I don't think isel selects these today, favoring adding the register to itself instead. But the load folding tables shouldn't be so concerned with what isel will use and just represent the relationships.
llvm-svn: 288007
If we were to unfold these, the load size would be increased to the register size. This is not safe to do since the enlarged load can do things like cross a page boundary into a page that doesn't exist.
I probably missed some instructions, but this should be a large portion of them.
llvm-svn: 288001
Most of these are the SSE4.1 PMOVZX/PMOVSX instructions which all read less than 128-bits. The only other was PMOVUPD which by definition is an unaligned load.
llvm-svn: 287991
Not sure this is truly needed but we had the floating point equivalents, the aligned equivalents, and the EVEX equivalents. So this just makes it complete.
llvm-svn: 287960
We did not support subregs in InlineSpiller:foldMemoryOperand() because targets
may not deal with them correctly.
This adds a target hook to let the spiller know that a target can handle
subregs, and actually enables it for x86 for the case of stack slot reloads.
This fixes PR30832.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26521
llvm-svn: 287792
I'm sure this caused the load size to misprint in Intel syntax output. We were also inconsistent about which patterns used which instruction between VEX and EVEX.
There are two different reg/reg versions of movq, one from a GPR and one from the lower 64-bits of an XMM register. This changes the loading folding table to use the single i64mem memory form for folding both cases. But we need to use TB_NO_REVERSE to prevent a duplicate entry in the unfolding table.
llvm-svn: 287622
Summary:
The index and one of the table operands can be swapped by changing the opcode to the other version. Neither of these operands are the one that can load from memory so this can't be used to increase memory folding opportunities.
We need to handle the unmasked forms and the kz forms. Since the load operand isn't being commuted we can commute the load and broadcast instructions too.
Reviewers: igorb, delena, Ayal, Farhana, RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25652
llvm-svn: 287621
We can replace "scalar" FP-bitwise-logic with other forms of bitwise-logic instructions.
Scalar SSE/AVX FP-logic instructions only exist in your imagination and/or the bowels of
compilers, but logically equivalent int, float, and double variants of bitwise-logic
instructions are reality in x86, and the float variant may be a shorter instruction
depending on which flavor (SSE or AVX) of vector ISA you have...so just prefer float all
the time.
This is a preliminary step towards solving PR6137:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6137
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26712
llvm-svn: 287122
-Don't print the 'x' suffix for the 128-bit reg/mem VEX encoded instructions in Intel syntax. This is consistent with the EVEX versions.
-Don't print the 'y' suffix for the 256-bit reg/reg VEX encoded instructions in Intel or AT&T syntax. This is consistent with the EVEX versions.
-Allow the 'x' and 'y' suffixes to be used for the reg/mem forms when we're assembling using Intel syntax.
-Allow the 'x' and 'y' suffixes on the reg/reg EVEX encoded instructions in Intel or AT&T syntax. This is consistent with what VEX was already allowing.
This should fix at least some of PR28850.
llvm-svn: 286787
This removes a couple tablegen classes that become unused after this change. Another class gained an additional parameter to allow PMADDUBSW to specify a different result type from its input type.
llvm-svn: 285515
MOVSD/MOVSS take a 128-bit register and a FR32/FR64 register input, the commutation code wasn't taking this into account leading to verification errors.
This patch inserts a vreg copy mi to ensure that the registers are correct.
Fix for PR30607
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25280
llvm-svn: 283539
I don't know for sure that we truly needs this, but its the only vector load that isn't rematerializable. Making it consistent allows it to not be a special case in the td files.
llvm-svn: 283083
Instead of selecting between MOVSD/MOVSS and BLENDPD/BLENDPS at shuffle lowering by subtarget this will help us select the instruction based on actual commutation requirements.
We could possibly add BLENDPD/BLENDPS -> MOVSD/MOVSS commutation and MOVSD/MOVSS memory folding using a similar approach if it proves useful
I avoided adding AVX512 handling as I'm not sure when we should be making use of VBLENDPD/VBLENDPS on EVEX targets
llvm-svn: 283037
We can't use Jcc to leave a Win64 function in general, because that
confuses the unwinder. However, for "leaf" functions, that is, functions
where the return address is always on top of the stack and which don't
have unwind info, it's OK.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24836
llvm-svn: 282920
This adds new pseudo instructions that can be selected during register allocation to represent loads and stores of XMM/YMM registers when AVX512F is available, but VLX isn't. They will be converted to VEX encoded moves if the register turns out to be XMM0-15/YMM0-15. Otherwise either an EVEX VEXTRACT(store) or VBROADCAST(load) will be used.
Fixes one of the cases from PR29112.
llvm-svn: 282690
VPTERNLOG is a ternary instruction with an immediate specifying the logical operation to perform. For each bit position in the 3 source vectors the bit from each source is concatenated together and the resulting 3-bit value is used to select a bit in the immediate. This bit value is written to the result vector.
We can commute this by swapping operands and modifying the immediate. To modify the immediate we need to swap two pairs of bits. The pairs correspond to the locations in the immediate where the commuted operands bits have opposite values and the uncommuted operand has the same value. Bits 0 and 7 will never be swapped since the relevant bits from all sources are the same value.
This refactors and reuses parts of the FMA3 commuting code which is also a three operand instruction.
llvm-svn: 282132
r280832 added 32-bit support for emitting conditional tail-calls, but
dropped imp-used parameter registers. This went unnoticed until
r281113, which added 64-bit support, as this is only exposed with
parameter passing via registers.
Don't drop the imp-used parameters.
llvm-svn: 281223
Now that MachineBasicBlock::reverse_instr_iterator knows when it's at
the end (since r281168 and r281170), implement
MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator directly on top of an
ilist::reverse_iterator by adding an IsReverse template parameter to
MachineInstrBundleIterator. This replaces another hard-to-reason-about
use of std::reverse_iterator on list iterators, matching the changes for
ilist::reverse_iterator from r280032 (see the "out of scope" section at
the end of that commit message). MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator
now has a handle to the current node and has obvious invalidation
semantics.
r280032 has a more detailed explanation of how list-style reverse
iterators (invalidated when the pointed-at node is deleted) are
different from vector-style reverse iterators like std::reverse_iterator
(invalidated on every operation). A great motivating example is this
commit's changes to lib/CodeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp.
Note: If your out-of-tree backend deletes instructions while iterating
on a MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator or converts between
MachineBasicBlock::iterator and MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator,
you'll need to update your code in similar ways to r280032. The
following table might help:
[Old] ==> [New]
delete &*RI, RE = end() delete &*RI++
RI->erase(), RE = end() RI++->erase()
reverse_iterator(I) std::prev(I).getReverse()
reverse_iterator(I) ++I.getReverse()
--reverse_iterator(I) I.getReverse()
reverse_iterator(std::next(I)) I.getReverse()
RI.base() std::prev(RI).getReverse()
RI.base() ++RI.getReverse()
--RI.base() RI.getReverse()
std::next(RI).base() RI.getReverse()
(For more details, have a look at r280032.)
llvm-svn: 281172
Summary:
An IR load can be invariant, dereferenceable, neither, or both. But
currently, MI's notion of invariance is IR-invariant &&
IR-dereferenceable.
This patch splits up the notions of invariance and dereferenceability at
the MI level. It's NFC, so adds some probably-unnecessary
"is-dereferenceable" checks, which we can remove later if desired.
Reviewers: chandlerc, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23371
llvm-svn: 281151
Summary:
I want to separate out the notions of invariance and dereferenceability
at the MI level, so that they correspond to the equivalent concepts at
the IR level. (Currently an MI load is MI-invariant iff it's
IR-invariant and IR-dereferenceable.)
First step is renaming this function.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: MatzeB, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23370
llvm-svn: 281125
This extends the optimization in r280832 to also work for 64-bit. The only
quirk is that we can't do this for 64-bit Windows (yet).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24423
llvm-svn: 281113
The REX prefix should be used on indirect jmps, but not direct ones.
For direct jumps, the unwinder looks at the offset to determine if
it's inside the current function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24359
llvm-svn: 281003
When branching to a block that immediately tail calls, it is possible to fold
the call directly into the branch if the call is direct and there is no stack
adjustment, saving one byte.
Example:
define void @f(i32 %x, i32 %y) {
entry:
%p = icmp eq i32 %x, %y
br i1 %p, label %bb1, label %bb2
bb1:
tail call void @foo()
ret void
bb2:
tail call void @bar()
ret void
}
before:
f:
movl 4(%esp), %eax
cmpl 8(%esp), %eax
jne .LBB0_2
jmp foo
.LBB0_2:
jmp bar
after:
f:
movl 4(%esp), %eax
cmpl 8(%esp), %eax
jne bar
.LBB0_1:
jmp foo
I don't expect any significant size savings from this (on a Clang bootstrap I
saw 288 bytes), but it does make the code a little tighter.
This patch only does 32-bit, but 64-bit would work similarly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24108
llvm-svn: 280832
The code is now written in terms of source and dest classes with feature checks inside each type of copy instead of having separate functions for each feature set.
llvm-svn: 280673
Previously we were extending to copying the whole ZMM register. The register allocator shouldn't use XMM16-31 or YMM16-31 in this configuration as the instructions to spill them aren't available.
llvm-svn: 280648
The only way to select them was in AVX512 mode because EVEX VMOVSS/SD was below them and the patterns weren't qualified properly for AVX only. So if you happened to have an aligned FR32/FR64 load in AVX512 you could get a VEX encoded VMOVAPS/VMOVAPD.
I tried to search back through history and it seems like these instructions were probably unselectable for at least 5 years, at least to the time the VEX versions were added. But I can't prove they ever were.
llvm-svn: 280644
According to spec cvtdq2pd and cvtps2pd instructions don't require memory operand to be aligned
to 16 bytes. This patch removes this requirement from the memory folding table.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23919
llvm-svn: 280402
These are no different in load behaviour to the existing ADD/SUB/MUL/DIV scalar ops but were missing from isNonFoldablePartialRegisterLoad
llvm-svn: 279652
This helped to improved memory-folding and register coalescing optimizations.
Also, this patch fixed the tracker #17229.
Reviewer: Craig Topper.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23108
llvm-svn: 278431
This patch helps avoid false dependencies on undef registers by updating the machine instructions' undef operand to use a register that the instruction is truly dependent on, or use a register with clearance higher than Pref.
Pseudo example:
loop:
xmm0 = ...
xmm1 = vcvtsi2sdl eax, xmm0<undef>
... = inst xmm0
jmp loop
In this example, selecting xmm0 as the undef register creates false dependency between loop iterations.
This false dependency cannot be solved by inserting an xor before vcvtsi2sdl because xmm0 is alive at the point of the vcvtsi2sdl instruction.
Selecting a different register instead of xmm0, especially a register that is not used in the loop, will eliminate this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22466
llvm-svn: 278321
We only had partial memory folding support for the intrinsic definitions, and (as noted on PR27481) was causing FR32/FR64/VR128 mismatch errors with the machine verifier.
This patch adds missing memory folding support for both intrinsics and the ffloor/fnearbyint/fceil/frint/ftrunc patterns and in doing so fixes the failing machine verifier stack folding tests from PR27481.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23276
llvm-svn: 278106
Assuming SSE2 is available then we can safely commute between these, removing some unnecessary register moves and improving memory folding opportunities.
VEX encoded versions don't benefit so I haven't added support to them.
llvm-svn: 277930
This places the 132/213/231 form number in front of the SS/SD/PS/PD. Move the Y for 256-bit versions to be after the PS/PD. Change the AVX512 scalar forms to include a Z in the their name. This new format should be consistent with the general naming of instructions.
llvm-svn: 276559
classifyLEAReg() deals with switching operands from 32bit to 64bit in
order to use a LEA64_32 instruction (for three address code goodness).
It currently performs a liveness analysis to determine the kill/undef
flag for the newly added operand. This should not be necessary:
- If the previous operand had a kill flag, then the 32bit part of the
register gets killed, this will kill the super register as well.
- If the previous operand had an undef flag then we didn't care what
value we read, just use the same flag on the new operand.
(No matter what an operand with an undef flag won't affect liveness)
This makes the code independent of the presence of kill flags because it
avoids a call to MachineBasicBlock::computeRegisterLiveness().
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22283
llvm-svn: 276222
Summary:
Previously we took an unsigned.
Hooray for type-safety.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22282
llvm-svn: 275591
Summary:
In this patch we implement the following parts of XRay:
- Supporting a function attribute named 'function-instrument' which currently only supports 'xray-always'. We should be able to use this attribute for other instrumentation approaches.
- Supporting a function attribute named 'xray-instruction-threshold' used to determine whether a function is instrumented with a minimum number of instructions (IR instruction counts).
- X86-specific nop sleds as described in the white paper.
- A machine function pass that adds the different instrumentation marker instructions at a very late stage.
- A way of identifying which return opcode is considered "normal" for each architecture.
There are some caveats here:
1) We don't handle PATCHABLE_RET in platforms other than x86_64 yet -- this means if IR used PATCHABLE_RET directly instead of a normal ret, instruction lowering for that platform might do the wrong thing. We think this should be handled at instruction selection time to by default be unpacked for platforms where XRay is not availble yet.
2) The generated section for X86 is different from what is described from the white paper for the sole reason that LLVM allows us to do this neatly. We're taking the opportunity to deviate from the white paper from this perspective to allow us to get richer information from the runtime library.
Reviewers: sanjoy, eugenis, kcc, pcc, echristo, rnk
Subscribers: niravd, majnemer, atrick, rnk, emaste, bmakam, mcrosier, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19904
llvm-svn: 275367
Avoid implicit conversions from MachineInstrBundleIterator to
MachineInstr*, mainly by preferring MachineInstr& over MachineInstr* and
using range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 275149
Change all the methods in LiveVariables that expect non-null
MachineInstr* to take MachineInstr& and update the call sites. This
clarifies the API, and designs away a class of iterator to pointer
implicit conversions.
llvm-svn: 274319
This is mostly a mechanical change to make TargetInstrInfo API take
MachineInstr& (instead of MachineInstr* or MachineBasicBlock::iterator)
when the argument is expected to be a valid MachineInstr. This is a
general API improvement.
Although it would be possible to do this one function at a time, that
would demand a quadratic amount of churn since many of these functions
call each other. Instead I've done everything as a block and just
updated what was necessary.
This is mostly mechanical fixes: adding and removing `*` and `&`
operators. The only non-mechanical change is to split
ARMBaseInstrInfo::getOperandLatencyImpl out from
ARMBaseInstrInfo::getOperandLatency. Previously, the latter took a
`MachineInstr*` which it updated to the instruction bundle leader; now,
the latter calls the former either with the same `MachineInstr&` or the
bundle leader.
As a side effect, this removes a bunch of MachineInstr* to
MachineBasicBlock::iterator implicit conversions, a necessary step
toward fixing PR26753.
Note: I updated WebAssembly, Lanai, and AVR (despite being
off-by-default) since it turned out to be easy. I couldn't run tests
for AVR since llc doesn't link with it turned on.
llvm-svn: 274189
Summary: LLVM assumes that large clearance will hide the partial register spill penalty. But in our experiment, 16 clearance is too small. As the inserted XOR is normally fairly cheap, we should have a higher clearance threshold to aggressively insert XORs that is necessary to break partial register dependency.
Reviewers: wmi, davidxl, stoklund, zansari, myatsina, RKSimon, DavidKreitzer, mkuper, joerg, spatel
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21560
llvm-svn: 274068
This used to be free, copying and moving DebugLocs became expensive
after the metadata rewrite. Passing by reference eliminates a ton of
track/untrack operations. No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 272512
Since r207518 they are printed exactly like non-hidden stubs on x86 and
since r207517 on ARM.
This means we can use a single set for all stubs in those platforms.
llvm-svn: 269776
This fixes a bug introduced in r267623, where we got smarter and avoided to save
EAX before using it. However, we failed to check if any of the subregister of
EAX were alive and thus, missed cases where we have to save EAX before using it.
The problem may happen on every X86/i386/... platform.
This fixes llvm.org/PR27624
llvm-svn: 269115
SystemZ (and probably other targets as well) can fold a memory operand
by changing the opcode into a new instruction that as a side-effect
also clobbers the CC-reg.
In order to do this, liveness of that reg must first be checked. When
LIS is passed, getRegUnit() can be called on it and the right
LiveRange is computed on demand.
Reviewed by Matthias Braun.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19861
llvm-svn: 269026
When loading or storing AVX512 registers we were not using the AVX512
variant of the load and store for VR128 and VR256 like registers.
Thus, we ended up with the wrong encoding and actually were dropping the
high bits of the instruction. The result was that we load or store the
wrong register. The effect is visible only when we emit the object file
directly and disassemble it. Then, the output of the disassembler does
not match the assembly input.
This is related to llvm.org/PR27481.
llvm-svn: 269001
Remove the AddPristinesAndCSRs parameters from
addLiveIns()/addLiveOuts().
We need to respect pristine registers after prologue epilogue insertion,
Seeing that we got this wrong in at least two commits already, we should
rather pay the small price to query MachineFrameInfo for it.
There are three cases that did not set AddPristineAndCSRs to true even
after register allocation:
- ExecutionDepsFix: live-out registers are used as a hint that the
register is used soon. This is not true for pristine registers so
use the new addLiveOutsNoPristines() to maintain this behaviour.
- SystemZShortenInst: Not setting AddPristineAndCSRs to true looks like
a bug, should do the right thing automatically now.
- StackMapLivenessAnalysis: Not adding pristine registers looks like a
bug to me. Added a FIXME comment but maintain the current behaviour
as a change may need to get coordinated with GC runtimes.
llvm-svn: 268336
Craig Topper