forked from OSchip/llvm-project
cc63203908
The profitability check is: we don't want to create more than a single PHI per instruction sunk. We need to create the PHI unless we'll sink all of it's would-be incoming values. But there is a caveat there. This profitability check doesn't converge on the first iteration! If we first decide that we want to sink 10 instructions, but then determine that 5'th one is unprofitable to sink, that may result in us not sinking some instructions that resulted in determining that some other instruction we've determined to be profitable to sink becoming unprofitable. So we need to iterate until we converge, as in determine that all leftover instructions are profitable to sink. But, the direct approach of just re-iterating seems dumb, because in the worst case we'd find that the last instruction is unprofitable, which would result in revisiting instructions many many times. Instead, i think we can get away with just two passes - forward and backward. However then it isn't obvious what is the most performant way to update InstructionsToSink. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| 2010-03-30-InvokeCrash.ll | ||
| CoveredLookupTable.ll | ||
| MagicPointer.ll | ||
| PR29163.ll | ||
| PR30210.ll | ||
| SpeculativeExec.ll | ||
| bug-25299.ll | ||
| combine-parallel-mem-md.ll | ||
| critedge-assume.ll | ||
| disable-lookup-table.ll | ||
| empty-cleanuppad.ll | ||
| invalidate-dom.ll | ||
| lit.local.cfg | ||
| merge-cleanuppads.ll | ||
| merge-cond-stores-cost.ll | ||
| pr39187-g.ll | ||
| remove-debug-2.ll | ||
| remove-debug.ll | ||
| safe-low-bit-extract.ll | ||
| sink-common-code.ll | ||
| speculate-cttz-ctlz.ll | ||
| switch-covered-bug.ll | ||
| switch-table-bug.ll | ||
| switch_to_lookup_table.ll | ||
| unreachable-blocks.ll | ||