This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
More work for temp.friend p9, this fixes a previous bug where we didn't
properly consider a friend to depend on the enclosing template if it
only did so via an NTTP.
This makes use of the changes introduced in D134604, in order to
instantiate alias templates witn a final sugared substitution.
This comes at no additional relevant cost.
Since we don't track / unique them in specializations, we wouldn't be
able to resugar them later anyway.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136565
This makes use of the changes introduced in D134604, in order to
instantiate non-type template parameters and default template arguments
with a final sugared substitution.
This comes at no additional relevant cost.
Since we don't track / unique them in specializations, we wouldn't be
able to resugar them later anyway.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136564
This patch reverts
- commit d4b1964f05
- commit 59f0827e2cf3755834620e7e0b6d946832440f80([clang] Instantiate alias templates with sugar)
As it makes clang fail to pass some code it used to compile.
See comments: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136564#3891065
template-template parameters. Although it effects whether a template can be
used as an argument for another template, the constraint seems not to
be checked, nor other major implementations (GCC, MSVC, et al.) check it.
Additionally, Part-A of the document seems to have been implemented.
So mark P0857R0 as completed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134128
Since we don't unique specializations for concepts, we can just instantiate
them with the sugared template arguments, at negligible cost.
If we don't track their specializations, we can't resugar them later
anyway, and that would be more expensive than just instantiating them
sugared in the first place since it would require an additional pass.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136566
This makes use of the changes introduced in D134604, in order to
instantiate alias templates witn a final sugared substitution.
This comes at no additional relevant cost.
Since we don't track / unique them in specializations, we wouldn't be
able to resugar them later anyway.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136565
This makes use of the changes introduced in D134604, in order to
instantiate non-type template parameters and default template arguments
with a final sugared substitution.
This comes at no additional relevant cost.
Since we don't track / unique them in specializations, we wouldn't be
able to resugar them later anyway.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136564
Implements the changes required to perform substitution with
non-canonical template arguments, and to 'finalize' them
by not placing 'Subst' nodes.
A finalized substitution means we won't resugar them later,
because these templates themselves were eagerly substituted
with the intended arguments at the point of use. We may still
resugar other templates used within those, though.
This patch does not actually implement any uses of this
functionality, those will be added in subsequent patches,
so expect no changes to existing tests.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134604
Since these are much like template type aliases, where we don't
track a specialization for them and just substitute them eagerly,
we can't resugar them anyway, and there is no relevant cost in just
performing a finalizing sugared substitution.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136563
Makes CheckTemplateArgumentList and the template deduction functions
produce a sugared converted argument list in addition to the canonical one.
This is mostly NFC except that we hook this up to a few diagnostics in
SemaOverload.
The infrastructure here will be used in subsequent patches
where we perform a finalized sugared substitution for entities
which we do not unique per specializations on canonical arguments,
and later on will be used for template specialization resugaring.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133874
Since we don't unique specializations for concepts, we can just instantiate
them with the sugared template arguments, at negligible cost.
If we don't track their specializations, we can't resugar them later
anyway, and that would be more expensive than just instantiating them
sugared in the first place since it would require an additional pass.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136566
This makes use of the changes introduced in D134604, in order to
instantiate alias templates witn a final sugared substitution.
This comes at no additional relevant cost.
Since we don't track / unique them in specializations, we wouldn't be
able to resugar them later anyway.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136565
This makes use of the changes introduced in D134604, in order to
instantiate non-type template parameters and default template arguments
with a final sugared substitution.
This comes at no additional relevant cost.
Since we don't track / unique them in specializations, we wouldn't be
able to resugar them later anyway.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136564
Implements the changes required to perform substitution with
non-canonical template arguments, and to 'finalize' them
by not placing 'Subst' nodes.
A finalized substitution means we won't resugar them later,
because these templates themselves were eagerly substituted
with the intended arguments at the point of use. We may still
resugar other templates used within those, though.
This patch does not actually implement any uses of this
functionality, those will be added in subsequent patches,
so expect no changes to existing tests.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134604
Since these are much like template type aliases, where we don't
track a specialization for them and just substitute them eagerly,
we can't resugar them anyway, and there is no relevant cost in just
performing a finalizing sugared substitution.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136563
Makes CheckTemplateArgumentList and the template deduction functions
produce a sugared converted argument list in addition to the canonical one.
This is mostly NFC except that we hook this up to a few diagnostics in
SemaOverload.
The infrastructure here will be used in subsequent patches
where we perform a finalized sugared substitution for entities
which we do not unique per specializations on canonical arguments,
and later on will be used for template specialization resugaring.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133874
Removes a bunch of obsolete methods in favor of a single one returning
an ArrayRef of TemplateArgument.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136602
This reverts commit cecc9a92cf.
The problem ended up being how we were handling the lambda-context in
code generation: we were assuming any decl context here would be a
named-decl, but that isn't the case. Instead, we just replace it with
the concept's owning context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136451
This reverts commit b876f6e2f2.
Still getting build failures on PPC AIX that aren't obvious what is causing
them, so reverting while I try to figure this out.
This reverts commit b7c922607c.
This seems to cause some problems with some modules related things,
which makes me think I should have updated the version-major in
ast-bit-codes? Going to revert to confirm this was a problem, then
change that and re-try a commit.
As that bug reports, the problem here is that the lambda's
'context-decl' was not set to the concept, and the lambda picked up
template arguments from the concept. SO, we failed to get the correct
template arguments in SemaTemplateInstantiate.
However, a Concept Specialization is NOT a decl, its an expression, so
we weren't able to put the concept in the decl tree like we needed.
This patch introduces a ConceptSpecializationDecl, which is the smallest
type possible to use for this purpose, containing only the template
arguments.
The net memory impliciation of this is turning a
trailing-objects into a pointer to a type with trailing-objects, so it
should be minor.
As future work, we may consider giving this type more responsibility, or
figuring out how to better merge duplicates, but as this is just a
template-argument collection at the moment, there isn't much value to
it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136451
The way this code checks whether a pointer is null is wrong for other
reasons; it doesn't actually check whether a null pointer constant is a
"constant" in the C++ standard sense. But this fix at least makes sure
we don't treat a non-null pointer as if it were null.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57883
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134928
This is a change to how we represent type subsitution in the AST.
Instead of only storing the replaced type, we track the templated
entity we are substituting, plus an index.
We modify MLTAL to track the templated entity at each level.
Otherwise, it's much more expensive to go from the template parameter back
to the templated entity, and not possible to do in some cases, as when
we instantiate outer templates, parameters might still reference the
original entity.
This also allows us to very cheaply lookup the templated entity we saw in
the naming context and find the corresponding argument it was replaced
from, such as for implementing template specialization resugaring.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131858
As another regression from the Deferred Concepts Instantiation patch, we
weren't properly detecting that a friend referenced its containing
Record when it referred to it without its template parameters. This
patch makes sure that we do.
Previously we were stripping these normally inherited attributes during
explicit specialization. However for class template member functions
(but not function templates), MSVC keeps the attribute.
This makes Clang match that behavior, and fixes GitHub issue #54717
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135154
As @mizvekov suggested in D134772. This works great for D128750 when
dealing with AutoType's.
Reviewed By: mizvekov, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135088
As fallout of the Deferred Concept Instantiation patch (babdef27c5), we
got a number of reports of a regression, where we asserted when
instantiating a constraint on a generic lambda inside of a variable
template. See: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57958
The problem was that getTemplateInstantiationArgs function only walked
up declaration contexts, and missed that this is not necessarily the
case with a lambda (which can ALSO be in a separate context).
This patch refactors the getTemplateInstantiationArgs function in a way
that is hopefully more readable, and fixes the problem with the concepts
on a generic lambda.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134874
This implements WG14 N2927 and WG14 N2930, which together define the
feature for typeof and typeof_unqual, which get the type of their
argument as either fully qualified or fully unqualified. The argument
to either operator is either a type name or an expression. If given a
type name, the type information is pulled directly from the given name.
If given an expression, the type information is pulled from the
expression. Recursive use of these operators is allowed and has the
expected behavior (the innermost operator is resolved to a type, and
that's used to resolve the next layer of typeof specifier, until a
fully resolved type is determined.
Note, we already supported typeof in GNU mode as a non-conforming
extension and we are *not* exposing typeof_unqual as a non-conforming
extension in that mode, nor are we exposing typeof or typeof_unqual as
a nonconforming extension in other language modes. The GNU variant of
typeof supports a form where the parentheses are elided from the
operator when given an expression (e.g., typeof 0 i = 12;). When in C2x
mode, we do not support this extension.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134286
This patch implements P0634r3 that removes the need for 'typename' in certain contexts.
For example,
```
template <typename T>
using foo = T::type; // ok
```
This is also allowed in previous language versions as an extension, because I think it's pretty useful. :)
Reviewed By: #clang-language-wg, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53847
Apparently TransformDecl in TreeTransform can be called with a nullptr
for a Decl, so my casts were illegal. The fix here is to add an early
exit to my TransformDecl.
This reverts commit 95d94a6775.
This implements the deferred concepts instantiation, which should allow
the libstdc++ ranges to properly compile, and for the CRTP to work for
constrained functions.
Since the last attempt, this has fixed the issues from @wlei and
@mordante.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907
This change allows us to represent in the AST some specific
circumstances where we substitute a template parameter type
which is part of the underlying type of a previous substitution.
This presently happens in some circumstances dealing with
substitution of defaulted parameters of template template
parameters, and in some other cases during concepts substitution.
The main motivation for this change is for the future use in the
implementation of template specialization resugaring, as this will
allow us to represent a substitution with sugared types.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132816
Implement suggested fix for [[ https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2628.html | DR2628. ]] Couldn't update the DR docs because there hasn't been a DR index since it was filed, but the tests still run in CI.
Note: I only transfer the constructor constraints, not the struct constraints. I think that's OK because the struct constraints are the same
for all constructors so they don't affect the overload resolution, and if they deduce to something that doesn't pass the constraints
we catch it anyway. So (hopefully) that should be more efficient without sacrificing correctness.
Closes:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57646https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/43829
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134145
Kazu Hirata