Another alternative to fix the thread identification problem in
coroutines.
We plan to fix this problem by unifying memory effecting attributes. See
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-unify-memory-effect-attributes/65579.
But it may be a long-term project. And it is a pity that the coroutines
can't resume in different threads for years. So this one is temporary
fix. It may cause unnecessary performance regression for coroutines. But
correctness are more important. And this one is planned to be reverted
after we are able to unify the memory effecting attributes actually.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135550
NewGVN tables are not cleared out between the initial run of NewGVN and the verification. In case of phi-of-ops optimization, OpSafeForPHIOfOps goes out of sync between the two runs. One operand might not be safe for one basic block, but it might be safe for one of its successors. In this case, the operand will be added in OpSafeForPHIOfOps map. In verification phase, we reuse OpSafeForPHIOfOps without updating it again. As a result, the operand will be considered safe for phi-of-ops optimization even for the case that it is not. This patch fixes this problem.
Fix for 53807.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130910
Nowdays we have a generic constant folding API to load a type from
an offset. It should be able to do anything that VNCoercion can do.
This avoids the weird templating between IRBuilder and ConstantFolder
in one function, which is will stop working as the IRBuilderFolder
moves from CreateXYZ to FoldXYZ APIs.
Unfortunately, this doesn't eliminate this pattern from VNCoercion
entirely yet.
Drop the requirement that getInitialValueOfAllocation() must be
passed an allocator function, shifting the responsibility for
checking that into the function (which it does anyway). The
motivation is to avoid some calls to isAllocationFn(), which has
somewhat ill-defined semantics (given the number of
allocator-related attributes we have floating around...)
(For this function, all we eventually need is an allockind of
zeroed or uninitialized.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127274
Binary size of `clang` is trivial; namely, numerical value doesn't
change when measured in MiB, and `.data` section increases from 139Ki to
173 Ki.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128070
NewGVN will find operator from other context. ValueTracking currently doesn't have a way to run completely without context instruction.
So it will use operator itself as conext instruction.
If the operator in another branch will never be executed but it has an assume, it may caused value tracking use the assume to do wrong simpilfy.
It would be better to make these simplification queries not use context at all, but that would require some API changes.
For now we just use the orignial instruction as context instruction to fix the issue.
Fix#56039
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127942
Clang-format InstructionSimplify and convert all "FunctionName"s to
"functionName". This patch does touch a lot of files but gets done with
the cleanup of InstructionSimplify in one commit.
This is the alternative to the less invasive clang-format only patch: D126783
Reviewed By: spatel, rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126889
phi([undef, A], [x, B]) -> x is only correct x is guaranteed to be
a non-poison value.
Otherwise we would be changing an undef to poison in the branch A.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117907
The phi-of-ops functionality has a function OpIsSafeForPHIOfOps
to determine when it's safe to create the new phi.
But this function only checks for the obvious dominator conditions
and ignores memory.
This patch takes the conservative approach and disables phi-of-ops
whenever there's a load that doesn't dominate the phi, as its
value may be affected by a store inside the loop.
This can be improved later to check aliasing between the
load/stores.
Fixes https://llvm.org/PR53277
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117999
This doesn't require callers to put the pointer operand and the indices
in a container like a vector when calling the function. This is not
really an issue with the existing callers. But when using it from
IRBuilder the inputs are available as separate pointer value and indices
ArrayRef.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117038
This is a reoccuring pattern, we can consolidate three copies into one. The main motivation is to reduce usages of isMallocLike.
The original commit (which was quickly reverted) didn't account for the allocation function could be an invoke, test coverage for that case added in this commit.
Symbolic execution using PredicateInfo is only done for the ssa.copy
intrinsic. It's using two potential sources for building the expression:
1. the Value of the instruction for which the instruction is a copy of, and
2. the Value from the contraint in PredicateInfo
It's possible to get into an infinite loop when choosing between these
two, as described in PR31613.
This patch proposes performing swapping of the two values (i.e. choosing
the second one for the expression), if that same second value was chosen
before; this breaks the cycle.
In the testcases provided, where there is a contradiction between the
value from symbolic execution and assume instruction, NewGVN reduces the
assume to assume(false).
Resolves PR31613.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110907
Currently all AA analyses marked as preserved are stateless, not taking
into account their dependent analyses. So there's no need to mark them
as preserved, they won't be invalidated unless their analyses are.
SCEVAAResults was the one exception to this, it was treated like a
typical analysis result. Make it like the others and don't invalidate
unless SCEV is invalidated.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102032
This patch updates performSymbolicPredicateInfoEvaluation to manage
registering additional dependencies using ExprResult. Similar to D99987,
this fixes an issues where we failed to track the correct dependency for
a phi-of-ops value, which is marked as temporary.
Fixes PR49873.
Reviewed By: asbirlea, ruiling
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100560
performSymbolicEvaluation is used to obtain the symbolic expression when
visiting instructions and this is used to determine their congruence
class.
performSymbolicEvaluation only creates expressions for certain
instructions (via createExpression). For unsupported instructions,
'unknown' expression are created.
The use of createExpression in processOutgoingEdges means we may
simplify the condition in processOutgoingEdges to a constant in the
initial round of processing, but we use Unknown(I) for the congruence
class. If an operand of I changes the expression Unknown(I) stays the
same, so there is no update of the congruence class of I. Hence it
won't get re-visited. So if an operand of I changes in a way that causes
createExpression to return different result, this update is missed.
This patch updates the code to use performSymbolicEvaluation, to be
symmetric with the congruence class updating code.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99990
This recommits 4f5da356ff, including
explicit implementations of move a constructor and deleted copy
constructors/assignment operators, to fix failures with some compilers.
This reverts the revert 74854d00e8.
If we are using a simplified value, we need to add an extra
dependency this value , because changes to the class of the
simplified value may require us to invalidate any decision based on
that value.
This is done by adding such values as additional users, however the
current code does not excludes temporary instructions.
At the moment, this means that we miss those dependencies for
phi-of-ops, because they are temporary instructions at this point. We
instead need to add the extra dependencies to the root instruction of
the phi-of-ops.
This patch pushes the responsibility of adding extra users to the
callers of createExpression & performSymbolicEvaluation. At those
points, it is clearer which real instruction to pick.
Alternatively we could either pass the 'real' instruction as additional
argument or use another map, but I think the approach in the patch makes
things a bit easier to follow.
Fixes PR35074.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99987
If the PHI-of-ops simplifies to an existing value, no real PHI is
created, which means the dependencies between the
PHI-of-ops and its operands is not materialized in IR. At the
moment, we fail to create a real PHI node for the PHI-of-ops,
because the PHI-of-ops root instruction is not re-visited if
one of the PHI-of-ops operands changes. We need to add the
operands as additional users in this case.
Even with this patch, there are still some dependencies
missing. I will continue tackling the outstanding
reporeted crashes in this area.
Fixes PR36501, PR42422, PR42557.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66924
Avoid having to instantiate and compile a subset of the dominator tree logic
separately for each node type. More importantly, this allows generic
algorithms to be built on top of dominator trees without writing them as
templates -- such algorithms can now use opaque CfgBlockRef and
CfgInterface instead.
A type-erased implementation of dominator trees could be written in
terms of CfgInterface as well, but doing so would change the current
trade-off: it would slightly reduce code size at the cost of a slight
runtime overhead.
This patch does not change the trade-off, as it only does type-erasure
where basic blocks can be treated in a fully opaque way, i.e. it only
moves methods that don't require iteration over CFG successors and
predecessors.
v5:
- rename generic_{begin,end,children} back without the generic_ prefix
and refer explictly to base class methods in NewGVN, which wants to
mutate the order of dominator tree node children directly
v6:
- style change: iDom -> idom; it's arguable whether this is really
invalid, since it is actually standard camelCase, but clang-tidy
complains about it so... *shrug*
- rename {to,from}Generic -> {wrap,unwrap}Ref
Change-Id: Ib860dc04cf8bb093d8ed00be7def40d662213672
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83089
The 1st try was reverted because I missed an assert that
needed softening.
As discussed in D86798 / rG09652721 , we were potentially
returning a different result for whether an Instruction
is commutable depending on if we call the base class or
derived class method.
This requires relaxing asserts in GVN, but that pass
seems to be working otherwise.
NewGVN requires more work because it uses different
code paths for numbering binops and calls.
As discussed in D86798 / rG09652721 , we were potentially
returning a different result for whether an Instruction
is commutable depending on if we call the base class or
derived class method.
This requires relaxing an assert in GVN, but that pass
seems to be working otherwise.
NewGVN requires more work because it uses different
code paths for numbering binops and calls.
Making use of undef is not safe if the simplification result is not used
to replace all uses of the result. This leads to problems in NewGVN,
which does not replace all uses in the IR directly. See PR33165 for more
details.
This patch adds an option to SimplifyQuery to disable the use of undef.
Note that I've only guarded uses if isa<UndefValue>/m_Undef where
SimplifyQuery is currently available. If we agree on the general
direction, I'll update the remaining uses.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84792
Both users of predicteinfo (NewGVN and SCCP) are interested in
getting a cmp constraint on the predicated value. They currently
implement separate logic for this. This patch adds a common method
for this in PredicateBase.
This enables a missing bit of PredicateInfo handling in SCCP: Now
the predicate on the condition itself is also used. For switches
it means we know that the switched-on value is the same as the case
value. For assumes/branches we know that the condition is true or
false.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83640
Each concrete instance of a predicate has a condition (also noted in the
original PredicateBase comment) and to me it seems like there is no
clear benefit of having both PredicateBase and PredicateWithCondition
and they can be folded together.
Reviewers: nikic, efriedma
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84089
Summary:
Avoid exposing details about how children are stored. This will enable
subsequent type-erasure changes.
New methods are introduced to cover common access patterns.
Change-Id: Idb5f4b1b9c84e4cc71ddb39bb52a388682f5674f
Reviewers: arsenm, RKSimon, mehdi_amini, courbet
Subscribers: qcolombet, sdardis, wdng, hiraditya, jrtc27, zzheng, atanasyan, asbirlea, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83083
Chuanqi Xu