Per our policy, the latest released AppleClang has been 14 for a while,
so libc++ is removing support for AppleClang 13. Our CI bots have been
moved to AppleClang 14 a few weeks ago.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138685
This patch removes the base template implementation for std::char_traits.
If my reading of http://eel.is/c++draft/char.traits is correct, the
Standard mandates that the library provides specializations for several
types like char and wchar_t, but not any implementation in the base
template. Indeed, such an implementation is bound to be incorrect for
most types anyways, since things like `eof()` and `int_type` will definitely
have to be customized.
Since the base template implementation should not have worked for anyone,
this shouldn't be a breaking change (I expect that anyone defining a
custom character type today will already have to provide their own
specialization of char_traits). However, since we're aware of some users
of char_traits for unsigned char and signed char, we're keeping those two
specializations around for two releases to give people some time to migrate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138307
There are a handful of standard library types that are intended
to support CTAD but don't need any explicit deduction guides to
do so.
This patch adds a dummy deduction guide to those types to suppress
-Wctad-maybe-unsupported (which gets emitted in user code).
This is a re-application of the original patch by Eric Fiselier in
fcd549a7d8 which had been reverted due to reasons lost at this point.
I also added the macro to a few more types. Reviving this patch was
prompted by the discussion on https://llvm.org/D133425.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133535
In the implementation of `std::views::take`, it uses `subrange<Iter>` as part of the return type. But in case of input iterator, `subrange<Iter>` can be ill-formed
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133220
When we ship LLVM 16, <ranges> won't be considered experimental anymore.
We might as well do this sooner rather than later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132151
1. for constructors that takes cvref variation of tuple<UTypes...>, there
used to be two SFINAE helper _EnableCopyFromOtherTuple,
_EnableMoveFromOtherTuple. And the implementations of these two helpers
seem to slightly differ from the spec. But now, we need 4 variations.
Instead of adding another two, this change refactored it to a single one
_EnableCtrFromUTypesTuple, which directly maps to the spec without
changing the C++11 behaviour. However, we need the helper __copy_cvref_t
to get the type of std::get<i>(cvref tuple<Utypes...>) for different
cvref, so I made __copy_cvref_t to be available in C++11.
2. for constructors that takes variations of std::pair, there used to be
four helpers _EnableExplicitCopyFromPair, _EnableImplicitCopyFromPair,
_EnableImplicitMoveFromPair, _EnableExplicitMoveFromPair. Instead of
adding another four, this change refactored into two helper
_EnableCtrFromPair and _BothImplicitlyConvertible. This also removes the
need to use _nat
3. for const member assignment operator, since the requirement is very
simple, I haven't refactored the old code but instead directly adding
the new c++23 code.
4. for const swap, I pretty much copy pasted the non-const version to make
these overloads look consistent
5. while doing these change, I found two of the old constructors wasn't
marked constexpr for C++20 but they should. fixed them and added unit
tests
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116621
When merging the changes of <type_traits> header with the commits on
this header over the last month, several conflicts were mistaken
resolved and the wrong branch was picked while resolving conflicts,
which leads to CI failure. In order to resolve the conflicts properly
with qualification CI job, this change is reverted.
This reverts commit 95733a55b9.
1. for constructors that takes cvref variation of tuple<UTypes...>, there
used to be two SFINAE helper _EnableCopyFromOtherTuple,
_EnableMoveFromOtherTuple. And the implementations of these two helpers
seem to slightly differ from the spec. But now, we need 4 variations.
Instead of adding another two, this change refactored it to a single one
_EnableCtrFromUTypesTuple, which directly maps to the spec without
changing the C++11 behaviour. However, we need the helper __copy_cvref_t
to get the type of std::get<i>(cvref tuple<Utypes...>) for different
cvref, so I made __copy_cvref_t to be available in C++11.
2. for constructors that takes variations of std::pair, there used to be
four helpers _EnableExplicitCopyFromPair, _EnableImplicitCopyFromPair,
_EnableImplicitMoveFromPair, _EnableExplicitMoveFromPair. Instead of
adding another four, this change refactored into two helper
_EnableCtrFromPair and _BothImplicitlyConvertible. This also removes the
need to use _nat
3. for const member assignment operator, since the requirement is very
simple, I haven't refactored the old code but instead directly adding
the new c++23 code.
4. for const swap, I pretty much copy pasted the non-const version to make
these overloads look consistent
5. while doing these change, I found two of the old constructors wasn't
marked constexpr for C++20 but they should. fixed them and added unit
tests
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116621
For an lvalue reference to a move only view x, views::all(x) gives hard error because the expression inside noexcept is not well formed and it is not SFINAE friendly.
Given a move only view type `V`, and a concept
```
template <class R>
concept can_all = requires {
std::views::all(std::declval<R>());
};
```
The expression `can_all<V&>` returns
libstdc++: false
msvc stl : false
libc++ : error: static_cast from 'V' to 'typename decay<decltype((std::forward<V &>(__t)))>::type' (aka 'V') uses deleted function
noexcept(noexcept(_LIBCPP_AUTO_CAST(std::forward<_Tp>(__t))))
The standard spec has its own problem, the spec says it is expression equivalent to `decay-copy(E)` but the spec of `decay-copy` does not have any constraint, which means the expression `decay-copy(declval<V&>())` is well-formed and the concept `can_all<V&>` should return true and should error when instantiating the function body of decay-copy. This is clearly wrong behaviour in the spec and we will probably create an LWG issue. But the libc++'s behaviour is clearly not correct. The `noexcept` is an "extension" in libc++ which is not in the spec, but the expression inside `noexpect` triggers hard error, which is not right.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, var-const
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128281
This removes all "TODO: remove these headers" comments from our headers.
Note there seem to be more headers that can be removed, that will be
done in separate commits.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127592
The compilers clang-11, clang-12, and apple-clang-12 are no longer
supported, so remove their annotations in the tests.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127588
The tests for `std::ranges::lazy_split_view` heavily use a wrapper class around
`std::string` because `std::string` was not `constexpr` until recently. Where
possible, remove the wrapper class and extra functionality no longer needed.
Remove `libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.adaptors/range.lazy.split/small_string.h`
and inline its one use remaining in
`libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.adaptors/range.lazy.split/general.pass.cpp`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126663
This only adds the customization point object (which isn't pipeable),
the view itself has already been implemented previously.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124978
- add zip_view and views::zip for C++23
- added unit tests
- implemented section 5.6 (zip) in P2321R2
I used clang-format to format the files but they look nothing like the rest of the code base. Manually indenting each line to match the styles sounds like an impossible task. Is there any clang-format file which can format it reasonable similar to the rest of the code base so that I can manually format the rest lines that look weird?
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, philnik, var-const
Spies: Mordante, philnik, libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122806
- added views::join adaptor object
- added test for the adaptor object
- fixed some join_view's tests. e.g iter_swap test
- added some negative tests for join_view to test that operations do not exist when constraints aren't met
- added tests that locks down issues that were already addressed in previous change
- LWG3500 `join_view::iterator::operator->()` is bogus
- LWG3313 `join_view::iterator::operator--` is incorrectly constrained
- LWG3517 `join_view::iterator`'s `iter_swap` is underconstrained
- P2328R1 join_view should join all views of ranges
- fixed some issues in join_view and added tests
- LWG3535 `join_view::iterator::iterator_category` and `::iterator_concept` lie
- LWG3474 Nesting ``join_views`` is broken because of CTAD
- added tests for an LWG issue that isn't resolved in the standard yet, but the previous code has workaround.
- LWG3569 Inner iterator not default_initializable
Reviewed By: #libc, var-const
Spies: var-const, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123466
Note that this class was called just `split_view` in the original One
Ranges Proposal and was renamed to `lazy_split_view` by
[P2210](https://wg21.link/p2210).
Co-authored-by: zoecarver <z.zoelec2@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107500
[libc++] add global variable template std::views::empty
Note it is neither a range adaptor, nor a CPO. It is simplify a global variable template.
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122996
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
Change the tests to use the base friend function instead of members.
Also changed some types to have a base friends instead of members.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120742
The renames the output_iterator to cpp17_output_iterator. These
iterators are still used in C++20 so it's not possible to change the
current type to the new C++20 requirements. This is done in a similar
fashion as the cpp17_input_iterator.
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117950
Fixed in counted_iterator and transform_view::iterator.
The LWG issue also affected elements_view::iterator, but we haven't
implemented that one yet, and whoever does implement it will get
the fix for free if they just follow the working draft's wording.
Drive-by stop calling `.base()` on test iterators in the test,
and improve the transform_view::iterator/sentinel tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117329
* Default-initialized `basic_string` iterators are not portably in the domain of `==`.
* Avoid comparing iterators from non-equal string_views which MSVCSTL considers not to be in the domain of equality.
* Don't test invalid range `[in, out + N)`.
Also silence some truncation warnings by testing with a non-narrowing conversion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118049
Instead of storing the wrapped iterator inside the stride_counting_iterator,
store its base so we can have e.g. a stride_counting_iterator of an
input_iterator (which was previously impossible because input_iterators
are not copyable). Also a few other simplifications in stride_counting_iterator.
As a fly-by fix, remove the member base() functions, which are super
confusing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116613
AFAICT, Cpp17InputIterators are not required to be default constructible,
since that requirement is added in Cpp17ForwardIterator. Hence, our
archetype for Cpp17InputIterator should not be default constructible.
Removing that constructor has a ripple effect on a couple of tests that
were making incorrect assumptions. Notably:
- Some tests were using cpp17_input_iterator as a sentinel for itself.
That is not valid, because a cpp17_input_iterator is not semiregular
anymore after the change (and hence it doesn't satisfy sentinel_for).
- Some tests were using a stride-counted cpp17_input_iterator as the
sentinel for a range. This doesn't work anymore because of the problem
above, so these tests were changed not to check stride counts for
input iterators.
- Some tests were default constructing cpp17_input_iterator when a simple
alternative was available -- those have been changed to use that alternative.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115806
Some individual test files verify the CPO under test satisfies
`semiregular` concept. This is redundant since it is already part of the test
in verifying whether the entity is indeed a CPO in
`libcxx/test/std/library/description/conventions/customization.point.object/cpo.compile.pass.cpp`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116173
Eliminate a bogus operator== overload.
Also, check more intermediate steps in the logic we're checking here.
Some of this simplification is possible only now that we've implemented
more of <ranges>.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116002
Remove `s.base()`; every test that wants to get the base of a "test sentinel"
should use the ADL `base(s)` from now on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115766
Louis Dionne