The lowercase `__ppc64__` is not defined by non-darwin powerpc64 GCC, therefore
it lures users to write code which is not portable to GCC. Migrate to
`__powerpc64__` in preparation for undefining `__ppc64__`. `__powerpc64__` is
much more common than `__PPC64__`.
Update alignment_of.pass.cpp to use 1 unconditionally:
on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu `alignof(bool) = _Alignof(bool) = __alignof(bool) = 1`.
The value 4 might be derived from an ancient Clang.
Change is_iec559 to true when long double uses uses IEEE 754 quadruple or double
precision (i.e. not ibm128).
Reviewed By: #libc, thesamesam, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137513
GCC expands the pointer type in this conditional expression even for
template types _Up that are not arrays. This raises an error when
std::decay<> is used with reference types (as is done in LLVM's
sources). Using add_pointer<> causes GCC to only instantiate a
pointer type for array types.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135469
Replace the two-level implementation with a simpler one that directly subclasses
the predicates, avoiding the instantiation of the template to get the `type`
member in a situation where we should short-circuit. This prevents incorrect
diagnostics when the instantiated predicate contains a static assertion.
Add a test case that reproduced the previous problem. The existing test case
involving `HasNoValue` didn't catch the problem because `HasNoValue` was in the
final position. The bug comes up when the predicate that shouldn't be
instantiated is after the short-circuit position but there is more to follow,
because then `__conjunction_impl<False, BadPredicate, ...>` instantiates
`__conjunction_impl<BadPredicate, ...>` (in order to obtain its `type` member),
which in turn instantiates `BadPredicate` in order to obtain its `value` member.
In contrast the new implementation doesn't recurse in instantiation any further
than it needs to, because it doesn't require particular members of the recursive
case.
I've also updated the test cases for `std::disjunction` to match,
although it doesn't have the same particular bug (its implementation is
quite different).
Fixes#58490.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, philnik
Spies: philnik, ldionne, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136318
Many tests in `libcxx/test/std/strings` use
`#if defined(__cpp_lib_char8_t) && __cpp_lib_char8_t >= 201811L`
which can be replaced with the more terse `#ifndef TEST_HAS_NO_CHAR8_T`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132626
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.
This reverts commit 6542cb55a3.
This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.
consider a c file having code
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
In clang the output is like:
<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:
<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Clang 3.7 and below is not actively used or supported in the test suite now, so
remove the workaround in the test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126603
This fixes incorrect handling of non-moveable types, adding tests for this case.
See [issue 55346](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55346).
The current implementation is based on is_convertible, which is
[defined](https://timsong-cpp.github.io/cppwp/n4659/meta.rel#5) in terms of
validity of the following function:
```
To test() {
return declval<From>();
}
```
But this doesn't work if To and From are both some non-moveable type, which the
[definition](https://timsong-cpp.github.io/cppwp/n4659/conv#3) of implicit
conversions says should work due to guaranteed copy elision:
```
To to = E; // E has type From
```
It is this latter definition that is used in the
[definition](https://timsong-cpp.github.io/cppwp/n4659/function.objects#func.require-2)
of INVOKE<R>. Make __invokable_r use __is_core_convertible, which
captures the ability to use guaranteed copy elision, making the
definition correct for non-moveable types.
Fixesllvm/llvm-project#55346.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, EricWF
Spies: EricWF, jloser, ldionne, philnik, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125300
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
All supported compilers have implemented this feature.
Therefore use the language version instead of the feature macro.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119865
... it's easier to suppress warnings internally, where we can detect the compiler.
* Rename `TEST_COMPILER_C1XX` to `TEST_COMPILER_MSVC`
* Rename all `TEST_WORKAROUND_C1XX_<meow>` to `TEST_WORKAROUND_MSVC_<meow>`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117422
This reverts commit 640beb38e7.
That commit caused performance degradtion in Quicksilver test QS:sGPU and a functional test failure in (rocPRIM rocprim.device_segmented_radix_sort).
Reverting until we have a better solution to s_cselect_b64 codegen cleanup
Change-Id: Ibf8e397df94001f248fba609f072088a46abae08
Reviewed By: kzhuravl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115960
Change-Id: Id169459ce4dfffa857d5645a0af50b0063ce1105
At this point, every supported compiler that claims a -std=c++17 mode
should also support these features.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113436
This changes adds the pipeline config for both 32-bit and 64-bit AIX targets. As well, we add a lit feature `LIBCXX-AIX-FIXME` which is used to mark the failing tests which remain to be investigated on AIX, so that the CI produces a clean build.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111359
Since we officially don't support several older compilers now, we can
drop a lot of the markup in the test suite. This helps keep the test
suite simple and makes sure that UNSUPPORTED annotations don't rot.
This is the first patch of a series that will remove annotations for
compilers that are now unsupported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107787
All supported compilers have been supporting __is_aggregate for a long
time now, so it's reasonable to remove this workaround.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107833
Due to issues with the detection of the clang-verify feature, these
tests have been skipped in the Windows CI configuration so far.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103308
After this patch, we can use `--param std=c++20` even if the compiler only
supports -std=c++2a. The test suite will handle that for us. The only Lit
feature that isn't fully baked will always be the "in development" one,
since we don't know exactly what year the standard will be ratified in.
This is another take on https://reviews.llvm.org/D99789.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100210
This makes no attempt yet to look into the why/what for each of them,
but makes the CI configuration useful for tracking further regressions.
After looking into each case, they can either be fixed, or converted
into UNSUPPORTED: windows or XFAIL: windows, once the cause is known
and explained.
A number of the filesystem cases can be fixed by patches that are
currently in review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99095
In previous versions of clang, __is_signed and __is_unsigned builtins did not
correspond to is_signed and is_unsigned behaviour for enums. The builtins were
fixed in D67897 and D98104.
* Disable the fast path of is_unsigned for clang versions < 13
* Add more tests for is_signed, is_unsigned and is_arithmetic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97283
Implements part of P0898R3 Standard Library Concepts
Reworks D74351 to use requires-clauses over SFINAE and so that it more
closely follows the wording.
Co-authored by: Michael Schellenberger Costa <mschellenbergercosta@googlemail.com>
(Michael did all the heavy lifting and I came in to polish it for
submission, since Michael is focussing on `std::format` now.)
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96657
This will fix remaining failures on gcc-9 buildbot: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/101.
gcc-8 and gcc-9 do not support constexpr destructors nor constexpr allocation.
Fix gcc warnings: -Wconversion, -Wpragmas.
- Several -Wshadow warnings
- Several places where we did not initialize our base class explicitly
- Unused variable warnings
- Some tautological comparisons
- Some places where we'd pass null arguments to functions expecting
non-null (in unevaluated contexts)
- Add a few pragmas to turn off spurious warnings
- Fix warnings about declarations that don't declare anything
- Properly disable deprecation warnings in ext/ tests (the pragmas we
were using didn't work on GCC)
- Disable include_as_c.sh.cpp because GCC complains about C++ flags
when compiling as C. I couldn't find a way to fix this one properly,
so I'm disabling the test. This isn't great, but at least we'll be
able to enable warnings in the whole test suite with GCC.
Fangrui Song