forked from OSchip/llvm-project
ddfdb32b30
LWG 3013 points out that the constructors and increment members of the directory iterators need to allocate, and therefore cannot be marked noexcept. It also points out that `is_empty` and `copy` likely need to allocate as well, and as such can also not be noexcept. This patch speculatively implements the resolution removing noexcept, because libc++ does indeed have the possibility of throwing on allocation failure. llvm-svn: 316941 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| fs.op.absolute | ||
| fs.op.canonical | ||
| fs.op.copy | ||
| fs.op.copy_file | ||
| fs.op.copy_symlink | ||
| fs.op.create_directories | ||
| fs.op.create_directory | ||
| fs.op.create_directory_symlink | ||
| fs.op.create_hard_link | ||
| fs.op.create_symlink | ||
| fs.op.current_path | ||
| fs.op.equivalent | ||
| fs.op.exists | ||
| fs.op.file_size | ||
| fs.op.hard_lk_ct | ||
| fs.op.is_block_file | ||
| fs.op.is_char_file | ||
| fs.op.is_directory | ||
| fs.op.is_empty | ||
| fs.op.is_fifo | ||
| fs.op.is_other | ||
| fs.op.is_regular_file | ||
| fs.op.is_socket | ||
| fs.op.is_symlink | ||
| fs.op.last_write_time | ||
| fs.op.permissions | ||
| fs.op.read_symlink | ||
| fs.op.remove | ||
| fs.op.remove_all | ||
| fs.op.rename | ||
| fs.op.resize_file | ||
| fs.op.space | ||
| fs.op.status | ||
| fs.op.status_known | ||
| fs.op.symlink_status | ||
| fs.op.system_complete | ||
| fs.op.temp_dir_path | ||