forked from OSchip/llvm-project
50 lines
1.3 KiB
C++
50 lines
1.3 KiB
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
|
|
|
|
namespace test0 {
|
|
char* p = 0;
|
|
template<class T> T g(T x = &p) { return x; }
|
|
template int g<int>(int); // OK even though &p isn't an int.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Don't impose access restrictions on explicit instantiations.
|
|
namespace test1 {
|
|
class A {
|
|
class Private {};
|
|
public:
|
|
typedef Private Public;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template <class T> class Temp {
|
|
static Temp<A::Public> make() { return Temp<A::Public>(); }
|
|
};
|
|
template class Temp<A::Private>;
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: this ought to be an error, but it isn't because Sema is
|
|
// silently failing to create a declaration for the explicit
|
|
// instantiation.
|
|
template class Temp<A::Private> Temp<int>::make();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Don't impose access restrictions on explicit specializations,
|
|
// either. This goes here because it's an extension of the rule for
|
|
// explicit instantiations and doesn't have any independent support.
|
|
namespace test2 {
|
|
class A {
|
|
class Private {}; // expected-note {{implicitly declared private here}}
|
|
public:
|
|
typedef Private Public;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template <class T> class Temp {
|
|
static Temp<A::Public> make();
|
|
};
|
|
template <> class Temp<A::Private> {
|
|
public:
|
|
Temp(int x) {}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template <> class Temp<A::Private> Temp<int>::make() { // expected-error {{'Private' is a private member of 'test2::A'}}
|
|
return Temp<A::Public>(0);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|