parent
162dfc3e6b
commit
bfe2c24c80
|
|
@ -2346,3 +2346,13 @@ Note that bb1 and bb2 are the same. This doesn't happen at the IR level
|
||||||
because one call is passing an i32 and the other is passing an i64.
|
because one call is passing an i32 and the other is passing an i64.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I see this sort of pattern in 176.gcc in a few places (e.g. the start of
|
||||||
|
store_bit_field). The rem should be replaced with a multiply and subtract:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
%3 = sdiv i32 %A, %B
|
||||||
|
%4 = srem i32 %A, %B
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Similarly for udiv/urem.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue