Clang incorrectly applied the packed attribute to base classes. Per GCC's
documentation and as can be observed from its behavior, packed only applies to
members, not base classes.
This change is conditioned behind -fclang-abi-compat so that an ABI break can
be avoided by users if desired.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46218
llvm-svn: 331136
layout" rules.
The new rules say that a standard-layout struct has its first non-static
data member and all base classes at offset 0, and consider a class to
not be standard-layout if that would result in multiple subobjects of a
single type having the same address.
We track "is C++11 standard-layout class" separately from "is
standard-layout class" so that the ABIs that need this information can
still use it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45176
llvm-svn: 329332
Make types with sizes that aren't a power of two an error (that can
be disabled) in structs with ms_struct layout, except on mingw where
the situation is quite likely to occur and GCC handles it silently.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43908
llvm-svn: 326476
So I wrote a clang-tidy check to lint out redundant `isa`, `cast`, and
`dyn_cast`s for fun. This is a portion of what it found for clang; I
plan to do similar cleanups in LLVM and other subprojects when I find
time.
Because of the volume of changes, I explicitly avoided making any change
that wasn't highly local and obviously correct to me (e.g. we still have
a number of foo(cast<Bar>(baz)) that I didn't touch, since overloading
is a thing and the cast<Bar> did actually change the type -- just up the
class hierarchy).
I also tried to leave the types we were cast<>ing to somewhere nearby,
in cases where it wasn't locally obvious what we were dealing with
before.
llvm-svn: 326416
When targeting GNU/MinGW for i386, the size of the "long double" data
type is 12 bytes (while it is 8 bytes in MSVC). When building
with -mms-bitfields to have struct layouts match MSVC, data types
are laid out in a struct with alignment according to their size.
However, this doesn't make sense for the long double type, since
it doesn't match MSVC at all, and aligning to a non-power-of-2
size triggers other asserts later.
This matches what GCC does, aligning a long double to 4 bytes
in structs on i386 even when -mms-bitfields is specified.
This fixes asserts when using the max_align_t data type when
building for MinGW/i386 with the -mms-bitfields flag.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43734
llvm-svn: 326173
The patch ensures that a new storage unit is created when the new bitfield's
size is wider than the available bits.
rdar://36343145
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42660
llvm-svn: 323921
Summary:
Convert clang::LangAS to a strongly typed enum
Currently both clang AST address spaces and target specific address spaces
are represented as unsigned which can lead to subtle errors if the wrong
type is passed. It is especially confusing in the CodeGen files as it is
not possible to see what kind of address space should be passed to a
function without looking at the implementation.
I originally made this change for our LLVM fork for the CHERI architecture
where we make extensive use of address spaces to differentiate between
capabilities and pointers. When merging the upstream changes I usually
run into some test failures or runtime crashes because the wrong kind of
address space is passed to a function. By converting the LangAS enum to a
C++11 we can catch these errors at compile time. Additionally, it is now
obvious from the function signature which kind of address space it expects.
I found the following errors while writing this patch:
- ItaniumRecordLayoutBuilder::LayoutField was passing a clang AST address
space to TargetInfo::getPointer{Width,Align}()
- TypePrinter::printAttributedAfter() prints the numeric value of the
clang AST address space instead of the target address space.
However, this code is not used so I kept the current behaviour
- initializeForBlockHeader() in CGBlocks.cpp was passing
LangAS::opencl_generic to TargetInfo::getPointer{Width,Align}()
- CodeGenFunction::EmitBlockLiteral() was passing a AST address space to
TargetInfo::getPointerWidth()
- CGOpenMPRuntimeNVPTX::translateParameter() passed a target address space
to Qualifiers::addAddressSpace()
- CGOpenMPRuntimeNVPTX::getParameterAddress() was using
llvm::Type::getPointerTo() with a AST address space
- clang_getAddressSpace() returns either a LangAS or a target address
space. As this is exposed to C I have kept the current behaviour and
added a comment stating that it is probably not correct.
Other than this the patch should not cause any functional changes.
Reviewers: yaxunl, pcc, bader
Reviewed By: yaxunl, bader
Subscribers: jlebar, jholewinski, nhaehnle, Anastasia, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38816
llvm-svn: 315871
Summary:
Change the condition of this unnecessary packed warning. The packed is unnecessary when
1. the alignment of the struct/class won't alter.
2. the size is unchanged.
3. the offset of each field is the same.
Remove all field-level warning.
Reviewers: chh, akyrtzi, rtrieu
Reviewed By: chh
Subscribers: rsmith, srhines, cfe-commits, xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34114
llvm-svn: 309750
According to the documentation, when encoding a bit-field, GNU runtime
needs its starting position in addition to its type and size.
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Type-encoding.html
Prior to r297702, the starting position information was not being
encoded, which is incorrect, and after r297702, an assertion started to
fail because an ObjCIvarDecl was being passed to a function expecting a
FieldDecl.
This commit moves LookupFieldBitOffset to ASTContext and uses the
function to encode the starting position of bit-fields.
llvm-svn: 306364
The layout_version attribute is pretty straightforward: use the layout
rules from version XYZ of MSVC when used like
struct __declspec(layout_version(XYZ)) S {};
The empty_bases attribute is more interesting. It tries to get the C++
empty base optimization to fire more often by tweaking the MSVC ABI
rules in subtle ways:
1. Disable the leading and trailing zero-sized object flags if a class
is marked __declspec(empty_bases) and is empty.
This means that given:
struct __declspec(empty_bases) A {};
struct __declspec(empty_bases) B {};
struct C : A, B {};
'C' will have size 1 and nvsize 0 despite not being annotated
__declspec(empty_bases).
2. When laying out virtual or non-virtual bases, disable the injection
of padding between classes if the most derived class is marked
__declspec(empty_bases).
This means that given:
struct A {};
struct B {};
struct __declspec(empty_bases) C : A, B {};
'C' will have size 1 and nvsize 0.
3. When calculating the offset of a non-virtual base, choose offset zero
if the most derived class is marked __declspec(empty_bases) and the
base is empty _and_ has an nvsize of 0.
Because of the ABI rules, this does not mean that empty bases
reliably get placed at offset 0!
For example:
struct A {};
struct B {};
struct __declspec(empty_bases) C : A, B { virtual ~C(); };
'C' will be pointer sized to account for the vfptr at offset 0.
'A' and 'B' will _not_ be at offset 0 despite being empty!
Instead, they will be located right after the vfptr.
This occurs due to the interaction betweeen non-virtual base layout
and virtual function pointer injection: injection occurs after the
nv-bases and shifts them down by the size of a pointer.
llvm-svn: 270457
"aligned", by Vladimir Yakovlev
Fix clang/gcc incompatibility of bitfields layout in the presence of
pragma packed and attributes aligned and packed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17023
llvm-svn: 261321
C++ emits vtables for classes that have key function present in the
current TU. While we compile CUDA the fact that key function was found
in this TU does not mean that we are going to generate code for it. E.g.
vtable for a class with host-only methods should not (and can not) be
generated on device side, because we'll never generate code for them
during device-side compilation.
This patch adds an extra CUDA-specific check during key method computation
and filters out potential key methods that are not suitable for this side
of CUDA compilation.
When we codegen vtable, entries for unsuitable methods are set to null.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15309
llvm-svn: 255911
This was already being done when injecting the VBPtr, but not
when injecting the VFPtr. This fixes a number of tests in LLDB's
test suite.
Reviewed by: David Majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13276
llvm-svn: 249085
alignment is ignored, and they always allocate a complete
storage unit.
Also, change the dumping of AST record layouts: use the more
readable C++-style dumping even in C, include bitfield offset
information in the dump, and don't print sizeof/alignof
information for fields of record type, since we don't do so
for bases or other kinds of field.
rdar://22275433
llvm-svn: 245514
Summary:
The vtable takes its DLL storage class from the class, not the key
function. When they disagree, the vtable won't be exported by the DLL
that defines the key function. The easiest way to ensure that importers
of the class emit their own vtable is to say that the class has no key
function.
Reviewers: hans, majnemer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11913
llvm-svn: 244488
RecordLayoutBuilder is an inaccruate name because it does not build all
records. It only builds layouts for targets using the Itanium C++ ABI.
llvm-svn: 243225
MSVC 2015 appears to be unable to find the correct operator== here. I
haven't yet filed a bug with Microsoft as I've been unable to create a
reduced test case.
llvm-svn: 237862
It broke test/PCH/headersearch.cpp because it was using -Wpadding, which
only works for Itanium layout. Before this commit, we would use Itanium
record layout when using PCH, which is crazy. Now that the test uses an
explicit Itanium triple, we can reland.
llvm-svn: 230525
Covered by existing tests in test/CodeGen/override-layout.c and
test/CodeGenCXX/override-layout.cpp. Seriously, they found real bugs in
my code. :)
llvm-svn: 230446
Summary:
We should avoid a tail padding not only if the last field
has zero size but also if the last field is a struct with a flexible array.
If/when http://reviews.llvm.org/D5478 is committed,
this will also handle the case of structs with zero-sized arrays.
Reviewers: majnemer, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5924
llvm-svn: 220708
Summary:
The general approach is to add extra paddings after every field
in AST/RecordLayoutBuilder.cpp, then add code to CTORs/DTORs that poisons the paddings
(CodeGen/CGClass.cpp).
Everything is done under the flag -fsanitize-address-field-padding.
The blacklist file (-fsanitize-blacklist) allows to avoid the transformation
for given classes or source files.
See also https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/IntraObjectOverflow
Test Plan: run SPEC2006 and some of the Chromium tests with -fsanitize-address-field-padding
Reviewers: samsonov, rnk, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: majnemer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5687
llvm-svn: 219961
Empty records do not always have size equivalent to their alignment.
They only do so when their alignment is at least as large as the minimum
empty struct size: 1 byte in C++ and 4 bytes in C.
llvm-svn: 218661
Usually, overriding a virtual function defined in a virtual base
required emission of a vtordisp slot in the record. However no vtordisp
is needed if the overriding function is pure; it should be impossible to
observe the pure virtual method.
This fixes PR21046.
llvm-svn: 218340
The MS ABI has a notion of 'required alignment' for fields; this
alignment supercedes pragma pack directives.
MSVC takes into account alignment attributes on typedefs when
determining whether or not a field has a certain required alignment.
Do the same in clang by tracking whether or not we saw such an attribute
when calculating the type's bitwidth and alignment.
This fixes PR20418.
Reviewers: rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4714
llvm-svn: 214274
We would correctly insert sufficiently aligned padding between vbases
when our leading base was empty, however we would neglect to increase
the required alignment of the most derived class.
This fixes PR20315.
llvm-svn: 213123
No functionality changed, just some cleanups:
- Switch some loops to range-based for.
- Name some iterators with a more creative name than "I".
- Reduce dependence on auto. Does RD->bases() give you a list of
CXXBaseSpecifiers or CXXRecordDecls? It's more clear to just say which
upfront.
llvm-svn: 213121
Previously, it was believed that #pragma vtordisp(0) would prohibit the
generation of any and all vtordisps.
In actuality, it only disables the generation of additional vtordisps.
This fixes PR19413.
llvm-svn: 206124
A portion of the vtordisp computation that was previously unguarded by a
test for the declaration of user defined constructors/destructors was
erroniously adding vtordisps to things that shouldn't have them. This
patch correctly guards that codepath. In addition, it updates the
comments to make them more clear. Test case is included.
llvm-svn: 206077
This patch updates the comments in RecordLayoutBuilder about record
layout in the MS-ABI. Also, I added a section about known
incompatibilities.
llvm-svn: 206010
In version 9 (VS2010) (and prior)? versions of msvc, if the last field
in a record was a bitfield padding equal to the size of the storage
class of that bitfield was added before each vbase and vtordisp. This
patch removes that feature from clang and updates the lit tests to
reflect it.
llvm-svn: 206004
The vbptr is injected after the last non-virtual base lexographically
rather than the last non-virtual base in layout order. Test case
included. Also, some line ending fixes.
llvm-svn: 206000
When __declspec(align()) is applied to a bitfield it affects the
alignment rather than the required alignment of the struct. The major
feature that this patch adds is that the alignment of the structure
obeys the alignment of __declspec(align()) from the bitfield over the
value specified in pragma pack.
Test cases are included.
The patch also includes some small cleanups in recordlayoutbuilder and
some cleanups to some lit tests, including line endings (but no
functionality change to lit tests)
llvm-svn: 205994
This patch changes how we determine if padding is needed between two
bases in msvc compatibility mode. Test cases included.
In addition, a very minor change to the printing of structures to ease
lit testing.
llvm-svn: 205933
As of cl.exe version 18, the special layout rules for structs with
alignment 16 or greater has been dropped. This patch drops the behavior
from clang. This patch also updates the lit tests to reflect the
change.
llvm-svn: 204674
or virtual functions, but permit that error to be downgraded to
a warning (with -Wno-error=incompatible-ms-struct), and officially
support this kind of dual, ABI-mixing layout.
The basic problem here is that projects which use ms_struct are often
not very circumspect about what types they annotate; for example,
some projects enable the pragma in a prefix header and then only
selectively disable it around system header inclusions. They may
only care about binary compatibility with MSVC for a subset of
those structs, but that doesn't mean they have no binary
compatibility concerns at all for the rest; thus we are essentially
forced into supporting this hybrid ABI. But it's reasonable for
us to at least point out the places where we're not making
any guarantees.
The original diagnostic was for dynamic classes, i.e. those with
virtual functions or virtual bases; I've extended it to include
all classes with bases, because we are not actually making any
attempt to duplicate MSVC's base subobject layout in ms_struct
(and it is indeed quite different from Itanium, even for
non-virtual bases).
rdar://16178895
llvm-svn: 202427
This was changed to use manual desugaring and multiplication in r201832
and fixed for multi-dimensional arrays in r201917. However, it breaks
down in the presence of typedefs. Rather than attempting to handle all
the desugaring, just go back to calling the generic type info code.
This was discovered while compiling SIInstrWaits.cpp in the R600
backend.
llvm-svn: 202175
A recent change caused multi-dimensional arrays not to be handled
correctly, this patch fixes that. Also, it adds a lit test for
multi-dimensional arrays.
llvm-svn: 201917
Slight change to the way zero-sized sub-objects are tracked in the
presence of virtual bases.
In addition we correctly distinguish between dsize and nvsize.
addresses http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18826
Unit tests are included.
llvm-svn: 201832
This reverts commit r201810.
It was failing these tests on my workstation:
Clang :: CodeGen/override-layout.c
Clang :: CodeGenCXX/override-layout.cpp
Clang :: PCH/check-deserializations.cpp
llvm-svn: 201823
External sources shouldn't prevent the layout engine from using
MSLayout. If lldb were to support debugging in microsoft mode, some
code will need to be added to MSRecordLayoutBuilder to handel external
layouts.
llvm-svn: 201810
According to the GNU docs, zero-sized bitfields should not be affected by the
packed attribute.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2693
llvm-svn: 201288
useBitFieldTypeAlignment() and appears to ignore the special
bit-packing semantics of __attribute__((packed)).
Further flesh out an already-extensive comment.
llvm-svn: 201282
These features are new in VS 2013 and are necessary in order to layout
std::ostream correctly. Currently we have an ABI incompatibility when
self-hosting with the 2013 stdlib in our convertible_fwd_ostream wrapper
in gtest.
This change adds another implicit attribute, MSVtorDispAttr, because
implicit attributes are currently the best way to make sure the
information stays on class templates through instantiation.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2746
llvm-svn: 201274
vptr injection must inject padding equivalent to the alignment of the
most aligned non-virtual subobject, not the alignment of the enclosing
record.
To fascilitate this change, don't let record layout observe the
alignment of the record until we've injected our vptrs. Also, do not
allow the alignment of vbases to affect required alignment until just
before we insert the vtordisp field.
llvm-svn: 201199
This patch makes a small behavioral change to the interaction between
pack and alignment. Specifically it makes __declspec(align()) on a
field change that field's alignment without respect to pack but the
alignment change to the record alignment as a whole still obeys pack.
llvm-svn: 199172
Although VBPtrs were being placed correctly by the ms-abi layout engine,
their offsets were being improperly reported to the ASTRecordLayout
builder due to a bug. This patch fixes that and fixes the test cases to
use the correct values.
y
llvm-svn: 199168
This patch moves the check for pragma pack until after the application
of __declspec align to before pragma pack. This causes observable
changes in the use of tail padding for bases. A test case is included.
llvm-svn: 199154
The MS-ABI tracks a bit that asserts that the first sub-object is zero
sized. This bit is used to add padding between objects if there's the
potential for zero sized objects to alias. The bit is still true even
if the zero sized base is lead by a VFPtr. This patch makes clang mimic
that behavior.
llvm-svn: 199132
This patch more cleanly seperates the concepts of Preferred Alignment
and Required Alignment. Most notable that changes to Required Alignment
do *not* impact preferred alignment until late in struct layout. This
is observable when using pragma pack and non-virtual bases and the use
of tail padding when laying them out.
Test cases included.
llvm-svn: 198988
The presence of a VBPtr suppresses the presence of zero sized
sub-objects in the non-virtual portion of the object in the context of
determining if two base objects need alias-avoidance padding placed
between them.
Test cases included.
llvm-svn: 198975
__declspec(align), when applied to bitfields affects their perferred
alignment instead of their required alignment. We don't know why.
Also, #pragma pack(n) turns packing *off* if n is greater than the
pointer size. This is now observable because of the impact of
declspec(align) on bitfields.
llvm-svn: 198907
The MS abi lays out *all* non-virtual bases with leading vfptrs before
laying out non-virutal bases without vfptrs. This guarantees that the
primary base is laid out first. r198818 fixed RecordLayoutBuilder to
produce compatiable layouts. This patch fixes CGRecordLayoutBuilder to
be able to consume those layouts and produce meaningful output without
tripping any asserts about assumed incoming layout.
A test case is included that shows CGRecordLayoutBuilder in fact
produces output in the compatiable order.
llvm-svn: 198900
This patch refactors microsoft record layout to be more "natural". The
most dominant change is that vbptrs and vfptrs are injected after the
fact. This simplifies the implementation and the math for the offest
for the first base/field after the vbptr.
llvm-svn: 198818
With pragma pack, the layout engine would produce vfptrs that were
packed width rather than pointer width. This patch addresses the issue
and adds a test case.
llvm-svn: 198059
Richard Smith