
Patch by Enea Zaffanella! Minimal adjustments: allocate the ExtInfo nodes
with the ASTContext and delete them during Destroy(). I audited a bunch of
Destroy methods at the same time, to ensure that the correct teardown was
being done.
llvm-svn: 98540
instantiation. Based on a patch by Enea Zaffanella! I found a way to
reduce some of the redundancy between TreeTransform's "standard"
FunctionProtoType transformation and TemplateInstantiator's override,
and I killed off the old SubstFunctionType by adding type source info
for the last cases where we were creating FunctionDecls without TSI
(at least that get passed through template instantiation).
llvm-svn: 98252
injected class name of a class template or class template partial specialization.
This is a non-canonical type; the canonical type is still a template
specialization type. This becomes the TypeForDecl of the pattern declaration,
which cleans up some amount of code (and complicates some other parts, but
whatever).
Fixes PR6326 and probably a few others, primarily by re-establishing a few
invariants about TypeLoc sizes.
llvm-svn: 98134
uninitialized. This seems not to be the case in C++0x, where we still
call the (trivial) default constructor for a POD class
(!). Previously, we had implemented only the C++0x rules; now we
implement both. Fixes PR6536.
llvm-svn: 97928
which has the label map, switch statement stack, etc. Previously, we
had a single set of maps in Sema (for the function) along with a stack
of block scopes. However, this lead to funky behavior with nested
functions, e.g., in the member functions of local classes.
The explicit-stack approach is far cleaner, and we retain a 1-element
cache so that we're not malloc/free'ing every time we enter a
function. Fixes PR6382.
Also, tweaked the unused-variable warning suppression logic to look at
errors within a given Scope rather than within a given function. The
prior code wasn't looking at the right number-of-errors count when
dealing with blocks, since the block's count would be deallocated
before we got to ActOnPopScope. This approach works with nested
blocks/functions, and gives tighter error recovery.
llvm-svn: 97518
re-declare them. This fixes PR6317. Also add the beginnings of an interesting
test case for p1 of [class.friend] which also covers PR6317.
llvm-svn: 97499
a fixme and PR6451.
Only perform jump checking if the containing function has no errors,
and add the infrastructure needed to do this.
On the testcase in the PR, we produce:
t.cc:6:3: error: illegal goto into protected scope
goto later;
^
t.cc:7:5: note: jump bypasses variable initialization
X x;
^
llvm-svn: 97497
errors, e.g.:
t.c:1:21: error: redefinition of parameter 'x'
int test(int x, int x);
^
t.c:1:14: note: previous declaration is here
int test(int x, int x);
^
llvm-svn: 96769
fixing up a few callers that thought they were propagating NoReturn
information but were in fact saying something about exception
specifications.
llvm-svn: 96766
are for out of line declarations more easily. This simplifies the logic and
handles the case of out-of-line class definitions correctly. Fixes PR6107.
llvm-svn: 96729
array allocated using the allocator in ASTContext. This addresses
these strings getting leaked when using a BumpPtrAllocator (in
ASTContext).
Fixes: <rdar://problem/7636765>
llvm-svn: 95853
Sema::ActOnUninitializedDecl over to InitializationSequence (with
default initialization), eliminating redundancy. More importantly, we
now check that a const definition in C++ has an initilizer, which was
an #if 0'd code for many, many months. A few other tweaks were needed
to get everything working again:
- Fix all of the places in the testsuite where we defined const
objects without initializers (now that we diagnose this issue)
- Teach instantiation of static data members to find the previous
declaration, so that we build proper redeclaration
chains. Previously, we had the redeclaration chain but built it
too late to be useful, because...
- Teach instantiation of static data member definitions not to try
to check an initializer if a previous declaration already had an
initializer. This makes sure that we don't complain about static
const data members with in-class initializers and out-of-line
definitions.
- Move all of the incomplete-type checking logic out of
Sema::FinalizeDeclaratorGroup; it makes more sense in
ActOnUnitializedDecl.
There may still be a few places where we can improve these
diagnostics. I'll address that as a separate commit.
llvm-svn: 95657
follows (as conservatively as possible) gcc's current behavior: attributes
written on return types that don't apply there are applied to the function
instead, etc. Only parse CC attributes as type attributes, not as decl attributes;
don't accepet noreturn as a decl attribute on ValueDecls, either (it still
needs to apply to other decls, like blocks). Consistently consume CC/noreturn
information throughout codegen; enforce this by removing their default values
in CodeGenTypes::getFunctionInfo().
llvm-svn: 95436
of a C++ record. Exposed a lot of problems where various routines were
silently doing The Wrong Thing (or The Acceptable Thing in The Wrong Order)
when presented with a non-definition. Also cuts down on memory usage.
llvm-svn: 95330
WHAT!?!
It turns out that Type::isPromotableIntegerType() was not considering
enumeration types to be promotable, so we would never do the
promotion despite having properly computed the promotion type when the
enum was defined. Various operations on values of enum type just
"worked" because we could still compute the integer rank of an enum
type; the oddity, however, is that operations such as "add an enum and
an unsigned" would often have an enum result type (!). The bug
actually showed up as a spurious -Wformat diagnostic
(<rdar://problem/7595366>), but in theory it could cause miscompiles.
In this commit:
- Enum types with a promotion type of "int" or "unsigned int" are
promotable.
- Tweaked the computation of promotable types for enums
- For all of the ABIs, treat enum types the same way as their
underlying types (*not* their promotion types) for argument passing
and return values
- Extend the ABI tester with support for enumeration types
llvm-svn: 95117
- In C++, prior to the closing '}', set the type of enumerators
based on the type of their initializer. Don't perform unary
conversions on the enumerator values.
- In C++, handle overflow when an enumerator has no initializer and
its value cannot be represented in the type of the previous
enumerator.
- In C, handle overflow more gracefully, by complaining and then
falling back to the C++ rules.
- In C, if the enumerator value is representable in an int, convert the
expression to the type 'int'.
Fixes PR5854 and PR4515.
llvm-svn: 95031
(1) libAnalysis is a generic analysis library that can be used by
Sema. It defines the CFG, basic dataflow analysis primitives, and
inexpensive flow-sensitive analyses (e.g. LiveVariables).
(2) libChecker contains the guts of the static analyzer, incuding the
path-sensitive analysis engine and domain-specific checks.
Now any clients that want to use the frontend to build their own tools
don't need to link in the entire static analyzer.
This change exposes various obvious cleanups that can be made to the
layout of files and headers in libChecker. More changes pending. :)
This change also exposed a layering violation between AnalysisContext
and MemRegion. BlockInvocationContext shouldn't explicitly know about
BlockDataRegions. For now I've removed the BlockDataRegion* from
BlockInvocationContext (removing context-sensitivity; although this
wasn't used yet). We need to have a better way to extend
BlockInvocationContext (and any LocationContext) to add
context-sensitivty.
llvm-svn: 94406
translation unit. This is temporary for function and block parameters;
template parameters can just stay this way, since Templates aren't
DeclContexts. This gives us the nice property that everything created
in a record DC should have access in C++.
llvm-svn: 94122
CallExprs as those edges help cause a n^2 explosion in the number of
destructor calls. Other consumers, such as static analysis, that
would like to have more a more complete CFG can select the inclusion
of those edges as CFG build time.
This also fixes up the two compilation users of CFGs to be tolerant of
having or not having those edges. All catch code is assumed be to
live if we didn't generate the exceptional edges for CallExprs.
llvm-svn: 94074
function template declared within a class template did not match a
function in another scope. We really need to rework how
friends-in-templates are semantically checked.
llvm-svn: 93642
do not look into base classes if there are any dependent base
classes. Instead, note in the lookup result that we couldn't look into
any dependent bases. Use that new result kind to detect when this case
occurs, so that we can fall back to treating the type/value/etc. as a
member of an unknown specialization.
Fixes an issue where we were resolving lookup at template definition
time and then missing an ambiguity at template instantiation time.
llvm-svn: 93497
finds nothing), and the current instantiation has dependent base
classes, treat the qualified lookup as if it referred to an unknown
specialization. Fixes PR6031.
llvm-svn: 93433
need an error term for the CFG. I suspect we'll always have to cope
with getCFG returning 0, though, I'd love to see even that possibility
removed.
llvm-svn: 93411
that name constructors, the endless joys of out-of-line constructor
definitions, and various other corner cases that the previous hack
never imagined. Fixes PR5688 and tightens up semantic analysis for
constructor names.
Additionally, fixed a problem where we wouldn't properly enter the
declarator scope of a parenthesized declarator. We were entering the
scope, then leaving it when we saw the ")"; now, we re-enter the
declarator scope before parsing the parameter list.
Note that we are forced to perform some tentative parsing within a
class (call it C) to tell the difference between
C(int); // constructor
and
C (f)(int); // member function
which is rather unfortunate. And, although it isn't necessary for
correctness, we use the same tentative-parsing mechanism for
out-of-line constructors to improve diagnostics in icky cases like:
C::C C::f(int); // error: C::C refers to the constructor name, but
// we complain nicely and recover by treating it as
// a type.
llvm-svn: 93322
latter may (eventually) perform multiple levels of desugaring (thus
breaking the newly-added tests) and the former is faster. Thanks, John!
llvm-svn: 93192
they redefine is a class-name but not a typedef-name, per C++0x
[dcl.typedef]p4. The code in the test was valid C++98 and is valid
C++0x, but an unintended consequence of DR56 made it ill-formed in
C++03 (which we were luck enough to implement). Fixes PR5455.
llvm-svn: 93188
result for a nested class whose first non-pure virtual member function
has an inline body. Previously, we were checking for the key function
before we had seen the (delayed) inline body.
llvm-svn: 92839
deterministic and work properly with templates. Once a class that
needs a vtable has been defined, we now do one if two things:
- If the class has no key function, we place the class on a list of
classes whose virtual functions will need to be "marked" at the
end of the translation unit. The delay until the end of the
translation unit is needed because we might see template
specializations of these virtual functions.
- If the class has a key function, we do nothing; when the key
function is defined, the class will be placed on the
aforementioned list.
At the end of the translation unit, we "mark" all of the virtual
functions of the classes on the list as used, possibly causing
template instantiation and other classes to be added to the
list. This gets LLVM's lib/Support/CommandLine.cpp compiling again.
llvm-svn: 92821
- All classes can have a key function; templates don't change that.
non-template classes when computing the key function.
- We always mark all of the virtual member functions of class
template instantiations.
- The vtable for an instantiation of a class template has weak
linkage.
We could probably use available_externally linkage for vtables of
classes instantiated by explicit instantiation declarations (extern
templates), but GCC doesn't do this and I'm not 100% that the ABI
permits it.
llvm-svn: 92753
assembly code. This avoids changing the bahvior when normal asm("")
statements are used.
The type of code affected would be:
void* t4(void) { __asm mov eax, fs:[0x10] }
I hope people like this version, if not, let me know.
llvm-svn: 92531
constructs:
- Instance variable lookup ("foo->ivar" and, in instance methods, "ivar")
- Property name lookup ("foo.prop")
- Superclasses
- Various places where a class name is required
- Protocol names (e.g., id<proto>)
This seems to cover many of the common places where typos could occur.
llvm-svn: 92449
attach the appropriate attributes to it. I don't think
this manifests as any real change though, we're still
not getting the right LLVM IR attributes out of codegen.
llvm-svn: 92316
tring str2;
we produce the following diagnostic + fix-it:
typo.cpp:15:1: error: unknown type name 'tring'; did you mean 'string'?
tring str2;
^~~~~
string
To make this really useful, we'll need to introduce typo correction in
many more places (wherever we do name lookup), and implement
declaration-vs-expression heuristics that cope with typos
better. However, for now this will handle the simple cases where we
already get good "unknown type name" diagnostics.
The LookupVisibleDecls functions are intended to be used by code
completion as well as typo correction; that refactoring will happen
later.
llvm-svn: 92308
Darwin's sekrit fourth argument. This should probably be factored to
let targets make target-specific decisions about what main() should look like.
Fixes rdar://problem/7414990
or if different platforms have radically different ideas of what they want in
llvm-svn: 92128
Sema::getTypeName.
"LookupNestedNameSpecifierName" isn't quite the right kind of lookup, though;
it doesn't ignore namespaces. Someone more familiar with the lookup code
should fix this properly.
llvm-svn: 91809
Because of the rules of base-class lookup* and the restrictions on typedefs, it
was actually impossible for this to cause any problems more serious than the
spurious acceptance of
template <class T> class A : B<A> { ... };
instead of
template <class T> class A : B<A<T> > { ... };
but I'm sure we can all agree that that is a very important restriction which
is well worth making another Parser->Sema call for.
(*) n.b. clang++ does not implement these rules correctly; we are not ignoring
non-type names
llvm-svn: 91792
the redeclaration problems in the [temp.explicit]p3 testcase worse, but I can
live with that; they'll need to be fixed more holistically anyhow.
llvm-svn: 91771
John McCall