forked from OSchip/llvm-project
				
			
		
			
				
	
	
		
			32 lines
		
	
	
		
			1.1 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			32 lines
		
	
	
		
			1.1 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
| =====================
 | |
| TableGen Deficiencies
 | |
| =====================
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. contents::
 | |
|    :local:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Introduction
 | |
| ============
 | |
| 
 | |
| Despite being very generic, TableGen has some deficiencies that have been
 | |
| pointed out numerous times. The common theme is that, while TableGen allows
 | |
| you to build Domain-Specific-Languages, the final languages that you create
 | |
| lack the power of other DSLs, which in turn increase considerably the size
 | |
| and complexity of TableGen files.
 | |
| 
 | |
| At the same time, TableGen allows you to create virtually any meaning of
 | |
| the basic concepts via custom-made back-ends, which can pervert the original
 | |
| design and make it very hard for newcomers to understand it.
 | |
| 
 | |
| There are some in favour of extending the semantics even more, but making sure
 | |
| back-ends adhere to strict rules. Others suggesting we should move to more
 | |
| powerful DSLs designed with specific purposes, or even re-using existing
 | |
| DSLs.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Known Problems
 | |
| ==============
 | |
| 
 | |
| TODO: Add here frequently asked questions about why TableGen doesn't do
 | |
| what you want, how it might, and how we could extend/restrict it to
 | |
| be more use friendly.
 |