Asiri Rathnayake 6edc12c886 [libcxx] Improve tests to use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive ... Quite a few libcxx tests seem to follow the format: #if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > X // Do test. #else // Empty test. #endif We should instead use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive to exclude the test on earlier C++ standards. This gives us a more accurate number of test passes for those standards and avoids unnecessary conflicts with other lit directives on the same tests. Reviewers: bcraig, ericwf, mclow.lists Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20730 llvm-svn: 271108		2016-05-28 08:57:35 +00:00
..
thread.lock.shared.cons	[libcxx] Improve tests to use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive	2016-05-28 08:57:35 +00:00
thread.lock.shared.locking	Make it possible to build a no-exceptions variant of libcxx.	2015-11-10 11:41:22 +00:00
thread.lock.shared.mod	Refactor shared_timed_mutex tests.	2015-08-22 21:24:01 +00:00
thread.lock.shared.obs	Refactor shared_timed_mutex tests.	2015-08-22 21:24:01 +00:00
types.pass.cpp	Refactor shared_timed_mutex tests.	2015-08-22 21:24:01 +00:00