John McCall dd1eca34b5 My original patch missed the virtual-base case for destroying ... base-class subojects. Incidentally, thinking about virtual bases makes it clear to me that we're not appropriately computing the access to the virtual base's member because we're not computing the best possible access to the virtual base at all; in fact, we're basically assuming it's public. I'll file a separate PR about that. llvm-svn: 154346		2012-04-09 21:51:56 +00:00
..
p1-cxx11.cpp	Fix the access check performed as part of the determination of whether	2012-04-09 20:53:23 +00:00
p1.cpp	My original patch missed the virtual-base case for destroying	2012-04-09 21:51:56 +00:00