Since those features are general properties of the environment, it makes
sense to use them from libc++abi too, and so the name libcpp-has-no-xxx
doesn't make sense.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126482
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
Since we officially don't support several older compilers now, we can
drop a lot of the markup in the test suite. This helps keep the test
suite simple and makes sure that UNSUPPORTED annotations don't rot.
This is the first patch of a series that will remove annotations for
compilers that are now unsupported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107787
This reverts a224bf8ec4 and fixes the
underlying issue.
The underlying issue is simply that MSVC headers contains a define
like "#define __in", where __in is one macro in the MSVC Source
Code Annotation Language, defined in sal.h
Just use a different variable name than "__in"
__indirectly_readable_impl, and add "__in" to nasty_macros.h just
like the existing __out. (Also adding a couple more potentially
conflicting ones.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101613
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D100073.
Reviewed By: ldionne, zoecarver, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100080
That was originally committed in 04733181b5 and then reverted in
a9f11cc0d9 because it broke several people.
The problem was a missing include of __iterator/concepts.h, which has now
been fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100073
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D99873.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100073
When porting libc++ to embedded systems, it can be useful to drop support
for localization, which these systems don't implement or care about.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90072
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
This patch almost entirely rewrites the unique_ptr tests. There are a couple
of reasons for this:
A) Most of the *.fail.cpp tests were either incorrect or could be better written
as a *.pass.cpp test that uses <type_traits> to check if certain operations
are valid (Ex. Using static_assert(!std::is_copy_constructible_v<T>) instead
of writing a failure test).
B) [unique.ptr.runtime] has very poor test coverage. Many of the constructors
and assignment operators have to tests at all. The special members that have
tests have very few test cases and are typically way out of date.
C) The tests for [unique.ptr.single] and [unique.ptr.runtime] are largely
duplicates of each other. This means common requirements have two different
sets of tests in two different test files. This makes the tests harder to
maintain than if there was a single copy.
To address (A) this patch changes almost all of the *.fail.cpp tests into
.pass.cpp tests using type traits; Allowing the *.fail.cpp tests to be removed.
The address (B) and (C) the tests for [unique.ptr.single] and [unique.ptr.runtime]
have been combined into a single directory, allowing both specializations to share
common tests. Tests specific to the single/runtime specializations are given the
suffix "*.single.pass.cpp" or "*.runtime.pass.cpp".
Finally the unique.ptr test have been moved into the correct directory according
to the standard. Specifically they have been removed from "utilities/memory" into
"utilities/smartptr".
PS. This patch also adds newly written tests for upcoming unique_ptr changes/fixes.
However since these tests don't currently pass they are guarded by the macro
TEST_WORKAROUND_UPCOMING_UNIQUE_PTR_CHANGES. This allows other STL's to validate
the tests before libc++ implements the changes. The relevant libc++ changes should
land in the next week.
llvm-svn: 300388
std::unique_ptr's default constructor must be constexpr in order
to allow constant initialization to take place for static objects;
Even though we can never have a constexpr unique_ptr variable since
it's not a literal type.
This patch adds tests that constant initialization takes place by
using the __attribute__((require_constant_initialization)) macro.
llvm-svn: 300158
Summary:
__compressed_pair takes and passes it's constructor arguments by value. This causes arguments to be moved 3 times instead of once. This patch addresses that issue and fixes `constexpr` on the constructors.
I would rather have this fix than D27564, and I'm fairly confident it's not ABI breaking but I'm not 100% sure.
I prefer this solution because it removes a lot of code and makes the implementation *much* smaller.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, K-ballo
Reviewed By: K-ballo
Subscribers: K-ballo, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27565
llvm-svn: 300140
For reference deleter types the const qualifier on the return type
of get_deleter() should be ignored, and a non-const deleter should
be returned.
This patch fixes a bug where "const deleter_type&" is incorrectly
formed.
llvm-svn: 300121
Quite a few libcxx tests seem to follow the format:
#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > X
// Do test.
#else
// Empty test.
#endif
We should instead use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive to exclude the test on
earlier C++ standards. This gives us a more accurate number of test passes
for those standards and avoids unnecessary conflicts with other lit
directives on the same tests.
Reviewers: bcraig, ericwf, mclow.lists
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20730
llvm-svn: 271108
When I was refactoring the unique_ptr.single.ctor tests I added a test
deleter, 'NCDeleter', to deleter.h. Other tests that include deleter.h
redefine the NCDeleter type causing test failures.
llvm-svn: 243733
One of the last sections of tests that still fail in C++03 are the unique_ptr
tests. This patch begins cleaning up the tests and fixing C++03 failures.
The main changes of this patch:
- The "Deleter" type in "deleter.h" tried to be "move-only" in C++03. However
the move simulation no longer works (see "__rv"). "Deleter" is now copy
constructible in C++03. However copying "Deleter" will "move" the test value
instead of copying it.
- Reduce the unique.ptr.single.ctor tests files from ~25 to 4. There is no
reason the tests were split through so many files.
llvm-svn: 243730
Automatically enable clang verify whenever the '-verify-ignore-unexpected' flag
is supported.
Failure tests are run using verify if they contain one or more "expected-*"
diagnostics tags. Otherwise they are run normally.
llvm-svn: 241492
Louis Dionne