Moves:
* `std::move`, `std::forward`, `std::declval`, and `std::swap` into
`__utility/${FUNCTION_NAME}`.
* `std::swap_ranges` and `std::iter_swap` into
`__algorithm/${FUNCTION_NAME}`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103734
C++03 didn't support `explicit` conversion operators;
but Clang's C++03 mode does, as an extension, so we can use it.
This lets us make the conversion explicit in `std::function` (even in '03),
and remove some silly metaprogramming in `std::basic_ios`.
Drive-by improvements to the tests for these operators, in addition
to making sure all these tests also run in `c++03` mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104682
While the std::allocator<void> specialization was deprecated by
https://wg21.link/p0174#2.2, the *use* of std::allocator<void> by users
was not. The intent was that std::allocator<void> could still be used
in C++17 and C++20, but starting with C++20 (with the removal of the
specialization), std::allocator<void> would use the primary template.
That intent was called out in wg21.link/p0619r4#3.9.
As a result of this patch, _LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_ALLOCATOR_MEMBERS
will also not control whether the explicit specialization is provided or
not. It shouldn't matter, since in C++20, one can simply use the primary
template.
Fixes http://llvm.org/PR50299
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104323
This has been broken out of D104170 since it should be merged whether or
not we go ahead with the module map changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104175
Makes the following operations constexpr:
* `std::swap(optional, optional)`
* `optional(optional<U> const&)`
* `optional(optional<U>&&)`
* `~optional()`
* `operator=(nullopt_t)`
* `operator=(U&&)`
* `operator=(optional<U> const&)`
* `operator=(optional<U>&&)`
* `emplace(Args&&...)`
* `emplace(initializer_list<U>, Args&&...)`
* `swap(optional&)`
* `reset()`
P2231 has been accepted by plenary, with the committee recommending
implementers retroactively apply to C++20. It's necessary for us to
implement _`semiregular-box`_ and _`non-propagating-cache`_, both of
which are required for ranges (otherwise we'll need to reimplement
`std::optional` with these members `constexpr`ified).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102119
The post-conditions for the self move assignment of `std::unique_ptr`
were changed. This requires no implementation changes. A test was added
to validate the new post-conditions.
Addresses
- LWG-3455: Incorrect Postconditions on `unique_ptr` move assignment
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103764
This define was out of sync with the corresponding define in tests, it
was added inconsistently in 171c77b7da.
Modern MSVC environments do have these typedefs and functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103398
Make sure we provide the correct It::difference_type member and update
the tests and synopses to be accurate.
Supersedes D102657 and D103101 (thanks to the original authors).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103273
Due to issues with the detection of the clang-verify feature, these
tests have been skipped in the Windows CI configuration so far.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103308
C++17 deprecated std::iterator and removed it as a base class for all
iterator adaptors. We implement that change, but we still provide a way
to inherit from std::iterator in the few cases where doing otherwise
would be an ABI break.
Supersedes D101729 and the std::iterator base parts of D103101 and D102657.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103171
This also provides some of the scaffolding needed by D102992 and D101729, and mops up after D101730 etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103055
C++17 deprecates `std::raw_storage_iterator` and C++20 removes it.
Implements part of:
* P0174R2 'Deprecating Vestigial Library Parts in C++17'
* P0619R4 'Reviewing Deprecated Facilities of C++17 for C++20'
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101730
This fixes a long standing issue where the triple is not always set
consistently in all configurations. This change also moves the
back-deployment Lit features to using the proper target triple
instead of using something ad-hoc.
This will be necessary for using from scratch Lit configuration files
in both normal testing and back-deployment testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102012
This is a rough reapplication of the change that fixed std::to_address
to avoid relying on element_type (da456167). It is somewhat different
because the fix to avoid breaking Clang (which caused it to be reverted
in 347f69c55) was a bit more involved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101638
This reverts commit da456167, which broke the Clang build. I'm able to
reproduce it but I want to give myself a bit more time to investigate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101638
In std::tuple, we should try to avoid calling std::is_copy_constructible
whenever we can to avoid surprising interactions with (I believe) compiler
builtins. This bug was reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/D96523#2730953.
The issue was that when tuple<_Up...> was the same as tuple<_Tp...>, we
would short-circuit the _Or (because sizeof...(_Tp) != 1) and go evaluate
the following `is_constructible<_Tp, const _Up&>...`. That shouldn't
actually be a problem, but see the analysis in https://reviews.llvm.org/D101770#2736470
for why it is with Clang and GCC.
Instead, after this patch, we check whether the constructed-from tuple
is the same as the current tuple regardless of the number of elements,
since we should always prefer the normal copy constructor in that case
anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101770
This fixes the issue by implementing _And using the short-circuiting
SFINAE trick that we previously used only in std::tuple. One thing we
could look into is use the naive recursive implementation for disjunctions
with a small number of arguments, and use that trick with larger numbers
of arguments. It might be the case that the constant overhead for setting
up the SFINAE trick makes it only worth doing for larger packs, but that's
left for further work.
This problem was raised in https://reviews.llvm.org/D96523.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101661
This patch gets rid of technical debt around std::pointer_safety which,
I claim, is entirely unnecessary. I don't think anybody has used
std::pointer_safety in actual code because we do not implement the
underlying garbage collection support. In fact, P2186 even proposes
removing these facilities entirely from a future C++ version. As such,
I think it's entirely fine to get rid of complex workarounds whose goals
were to avoid breaking the ABI back in 2017.
I'm putting this up both to get reviews and to discuss this proposal for
a breaking change. I think we should be comfortable with making these
tiny breaks if we are confident they won't hurt anyone, which I'm fairly
confident is the case here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100410
C++20 revised the definition of what it means to be an iterator. While
all _Cpp17InputIterators_ satisfy `std::input_iterator`, the reverse
isn't true. D100271 introduces a new test adaptor to accommodate this
new definition (`cpp20_input_iterator`).
In order to help readers immediately distinguish which input iterator
adaptor is _Cpp17InputIterator_, the current `input_iterator` adaptor
has been prefixed with `cpp17_`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101242
This reverts a224bf8ec4 and fixes the
underlying issue.
The underlying issue is simply that MSVC headers contains a define
like "#define __in", where __in is one macro in the MSVC Source
Code Annotation Language, defined in sal.h
Just use a different variable name than "__in"
__indirectly_readable_impl, and add "__in" to nasty_macros.h just
like the existing __out. (Also adding a couple more potentially
conflicting ones.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101613
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D100073.
Reviewed By: ldionne, zoecarver, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100080
This nasty patch rewrites the tuple constructors to match those defined
by the Standard. We were previously providing several extensions in those
constructors - those extensions are removed by this patch.
The issue with those extensions is that we've had numerous bugs filed
against us over the years for problems essentially caused by them. As a
result, people are unable to use tuple in ways that are blessed by the
Standard, all that for the perceived benefit of providing them extensions
that they never asked for.
Since this is an API break, I communicated it in the release notes.
I do not foresee major issues with this break because I don't think the
extensions are too widely relied upon, but we can ship it and see if we
get complaints before the next LLVM release - that will give us some
amount of information regarding how much use these extensions have.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96523
That was originally committed in 04733181b5 and then reverted in
a9f11cc0d9 because it broke several people.
The problem was a missing include of __iterator/concepts.h, which has now
been fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100073
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D99873.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100073
This patch fixes LWG2874. It is based on the original patch by Zoe Carver
originally uploaded at D81417.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81417
Some of Microsoft's unit tests in D70631 fail because libc++'s
implementation of std::chars_format isn't a proper bitmask type. Adding
the required functions to make std::chars_format a proper bitmask type.
Implements parts of P0067: Elementary string conversions
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97115
These [[nodiscard]] annotations are added as a conforming extension;
it's unclear whether the paper will actually be adopted and make them
mandatory, but they do seem like good ideas regardless.
https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D2351R0.pdf
This patch implements the paper's effect on:
- std::to_integer, std::to_underlying
- std::forward, std::move, std::move_if_noexcept
- std::as_const
- std::identity
The paper also affects (but libc++ does not yet have an implementation of):
- std::bit_cast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99895
After this patch, we can use `--param std=c++20` even if the compiler only
supports -std=c++2a. The test suite will handle that for us. The only Lit
feature that isn't fully baked will always be the "in development" one,
since we don't know exactly what year the standard will be ratified in.
This is another take on https://reviews.llvm.org/D99789.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100210
Use `_LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS` instead of `_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS` for a template
class.
This fixes the nodiscard_extensions.pass.cpp and a couple
func.search.default test cases when built in MSVC/DLL configurations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99932
This doesn't fail when _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INT128 is defined consistently
in both CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS and LIBCXX_TEST_COMPILER_FLAGS; the XFAIL was
added based on early CI testruns where that flag was missing in
LIBCXX_TEST_COMPILER_FLAGS.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99705
This will avoid typos like `_LIBCPP_STD_VERS` (<future>) or using `#if TEST_STD_VER > 17` without including "test_macros.h".
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99515
Because the constexpr-time codepath triggers a Clang bug. It seems
that Clang compiles it okay in release mode, but when Clang itself
is compiled in debug mode (with assertions turned on), this input
triggers an assertion failure in Clang itself. See comments on D96385
and Clang bug report https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45879
This commit should get the debug-mode buildbots back to green.
This patch changes the variant even in pre-C++2b.
It should not break anything, only allow use cases that didn't work previously.
Notes:
`__as_variant` is used in `__visitation::__variant::__visit_alt`, but I haven't used it in `__visitation::__variant::__visit_alt_at`.
That's because it is used only in `__visit_value_at`, which in turn is always used on variant specializations (that's in comparison operators).
* https://wg21.link/P2162
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97394
This makes no attempt yet to look into the why/what for each of them,
but makes the CI configuration useful for tracking further regressions.
After looking into each case, they can either be fixed, or converted
into UNSUPPORTED: windows or XFAIL: windows, once the cause is known
and explained.
A number of the filesystem cases can be fixed by patches that are
currently in review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99095
In previous versions of clang, __is_signed and __is_unsigned builtins did not
correspond to is_signed and is_unsigned behaviour for enums. The builtins were
fixed in D67897 and D98104.
* Disable the fast path of is_unsigned for clang versions < 13
* Add more tests for is_signed, is_unsigned and is_arithmetic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97283
Implements part of P0898R3 Standard Library Concepts
Reworks D74351 to use requires-clauses over SFINAE and so that it more
closely follows the wording.
Co-authored by: Michael Schellenberger Costa <mschellenbergercosta@googlemail.com>
(Michael did all the heavy lifting and I came in to polish it for
submission, since Michael is focussing on `std::format` now.)
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96657
The implementation of tuple's constructors and assignment operators
currently diverges from the way the Standard specifies them, which leads
to subtle cases where the behavior is not as specified. In particular, a
class derived from a tuple-like type (e.g. pair) can't be assigned to a
tuple with corresponding members, when it should. This commit re-implements
the assignment operators (BUT NOT THE CONSTRUCTORS) in a way much closer
to the specification to get rid of this bug. Most of the tests have been
stolen from Eric's patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D27606.
As a fly-by improvement, tests for noexcept correctness have been added
to all overloads of operator=. We should tackle the same issue for the
tuple constructors in a future patch - I'm just trying to make progress
on fixing this long-standing bug.
PR17550
rdar://15837420
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50106
This patch ensures that SFINAE is used to delete assignment operators in pair and tuple based on issue 2729.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62454
This patch implements 2802. Requires _Deleter to have call operator and be move constructible. Based on D62233.
Refs PR37637.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62274
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Depends on D92214
Reland with changes:
The format header will only be compiled if the compiler used has support
for concepts. This should fix the issues with the initial version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93166
Implement the resolution of LWG2993. Replace a deleted constructor
with a constructor that SFINAEs away in appropriate circumstances.
Also, now that the constructor is templated, we must have an
explicit deduction guide to make CTAD work.
Some tests have been merged in from Agustín Bergé's D40259.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92725
This reverts commit 35a57f39b5.
A build is broken during clang bootstrap with:
In file included from ../libcxx/src/format.cpp:9:
/tmp/ci-nGNyLRM9V3/include/c++/v1/format:153:16: error: no member named 'is_constant_evaluated' in namespace 'std::__1'
if (_VSTD::is_constant_evaluated() && __id >= __num_args_)
~~~~~~~^
1 error generated.
This is the first step at implementing <format>. It adds the <format> header
and implements the `format_error`. class.
Implemnts parts of:
-P0645 Text Formatting
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, miscco, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92214
LWG reflector consensus is that this was a bug in libc++.
(In particular, MSVC also will fix it in their STL, soon.)
Bug originally discovered by Logan Smith.
Also fix `std::function<const void()>`, which should work
the same way as `std::function<void()>` in terms of allowing
"conversions" from non-void types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94452
Previously, LIBCXX_ENABLE_FILESYSTEM controlled only whether the filesystem
support was compiled into libc++'s library. This commit promotes the
setting to a first-class option like LIBCXX_ENABLE_LOCALIZATION, where
the whole library is aware of the setting and features that depend on
<filesystem> won't be provided at all. The test suite is also properly
annotated such that tests that depend on <filesystem> are disabled when
the library doesn't support it.
This is an alternative to https://llvm.org/D94824, but also an improvement
along the lines of LIBCXX_ENABLE_LOCALIZATION that I had been wanting to
make for a while.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94921
This patch updates `allocate_shared` to call `allocator_traits::construct`
when creating the object held inside the shared_pointer, and
`allocator_traits::destroy` when destroying it. This resolves
the part of P0674R1 that was originally filed as LWG2070.
This change is landed separately from the rest of P0674R1 because it is
incredibly tricky from an ABI perspective.
This is the reason why this change is so tricky is that we previously
used EBO in a compressed pair to store both the allocator and the object
type stored in the `shared_ptr`. However, starting in C++20, P0674
requires us to use Allocator construction for initializing the object type.
That requirement rules out the use of the EBO for the object type, since
using the EBO implies that the base will be initialized when the control
block is initialized (and hence we can't do it through Allocator construction).
Hence, supporting P0674 requires changing how we store the object type
inside the control block, which we do while being ABI compatible by using
some trickery with a properly aligned char buffer.
Fixes https://llvm.org/PR41900
Supersedes https://llvm.org/D62760
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91201
"LLVM Buildbot on libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-debian" is not happy
with default-initializing the `double` member of `A` in a constexpr
function. At least I'm pretty sure that's what it's complaining about.
When the allocator is only explicitly convertible from other specializations
of itself, the new version of std::allocate_shared would not work because
it would try to do an implicit conversion. This patch fixes the problem
and adds a test so that we don't fall into the same trap in the future.
Checking that `T` is constructible from `Args...` is technically not
required by the Standard, although any implementation will obviously
error out if that's not satisfied. However, this check is incompatible
with using Allocator construction in the control block (upcoming change
as part of implementing P0674), so I'm removing it now to reduce the
upcoming diff as much as possible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93246
- std::reference_wrapper
- std::function
- std::mem_fn
While I'm here, remove _VSTD:: qualification from calls to `declval`
because it takes no arguments and thus isn't susceptible to ADL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92884
This simplifies the implementation, and it appears to be equivalent since
make_shared was allocating memory with std::allocator anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93071
This will fix remaining failures on gcc-9 buildbot: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/101.
gcc-8 and gcc-9 do not support constexpr destructors nor constexpr allocation.
Fix gcc warnings: -Wconversion, -Wpragmas.
These changes cause substantial binary size increases for non-opt builds.
For example, the visit.pass.cpp test grows from 20k to 420k.
Further work will be done to re-land this patch without the size increases,
but that work is proving too tricky to fix forward.
This patch fully reverts:
* 35d2269111
And it partially reverts:
* bb43a0cd4a
The latter of which added XFAIL's to new variant tests
because the new implementation needlessly makes non-throwing code
paths in variant invoke throwing code.
This means the reverted change also breaks source backwards compat
with code compiled on OS X targeting older system dylibs. There is no
need for this to be the case. We should fix it before recommitting.
Reviewed as:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D91662
The current way we test this is pretty cheap, i.e. we download previously
released macOS dylibs and run against that. Ideally, we would require a
full host running the appropriate version of macOS, and we'd execute the
tests using SSH on that host. But since we don't have such hosts available
easily for now, this is better than nothing.
At the same time, also fix some tests that were failing when back
deploying.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90869
This undefined behavior was found by applying Lénárd Szolnoki's proposal
to disable implicit conversion of default_delete<D> to default_delete<B>.
The offending part of the test is circa line 243.
The wording that makes it undefined behavior is http://eel.is/c++draft/expr.delete#3 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90536
- Several -Wshadow warnings
- Several places where we did not initialize our base class explicitly
- Unused variable warnings
- Some tautological comparisons
- Some places where we'd pass null arguments to functions expecting
non-null (in unevaluated contexts)
- Add a few pragmas to turn off spurious warnings
- Fix warnings about declarations that don't declare anything
- Properly disable deprecation warnings in ext/ tests (the pragmas we
were using didn't work on GCC)
- Disable include_as_c.sh.cpp because GCC complains about C++ flags
when compiling as C. I couldn't find a way to fix this one properly,
so I'm disabling the test. This isn't great, but at least we'll be
able to enable warnings in the whole test suite with GCC.
When porting libc++ to embedded systems, it can be useful to drop support
for localization, which these systems don't implement or care about.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90072
It appears that the released version of clang that supports constexpr
destructors is clang 10 and the oldest one that accepts -std=c++2a is 5,
so mark these as UNSUPPORTED for clang-5 to clang-9.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89704
Also, some tests had multiple death tests in them, so split them into
separate tests instead. The second death test would obviously never
get run, because the first one would kill the program before.
This is needed when running the tests in Freestanding mode, where main()
isn't treated specially. In Freestanding, main() doesn't get mangled as
extern "C", so whatever runtime we're using fails to find the entry point.
One way to solve this problem is to define a symbol alias from __Z4mainiPPc
to _main, however this requires all definitions of main() to have the same
mangling. Hence this commit.
We're technically not allowed by the Standard to call ::operator new in
constexpr functions like __libcpp_allocate. Clang doesn't seem to complain
about it, but GCC does.
This commit adds std::construct_at, and marks various members of
std::allocator_traits and std::allocator as constexpr. It also adds
tests and turns the existing tests into hybrid constexpr/runtime tests.
Thanks to Richard Smith for initial work on this, and to Michael Park
for D69803, D69132 and D69134, which are superseded by this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68364
We don't support GCC in C++03 mode, and Clang provides variadic templates
even in C++03 mode. So there's effectively no supported compiler that
doesn't support variadic templates.
This effectively gets rid of all uses of _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_VARIADICS, but
some workarounds for the lack of variadics remain.
This implements the part of P0619R4 related to the default allocator.
This is incredibly important, since otherwise there is an ABI break
between C++17 and C++20 w.r.t. the default allocator's size_type on
platforms where std::size_t is not the same as std::make_unsigned<std::ptrdiff_t>.
We don't support GCC in C++03 mode, and Clang provides rvalue references
even in C++03 mode. So there's effectively no supported compiler that
doesn't support rvalue references.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84943
Add shared_ptr tests where the element type and pointer type aren't 'convertible' but are 'compatible'.
Responding to a comment from D81414.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81532
Some time ago, I introduced shortcut features like dylib-has-no-shared_mutex
to encode whether the deployment target supported shared_mutex (say). This
made the test suite annotations cleaner.
However, the problem with building Lit features on top of other Lit
features is that it's easier for them to become stale, especially when
they are generated programmatically. Furthermore, it makes the bar for
defining configurations from scratch higher, since more features have
to be defined. Instead, I think it's better to put the XFAILs in the
tests directly, which allows cleaning them up with a simple grep.
This reverts commit 0c148430cf, which added an assertion in day().
The Standard doesn't allow day() to crash -- instead it says that the
result is unspecified.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70346
All compilers supported by libc++ have rvalues in C++03 mode so, there is no need for this non-rvalue overload.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80881
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
The tests had copy-paste errors which started showing when an
unused-variable warning started being emitted after we made
the MoveOnly type constexpr (in a4b8ee6422).
* improve coverage in `span`'s "conversion from `std::array`" test, while eliminating MSVC diagnostics about `testConstructorArray<T>() && testConstructorArray<const T, T>()` being redundant when `T` is already `const`.
* Remove use of `is_assignable` that triggers UB due to an insufficiently-complete type argument in `std::function`'s assignment operator test.
* Don't test that `shared_ptr` initialization from an rvalue triggers the lvalue aliasing constructor on non-libc++; this is not the case for Standard Libraries that implement LWG-2996. (Ditto, I'd simply remove this but it's your library ;).)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80030
Implements P0414R2:
* Adds support for array types in std::shared_ptr.
* Adds reinterpret_pointer_cast for shared_ptr.
Re-committing now that the leaking tests are fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62259
Implements P0414R2:
* Adds support for array types in std::shared_ptr.
* Adds reinterpret_pointer_cast for shared_ptr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62259
This patch adds deduction guides to <memory> to allow deducing
construction of shared_ptrs from unique_ptrs, and from weak_ptrs
and vice versa, as specified by C++17.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69603
Tests that require support for Clang-verify are already marked as such
explicitly by their extension, which is .verify.cpp. Requiring the use
of an explicit Lit feature is, after thought, not really helpful.
This is a change in design: we have been bitten in the past by tests not
being enabled when we thought they were. However, the issue was mostly
with file extensions being ignored. The fix for that is not to blindly
require explicit features all the time, but instead to report all files
that are in the suite but that don't match any known test format. This
can be implemented in a follow-up patch.
Instead of having different names for the same Lit feature accross code
bases, use the same name everywhere. This NFC commit is in preparation
for a refactor where all three projects will be using the same Lit
feature detection logic, and hence it won't be convenient to use
different names for the feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78370
By renaming .fail.cpp tests that don't need clang-verify to .compile.fail.cpp,
the new test format will not try to compile these tests with clang-verify,
and the old test format will work just the same. However, this allows
removing a workaround that requires parsing each test looking for
clang-verify markup.
After this change, a .fail.cpp test should always have clang-verify markup.
When clang-verify is not supported by the compiler, we will just check that
these tests fail to compile. When clang-verify is supported, these tests
will be compiled with clang-verify whether they have markup or not (so
they should have markup, or they will fail).
This simplifies the test suite and also ensures that all of our .fail.cpp
tests provide clang-verify markup. If it's impossible for a test to have
clang-verify markup, it can be moved to a .compile.fail.cpp test, which
are unconditionally just checked for compilation failure.
The libc++ test suite currently defines several features that are not
used anywhere in the tests, or that are redundant with other features.
For the purpose of simplifying config.py and to ease the bring up of a
new configuration, this commit removes some of these features:
- rename dylib-has-no-filesystem to c++filesystem-disabled, which exists
- rename apple-darwin to just darwin, which is already set
- remove useless setting of libstdc++, which is already set correctly
- remove libcpp-abi-unstable, which is not used anywhere
- remove the glibc-XXX features, which are not used anywhere
The libc++ test suite has a lot of old Lit features used to XFAIL tests
and mark them as UNSUPPORTED. Many of them are to workaround problems on
old compilers or old platforms. As time goes by, it is good to go and
clean those up to simplify the configuration of the test suite, and also
to reflect the testing reality. It's not useful to have markup that gives
the impression that e.g. clang-3.3 is supported, when we don't really
test on it anymore (and hence several new tests probably don't have the
necessary markup on them).
This allows both the old and the new testing formats to handle these
tests with modules enabled.
We also include the modules flags in the %{flags} substitution, which
means that .sh.cpp tests in the old format and all tests in the new
format will use modules flags when enabled.
We had a workaround because GCC 5 does not evaluate static assertions
that are dependent on template parameters. This commit removes the
workaround and marks the corresponding tests as unsupported with GCC 5.
This has the benefit of bringing the new and the old test formats closer
without having to carry a workaround for an old compiler in the new
test format.
Always depend on the compiler to have a correct implementation of
max_align_t in stddef.h and don't provide a fallback. For pre-C++11,
require __STDCPP_NEW_ALIGNMENT__ in <new> as provided by clang in all
standard modes. Adjust test cases to avoid testing or using max_align_t
in pre-C++11 mode and also to better deal with alignof(max_align_t)>16.
Document requirements of the alignment tests around natural alignment of
power-of-two-sized types.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73245
The testing script used to test libc++ historically did not like directories
without any testing files, so these tests had been added. Since this is
not necessary anymore, we can now remove these files. This has the benefit
that the total number of tests reflects the real number of tests more
closely, and we also skip some unnecessary work (especially relevant when
running tests over SSH).
However, some nothing_to_do.pass.cpp tests actually serve the purpose of
documenting that an area of the Standard doesn't need to be tested, or is
tested elsewhere. These files are not removed by this commit.
Removal done with:
import os
import itertools
for (dirpath, dirnames, filenames) in itertools.chain(os.walk('./libcxx/test'),
os.walk('./libcxxabi/test')):
if len(filenames + dirnames) > 1 and \
any(p == 'nothing_to_do.pass.cpp' for p in filenames):
os.remove(os.path.join(dirpath, 'nothing_to_do.pass.cpp'))
Forcing -Werror and other warnings means that the test suite isn't
actually testing what most people are seeing in their code -- it seems
better and less arbitrary to compile these tests as close as possible
to the compiler default instead.
Removing -Werror also means that we get to differentiate between
diagnostics that are errors and those that are warnings, which makes
the test suite more precise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76311
Some tests do not fail at all when -verify is not supported, unless some
arbitrary warning flag is added to make them fail. We currently used
-Werror=unused-result to make them fail, but doing so makes the test
suite a lot more inscrutable. It seems better to just disable those
tests when -verify is not supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76256
This patch updates <type_traits> to use builtin type traits whenever
possible to improve compile times.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67900
Summary:
Android's libc uses new/delete internally and these are counted, so
the counter needs to be reset to zero at the start of the test.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, #libc, ldionne
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Subscribers: dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76091
This patch qualifies calls to ref and cref inside ref(reference_wrapper<T>)
and cref(reference_wrapper<T>), respectively. These previously unqualified
calls could break in the presence of user functions called ref/cref inside
associated namespaces: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/8VfprT
Fixes PR44398.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74287
[libcxx] [test] Calling min and max on an empty valarray is UB.
libcxx/test/std/numerics/numarray/template.valarray/valarray.members/min.pass.cpp
libcxx/test/std/numerics/numarray/template.valarray/valarray.members/max.pass.cpp
The calls `v1.min();` and `v1.max();` were emitting nodiscard warnings
with MSVC's STL. Upon closer inspection, these calls were triggering
undefined behavior. N4842 [valarray.members] says:
"T min() const;
8 Preconditions: size() > 0 is true.
T max() const;
10 Preconditions: size() > 0 is true."
As these tests already provide coverage for non-empty valarrays
(immediately above), I've simply deleted the code for empty valarrays.
[libcxx] [test] Add macros to msvc_stdlib_force_include.h (NFC).
libcxx/test/support/msvc_stdlib_force_include.h
These macros are being used by:
libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.trans/meta.trans.other/result_of11.pass.cpp
Defining them to nothing allows that test to pass.
[libcxx] [test] Silence MSVC warning C5063 for is_constant_evaluated (NFC).
libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.const.eval/is_constant_evaluated.pass.cpp
This test is intentionally writing code that MSVC intentionally warns
about, so the warning should be silenced.
Additionally, comment an endif for clarity.
[libcxx] [test] Silence MSVC warning C4127 (NFC).
libcxx/test/support/charconv_test_helpers.h
MSVC avoids emitting this warning when it sees a single constexpr value
being tested, but this condition is a mix of compile-time and run-time.
Using push-disable-pop is the least intrusive way to silence this.
[libcxx] [test] Silence MSVC truncation warning (NFC).
libcxx/test/std/containers/sequences/vector/vector.cons/construct_iter_iter.pass.cpp
This test is intentionally truncating float to int, which MSVC
intentionally warns about, so push-disable-pop is necessary.
[libcxx] [test] Avoid truncation warnings in erase_if tests (NFC).
libcxx/test/std/containers/associative/map/map.erasure/erase_if.pass.cpp
libcxx/test/std/containers/associative/multimap/multimap.erasure/erase_if.pass.cpp
libcxx/test/std/containers/unord/unord.map/erase_if.pass.cpp
libcxx/test/std/containers/unord/unord.multimap/erase_if.pass.cpp
These tests use maps with `short` keys and values, emitting MSVC
truncation warnings from `int`. Adding `static_cast` to `key_type`
and `mapped_type` avoids these warnings.
As these tests require C++20 mode (or newer), for brevity I've changed
the multimap tests to use emplace to initialize the test data.
This has no effect on the erase_if testing.
Too many warnings are being disabled too quickly. Warnings are
important to keeping libc++ correct. This patch re-enables two
warnings: -Wconstant-evaluated and -Wdeprecated-copy.
In future, all warnings disabled for the test suite should require
an attached bug. The bug should state the plan for re-enabling that
warning, or a strong case why it should remain disabled.
Summary:
Android added quick_exit()/at_quick_exit() in API level 21,
aligned_alloc() in API level 28, and timespec_get() in API level 29,
but has the other C11 features at all API levels (since they're basically
just coming from clang directly).
_LIBCPP_HAS_QUICK_EXIT and _LIBCPP_HAS_TIMESPEC_GET already existed,
so we can reuse them. (And use _LIBCPP_HAS_TIMESPEC_GET in a few more
places where _LIBCPP_HAS_C11_FEATURES has been used as a proxy. This
isn't correct for Android.)
_LIBCPP_HAS_ALIGNED_ALLOC is added, to cover aligned_alloc() (obviously).
Add a missing std:: before aligned_alloc in a cstdlib test, and remove a
couple of !defined(_WIN32)s now that we're explicitly testing
TEST_HAS_ALIGNED_ALLOC rather than TEST_HAS_C11_FEATURES.
Reviewers: danalbert, EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: danalbert
Subscribers: srhines, christof, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69929
PR13592 was caused by a problem in how to compiler implemented the
__is_convertible_to intrinsic. That problem, reported as PR13591,
was fixed back in 2012. We don't support such old versions of Clang
anyway, so we don't need the library workaround that had been added
to solve PR13592 (while waiting for the compiler fix).
Summary: The implementation of P1152R4 in Clang has resulted in some deprecation warnings appearing in the libc++ and libc++abi test suite. Fix or suppress these warnings.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, ldionne, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68879
llvm-svn: 375307
* Add the conventional `return 0` to `main` in `variant.assign/conv.pass.cpp` and `variant.ctor/conv.pass.cpp`
* Fix some MSVC signed-to-unsigned conversion warnings by replacing `int` literarls with `unsigned int` literals
llvm-svn: 374723
`make_optional<string>(4, 'X')` passes `4` (an `int`) as the first argument to `string`'s `(size_t, charT)` constructor, triggering a signed/unsigned mismatch warning when compiling with MSVC at `/W4`. The incredibly simple fix is to instead use an unsigned literal (`4u`).
llvm-svn: 374684
* Silence unused-local-typedef warnings: `map.cons/assign_initializer_list.pass.cpp` (and the `set.cons` variant) uses a local typedef only within `LIBCPP_ASSERT`s, so clang diagnoses it as unused when testing non-libc++.
* Add missing include: `c.math/abs.pass.cpp` uses `std::numeric_limits` but failed to `#include <limits>`.
* Don't test non-type: A "recent" change to `meta.trans.other/underlying_type.pass.cpp` unconditionally tests the type `F` which is conditionally defined.
* Use `hash<long long>` instead of `hash<short>` with `int` in `unordered_meow` deduction guide tests to avoid truncation warnings.
* Convert `3.14` explicitly in `midpoint.float.pass` since MSVC incorrectly diagnoses `float meow = 3.14;` as truncating.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68681
llvm-svn: 374248
Summary:
LWG 3158 marks the allocator_arg_t constructor of std::tuple as
conditionnally explicit based on whether the default constructors
of the tuple's members are explicitly default constructible.
This was previously committed as r372778 and reverted in r372832 due to
the commit breaking LLVM's build in C++14 mode. This issue has now been
addressed.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65232
llvm-svn: 373092
Summary:
LWG2510 makes tag types like allocator_arg_t explicitly default
constructible instead of implicitly default constructible. It also
makes the constructors for std::pair and std::tuple conditionally
explicit based on the explicit-ness of the default constructibility
for the pair/tuple's elements.
This was previously committed as r372777 and reverted in r372832 due to
the commit breaking LLVM's build in C++14 mode. This issue has now been
addressed.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65161
llvm-svn: 372983
We don't support GCC 4 and older according to the documentation, so
we should pretend it doesn't exist.
This is a re-application of r372787.
llvm-svn: 372916
This also reverts:
- r372778: [libc++] Implement LWG 3158
- r372782: [libc++] Try fixing tests that fail on GCC 5 and older
- r372787: Purge mentions of GCC 4 from the test suite
Reason: the change breaks compilation of LLVM with libc++, for details see
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/libcxx-dev/2019-September/000599.html
llvm-svn: 372832
Summary: As suggested by @ldionne in D66178, this patch removes C++03 variadics //only//. Following patches will apply more updates.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits, ldionne
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67675
llvm-svn: 372780
Summary:
LWG 3158 marks the allocator_arg_t constructor of std::tuple as
conditionnally explicit based on whether the default constructors
of the tuple's members are explicitly default constructible.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65232
llvm-svn: 372778
Summary:
LWG2510 makes tag types like allocator_arg_t explicitly default
constructible instead of implicitly default constructible. It also
makes the constructors for std::pair and std::tuple conditionally
explicit based on the explicit-ness of the default constructibility
for the pair/tuple's elements.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65161
llvm-svn: 372777
Summary:
The resolution of LWG 3199 makes sure that input-streaming into an empty bitset
does not set the failbit on the input stream.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65105
llvm-svn: 369422
In r368882, I enabled those tests for all AppleClang's above version 9.
However, it turns out that the feature is only supported starting with
AppleClang 10.0.1, not AppleClang 10.0.0. This commit fixes that hole.
llvm-svn: 369409
Like CTAD for std::unordered_set, AppleClang 9's support for CTAD is
insufficient. I suspect the corresponding LLVM Clang is broken too,
but we don't seem to have testers using that Clang.
llvm-svn: 368911
Summary:
We were using implicit deduction guides instead of explicit ones,
however the implicit ones don't do work anymore when changing the
constructors.
This commit adds the actual guides specified in the Standard to make
libc++ (1) closer to the Standard and (2) more resistent to changes
in std::tuple's constructors.
Reviewers: Quuxplusone
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65225
llvm-svn: 368599
The standard disallows narrowing conversions when constructing a variant.
This is checked by attempting to perform braced initialization of the
destination type from the argument type. However, braced initialization
can force the compiler (mostly clang) to eagerly instantiate the
constructors of the destintation type -- which can lead to errors in
a non-immediate context.
However, as variant is currently specified, the narrowing checks only
observably apply when the destination type is arithmetic. Meaning we can
skip the check for class types. Hense avoiding the hard errors.
In order to cause fewer build breakages, this patch avoids the narrowing
check except when the destination type is arithmetic.
llvm-svn: 366022
Previously we implemented all one trillion tuple-like constructors using
a single generic overload. This worked fairly well, except that it
differed in behavior from the standard version because it didn't
consider both T&& and T const&. This was observable for certain
types.
This patch addresses that issue by splitting the generic constructor
in two. We now provide both T&& and T const& versions of the
tuple-like constructors (sort of).
llvm-svn: 365973
The paper P0608R3 - "A sane variant converting constructor" disallows
narrowing conversions in variant. It was meant to address this
surprising problem:
std::variant<std::string, bool> v = "abc";
assert(v.index() == 1); // constructs a bool.
However, it also disables every potentially narrowing conversion. For
example:
variant<unsigned> v = 0; // ill-formed
variant<string, double> v2 = 42; // ill-formed (int -> double narrows)
These latter changes break code. A lot of code. Within Google it broke
on the order of a hundred thousand target with thousands of root causes
responsible for the breakages.
Of the breakages related to the narrowing restrictions, none of them
exposed outstanding bugs. However, the breakages caused by boolean
conversions (~13 root causes), all but one of them were bugs.
For this reasons, I am adding a flag to disable the narrowing conversion
changes but not the boolean conversions one.
One purpose of this flag is to allow users to opt-out of breaking changes
in variant until the offending code can be cleaned up. For non-trivial
variant usages the amount of cleanup may be significant.
This flag is also required to support automated tooling, such as
clang-tidy, that can automatically fix code broken by this change.
In order for clang-tidy to know the correct alternative to construct,
it must know what alternative was being constructed previously, which
means running it over the old version of std::variant.
Because this change breaks so much code, I will be implementing the
aforementioned clang-tidy check in the very near future.
Additionally I'm plan present this new information to the committee so they can
re-consider if this is a breaking change we want to make.
I think libc++ should very seriously consider pulling this change
before the 9.0 release branch is cut. But that's a separate discussion
that I will start on the lists.
For now this is the minimal first step.
llvm-svn: 365960
types.
It seems some people like to write types that can explicitly convert
to anything, but cannot be used to explicitly construct anything.
This patch makes tuple tolerate such types, as is required
by the standard.
llvm-svn: 365074
These functions are key to allowing the use of rvalues and variadics
in C++03 mode. Everything works the same as in C++11, except for one
tangentially related case:
struct T {
T(T &&) = default;
};
In C++11, T has a deleted copy constructor. But in C++03 Clang gives
it both a move and a copy constructor. This seems reasonable enough
given the extensions it's using.
The other changes in this patch were the minimal set required
to keep the tests passing after the move/forward change. Most notably
the removal of the `__rv<unique_ptr>` hack that was present
in an attempt to make unique_ptr move only without language support.
llvm-svn: 364063
This was found to be broken on Clang trunk. This is a revert of the
following commits (the subsequent commits added XFAILs to the tests
that were missing from the original submission):
r362986: Implement deduction guides for map/multimap.
r363014: Add some XFAILs
r363097: Add more XFAILs
r363197: Add even more XFAILs
llvm-svn: 363688
Some tests require `TEST_WORKAROUND_CONSTEXPR_IMPLIES_NOEXCEPT`, but they
did not include the header that defines that macro.
Thanks to Michael Park for the patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62920
llvm-svn: 362660
Summary:
The current implementation of aligned storage was written before we had `alignas`, so it used a list of builtin types to force the alignment. But this doesn't work overaligned requests.
This patch adds a fallback case supporting over-alignment. It only affects case that were previously ill-formed.
Reviewers: rsmith, ldionne, dlj, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: mclow.lists, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61301
llvm-svn: 359596
When the arguments to tuple cat were const, the const was incorrectly
propagated into the type of the resulting tuple. For example:
const std::tuple<int> t(42);
auto r = std::tuple_cat(t, t);
// Incorrect! should be std::tuple<int, int>.
static_assert(is_same_v<decltype(r), std::tuple<const int, const int>>);
llvm-svn: 359255
All constant expressions are non-potentially-throwing in C++14, but that is *not* the case in C++17. Change these tests of the `variant`-flavored overloads of `std::get` to expect the correct behavior when the compiler is not GCC or is GCC 9+.
Credit to Jonathan Wakely for providing an improved version of my initial change that validates the incorrect behavior on GCC < 9 as well as validating the correct behavior on other compilers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61033
llvm-svn: 359220
Teach libcxx to stop using various deprecated __has_* type traits, in favor of
the ("modern", C++11 era) __is_* type traits.
This is mostly just a simplification, but fixes at least one bug: _Atomic T
should be considered trivially-destructible, but is not considered to be POD by
Clang, and __has_trivial_destructor is specified in the GCC documentation as
returning false for non-POD non-class types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48292
llvm-svn: 359159
Summary:
This is a re-application of r357533 and r357531. They had been reverted
because we thought the commits broke the LLDB data formatters, but it
turns out this was because only r357531 had been included in the CI
run.
Before this patch, we would only ever throw an exception if the badbit
was set on the stream. The Standard is currently very unclear on how
exceptions should be propagated and what error flags should be set by
the input stream operations. This commit changes libc++ to behave under
a different (but valid) interpretation of the Standard. This interpretation
of the Standard matches what other implementations are doing.
This effectively implements the wording in p1264r0. It hasn't been voted
into the Standard yet, however there is wide agreement that the fix is
correct and it's just a matter of time before the fix is standardized.
PR21586
PR15949
rdar://problem/15347558
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49863
llvm-svn: 357775
This reverts commits r357533 and r357531, which broke the LLDB
data formatters. I'll hold off until we know how to fix the data
formatters accordingly.
llvm-svn: 357536
Summary:
Before this patch, we would only ever throw an exception if the badbit
was set on the stream. The Standard is currently very unclear on how
exceptions should be propagated and what error flags should be set by
the input stream operations. This commit changes libc++ to behave under
a different (but valid) interpretation of the Standard. This interpretation
of the Standard matches what other implementations are doing.
I will submit a paper in San Diego to clarify the Standard such that the
interpretation used in this commit (and other implementations) is the only
possible one.
PR21586
PR15949
rdar://problem/15347558
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49863
llvm-svn: 357531
Summary: Completes P0357R3, which was merged into the C++20 Working Draft in San Diego.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54722
llvm-svn: 357423
Summary:
Currently the C++03 implementation of common_type has much different behavior than the C++11 one. This causes bugs, including inside `<chrono>`.
This patch unifies the two implementations as best it can. The more code they share, the less their behavior can diverge.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, ldionne, sbenza
Reviewed By: mclow.lists, ldionne
Subscribers: libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59678
llvm-svn: 357370
Some tests #include <iostream> but they don't use anything from the
header. Those are probably artifacts of when the tests were developped.
llvm-svn: 357181
Summary:
Also add the corresponding XFAILs to tests that require filesystem.
The approach taken to mark <filesystem> as unavailable in this patch
is to mark all the header as unavailable using #pragma clang attribute.
Marking each declaration using the attribute is more intrusive and
does not provide a lot of value right now because pretty much everything
in <filesystem> requires dylib support, often transitively.
This is an alternative to https://reviews.llvm.org/D59093.
A similar (but partial) patch was already applied in r356558.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59224
llvm-svn: 356616
This fixes CI for back-deployment testers on platforms that don't have
<filesystem> support in the dylib.
This is effectively half of https://reviews.llvm.org/D59224. The other
half requires fixes in Clang.
llvm-svn: 356558
This silences a known issue, as can be seen by looking at similar
tests for other clocks, like time.clock.steady/consistency.pass.cpp.
llvm-svn: 356528
Summary:
This patch treats <filesystem> as a first-class citizen of the dylib,
like all other sub-libraries (e.g. <chrono>). As such, it also removes
all special handling for installing the filesystem library separately
or disabling part of the test suite from the lit command line.
Unlike the previous attempt (r356500), this doesn't remove all the
filesystem tests.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: mgorny, christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, jfb, jdoerfert, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59152
llvm-svn: 356518
When I applied r356500 (https://reviews.llvm.org/D59152), I somehow
deleted all of filesystem's tests. I will revert r356500 and re-apply
it properly.
llvm-svn: 356505
Summary:
This patch treats <filesystem> as a first-class citizen of the dylib,
like all other sub-libraries (e.g. <chrono>). As such, it also removes
all special handling for installing the filesystem library separately
or disabling part of the test suite from the lit command line.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: mgorny, christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, jfb, jdoerfert, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59152
llvm-svn: 356500
Summary:
In r342843, I added deprecation warnings to some facilities that were
deprectated in C++14 and C++17. However, those deprecation warnings
were not enabled by default.
After discussing this on IRC, we had finally gotten consensus to enable
those warnings by default, and I'm getting around to doing that only
now.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, jdoerfert, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58140
llvm-svn: 355961
When Clang tries to complete a type containing `std::optional` it
considers the `in_place_t` constructor with no arguments which checks
if the value type is default constructible. If the value type is a
nested class type, then this check occurs too early and poisons the
is_default_constructible trait.
This patch makes optional deduce `in_place_t` so we can prevent
this early SFINAE evaluation. Technically this could break people
doing weird things with the in_place_t tag, but that seems less
important than making the nested class case work.
llvm-svn: 355877
Those tests fail when linking against a new dylib but running against
macosx10.7. I believe this is caused by a duplicate definition of the
RTTI for exception classes in libc++.dylib and libc++abi.dylib, but
this matter still needs some investigation.
This issue was not caught previously because all the tests always linked
against the same dylib used for running (because LIT made it impossible
to do otherwise before r349171).
rdar://problem/46809586
llvm-svn: 354940
It turns out that I un-XFAILed too many tests in r353210: some tests
actually fail whether exceptions are enabled or not because they use
types that are marked as unavailable even when exceptions are disabled.
llvm-svn: 353215
Some tests are marked as failing on platforms where the dylib does not
provide the required exception classes. However, when testing with
exceptions disabled, those tests shouldn't be marked as failing.
llvm-svn: 353210
When the whole test only works starting at some version of the Standard,
use UNSUPPORTED lit markup instead of #ifdef TEST_STD_VER. This provides
more visibility into the test suite.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D57704.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 353206
This patch removes some vendor-specific availability XFAILs from the
test suite. In the future, when a new feature is introduced in the
dylib, an availability macro should be created and a matching lit
feature should be created. That way, the test suite can XFAIL whenever
the implementation lacks the necessary feature instead of being
cluttered by vendor-specific annotations.
Right now, those vendor-specific annotations are still somewhat cluttering
the test suite by being in `config.py`, but at least they are localized.
In the future, we could design a way to define those less intrusively or
even automatically based on the availability macros that already exist
in <__config>.
llvm-svn: 353201
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
The meta-programming that attempted to form the invoke call expression
was not in a SFINAE context. This made it a hard error to provide
non-referencable types like 'void' or 'void (...) const'.
This patch fixes the error by checking the validity of the call
expression within a SFINAE context.
llvm-svn: 352522
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Summary:
Starting in Clang 8.0 and GCC 8.0, `alignof` and `__alignof` return different values in same cases. Specifically `alignof` and `_Alignof` return the minimum alignment for a type, where as `__alignof` returns the preferred alignment. libc++ currently uses `__alignof` but means to use `alignof`. See llvm.org/PR39713
This patch introduces the macro `_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF` so we can control which spelling gets used.
This patch does not introduce any ABI guard to provide the old behavior with newer compilers. However, if we decide that is needed, this patch makes it trivial to implement.
I think we should commit this change immediately, and decide what we want to do about the ABI afterwards.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF
Reviewed By: ldionne, EricWF
Subscribers: jyknight, christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54814
llvm-svn: 351289
Summary:
P0602R4 makes the special member functions of optional and variant
conditionally trivial based on the types in the optional/variant.
We already implemented that, but the tests were organized as if this
were a non-standard extension. This patch reorganizes the tests in a
way that makes more sense since this is not an extension anymore.
Reviewers: EricWF, mpark, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54772
llvm-svn: 350884
There were 3 tests with 'int main(void)', and 6 with the return type on a different line. I'm about to send a patch for main in tests, and this NFC change is unrelated.
llvm-svn: 350770
Makes libc++ behavior consistent between C++03 and C++11.
Can use `decltype` in C++03 because `include/__config` defines a macro when
`decltype` is not available.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, erik.pilkington, ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: dexonsmith, cfe-commits, howard.hinnant, ldionne, christof, jkorous, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48753
llvm-svn: 349676
Explicitly disable the -Wformat-zero-length diagnostic when running
ctime tests, since one of the test cases passes zero-length format
string to strftime(). When strftime() is appropriately decorated
with __attribute__(format, ...), this caused the test to fail because
of this warning (e.g. on NetBSD).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55661
llvm-svn: 349294
Summary:
std::tuple marks its constructors as noexcept when the corresponding
memberwise constructors are noexcept too -- this commit improves std::pair
so that it behaves the same.
This is a re-application of r348824, which broke the build in C++03 mode
because a test was marked as supported in C++03 when it shouldn't be.
Note:
I did not add support in the explicit and non-explicit `pair(_Tuple&& __p)`
constructors because those are non-standard extensions, and supporting them
properly is tedious (we have to copy the rvalue-referenceness of the deduced
_Tuple&& onto the result of tuple_element).
<rdar://problem/29537079>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48669
llvm-svn: 348847
Summary:
std::tuple marks its constructors as noexcept when the corresponding
memberwise constructors are noexcept too -- this commit improves std::pair
so that it behaves the same.
Note:
I did not add support in the explicit and non-explicit `pair(_Tuple&& __p)`
constructors because those are non-standard extensions, and supporting them
properly is tedious (we have to copy the rvalue-referenceness of the deduced
_Tuple&& onto the result of tuple_element).
<rdar://problem/29537079>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48669
llvm-svn: 348824
The tests were marked to fail based on the 'availability' LIT feature.
However, those tests should really only be failing when we run them
against the dylibs that were deployed on macosx10.7 and macosx10.8,
which the deployment target has nothing to do with.
This caused the tests to unexpectedly pass when running the tests
with deployment target macosx10.{7,8} but running with a recent dylib.
llvm-svn: 348520
Summary:
This was voted into C++20 in San Diego. Note that there was a revision
D0318R2 which did include unwrap_reference_t, but we mistakingly voted
P0318R1 into the C++20 Working Draft (which does not include
unwrap_reference_t). This patch implements D0318R2, which is what
we'll end up with in the Working Draft once this mistake has been
fixed.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54485
llvm-svn: 348138
This reverts commit 087f065cb0c7463f521a62599884493aaee2ea12.
The tests were failing on 32 bit builds, and I don't have time
to clean them up right now. I'll recommit tomorrow with fixed tests.
llvm-svn: 347816
Summary:
Starting in Clang 8.0 and GCC 8.0, `alignof` and `__alignof` return different values in same cases. Specifically `alignof` and `_Alignof` return the minimum alignment for a type, where as `__alignof` returns the preferred alignment. libc++ currently uses `__alignof` but means to use `alignof`. See llvm.org/PR39713
This patch introduces the macro `_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF` so we can control which spelling gets used.
This patch does not introduce any ABI guard to provide the old behavior with newer compilers. However, if we decide that is needed, this patch makes it trivial to implement.
I think we should commit this change immediately, and decide what we want to do about the ABI afterwards.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54814
llvm-svn: 347787
Summary:
In PR39232, we noticed that some variant tests started failing in C++2a mode
with recent Clangs, because the rules for literal types changed in C++2a. As
a result, a temporary fix was checked in (enabling the test only in C++17).
This commit is what I believe should be the long term fix: I removed the
tests that checked constexpr default-constructibility with a weird type
from the tests for index() and valueless_by_exception(), and instead I
added tests for those using an obviously literal type in the test for the
default constructor.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, libcxx-commits, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54767
llvm-svn: 347568
The XFAIL started passing since we're only testing for trivial-copyability of
reference_wrapper in C++14 and above. This commit constrains the XFAIL to
gcc-4.9 with C++14 (it would also fail on C++17 and above, but those standards
are not available with GCC 4.9).
llvm-svn: 347264
Some tests use type std::max_align_t, but don't include <cstddef> header
directly. As a result, these tests won't compile against some conformant
libraries.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54645.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 347232
Summary:
P1006 adds support for constexpr in the specialization of pointer_traits
for raw pointers. This is necessary in order to use pointer_traits in
the upcoming constexpr containers. We expect P1006 to be voted into the
working draft for C++20 at the San Diego meeting.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53867
llvm-svn: 346764
Summary:
Some tests (mainly the new C++20 calendar library) fail when libc++ is
tested with '--param=std=c++98'. The failures happen because the tests
actually don't support C++98, but don't mention C++98 in the
'UNSUPPORTED:' line.
This change fixes the issue.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: arphaman, michaelplatings, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53640
llvm-svn: 345148
Revert r344535 "Wrap up the new chrono literals in an #ifdef..."
Revert r344546 "Mark a couple of test cases as 'C++17-only'..."
Some of the buildbot failures were masked by another error,
and this one was probably missed.
llvm-svn: 344580
Debian build bots are running Clang 4, which apparently does not support
the "deprecated" attribute properly. Clang pretends to support the attribute,
but the attribute doesn't do anything.
(live example: https://wandbox.org/permlink/0De69aXns0t1D59r)
On a separate note, I'm not sure I understand why we're even running the
libc++ tests under Clang-4. Is this a configuration we support? I can
understand that libc++ should _build_ with Clang 4, but it's not clear
to me that new libc++ headers should be usable under older compilers
like that.
llvm-svn: 342854
Summary:
These deprecation warnings are opt-in: they are only enabled when the
_LIBCXX_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS macro is defined, which is not the case
by default. Note that this is a first step in the right direction, but
I wasn't able to get an exhaustive list of all deprecated components
per standard, so there's certainly stuff that's missing. The list of
components this commit marks as deprecated is:
in C++11:
- auto_ptr, auto_ptr_ref
- binder1st, binder2nd, bind1st(), bind2nd()
- pointer_to_unary_function, pointer_to_binary_function, ptr_fun()
- mem_fun_t, mem_fun1_t, const_mem_fun_t, const_mem_fun1_t, mem_fun()
- mem_fun_ref_t, mem_fun1_ref_t, const_mem_fun_ref_t, const_mem_fun1_ref_t, mem_fun_ref()
in C++14:
- random_shuffle()
in C++17:
- unary_negate, binary_negate, not1(), not2()
<rdar://problem/18168350>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48912
llvm-svn: 342843
type.
Libc++ correctly asserts that a set of visitors for a variant all
return the same type. However, we use the visitation machinary to
perform relational operations. This causes a static assertion when
some of the alternatives relops return a UDT which is implicitly
convertible to bool instead of 'bool' exactly.
llvm-svn: 342560
zoecarver