Louis Dionne 9f77b1a1de [pair] Mark constructors as conditionally noexcept ... Summary: std::tuple marks its constructors as noexcept when the corresponding memberwise constructors are noexcept too -- this commit improves std::pair so that it behaves the same. This is a re-application of r348824, which broke the build in C++03 mode because a test was marked as supported in C++03 when it shouldn't be. Note: I did not add support in the explicit and non-explicit `pair(_Tuple&& __p)` constructors because those are non-standard extensions, and supporting them properly is tedious (we have to copy the rvalue-referenceness of the deduced _Tuple&& onto the result of tuple_element). <rdar://problem/29537079> Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48669 llvm-svn: 348847		2018-12-11 14:22:28 +00:00
..
pair.astuple	Remove unneeded typename from test	2017-10-10 07:42:19 +00:00
pair.piecewise	Cleanup _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_<c++11-feature> in the utilities library	2017-04-19 00:56:32 +00:00
pairs.general	…
pairs.pair	[pair] Mark constructors as conditionally noexcept	2018-12-11 14:22:28 +00:00
pairs.spec	[libcxx] [test] Fix MSVC warning C4244 "conversion from 'X' to 'Y', possible loss of data", part 7/7.	2016-12-08 21:38:57 +00:00
nothing_to_do.pass.cpp	…