As mentioned on D127115, this patch that attempts to recognise shuffle masks that could be simplified to a AND mask - we already have a similar transform that will fold AND -> 'clear mask' shuffle, but this patch handles cases where the referenced elements are not from the same lane indices but are known to be zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129150
combineShiftAnd1ToBitTest already matches "and (not (srl X, C)), 1 --> (and X, 1<<C) == 0" patterns, but we can end up with situations where the not is before the shift.
Part of some yak shaving for D127115 to generalise the "xor (X >> ShiftC), XorC --> (not X) >> ShiftC" fold.
SimplifyDemandedBits is called slightly later which allows the not(sext(x)) -> sext(not(x)) fold to occur via foldLogicOfShifts
As mentioned on D127115, we should be able to further generalise this based off the demanded bits.
This is similar to D125680, but for llvm.experimental.patchpoint
(instead of llvm.experimental.stackmap).
Differential review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129268
Following some recent discussions, this changes the representation
of callbrs in IR. The current blockaddress arguments are replaced
with `!` label constraints that refer directly to callbr indirect
destinations:
; Before:
%res = callbr i8* asm "", "=r,r,i"(i8* %x, i8* blockaddress(@test8, %foo))
to label %asm.fallthrough [label %foo]
; After:
%res = callbr i8* asm "", "=r,r,!i"(i8* %x)
to label %asm.fallthrough [label %foo]
The benefit of this is that we can easily update the successors of
a callbr, without having to worry about also updating blockaddress
references. This should allow us to remove some limitations:
* Allow unrolling/peeling/rotation of callbr, or any other
clone-based optimizations
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/41834)
* Allow duplicate successors
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/45248)
This is just the IR representation change though, I will follow up
with patches to remove limtations in various transformation passes
that are no longer needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129288
If we have a variable shift amount and the demanded mask has leading
zeros, we can propagate those leading zeros to not demand those bits
from operand 0. This can allow zero_extend/sign_extend to become
any_extend. This pattern can occur due to C integer promotion rules.
This transform is already done by InstCombineSimplifyDemanded.cpp where
sign_extend can be turned into zero_extend for example.
Reviewed By: spatel, foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121833
When doing scalable vectorization, the loop vectorizer uses a urem in the computation of the vector trip count. The RHS of that urem is a (possibly shifted) call to @llvm.vscale.
vscale is effectively the number of "blocks" in the vector register. (That is, types such as <vscale x 8 x i8> and <vscale x 1 x i8> both fill one 64 bit block, and vscale is essentially how many of those blocks there are in a single vector register at runtime.)
We know from the RISCV V extension specification that VLEN must be a power of two between ELEN and 2^16. Since our block size is 64 bits, the must be a power of two numbers of blocks. (For everything other than VLEN<=32, but that's already broken.)
It is worth noting that AArch64 SVE specification explicitly allows non-power-of-two sizes for the vector registers and thus can't claim that vscale is a power of two by this logic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129609
We have the same fold in InstCombine - though implemented via OrZero flag on isKnownToBePowerOfTwo. The reasoning here is that either a) the result of the lshr is a power-of-two, or b) we have a div-by-zero triggering UB which we can ignore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129606
To convert CTLZ to popcount we do
x = x | (x >> 1);
x = x | (x >> 2);
...
x = x | (x >>16);
x = x | (x >>32); // for 64-bit input
return popcount(~x);
This smears the most significant set bit across all of the bits
below it then inverts the remaining 0s and does a population count.
To support non-power of 2 types, the last shift amount must be
more than half of the size of the type. For i15, the last shift
was previously a shift by 4, with this patch we add another shift
of 8.
Fixes PR56457.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129431
Noticed while investigating the SystemZ regressions in D77804, prefer handling the knownbits analysis/simplification in the bitop nodes directly before falling back to SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits
visitInlineAsm() in SDAGBuilder was duplicating a lot of the code
in ParseConstraints(), in particular all the logic to determine the
operand value and constraint VT.
Rely on the data computed by ParseConstraints() instead, and update
its ConstraintVT implementation to match getCallOperandValEVT()
more precisely.
As far as I can tell what was happening in the original code is
that the getNode call receives the same operands as the original
node with different SDNodeFlags. The logic inside getNode detects
that the node already exists and intersects the flags into the
existing node and returns it. This results in Op and NewOp for the
TLO.CombineTo call always being the same node.
We may have already called CombineTo as part of the recursive handling.
A second call to CombineTo as we unwind the recursion overwrites
the previous CombineTo. I think this means any time we updated the
poison flags that was the only change that ends up getting made
and we relied on DAGCombiner to revisit and call SimplifyDemandedBits
again. The second time the poison flags wouldn't need to be dropped
and we would keep the CombineTo call from further down the recursion.
We can instead call setFlags to drop the poison flags and remove the
call to TLO.CombineTo. This way we keep the CombineTo from deeper in
the recursion which should be more efficient.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129511
As suggested in the post-commit feedback for D128123,
we can ease the mask constraint to ignore the MSB
(and make the code easier to read by adjusting the check).
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/bbvqWv
This patch restores calls to has_value to make it clear that we are
checking the presence of an optional value, not the underlying value.
This patch partially reverts d08f34b592.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129454
(Reapply after revert in e9ce1a5880 due to
Fuchsia test failures. Removed changes in lib/ExecutionEngine/ other
than error categories, to be checked in more detail and reapplied
separately.)
Bulk remove many of the more trivial uses of ManagedStatic in the llvm
directory, either by defining a new getter function or, in many cases,
moving the static variable directly into the only function that uses it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129120
Bulk remove many of the more trivial uses of ManagedStatic in the llvm
directory, either by defining a new getter function or, in many cases,
moving the static variable directly into the only function that uses it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129120
We already handled this case for add with a constant RHS. A
similar pattern can occur for sub with a constant left hand side.
Test cases use add and a mul representing (neg (shl X, C)) because
that's what I saw in the wild. The mul will be decomposed and then
the new transform can kick in.
Tests have not been committed, but this patch shows the changes.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128769
If all the demanded bits of the AND mask covering the inserted subvector 'X' are known to be one, then the mask isn't affecting the subvector at all.
In which case, if the base vector 'C' is undef/constant, then move the AND mask up to just (constant) fold it directly.
Addresses some of the regressions from D129150, particularly the cases where we're attempting to zero the upper elements of a widened vector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129290
This is almost the same as the abandoned D48529, but it
allows splat vector constants too.
This replaces the x86-specific code that was added with
the alternate patch D48557 with the original generic
combine.
This transform is a less restricted form of an existing
InstCombine and the proposed SDAG equivalent for that
in D128080:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/OUm6N_
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128123
This is done during type legalization since the target representation of
these nodes may not be valid until after type legalization, and after
type legalization the fact that these are dealing with i1 types may be
lost.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128996
Truncates and compares require some changes to generic legalisation functions
to use ElementCount instead of getNumElements.
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129082
Prior to this change, live variable operands passed to
`llvm.experimental.stackmap` would be emitted directly to target nodes,
meaning that they don't get legalised. The upshot of this is that LLVM
may crash when encountering illegally typed target nodes.
e.g. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/21657
This change introduces a platform independent stackmap DAG node whose
operands are legalised as per usual, thus avoiding aforementioned
crashes.
Note that some kinds of argument are still not handled properly, namely
vectors, structs, and large integers, like i128s. These will need to be
addressed in follow-up changes.
Note also that this does not change the behaviour of
`llvm.experimental.patchpoint`. A follow up change will do the same for
this intrinsic.
Differential review:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D125680
This patch adds the support for `fmax` and `fmin` operations in `atomicrmw`
instruction. For now (at least in this patch), the instruction will be expanded
to CAS loop. There are already a couple of targets supporting the feature. I'll
create another patch(es) to enable them accordingly.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127041
As integer div/rem constant expressions are no longer supported,
constants can no longer trap and are always safe to speculate.
Remove the Constant::canTrap() method and its usages.
This removes the insertvalue constant expression, as part of
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179.
This is very similar to the extractvalue removal from D125795.
insertvalue is also not supported in bitcode, so no auto-ugprade
is necessary.
ConstantExpr::getInsertValue() can be replaced with
IRBuilder::CreateInsertValue() or ConstantFoldInsertValueInstruction(),
depending on whether a constant result is required (with the latter
being fallible).
The ConstantExpr::hasIndices() and ConstantExpr::getIndices()
methods also go away here, because there are no longer any constant
expressions with indices.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128719
One motivation to add support for these types are the LD1Q/ST1Q
instructions in SME, for which we have defined a number of load/store
intrinsics which at the moment still take a `<vscale x 16 x i1>` predicate
regardless of their element type.
This patch adds basic support for the nxv1i1 type such that it can be passed/returned
from functions, as well as some basic support to support some existing tests that
result in a nxv1i1 type. It also adds support for splats.
Other operations (e.g. insert/extract subvector, logical ops, etc) will be
supported in follow-up patches.
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm, efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128665
`commonAlignment` is a shortcut to pick the smallest of two `Align`
objects. As-is it doesn't bring much value compared to `std::min`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128345
These intrinsics are now fundemental for SVE code generation and have been
present for a year and a half, hence move them out of the experimental
namespace.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127976
Patch was reverted in 4c5f10a due to buildbot failures, now being
reapplied with updated AArch64 and RISCV tests.
This patch adds handling for the llvm.powi.* intrinsics in
BasicTTIImplBase::getIntrinsicInstrCost() and improves vectorization.
Closes#53887.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128172
According to the vector spec, mf8 is not supported for i8 if ELEN
is 32. Similarily mf4 is not suported for i16/f16 or mf2 for i32/f32.
Since RVVBitsPerBlock is 64 and LMUL is calculated as
((MinNumElements * ElementSize) / RVVBitsPerBlock) this means we
need to disable any type with MinNumElements==1.
For generic IR, these types will now be widened in type legalization.
For RVV intrinsics, we'll probably hit a fatal error somewhere. I plan
to work on disabling the intrinsics in the riscv_vector.h header.
Reviewed By: arcbbb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128286
We're slowly removing SelectionDAG::GetDemandedBits and replacing it with SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits, we no longer have any uses for the vector demanded elt variant.
This patch adds handling for the llvm.powi.* intrinsics in
BasicTTIImplBase::getIntrinsicInstrCost() and improves vectorization.
Closes#53887.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128172
An AArch64ISD::DUP is just a splat, where the known bits for each lane
are the same as the input. This teaches that to computeKnownBitsForTargetNode.
Problems arise for constants though, as a constant BUILD_VECTOR can be
lowered to an AArch64ISD::DUP, which SimplifyDemandedBits would then
turn back into a constant BUILD_VECTOR leading to an infinite cycle.
This has been prevented by adding a isTargetCanonicalConstantNode node
to prevent the conversion back into a BUILD_VECTOR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128144
Similar to the existing (shl (srl x, c1), c2) fold
Part of the work to fix the regressions in D77804
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125836
The VT we want to shrink to may not be legal especially after type
legalization.
Fixes PR56110.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128135
WidenVecOp_INSERT_SUBVECTOR only supported cases where widening
effectively converts the insert into a copy. However, when the
widened subvector is no bigger than the vector being inserted into
and we can be sure there's no loss of data, we can simply emit
another INSERT_SUBVECTOR.
Fixes: #54982
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127508
MinRCSize is 4 and prevents constrainRegClass from changing the
register class if the new class has size less than 4.
IMPLICIT_DEF gets a unique vreg for each use and will be removed
by the ProcessImplicitDef pass before register allocation. I don't
think there is any reason to prevent constraining the virtual register
to whatever register class the use needs.
The attached test case was previously creating a copy of IMPLICIT_DEF
because vrm8nov0 has 3 registers in it.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128005
This helps handling a case where the BUILD_VECTOR has i16 element type
and i32 constant operands
t2: v8i16 = setcc t8, t17, setult:ch
t3: v8i16 = BUILD_VECTOR Constant:i32<1>, ...
t4: v8i16 = and t2, t3
t5: v8i16 = add t8, t4
This can be turned into t5: v8i16 = sub t8, t2, and allows us to remove
t3 and t4 from the DAG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127354
This is modeled after the half-precision fp support. Two new nodes are
introduced for casting from and to bf16. Since casting from bf16 is a
simple operation I opted to always directly lower it to integer
arithmetic. The other way round is more complicated if you want to
preserve IEEE semantics, so it's handled by a new __truncsfbf2
compiler-rt builtin.
This is of course very bare bones, but sufficient to get a semi-softened
fadd on x86.
Possible future improvements:
- Targets with bf16 conversion instructions can now make fp_to_bf16 legal
- The software conversion to bf16 can be replaced by a trivial
implementation under fast math.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126953
Another issue unearthed by D127115
We take a long time to canonicalize an insert_vector_elt chain before being able to convert it into a build_vector - even if they are already in ascending insertion order, we fold the nodes one at a time into the build_vector 'seed', leaving plenty of time for other folds to alter it (in particular recognising when they come from extract_vector_elt resulting in a shuffle_vector that is much harder to fold with).
D127115 makes this particularly difficult as we're almost guaranteed to have the lost the sequence before all possible insertions have been folded.
This patch proposes to begin at the last insertion and attempt to collect all the (oneuse) insertions right away and create the build_vector before its too late.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127595
This patch allows SimplifyDemandedBits to call SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits in cases where the source operand has other uses, enabling us to peek through the shifted value if we don't demand all the bits/elts.
This helps with several of the regressions from D125836
In the same spirit as D73543 and in reply to https://reviews.llvm.org/D126768#3549920 this patch is adding support for `__builtin_memset_inline`.
The idea is to get support from the compiler to easily write efficient memory function implementations.
This patch could be split in two:
- one for the LLVM part adding the `llvm.memset.inline.*` intrinsics.
- and another one for the Clang part providing the instrinsic as a builtin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126903
This should fix a number of shuffle regressions in D127115 where the re-ordered combines mean we fail to fold a EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT/INSERT_VECTOR_ELT sequence into a BUILD_VECTOR if we extract from more than one vector source.
This matches what we do in IR. For the RISC-V test case, this allows
us to use -8 for the AND mask instead of materializing a constant in a register.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127335
During lowering of memcmp/bcmp, the check for a size of 0 is done
in 2 different ways. In rare cases this can lead to a crash in
SystemZSelectionDAGInfo::EmitTargetCodeForMemcmp(). The root cause
is that SelectionDAGBuilder::visitMemCmpBCmpCall() checks for a
constant int value which is not yet evaluated. When the value is
turned into a SDValue, then the evaluation is done and results in
a ConstantSDNode. But EmitTargetCodeForMemcmp() expects the special
case of 0 length to be handled, which results in an assertion.
The fix is to turn the value into a SDValue, so that both functions
use the same check.
Reviewed By: uweigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126900
Extend the TypeWidenVector case of PromoteIntRes_BITCAST to work
with TypeSize directly rather than silently casting to unsigned.
To accomplish this I've extended TypeSize with an interface that
essentially allows TypeSize division when both operands have the
same number of dimensions.
There still exists combinations of scalable vector bitcasts that
cause compiler crashes. I call these out by adding "is missing"
entries to sve-bitcast.
Depends on D126957.
Fixes: #55114
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127126
Bitcasting between unpacked scalable vector types of different
element counts is not a NOP because the live elements are laid out
differently.
01234567
e.g. nxv2i32 = XX??XX??
nxv4f16 = X?X?X?X?
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126957
As noticed on D127115 - we were missing this fold, instead just having the shuffle(shuffle(x,undef,splatmask),undef) fold. We should be able to merge these into one using SelectionDAG::isSplatValue, but we'll need to match the shuffle's undef handling first.
This also exposed an issue in SelectionDAG::isSplatValue which was incorrectly propagating the undef mask across a bitcast (it was trying to just bail with a APInt::isSubsetOf if it found any undefs but that was actually the wrong way around so didn't fire for partial undef cases).
I can't remove the function just yet as it is used in the generated .inc files.
I would also like to provide a way to compare alignment with TypeSize since it came up a few times.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126910
These assert that there are no "useless" assertzext/assertsext nodes
(that assert a wider width than a following trunc), but I don't think
there is anything preventing such nodes from reaching this code.
I don't think the assertion is relevant for correctness of this
transform either -- if such an assert is present, then the other
one will always be to a smaller width, and we'll pick that one.
The assertion dates back to D37017.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55846.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126952
Move the code that was added for D126896 after the normal recursive calls
to computeKnownBits. This allows us to calculate trailing zeros.
Previously we would break out of the switch before the recursive calls.
Some cl::ZeroOrMore were added to avoid the `may only occur zero or one times!`
error. More were added due to cargo cult. Since the error has been removed,
cl::ZeroOrMore is unneeded.
Also remove cl::init(false) while touching the lines.
When promoting a shift, make sure we only fetch the second operand
after promoting the first. Load promotion may replace users of the
old load, and we don't want to be left with a dangling reference to
the old load instruction.
The crashing test case is from https://reviews.llvm.org/D126689#3553212.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126886
If C is non-negative, the result of the smax must also be
non-negative, so all sign bits of the result are 0.
This allows DAGCombiner to remove a zext_inreg in the modified test.
This zext_inreg started as a sext that became zext before type
legalization then was promoted to a zext_inreg.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126896
With a fix for an expensive checks build failure exposed by new RISC-V tests.
Something about expanding two rotates in type legalization caused a change
in the remapping tables that the expensive checks verifying wasn't expecting.
See comment in the code for how it was fixed.
Tests came from this commit that exposed the bug
[RISCV] Add test cases showing failure to remove mask on rotate amounts.
If the masking AND has multiple users we fail to remove it.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126036
The second argument to is_fp_class specifies the set of floating-point
class to test against. It can be zero, in this case the intrinsic is
expected to return zero value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112025
Followup to D125988 - FPOW is similar to FREM and will most likely scalarize to libcalls, so unroll before widening to prevent use making additional libcalls with UNDEF args.
Currently, two element vectors produced as the result of a binary op are
widened to four element vectors on x86 by
DAGTypeLegalizer::WidenVecRes_BinaryCanTrap. If the op still isn't legal
after widening it is unrolled into 4 scalar ops in SelectionDAG before
being converted into a libcall. This way we end up with 4 libcalls (two of
them on known undef elements) instead of the original two libcalls.
This patch modifies DAGTypeLegalizer::WidenVectorResult to ensure that if
it is known that a binary op will be tunred into a libcall, it is unrolled
instead of being widened. This prevents the creation of the extra scalar
instructions on known undef elements and (eventually) libacalls with known
undef parameters which would otherwise be created when the op gets expanded
post widening.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125988
If the VT is i2, then 2 is really -2.
Test has not been commited yet, but diff shows the change.
Fixes PR55644.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126213
I had initially assumed this was the problem with
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55271#issuecomment-1133426243
But it turns out that was a simpler issue. This patch is still
more correct than what we were doing before so figured I'd submit
it anyway.
No test case because I'm not sure how to get an undef around
until expansion.
Looking at the test deltas I wonder if it be valid to combine
(sext_inreg (freeze (aextload X))) -> (freeze (sextload X)).
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126175
abs should only produce a positive value or the signed minimum
value. This means we can't fold abs(undef) to undef as that would
allow more values. Fold to 0 instead to match InstSimplify.
Fixes test mentioned in comment on pr55271.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126174
Most clients only used these methods because they wanted to be able to
extend or truncate to the same bit width (which is a no-op). Now that
the standard zext, sext and trunc allow this, there is no reason to use
the OrSelf versions.
The OrSelf versions additionally have the strange behaviour of allowing
extending to a *smaller* width, or truncating to a *larger* width, which
are also treated as no-ops. A small amount of client code relied on this
(ConstantRange::castOp and MicrosoftCXXNameMangler::mangleNumber) and
needed rewriting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125557
This function tries to match (a >> 8) | (a << 8) as (bswap a) >> 16.
If the SRL isn't masked and the high bits aren't demanded, we still
need to ensure that bits 23:16 are zero. After the right shift they
will be in bits 15:8 which is where the important bits from the SHL
end up. It's only a bswap if the OR on bits 15:8 only takes the bits
from the SHL.
Fixes PR55484.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125641
The patch does not pass math flags to float VPCmpIntrinsics because LLParser
could not identify float VPCmpIntrinsics as FPMathOperators.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125600
If we're using shift pairs to mask, then relax the one use limit if the shift amounts are equal - we'll only be generating a single AND node.
AArch64 has a couple of regressions due to this, so I've enforced the existing one use limit inside a AArch64TargetLowering::shouldFoldConstantShiftPairToMask callback.
Part of the work to fix the regressions in D77804
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125607
This patch uses VP_REDUCE_AND and VP_REDUCE_OR to replace VP_REDUCE_SMAX,VP_REDUCE_SMIN,VP_REDUCE_UMAX and VP_REDUCE_UMIN for mask vector type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125002
During early gather/scatter enablement two different approaches
were taken to represent scaled indices:
* A Scale operand whereby byte_offsets = Index * Scale
* An IndexType whereby byte_offsets = Index * sizeof(MemVT.ElementType)
Having multiple representations is bad as shown by this patch which
fixes instances where the two are out of sync. The dedicated scale
operand is more flexible and pervasive so this patch removes the
UNSCALED values from IndexType. This means all indices are scaled
but the scale can be one, hence unscaled. SDNodes now use the scale
operand to answer the "isScaledIndex" question.
I toyed with the idea of keeping the UNSCALED enums and helper
functions but because they will have no uses and force SDNodes to
validate the set of supported values I figured it's best to remove
them. We can re-add them if there's a real need. For similar
reasons I've kept the IndexType enum when a bool could be used as I
think being explicitly looks better.
Depends On D123347
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123381
If we use multiply it would be with 0x0101 which is 1 more than a power
of 2. On some targets we would expand this to shl+add. By avoiding the
multiply earlier, we can generate better code.
Note, PowerPC doesn't do the shl+add expansion of multiply so one of
the tests increased in instruction count.
Limiting to scalars because it almost always increased the number of
instructions in vector tests.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125638
The patch make users not need to know getNode with SDNodeFlags argument may not
pass its flags.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125659
FunctionLoweringInfo::StatepointRelocationMaps map is used to pass GC pointer
lowering information from statepoint to gc.relocate which may appear ini
different block.
D124444 introduced different lowering for local and non-local relocates.
Local relocates use SDValue and non-local relocates use value exported to VReg.
But I overlooked the fact that StatepointRelocationMap is indexed not by
GCRelocate instruction, but by derived pointer. This works incorrectly when
we have two relocates (one local and another non-local) of the same value,
because they need different relocation records.
This patch fixes the problem by recording relocation information per relocate
instruction, not per derived pointer. This way, each gc.relocate can be lowered
differently.
Reviewed By: skatkov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125538
FastISel tries to fold loads into the single using instruction.
However, if the register has fixups, then there may be additional
uses through an alias of the register.
In particular, this fixes the problem reported at
https://reviews.llvm.org/D119432#3507087. The load register is
(at the time of load folding) only used in a single call instruction.
However, selection of the bitcast has added a fixup between the
load register and the cross-BB register of the bitcast result.
After fixups are applied, there would now be two uses of the load
register, so load folding is not legal.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125459
SelectionDAG::FoldConstantArithmetic determines if operands are foldable constants, so we don't need to bother with isConstantOrConstantVector / Opaque tests before calling it directly.
SelectionDAG::FoldConstantArithmetic determines if operands are foldable constants, so we don't need to bother with isConstantOrConstantVector / Opaque tests before calling it directly.
Pulled out of D77804 as its going to be easier to address the regressions individually.
This patch allows SimplifyDemandedBits to call SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits in cases where the source operand has other uses, enabling us to peek through the shifted value if we don't demand all the bits/elts.
The lost RISCV gorc2 fold shouldn't be a problem - instcombine would have already destroyed that pattern - see https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/50553
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124839
As suggested from 02f8519502, this uses the
isAnyConstantBuildVector method in lieu of separate
isBuildVectorOfConstantSDNodes calls. It should
otherwise be an NFC.
This prevents an infinite loop from D123801, where code trying to reduce
the total number of bitcasts, but also handling constants, could create
the opposite transform. Prevent the transform in these case to let the
bitcast of a constant transform naturally.
Fixes#55345
Like other shifts, the type isn't required to match. We shouldn't
assume we can call ZExtPromotedInteger.
I tested the PromoteIntOp_FunnelShift locally by removing the promotion
of the shift amount from PromoteIntRes_FunnelShift. But with the final
version of this patch it is never executed on any tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125106
This is part of an ongoing effort toward making DAGCombine process the nodes in topological order.
This is able to discover a couple of new optimizations, but also causes a couple of regression. I nevertheless chose to submit this patch for review as to start the discussion with people working on the backend so we can find a good way forward.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124743
Add helper functions to query the signed and scaled properties
of ISD::IndexType along with functions to change them.
Remove setIndexType from MaskedGatherSDNode because it only has
one usage and typically should only be changed alongside its
index operand.
Minimise the direct use of the enum values to lay the groundwork
for more refactoring.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123347
Something is going wrong with the BigEndian PowerPC bot. It is hard to
tell what is wrong from here, but attempt to fix it by disabling the
combineShuffleOfBitcast combine for bigendian.
Otherwise we have garbage in the upper bits that can affect the
results of the UREM.
Fixes PR55296.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125076
If the mask is made up of elements that form a mask in the higher type
we can convert shuffle(bitcast into the bitcast type, simplifying the
instruction sequence. A v4i32 2,3,0,1 for example can be treated as a
1,0 v2i64 shuffle. This helps clean up some of the AArch64 concat load
combines, along with helping simplify a number of other tests.
The PowerPC combine for v16i8 splat vector loads needed some fixes to
keep it working for v16i8 vectors. This improves the handling of v2i64
shuffles to match too, hopefully improving them in general.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123801
The result of sign_extend_inreg needs to have as many sign bits
as requested by the VT argument. The easiest way to guarantee this
is to fold it to 0.
SystemZ test was modified to avoid using undef.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55178
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124696
This extends the (X & ~Y) | Y to X | Y fold to also work if ~Y is
a truncated not (when taking into account the mask X). This is
done by exporting the infrastructure added in D124856 and reusing
it here.
I've retained the old value of AllowUndefs=false, though probably
this can be switched to true with extra test coverage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124930
Demanded bits analysis may replace a full-width not with a
any_extend (not (truncate X)) pattern. This patch looks through
this kind of pattern in haveNoCommonBitsSet(). Of course, we can
only do this if we only need negated bits in the non-extended part,
as the other bits may now be arbitrary. For example, if we have
haveNoCommonBitsSet(~X & Y, X) then ~X only needs to actually
negate bits set in Y.
This is only a partial solution to the problem in that it allows
add -> or conversion, but the resulting or doesn't get folded yet.
(I guess that will involve exposing getBitwiseNotOperand() as a
more general helper and using that in the relevant transform.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124856
Don't assume the rotation amounts have been correctly normalized - do it as part of the constant folding.
Also, the normalization should be performed with UREM not SREM.
This is the DAG variant of D124763. The code already handles the
general pattern, but not this degenerate case.
This allows folding A + (B&~A) to A | (B&~A) which further holds
to A | B.
Handling on the SDAG level is needed because in the motivating
case the add is actually a getelementptr, which only gets converted
into an add on the SDAG level. However, this patch is not quite
sufficient to handle the getelementptr case yet, because of an
interfering demanded bits simplification.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124772
When looking for memory uses,
reassociationCanBreakAddressingModePattern should check uses of
the outer ADD rather than the inner ADD. We want to know if the
two ops we're reassociating are used by a load/store.
In practice, the existing check usually works because CodeGenPrepare
will make one of the load/stores have an offset of 0 relative to
split GEP. That will make the inner add have a memory use.
To test this, I've manually split the GEPs so there is no 0 offset
store.
This issue was recently discussed in the original review D60294.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124644
SIGN_EXTEND_INREG expansion can trigger a TypeSize error because
"VT.getSizeInBits() == 1" is used to detect for a boolean without
first verifying VT is a scalar.
We try to match as a disguised rotate by constant of these forms
(shl (X | Y), C1) | (srl X, C2) --> (rotl X, C1) | (shl Y, C1)
(shl X, C1) | (srl (X | Y), C2) --> (rotl X, C1) | (srl Y, C2)
We may have also looked through an AND to find the shift. If we
did, we need to apply a mask to the result.
I'll add an AArch64 test and pre-commit it and the RISC-V test
tomorrow.
Fixes PR55201.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124711
When looking through extends of gather/scatter indices it's safe
to convert a known positive signed index to unsigned, but unsigned
indices must remain unsigned.
Depends On D123318
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123326
This is an alternative to D124530. In getUniformBase() only create
scales that match the gather/scatter element size. If targets also
support other scales, then they can produce those scales in target
DAG combines. This is what X86 already does (as long as the
resulting scale would be 1, 2, 4 or 8).
This essentially restores the pre-opaque-pointer state of things.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55021.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124605
refineUniformBase and selectGatherScatterAddrMode both attempt the
transformation:
base(0) + index(A+splat(B)) => base(B) + index(A)
However, this is only safe when index is not implicitly scaled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123222
PowerPC supports `ppc_fp128`, which is not an IEEE floating point
type. The generic lowering of llvm.is_fpclass could not handle it
properly. This change extends the generic lowering code to
support `ppc_fp128`.
The change was tested on emulator using runtime tests from
https://reviews.llvm.org/D112933 and the patch for clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D112932.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113908
Introduced masks where they are not added and improved target dependent
cost models to avoid returning of the incorrect cost results after
adding masks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100486
The description of SETCC says
/// SetCC operator - This evaluates to a true value iff the condition is
/// true. If the result value type is not i1 then the high bits conform
/// to getBooleanContents.
Without this patch, we sign extended the i1 to the used larger type
regardless of getBooleanContents. This resulted in miscompiles, as
shown in the attached testcase that ended up returning -1 instead of
1 when using -mattr=+v.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55168
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124618
Introduced masks where they are not added and improved target dependent
cost models to avoid returning of the incorrect cost results after
adding masks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100486
Cuurently we always export STATEPOINT results (GC pointers lowered via VRegs)
to virtual registers. When processing gc.relocate instructions we have to
generate CopyFromRegs node and then export it to VReg again if gc.relocate
is used in other basic blocks. This results in generation of extra COPY MIR
instruction if statepoint and its gc.relocate are in the same BB, but gc.relocate
result is used in other blocks.
This patch changes this behavior to export statepoint results only if used
in other basic blocks. For local uses StatepointLoweringState.(get|set)Location()
API is used to communicate appropriate statepoint result from `LowerStatepoint()`
to `visitGCRelocate()`
This is NFC and is purely compile time optimization. On big methids it can improve
codegen compile time up to 10%.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124444
This change introduces a new intrinsic, `llvm.is.fpclass`, which checks
if the provided floating-point number belongs to any of the the specified
value classes. The intrinsic implements the checks made by C standard
library functions `isnan`, `isinf`, `isfinite`, `isnormal`, `issubnormal`,
`issignaling` and corresponding IEEE-754 operations.
The primary motivation for this intrinsic is the support of strict FP
mode. In this mode using compare instructions or other FP operations is
not possible, because if the value is a signaling NaN, floating-point
exception `Invalid` is raised, but the aforementioned functions must
never raise exceptions.
Currently there are two solutions for this problem, both are
implemented partially. One of them is using integer operations to
implement the check. It was implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D95948
for `isnan`. It solves the problem of exceptions, but offers one
solution for all targets, although some can do the check in more
efficient way.
The other, implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D96568, introduced a
hook 'clang::TargetCodeGenInfo::testFPKind', which injects a target
specific code into IR to implement `isnan` and some other functions. It is
convenient for targets that have dedicated instruction to determine FP data
class. However using target-specific intrinsic complicates analysis and can
prevent some optimizations.
A special intrinsic for value class checks allows representing data class
tests with enough flexibility. During IR transformations it represents the
check in target-independent way and saves it from undesired transformations.
In the instruction selector it allows efficient lowering depending on the
used target and mode.
This implementation is an extended variant of `llvm.isnan` introduced
in https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854. It is limited to minimal intrinsic
support. Target-specific treatment will be implemented in separate
patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112025
This is a very specific fold to fix an upstream poor codegen issue.
InstCombine has the much more flexible pushFreezeToPreventPoisonFromPropagating but I don't think we're quite there with DAG/TLI handling for canCreateUndefOrPoison/isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison value tracking yet.
Fixes#54911
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124185
We can process the long shuffles (working across several actual
vector registers) in the best way if we take the actual register
represantion into account. We can build more correct representation of
register shuffles, improve number of recognised buildvector sequences.
Also, same function can be used to improve the cost model for the
shuffles. in future patches.
Part of D100486
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115653
We can process the long shuffles (working across several actual
vector registers) in the best way if we take the actual register
represantion into account. We can build more correct representation of
register shuffles, improve number of recognised buildvector sequences.
Also, same function can be used to improve the cost model for the
shuffles. in future patches.
Part of D100486
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115653
1. X%C to the equivalent of X-X/C*C is not always fastest path if there is no SDIV pair exist. So check target have faster for srem only first.
2. Add AArch64 faster path for SREM only pow2 case.
Fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54649
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122968
hasOneUse is not cheap on nodes with chain results that might have
many uses. By checking the opcode first, we can avoid a costly walk
of the use list on nodes we aren't interested in.
Found by investigating calls to hasNUsesOfValue from the example
provided in D123857.
For strict FP16 to work correctly needs some changes in lowering and
legalization:
* SelectionDAGLegalize::PromoteNode was missing handling for some
strict fp opcodes.
* Some of the custom lowering of strict fp operations needed to be
adjusted to work with FP16.
* Custom lowering needed to be added for round-to-int operations.
With this, and the previous patches for the rest of the strict fp
isel, we can set IsStrictFPEnabled = true.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115620
The lowering code did not use the scale operand of MGATHER/MSCATTER
nodes, but instead assumed scaled indices were always scaled based
on the element type of the memory type. This patch adds the missing
support by rewritting the nodes as unscaled variants.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123670
This patch adds support for inline assembly address operands using the "p"
constraint on X86 and SystemZ.
This was in fact broken on X86 (see example at
https://reviews.llvm.org/D110267, Nov 23).
These operands should probably be treated the same as memory operands by
CodeGenPrepare, which have been commented with "TODO" there.
Review: Xiang Zhang and Ulrich Weigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122220
As far as I know getNode will never return a null SDValue.
I'm guessing this was modeled after the FoldConstantArithmetic
call earlier.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123550
Materializing constants on RISCV is simpler if the constant is sign
extended from i32. By default i32 constant operands of phis are
zero extended.
This patch adds a hook to allow RISCV to override this for i32. We
have an existing isSExtCheaperThanZExt, but it operates on EVT which
we don't have at these places in the code.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122951
We're just trying to canonicalize here and won't be using the constant
value returned.
The attached test changes are because we were previously commuting
a seteq X, (splat_vector 0) because we also have (sub 0, X). The
0 is larger than the element type so we don't detect it as a splat
without the AllowTruncation flag. By preventing the commute we are
able to match it to the vmseq.vx instruction during isel. We only
look for constants on the RHS in isel.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123256
fshl (or X, Y), X, C ==/!= 0 --> or (shl Y, C), X ==/!= 0
fshl X, (or X, Y), C ==/!= 0 --> or (srl Y, BW-C), X ==/!= 0
This is similar to an existing setcc-of-rotate fold, but the
matching requires more checks for the more general funnel op:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/Ab2jDd
We are effectively decomposing the funnel shift into logical
shifts, reassociating, and removing a shift.
This should get us the final improvements for x86-64 that were
originally shown in D111530
( https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/49541 );
x86-32 still shows some SHLD/SHRD, so the pattern is not
matching there yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122919
arm64_32 guarantees the high 32 bits of pointer parameters are passed as 0, and
this is modelled in the IR by inserting an AssertZExt after the CopyFromReg.
The function deciding whether registers that need to be preserved actually are
wasn't expecting this so it banned perfectly legitimate tail calls.
This patch aims to overcome an issue in these mappings where, when an ISD
node was registered with BEGIN_REGISTER_VP_SDNODE but outwidth the scope
of a pair of BEGIN_REGISTER_VP_INTRINSIC/END_REGISTER_VP_INTRINSIC
macros, the switch cases fell apart. This in particular happened with
VP_SETCC, where we'd end up with something along the lines of:
case Intrinsic::vp_fcmp:
break;
case Intrinsic::vp_icmp:
break;
ResOpc = ISD::VP_SETCC;
case Intrinsic::vp_store:
...
To remedy this, we introduce a special-purpose mapping macro which can
map any number of VP intrinsic opcodes to an ISD opcode.
As a result, we no longer need to special-case the mapping from vp.icmp
and vp.fcmp to VP_SETCC, as the new helper macro does it for us.
Thanks to @craig.topper for noticing this and to @rogfer01 for the idea.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123324
This patch adds the necessary infrastructure to lower vp.fcmp via
ISD::VP_SETCC to RVV instructions.
Most notably this patch adds cond-code legalization for VP_SETCC,
reusing the existing TargetLowering::LegalizeSetCCCondCode by passing in
additional SDValue parameters for the Mask and EVL. This method then
uses VP operations to legalize the condcode.
There is still a general lack of canonicalization on VP_SETCC as opposed
to SETCC which results in worse code than is theoretically possible.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123051
The VP path was using the split source VTs instead of the split
destination VTs. This may not be a problem today because the VP
nodes going through this have the same source and dest VTs.
It will be a problem when we start using this function for legalizing
VP cast operations.
This patch adds the minimum required to successfully lower vp.icmp via
the new ISD::VP_SETCC node to RVV instructions.
Regular ISD::SETCC goes through a lot of canonicalization which targets
may rely on which has not hereto been ported to VP_SETCC. It also
supports expansion of individual condition codes and a non-boolean
return type. Support for all of that will follow in later patches.
In the case of RVV this largely isn't a problem as the vector integer
comparison instructions are plentiful enough that it can lower all
VP_SETCC nodes on legal integer vectors except for boolean vectors,
which regular SETCC folds away immediately into logical operations.
Floating-point VP_SETCC operations aren't as well supported in RVV and
the backend relies on condition code expansion, so support for those
operations will come in later patches.
Portions of this code were taken from the VP reference patches.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122743
Promotion does not affect the base element type and so the original
index type will remain unchanged. This reflects the behaviour of
DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntOp_MGATHER with no tests affected.
Accord the discussion in D122281, we missing an ISD::AND combine for MLOAD
because it relies on BuildVectorSDNode is fails for scalable vectors.
This patch is intend to handle that, so we can circle back the type MVT::nxv2i32
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122703
E.g. in
```
%i0 = zext <2 x i8> to <2 x i16>
%i1 = bitcast <2 x i16> to <4 x i8>
```
the `%i0`'s zero bits are known to be `0xFF00` (upper half of every element is known zero),
but no elements are known to be zero, and for `%i1`, we don't know anything about zero bits,
but the elements under `0b1010` mask are known to be zero (i.e. the odd elements).
But, we didn't perform such a propagation.
Noticed while investigating more aggressive `vpmaddwd` formation.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123163
Place PersistentId declaration under #if LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS to
reduce memory usage when it is not needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120714
Variable locations now come in two modes, instruction referencing and
DBG_VALUE. At -O0 we pick DBG_VALUE to allow fast construction of variable
information. Unfortunately, SelectionDAG edits the optimisation level in
the presence of opt-bisect-limit, meaning different passes have different
views of what variable location mode we should use. That causes assertions
when they're mixed.
This patch plumbs through a boolean in SelectionDAG from start to
instruction emission, so that we don't rely on the current optimisation
level for correctness.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123033
As raised on PR52267, XOR(X,MIN_SIGNED_VALUE) can be treated as ADD(X,MIN_SIGNED_VALUE), so let these cases use the 'AddLike' folds, similar to how we perform no-common-bits OR(X,Y) cases.
define i8 @src(i8 %x) {
%r = xor i8 %x, 128
ret i8 %r
}
=>
define i8 @tgt(i8 %x) {
%r = add i8 %x, 128
ret i8 %r
}
Transformation seems to be correct!
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/qV46E2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122754
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/A_auBq
Remove limitation that wouldn't perform the fold if all the inverted bits are known zero
The thumb2 changes look to be benign, although it does show that the TEQ/TST isel patterns could probably be improved.
Fixes movmsk regression in D122754
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123023
The reason why I am making this change is that before this commit,
EmitFuncArgumentDbgValue relied on a boolean flag IsDbgDeclare both to signal
that a DBG_VALUE should be made to be indirect /and/ that the original intrinsic
was a dbg.declare. This is no longer always true if we add support for handling
dbg.addr since we will have an indirect DBG_VALUE that is a different intrinsic
from dbg.declare.
With that in mind, in this NFC patch, we prepare for future fixes by introducing
a 3 case-enum argument to EmitFuncArgumentDbgValue that allows the caller to
explicitly specify how the argument's DBG_VALUE should be emitted. This then
allows us to turn the indirect checks into a != FuncArgumentDbgValueKind::Value
and prepare us for a future where we add support here for llvm.dbg.addr
directly.
rdar://83957028
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122945
If we expand (uaddo X, 1) we previously expanded the overflow calculation
as (X + 1) <u X. This potentially increases the live range of X and
can prevent X+1 from reusing the register that previously held X.
Since we're adding 1, overflow only occurs if X was UINT_MAX in which
case (X+1) would be 0. So this patch adds a special case to expand
the overflow calculation to (X+1) == 0.
This seems to help with uaddo intrinsics that get introduced by
CodeGenPrepare after LSR. Alternatively, we could block the uaddo
transform in CodeGenPrepare for this case.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122933
D122053 set the ExtendType for ConstantSDNodes in getCopyToRegs to
ZERO_EXTEND to match assumptions in ComputePHILiveOutRegInfo. PHIs
are probably not the only way ConstantSDNodeNodes can get to
getCopyToRegs.
This patch adds an ExtendType parameter to CopyValueToVirtualRegister and
has HandlePHINodesInSuccessorBlocks pass ISD::ZERO_EXTEND for ConstantInts.
This way we only affect ConstantSDNodes for PHIs.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122171
This is an extension of D70965 to avoid creating a mathlib
call where it did not exist in the original source. Also see
D70852 for discussion about an alternative proposal that was
abandoned.
In the motivating bug report:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54554
...we also have a more general issue about handling "no-builtin" options.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122610
When shifting by a byte-multiple:
bswap (shl X, C) --> lshr (bswap X), C
bswap (lshr X, C) --> shl (bswap X), C
This is the backend version of D122010 and an alternative
suggested in D120648.
There's an extra check to make sure the shift amount is
valid that was not in the rough draft.
I'm not sure if there is a larger motivating case for RISCV (bug report?),
but the ARM diffs show a benefit from having a late version of the
transform (because we do not combine the loads in IR).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122655
This patch fixes a (seemingly very rare) crash during vector constant
folding introduced in D113300.
Normally, during legalization, if we create an illegally-typed node during
a failed attempt at constant folding it's cleaned up before being
visited, due to it having no uses.
If, however, an illegally-typed node is created during one round of
legalization and isn't cleaned up, it's possible for a second round of
legalization to create new illegally-typed nodes which add extra uses to
the old illegal nodes. This means that we can end up visiting the old
nodes before they're known to be dead, at which point we crash.
I'm not happy about this fix. Creating illegal types at all seems like a
bad idea, but we all-too-often rely on illegal constants being
successfully folded and being fixed up afterwards. However, we can't
rely on constant folding actually happening, and we don't have a
foolproof way of peering into the future.
Perhaps the correct fix is to revisit the node-iteration order during
legalization, ensuring we visit all uses of nodes before the nodes
themselves. Or alternatively we could try and clean up dead nodes
immediately after failing constant folding.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122382
Modified DAGCombiner to pass the shift the bittest input and the shift amount
to hasBitTest. This matches the other call to hasBitTest in TargetLowering.h
This is an alternative to D122454.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122458
The alignment needs to be part of the folding set hash. This is
handled by getAssertAlign when nodes are created, but needs to repeated here.
No test case as I found it as part of a very early experimental patch.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122279
Non-static class members declared under #ifndef NDEBUG should be declared
under #if LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS to make headers library-friendly and
allow cross-linking, as discussed in D120714.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121549
Instead of using operator[], use DenseMap::find to prevent default
constructing an entry if it isn't already in the map.
Also simplify a condition to check for 0 instead of a virtual register.
I'm pretty sure we can only get 0 or a virtual register out of the value
map.
This is only called for instructions and the caller is already holding
an Instruction *. This makes the code more explicit and makes it
obvious the code doesn't make decisions about constants.
Trying to reduce the number of masked loads in favour of more unpklo/hi
instructions. Both ISD::ZEXTLOAD and ISD::SEXTLOAD are supported to extensions
from legal types.
Both of normal and masked loads test cases added to guard compile crash.
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120953
Add shl/srl/sra to the list of ops that we canonicalize with a select to expose an identity merge
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122070
ComputePHILiveOutRegInfo assumes that constant incoming values to
Phis will be zero extended if they aren't a legal type. To guarantee
that we should zero_extend rather than any_extend constants.
This fixes a bug for RISCV where any_extend of constants can be
treated as a sign_extend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122053
This fixes a reported bug that caused an infinite loop during the
SelectionDAG optimization phase in ISel, by creating an overridable hook
in `TargetLowering` that allows us to bail out from running
`SimplifyDemandedVectorElts`.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121869
If we promote the ABS and then Expand in LegalizeDAG, then both the
sra and the xor will have their inputs sign extended. This generates
extra code on RISCV which lacks an i8 or i16 sign extend instructon.
If we expand during type legalization, then only the sra will get its
input sign extended. RISCV is able to combine this with the sra by
doing a shift left followed by an sra.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121664
RISCV strong prefers i32 values be sign extended to i64. This combine
was always zero extending the constant using APInt methods.
This adjusts the code so that it calls getNode using ISD::ANY_EXTEND instead.
getNode will call TLI.isSExtCheaperThanZExt to decide how to handle
the constant.
Tests were copied from D121598 where I noticed that we were creating
constants that were hard to materialize.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121650
We do not have general reassociation here (and probably
do not need it), but I noticed these were missing in
patches/tests motivated by D111530, so we can at
least handle the simplest patterns.
The VE test diff looks correct, but we miss that
pattern in IR currently:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/u66_PM
This patch introduces two new experimental IR intrinsics and SDAG nodes
to represent vector strided loads and stores.
Reviewed By: simoll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114884
SDNodes with different target flags may now be folded together
rightfully resulting in the assertion in the refineAlignment.
Folding nodes with different target flags may result in the
wrong load instructions produced at least on the AMDGPU.
Fixes: SWDEV-326805
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121335
This is another fold generalized from D111530.
We can find a common source for a rotate operation hidden inside an 'or':
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/9pV8hn
Deciding when this is profitable vs. a funnel-shift is tricky, but this
does not show any regressions: if a target has a rotate but it does not
have a funnel-shift, then try to form the rotate here. That is why we
don't have x86 test diffs for the scalar tests that are duplicated from
AArch64 ( 74a65e3834 ) - shld/shrd are available. That also makes it
difficult to show vector diffs - the only case where I found a diff was
on x86 AVX512 or XOP with i64 elements.
There's an additional check for a legal type to avoid a problem seen
with x86-32 where we form a 64-bit rotate but then it gets split
inefficiently. We might avoid that by adding more rotate folds, but
I didn't check to see what is missing on that path.
This gets most of the motivating patterns for AArch64 / ARM that are in
D111530.
We still need a couple of enhancements to setcc pattern matching with
rotate/funnel-shift to get the rest.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120933
Previously we used sra+add+xor if ADDCARRY is supported. This changes
to sra+xor+sub is SUBCARRY is available.
This is consistent with the recent change to the default expansion
in LegalizeDAG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121039
When inserting undef into buildvectors created from shuffles of
buildvectors, we convert elements to the largest needed type. This had
the effect of converting undef into 0, which isn't needed as the
buildvector implicitly truncates and trunc(zext(undef)) == undef.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121002
This extends acb96ffd14 to 'and' and 'xor' opcodes.
Copying from that message:
LOGIC (LOGIC (SH X0, Y), Z), (SH X1, Y) --> LOGIC (SH (LOGIC X0, X1), Y), Z
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/QmR9rR
This is a reassociation + factoring fold. The common shift operation is moved
after a bitwise logic op on 2 input operands.
We get simpler cases of these patterns in IR, but I suspect we would miss all
of these exact tests in IR too. We also handle the simpler form of this plus
several other folds in DAGCombiner::hoistLogicOpWithSameOpcodeHands().
When triggered during operation legalisation the affected combine
generates a splat_vector that when custom lowered for SVE fixed
length code generation, results in the original precombine sequence
and thus we enter a legalisation/combine hang.
NOTE: The patch contains no tests because I observed this issue
only when combined with other work that might never become public.
The current way AArch64 lowers ISD::SPLAT_VECTOR meant a specific
test was not possible so I'm hoping the DAGCombiner fix can be seen
as obvious. The AArch64ISelLowering change is requirted to maintain
existing code quality.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120735
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/mJP7XP
This can be viewed as expanding the compare into and/or-of-compares:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/bkZYWE
followed by reduction of each compare.
This could be extended in several ways:
1. There's a (X & Y) == -1 sibling.
2. We can recurse through more than 1 'or'.
3. The fold could be generalized beyond rotates - any operation that
only changes the order of bits (bswap, bitreverse).
This is a transform noted in D111530.
Instead of emitting 0 > Hi, emit Hi < 0. If Hi needs to be expanded again
this will allow the special case for sign bit tests in ExpandIntOp_SETCC
to trigger.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120761
Currently we only check for splat shuffles, this extends it to see if the source operand is a splat across the demanded elts based upon the shuffle mask
This patch adds support for recognising vector splats by peeking through bitcasts to vectors with smaller element types - if all the offset subelements are splats then the bitcasted vector is a splat as well.
We don't have great coverage for isSplatValue so I've made this pretty specific to the use case I'm trying to fix - regressions in some vXi64 vector shift by splat cases that 32-bit x86 doesn't recognise because the shift amount buildvector has been type legalised to v2Xi32.
We can add further support (floats, bitcast from larger element types, undef elements) when we have actual test coverage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120553
If the types aren't legal, the expansions may get type legalized in a
different way preventing code sharing. If the type is legal, we will
share some instructions between the two expansions, but we will need an
extra register.
Since we don't appear to fold (neg (sub A, B)) if the sub has an
additional user, I think it makes sense not to expand NABS.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120513
This is the SDAG equivalent of an instcombine transform added with:
fd807601a7
This is another step towards solving #49541 and part of an alternative
set of more general transforms than what is proposed in D111530.
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/ToxaE8
LOGIC (LOGIC (SH X0, Y), Z), (SH X1, Y) --> LOGIC (SH (LOGIC X0, X1), Y), Z
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/QmR9rR
This is a reassociation + factoring fold. The common shift operation is moved
after a bitwise logic op on 2 input operands.
We get simpler cases of these patterns in IR, but I suspect we would miss all
of these exact tests in IR too. We also handle the simpler form of this plus
several other folds in DAGCombiner::hoistLogicOpWithSameOpcodeHands().
This is a partial implementation of a transform suggested in D111530
(only handles 'or' bitwise logic as a first step - need to stamp out more
tests for other opcodes).
Several of the same tests added for D111530 are altered here (but not
fully optimized). I'm not sure yet if this would help/hinder that patch,
but this should be an improvement for all tests added with ecf606cb43
since it removes a shift operation in those examples.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120516
If the shl is at least half the bitwidth (i.e. the lower half of the bswap source is zero), then we can reduce the shift and perform the bswap at half the bitwidth and just zero extend.
Based off PR51391 + PR53867
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120192
This is the SDAG translation of D120253 :
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/qHpmNn
The SDAG nodes can have different operand types than the result value.
We can see an example of that with AArch64 - the funnel shift amount
is an i64 rather than i32.
We may need to make that match even more flexible to handle
post-legalization nodes, but I have not stepped into that yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120264
Internally to DAGCombiner the SDValues were passed by non-const
reference despite not being modified. They were then passed by
const reference to TLI.
This patch passes them by value which is consistent with the vast
majority of code.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120420
In combineCarryDiamond() use getAsCarry() to find more candidates for being a carry flag.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118362
This is a fix for a regression discussed in:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53829
We cleared more high multiplier bits with 995d400,
but that can lead to worse codegen because we would fail
to recognize the now disguised multiplication by neg-power-of-2
as a shift-left. The problem exists independently of the IR
change in the case that the multiply already had cleared high
bits. We also convert shl+sub into mul+add in instcombine's
negator.
This patch fills in the high-bits to see the shift transform
opportunity. Alive2 attempt to show correctness:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/GgSKVX
The AArch64, RISCV, and MIPS diffs look like clear wins. The
x86 code requires an extra move register in the minimal examples,
but it's still an improvement to get rid of the multiply on all
CPUs that I am aware of (because multiply is never as fast as a
shift).
There's a potential follow-up noted by the TODO comment. We
should already convert that pattern into shl+add in IR, so
it's probably not common:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/7QY_GaFixes#53829
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120216
Previous we used sra (X, size(X)-1); xor (add (X, Y), Y).
By placing sub at the end, we allow RISCV to combine sign_extend_inreg
with it to form subw.
Some X86 tests for Z - abs(X) seem to have improved as well.
Other targets look to be a wash.
I had to modify ARM's abs matching code to match from sub instead of
xor. Maybe instead ISD::ABS should be made legal. I'll try that in
parallel to this patch.
This is an alternative to D119099 which was focused on RISCV only.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119171
This code was detecting whether the value returned by getShiftAmountTy
can represent all shift amounts. If not, it would use MVT::i32 as a
placeholder. getShiftAmountTy was updated last year to return i32
if the type returned by the target couldn't represent all values.
This means the MVT::i32 case here is dead and can the logic can
be simplified.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120164
The code was considering shifts by an about larger than the number of
bits in the original VT to be out of range. Shifts exactly equal to
the original bit width are also out of range.
I don't know how to test this. DAGCombiner should usually fold this
away. I just noticed while looking for something else in this code. The
llvm-cov report shows that we don't have coverage for out of range shifts here.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120170
getShiftAmountTy will return MVT::i32 if the shift amount
coming from the target's getScalarShiftAmountTy can't reprsent
all possible values. That should eliminate the need to use the
pointer type which is what we do when LegalTypes is false.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120165
This fold is done in IR:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/jWyFrP
There is an x86 test that shows an improvement
from the added flexibility of using add (commutative).
The other diffs are presumed neutral.
Note that this could also be folded to an 'xor',
but I'm not sure if that would be universally better
(eg, x86 can convert adds more easily into LEA).
This helps prevent regressions from a potential fold for
issue #53829.
The current ABD combine doesn't quite work for SVE because only a
single scalable vector per scalar integer type is legal (e.g. for
i32, <vscale x 4 x i32> is the only legal scalable vector type).
This patch extends the combine to also trigger for the cases when
operand extension must be retained.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115739
When doing SelectionDAG::ReplaceAllUsesOfValuesWith a worklist is
prepared containing all users that should be updated. Then we use
the RemoveNodeFromCSEMaps/AddModifiedNodeToCSEMaps helpers to handle
recursive CSE updates while doing the replacements.
This patch aims at solving a problem that could arise if the recursive
CSE updates would result in an SDNode present in the worklist is being
removed as a side-effect of morphing a prio user in the worklist.
To examplify such a scenario, imagine that we have these nodes in
the DAG
t12: i64 = add t8, t11
t13: i64 = add t12, t8
t14: i64 = add t11, t11
t15: i64 = add t14, t8
t16: i64 = sub t13, t15
and that the t8 uses should be replaced by t11. An initial worklist
(listing the users that should be morphed) could be [t12, t13, t15].
When updating t12 we get
t12: i64 = add t11, t11
which results in a CSE update that replaces t14 by t12, so we get
t15: i64 = add t12, t8
which results in a CSE update that replaces t13 by t12, so we get
t16: i64 = sub t12, t15
and then t13 is removed given that it was the last use of t13.
So when being done with the updates triggered by rewriting the use
of t8 in t12 the t13 node no longer exist. And we used to end up
hitting an assertion when continuing with the worklist aiming at
replacing the t8 uses in t13.
The solution is based on using a DAGUpdateListener, making sure that
we prune a user from the worklist if it is removed during the
recursive CSE updates.
The bug was found using an OOT target. I think the problem is quite
old, even if the particular intree target reproducer added in this
patch seem to pass when using LLVM 13.0.0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119088
This moves the matching of AVGFloor and AVGCeil into a place where
demand bit are available, so that it can detect more cases for more
folds. It changes the transform to start from a shift, not from a
truncate. We match the pattern shr(add(ext(A), ext(B)), 1), transforming
to ext(hadd(A, B)).
For signed values, because only the bottom bits are demanded llvm will
transform the above to use a lshr too, as opposed to ashr. In order to
correctly detect the hadd we need to know the demanded bits to turn it
back. Depending on whether the shift is signed (ashr) or logical (lshr),
and the extensions are signed or unsigned we can create different nodes.
If the shift is signed:
Needs >= 2 sign bits. https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/h4gQAW generating signed rhadd.
Needs >= 2 zero bits. https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/B64DUA generating unsigned rhadd.
If the shift is unsigned:
Needs >= 1 zero bits. https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/ByD8sj generating unsigned rhadd.
Needs 1 demanded bit zero and >= 2 sign bits https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/hvPGxX and
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/32P5n1 generating signed rhadd.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119072
This adds very basic combines for AVG nodes, mostly for constant folding
and handling degenerate (zero) cases. The code performs mostly the same
transforms as visitMULHS, adjusted for AVG nodes.
Constant folding extends to a higher bitwidth and drops the lowest bit.
For undef nodes, `avg undef, x` is transformed to x. There is also a
transform for `avgfloor x, 0` transforming to `shr x, 1`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119559
The current FastISel code reuses the register for a bitcast that
doesn't change the IR type, but uses a reg-to-reg copy if it
changes the IR type without changing the MVT. However, we can
simply reuse the register in that case as well.
In particular, this avoids unnecessary reg-to-reg copies for pointer
bitcasts. This was found while inspecting O0 codegen differences
between typed and opaque pointers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119432
This enables fshl to be matched earlier on X86
%6 = lshr i32 %3, 1
%7 = select i1 %4, i32 -2147483648, i32 0
%8 = or i32 %6, %7
X86 uses i8 for shift amounts. SelectionDAGBuilder creates the
ISD::SRL with an i8 shift type. DAGCombiner turns the select into
an ISD::SHL. Prior to this patch it would use i32 for the shift
amount. fshl matching failed because the shift amounts have different
types. LegalizeDAG fixes the ISD::SHL shift amount to i8. This
allowed fshl matching to succeed.
With this patch, the ISD::SHL will be created with an i8 shift
amount. This allows the fshl to match immediately.
No test case beause we still end up with a fshl either way.
I have not found a way to expose a difference for this patch in a test
because it only triggers for a one-use load, but this is the code that
was adapted into D118376 and caused miscompiles. The new code pattern
is the same as what we do in narrowExtractedVectorLoad() (reduces load
width for a subvector extract).
This removes seemingly unnecessary manual worklist management and fixes
the chain updating via "SelectionDAG::makeEquivalentMemoryOrdering()".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119549
This ports the aarch64 combines for HADD and RHADD over to DAG combine,
so that they can be used in more architectures (notably MVE in a
followup patch). They are renamed to AVGFLOOR and AVGCEIL in the
process, to avoid confusion with instructions such as X86 hadd. The code
was also rewritten slightly to remove the AArch64 idiosyncrasies.
The general pattern for a AVGFLOORS is
%xe = sext i8 %x to i32
%ye = sext i8 %y to i32
%a = add i32 %xe, %ye
%r = lshr i32 %a, 1
%t = trunc i32 %r to i8
An AVGFLOORU is equivalent with zext. Because of the truncate
lshr==ashr, as the top bits are not demanded. An AVGCEIL also includes
an extra rounding, so includes an extra add of 1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106237
Add a new llvm.fptrunc.round intrinsic to precisely control
the rounding mode when converting from f32 to f16.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110579
We're hitting a pathological compile-time case, profiled to be in
DagCombiner::visitTokenFactor and many inserts into a SmallPtrSet.
It looks like one of the paths around findBetterNeighborChains is not
capped and leads to this.
This patch resolves the issue. Looking for feedback if this solution
looks reasonable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118877
The test diffs are identical to D119111.
This only affects x86 currently because no other target
has an override for the TLI hook that controls this transform.
This is no-functional-change-intended because only the
x86 target enables the TLI hook currently.
We can add fmul/fdiv opcodes to the switch similar to the
proposal D119111, but we don't need to make other changes
like enabling target-specific combines.
We can also add integer opcodes (add, or, shl, etc.) to
the switch because this function is called from all of the
generic binary opcodes.
The goal is to incrementally enable the profitable diffs
from D90113 while avoiding regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119150
In many cases, calls to isShiftedMask are immediately followed with checks to determine the size and position of the bitmask.
This patch adds variants of APInt::isShiftedMask, isShiftedMask_32 and isShiftedMask_64 that return these values as additional arguments.
I've updated a number of cases that were either performing seperate size/position calculations or had created their own local wrapper versions of these.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119019
rv64izbb has a RORW/ROLW instructions that operate on the lower
32-bits of a 64-bit value and sign extend bit 31 of the result.
DAGCombiner won't match rotate idioms because the i32 type isn't Legal
on riscv64.
This patch teaches DAGCombiner to allow it if the type is going to
be promoted and the target has Custom type legalization for ISD::ROTL
or ISD::ROTR. I've restricted this to scalar types. It doesn't appear
any in tree targets other than riscv64 have custom type legalization
for rotates.
If this patch isn't acceptable, I guess I can match SRLW, SLLW, and OR
after type legalization, but I'd like to avoid that if possible.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119062
When the shift amount is known and a known sign bit analysis of
the shiftee indicates that no saturation will occur, then we can
replace SSHLSAT/USHLSAT by SHL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118765
Simon Pilgrim