Louis Dionne 31cbe0f240 [libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite ... C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926		2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
..
alloc.errors	[libc++] Remove useless nothing_to_do.pass.cpp tests	2020-04-03 13:48:34 -04:00
new.delete	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
ptr.launder	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
align_val_t.pass.cpp	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
destroying_delete_t.pass.cpp	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
destroying_delete_t_declaration.pass.cpp	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
nothrow_t.fail.cpp	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
nothrow_t.pass.cpp	[libc++] Take 2: Implement LWG 2510	2019-09-26 14:51:10 +00:00