forked from OSchip/llvm-project
![]() C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
delete_align_val_t_replace.pass.cpp | ||
new_align_val_t.pass.cpp | ||
new_align_val_t_nothrow.pass.cpp | ||
new_align_val_t_nothrow_replace.pass.cpp | ||
new_align_val_t_replace.pass.cpp | ||
new_array.pass.cpp | ||
new_array_nothrow.pass.cpp | ||
new_array_nothrow_replace.pass.cpp | ||
new_array_replace.pass.cpp | ||
new_size.verify.cpp | ||
new_size_align.verify.cpp | ||
new_size_align_nothrow.verify.cpp | ||
new_size_nothrow.verify.cpp | ||
sized_delete_array11.pass.cpp | ||
sized_delete_array14.pass.cpp | ||
sized_delete_array_calls_unsized_delete_array.pass.cpp | ||
sized_delete_array_fsizeddeallocation.pass.cpp |