Summary:
We are incorrectly folding selects into phi nodes when the incoming value of a phi
node is a constant vector. This optimization is done in `FoldOpIntoPhi` when the
select condition is a phi node with constant incoming values.
Without the fix, we are miscompiling (i.e. incorrectly folding the
select into the phi node) when the vector contains non-zero
elements.
This patch fixes the miscompile and we will correctly fold based on the
select vector operand (see added test cases).
Reviewers: majnemer, sanjoy, spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31189
llvm-svn: 298845
The first thing it did was get the User for the Use to get the instruction back. This requires looking through the Uses for the User using the waymarking walk. That's pretty fast, but its probably still better to just pass the Instruction we already had.
llvm-svn: 298772
SimplifyDemandedUseBits for Add/Sub already recursed down LHS and RHS for simplifying bits. If that didn't provide any simplifications we fall back to calling computeKnownBits which will recurse again. Instead just take the known bits for LHS and RHS we already have and call into a new function in ValueTracking that can calculate the known bits given the LHS/RHS bits.
llvm-svn: 298711
Now that we call ShrinkDemandedConstant on the RHS of sub this should be taken care of. This code doesn't trigger on any in tree regressions, but did before ShrinkDemandedConstant was added to the RHS.
llvm-svn: 298644
insertelement (insertelement X, Y, IdxC1), ScalarC, IdxC2 -->
insertelement (insertelement X, ScalarC, IdxC2), Y, IdxC1
As noted in the code comment and seen in the test changes, the motivation is that by pulling
constant insertion up, we may be able to constant fold some insertelement instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31196
llvm-svn: 298520
Summary: Subtracts can have constants on the left side, but we don't shrink them based on demanded bits. This patch fixes that to match the right hand side.
Reviewers: davide, majnemer, spatel, sanjoy, hfinkel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31119
llvm-svn: 298478
Summary:
This class is a list of AttributeSetNodes corresponding the function
prototype of a call or function declaration. This class used to be
called ParamAttrListPtr, then AttrListPtr, then AttributeSet. It is
typically accessed by parameter and return value index, so
"AttributeList" seems like a more intuitive name.
Rename AttributeSetImpl to AttributeListImpl to follow suit.
It's useful to rename this class so that we can rename AttributeSetNode
to AttributeSet later. AttributeSet is the set of attributes that apply
to a single function, argument, or return value.
Reviewers: sanjoy, javed.absar, chandlerc, pete
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: pete, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, mehdi_amini, jfb, nhaehnle, sbc100, void, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31102
llvm-svn: 298393
InstCombine tries to constant fold instruction operands during worklist building, but we don't print that we're doing this.
We also set a change flag here that causes us to rebuild and rerun the worklist one more time even if processing the worklist itself created no additional changes. So in the log I saw two inst combine runs that visited all instructions without printing that anything was changed. I may be submitting another patch to remove the change flag unless I can find some reason why we should be doing that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31091
llvm-svn: 298264
[Reapplies r297971 and punting on finding a better API for findDbgValues()]
This patch improves debug info quality in InstCombine by looking at
values that are about to be deleted, checking whether there are any
dbg.value instrinsics referring to them, and potentially encoding the
semantics of the deleted instruction into the dbg.value's
DIExpression.
In the example in the testcase (which was extracted from XNU) there is a sequence of
%4 = load %struct.entry*, %struct.entry** %next2, align 8, !dbg !41
%5 = bitcast %struct.entry* %4 to i8*, !dbg !42
%add.ptr4 = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %5, i64 -8, !dbg !43
%6 = bitcast i8* %add.ptr4 to %struct.entry*, !dbg !44
call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %struct.entry* %6, i64 0, metadata !20, metadata !21), !dbg 34
When these instructions are eliminated by instcombine one after
another, we can still salvage the otherwise dead debug info:
- Bitcasts have no effect, so have the dbg.value point to operand(0)
- Loads can be expressed via a DW_OP_deref
- Constant gep instructions can be replaced by DWARF expression arithmetic
The API introduced by this patch is not specific to instcombine and
can be useful in other places, too.
rdar://problem/30725338
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30919
llvm-svn: 297994
As the related tests show, we're not canonicalizing to this form for scalars or vectors yet,
but this solves the immediate problem in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32306
llvm-svn: 297989
This patch improves debug info quality in InstCombine by looking at
values that are about to be deleted, checking whether there are any
dbg.value instrinsics referring to them, and potentially encoding the
semantics of the deleted instruction into the dbg.value's
DIExpression.
In the example in the testcase (which was extracted from XNU) there is a sequence of
%4 = load %struct.entry*, %struct.entry** %next2, align 8, !dbg !41
%5 = bitcast %struct.entry* %4 to i8*, !dbg !42
%add.ptr4 = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %5, i64 -8, !dbg !43
%6 = bitcast i8* %add.ptr4 to %struct.entry*, !dbg !44
call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %struct.entry* %6, i64 0, metadata !20, metadata !21), !dbg 34
When these instructions are eliminated by instcombine one after
another, we can still salvage the otherwise dead debug info:
- Bitcasts have no effect, so have the dbg.value point to operand(0)
- Loads can be expressed via a DW_OP_deref
- Constant gep instructions can be replaced by DWARF expression arithmetic
The API introduced by this patch is not specific to instcombine and
can be useful in other places, too.
rdar://problem/30725338
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30919
llvm-svn: 297971
Summary:
The call to canEvaluateZExtd in InstCombiner::visitZExt may
return with BitsToClear == SrcTy->getScalarSizeInBits(), but
there is an assert that BitsToClear should be smaller than
SrcTy->getScalarSizeInBits().
I have a test case that triggers the assert, but it only happens
for my downstream target. I've not been able to trigger it for
any upstream target.
The assert triggered for a piece of code such as this
%shr1 = lshr i16 undef, 15
...
%shr2 = lshr i16 %shr1, 1
%conv = zext i16 %shr2 to i32
Normally the lshr instructions are constant folded before we
visit the zext (that is why it is so hard to reproduce).
The original pattern, before instcombine, is of course a lot more
complicated in my test case. The shift count in the second lshr
is for example determined by the outcome of a PHI instruction.
It seems like other rewrites by instcombine leads up to
the pattern above. And then the zext is pulled from the
worklist, and visited (hitting the assert), before we detect
that the lshr instrucions can be constant folded.
Anyway, since the canEvaluateZExtd may return with BitsToClear
equal to SrcTy->getScalarSizeInBits(), and since the rewrite
that converts the expression type to avoid a zero extend works
also for the case where SrcBitsKept ends up being zero, then
it should be OK to liberate the assert to
assert(BitsToClear <= SrcTy->getScalarSizeInBits() &&
"Unreasonable BitsToClear");
Reviewers: hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: hfinkel, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30993
llvm-svn: 297952
This was committed at r297155 and reverted at r297166 because of an
over-reaching clang test. That should be fixed with r297189.
This is one part of solving a recent bug report:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-February/110293.html
This keeps with our general approach: changing arbitrary shuffles is off-limts,
but changing splat is ok. The transform is very similar to the existing
shrinkBitwiseLogic() canonicalization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30123
llvm-svn: 297232
Summary:
When InstCombine is optimizing certain select-cmp-br patterns
it replaces the result of the select in uses outside of the
basic block containing the select. This is only legal if the
path from the select to the outside use is disjoint from all
other paths out from the originating basic block.
The problem found was that InstCombiner::replacedSelectWithOperand
did not consider the case when both edges out from the br pointed
to the same label. In that case the paths aren't disjoint and the
transformation is illegal. This patch avoids the faulty rewrites
by verifying that there is a single flow to the successor where
we want to replace uses.
Reviewers: llvm-commits, spatel, majnemer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30455
llvm-svn: 296752
Summary:
Solves PR 31990.
The bad rewrite could replace a memcpy of one word with
store i4 -1
while it should actually be
store i8 -1
Hopefully opt and llc has improved enough so the original optimization
done by the code isn't needed anymore.
One already existing testcase is affected. It originally tested that
the memcpy was replaced with
load double
but since we now remove that rewrite it will be
load i64
instead.
Patch suggestion by Eli Friedman.
Reviewers: eli.friedman, majnemer, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30254
llvm-svn: 296585
This optimisation was crashing when there was a chain of more than one bitcast
instruction to replace, as a result of the changes in D27283.
Patch by James Price.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30347
llvm-svn: 296163
This one seems more obvious than D30270 that it can't make improvements because an extension always needs
all of the incoming bits. There's one specific transform in SimplifyDemandedInstructionBits of converting
a sext to a zext when the sign-bit is known zero, but that is handled explicitly in visitSext() with
ComputeSignBit().
Like D30270, there are no IR differences (other than instruction names) for the case in PR32037:
https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=32037
...and no regression test differences.
Zext/sext are a smaller part of the profile, but this still appears to shave off another 0.5% or so from
'opt -O2'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30280
llvm-svn: 296129
Notably, no regression tests change when we remove these calls, and these are expensive calls.
The motivation comes from the general acknowledgement that the compiler is getting slower:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/109188.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-December/108279.html
And specifically the test case attached to PR32037:
https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=32037
Profiling the middle-end (opt) part of the compile:
$ ./opt -O2 row_common.bc -o /dev/null
...visitAdd and visitSub are near the top of the instcombine list, and the calls to SimplifyDemandedInstructionBits()
are high within each of those. Those calls account for 1%+ of the opt time in either debug or release profiles. And
that's the rough win I see from this patch when testing opt built release from r295864 on an iMac with Haswell 4GHz
(model 4790K).
It seems unlikely that we'd be able to eliminate add/sub or change their operands given that add/sub normally affect
all bits, and the PR32037 example shows no IR difference after this change using -O2.
Also worth noting - the code comment in visitAdd:
// This handles stuff like (X & 254)+1 -> (X&254)|1
...isn't true. That transform is handled later with a call to haveNoCommonBitsSet().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30270
llvm-svn: 295898
This is part of trying to clean up our handling of min/max patterns in IR.
By converting these to canonical form, we're more likely to recognize them
because there are various places in InstCombine that don't use
matchSelectPattern or m_SMax and friends.
The backend fixups referenced in the now deleted TODO comment were added with:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL291392https://reviews.llvm.org/rL289738
If there's any codegen fallout from this change, we should be able to address
it in DAGCombiner or target-specific lowering.
llvm-svn: 295758
Summary:
This is a fix for assertion failure in
`getInverseMinMaxSelectPattern` when ABS is passed in as a select pattern.
We should not be invoking the simplification rule for
ABS(MIN(~ x,y))) or ABS(MAX(~x,y)) combinations.
Added a test case which would cause an assertion failure without the patch.
Reviewers: sanjoy, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30051
llvm-svn: 295719
Changing to 'or' (rather than 'xor' when no wrapping flags are set)
allows icmp simplifies to happen as expected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29729
llvm-svn: 295574
This is necessary to avoid warnings from GCC.
InstCombineLoadStoreAlloca.cpp:238:7: error: 'PointerReplacer' declared
with greater visibility than the type of its field 'PointerReplacer::IC'
llvm-svn: 294794
For function-scope variables with large initialisation list, FE usually
generates a global variable to hold the initializer, then generates
memcpy intrinsic to initialize the alloca. InstCombiner::visitAllocaInst
identifies such allocas which are accessed only by reading and replaces
them with the global variable. This is done by casting the global variable
to the type of the alloca and replacing all references.
However, when the global variable is in a different address space which
is disjoint with addr space 0 (e.g. for IR generated from OpenCL,
global variable cannot be in private addr space i.e. addr space 0), casting
the global variable to addr space 0 results in invalid IR for certain
targets (e.g. amdgpu).
To fix this issue, when the global variable is not in addr space 0,
instead of casting it to addr space 0, this patch chases down the uses
of alloca until reaching the load instructions, then replaces load from
alloca with load from the global variable. If during the chasing
bitcast and GEP are encountered, new bitcast and GEP based on the global
variable are generated and used in the load instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27283
llvm-svn: 294786
This fold already existed for vectors but only when 'C1' was a splat
constant (but 'C2' could be any constant).
There were no tests for any vector constants, so I'm adding a test
that shows non-splat constants for both operands.
llvm-svn: 294650
This patch is based on the llvm-dev discussion here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/109631.html
Folding to i1 should always be desirable because that's better for value tracking
and we have special folds for i1 types.
I checked for other users of shouldChangeType() where this might have an effect,
but we already handle the i1 case differently than other types in all of those cases.
Side note: the default datalayout includes i1, so it seems we only find this gap in
shouldChangeType + phi folding for the case when there is (1) an explicit datalayout
without i1, (2) casting to i1 from a legal type, and (3) a phi with exactly 2 incoming
casted operands (as Björn mentioned).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29336
llvm-svn: 294066
The code comments didn't match the code logic, and we didn't actually distinguish the fake unary (not/neg/fneg)
operators from arguments. Adding another level to the weighting scheme provides more structure and can help
simplify the pattern matching in InstCombine and other places.
I fixed regressions that would have shown up from this change in:
rL290067
rL290127
But that doesn't mean there are no pattern-matching logic holes left; some combines may just be missing regression tests.
Should fix:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28296
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27933
llvm-svn: 294049
Although this is 'no-functional-change-intended', I'm adding tests
for shl-shl and lshr-lshr pairs because there is no existing test
coverage for those folds.
It seems like we should be able to remove some code from foldShiftedShift()
at this point because we're handling those patterns on the general path.
llvm-svn: 293814
Summary:
If there are two adjacent guards with different conditions, we can
remove one of them and include its condition into the condition of
another one. This patch allows InstCombine to merge them by the
following pattern:
guard(a); guard(b) -> guard(a & b).
Reviewers: reames, apilipenko, igor-laevsky, anna, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29378
llvm-svn: 293778
transformToIndexedCompare
If they don't have the same type, the size of the constant
index would need to be adjusted (and this wouldn't be always
possible).
Alternatively we could try the analysis with the initial
RHS value, which would guarantee that the two sides have
the same type. However it is unlikely that in practice this
would pass our transformation requirements.
Fixes PR31808 (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31808).
llvm-svn: 293629
The original shift is bigger, so this may qualify as 'obvious',
but here's an attempt at an Alive-based proof:
Name: exact
Pre: (C1 u< C2)
%a = shl i8 %x, C1
%b = lshr exact i8 %a, C2
=>
%c = lshr exact i8 %x, C2 - C1
%b = and i8 %c, ((1 << width(C1)) - 1) u>> C2
Optimization is correct!
llvm-svn: 293498
This is a minimal patch to avoid the infinite loop in:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31751
But the general problem is bigger: we're not canonicalizing all of the min/max forms reported
by value tracking's matchSelectPattern(), and we don't define min/max consistently. Some code
uses matchSelectPattern(), other code uses matchers like m_Umax, and others have their own
inline definitions which may be subtly different from any of the above.
The reason that the test cases in this patch need a cast op to trigger is because we don't
(yet) canonicalize all min/max forms based on matchSelectPattern() in
canonicalizeMinMaxWithConstant(), but we do make min/max+cast transforms based on
matchSelectPattern() in visitSelectInst().
The location of the icmp transforms that trigger the inf-loop seems arbitrary at best, so
I'm moving those behind the min/max fence in visitICmpInst() as the quick fix.
llvm-svn: 293345
Summary:
There are many NVVM intrinsics that we can't entirely get rid of, but
that nonetheless often correspond to target-generic LLVM intrinsics.
For example, if flush denormals to zero (ftz) is enabled, we can convert
@llvm.nvvm.ceil.ftz.f to @llvm.ceil.f32. On the other hand, if ftz is
disabled, we can't do this, because @llvm.ceil.f32 will be lowered to a
non-ftz PTX instruction. In this case, we can, however, simplify the
non-ftz nvvm ceil intrinsic, @llvm.nvvm.ceil.f, to @llvm.ceil.f32.
These transformations are particularly useful because they let us
constant fold instructions that appear in libdevice, the bitcode library
that ships with CUDA and essentially functions as its libm.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: hfinkel, majnemer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28794
llvm-svn: 293244
This change reverts:
r293061: "[InstCombine] Canonicalize guards for NOT OR condition"
r293058: "[InstCombine] Canonicalize guards for AND condition"
They miscompile cases like:
```
declare void @llvm.experimental.guard(i1, ...)
define void @test_guard_not_or(i1 %A, i1 %B) {
%C = or i1 %A, %B
%D = xor i1 %C, true
call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %D, i32 20, i32 30)[ "deopt"() ]
ret void
}
```
because they do transfer the `i32 20, i32 30` parameters to newly
created guard instructions.
llvm-svn: 293227
We already have this fold when the lshr has one use, but it doesn't need that
restriction. We may be able to remove some code from foldShiftedShift().
Also, move the similar:
(X << C) >>u C --> X & (-1 >>u C)
...directly into visitLShr to help clean up foldShiftByConstOfShiftByConst().
That whole function seems questionable since it is called by commonShiftTransforms(),
but there's really not much in common if we're checking the shift opcodes for every
fold.
llvm-svn: 293215
This intrinsic uses bit 0 and bit 4 of an immediate argument to determine which bits of its inputs to read. This patch uses this information to simplify the demanded elements of the input vectors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28979
llvm-svn: 293151
This is a partial fix for Bug 31520 - [guards] canonicalize guards in instcombine
Reviewed By: apilipenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29075
Patch by Maxim Kazantsev.
llvm-svn: 293061
This is a partial fix for Bug 31520 - [guards] canonicalize guards in instcombine
Reviewed By: apilipenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29074
Patch by Maxim Kazantsev.
llvm-svn: 293058
This is a partial fix for Bug 31520 - [guards] canonicalize guards in instcombine
Reviewed By: majnemer, apilipenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29071
Patch by Maxim Kazantsev.
llvm-svn: 293056
Summary: As per title. This will add the instructiions we are interested in in the worklist.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, majnemer, andreadb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29081
llvm-svn: 292957
Added early out for single undef input - we were already supporting (and testing) this in the constant folding code, we just do it quicker now
Drop undef handling from demanded elts code now that we handle it fully in InstCombiner::visitCallInst
llvm-svn: 292913
We may be able to assert that no shl-shl or lshr-lshr pairs ever get here
because we should have already handled those in foldShiftedShift().
llvm-svn: 292726
Simplify a packss/packus truncation based on the elements of the mask that are actually demanded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28777
llvm-svn: 292591
As discussed on D28777 - we don't need to handle 'all element' shuffles inside InstCombiner::visitCallInst as InstCombiner::SimplifyDemandedVectorElts will do everything we need.
llvm-svn: 292365
Add missing fabs(fpext) optimzation that worked with the call,
and also fixes it creating a second fpext when there were multiple
uses.
llvm-svn: 292172
It's not clear what 'First' and 'Second' mean, so use 'Inner' and 'Outer'
to match foldShiftedShift() and add comments with formulas, so it's easier
to see what's going on.
llvm-svn: 292153
Simplify a pshufb shuffle mask based on the elements of the mask that are actually demanded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28745
llvm-svn: 292101
a function's CFG when that CFG is unchanged.
This allows transformation passes to simply claim they preserve the CFG
and analysis passes to check for the CFG being preserved to remove the
fanout of all analyses being listed in all passes.
I've gone through and removed or cleaned up as many of the comments
reminding us to do this as I could.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28627
llvm-svn: 292054
mark it as never invalidated in the new PM.
The old PM already required this to work, and after a discussion with
Hal this seems to really be the only sensible answer. The cache
gracefully degrades as the IR is mutated, and most things which do this
should already be incrementally updating the cache.
This gets rid of a bunch of logic preserving and testing the
invalidation of this analysis.
llvm-svn: 292039
cover domtree and alias analysis. These are the pretty clear analyses
that we would always want to survive this pass.
To make these survive, we also need to preserve the assumption cache.
Added a test that verifies the important bits of this preservation.
llvm-svn: 292037
Allows LLVM to optimize sequences like the following:
%add = add nuw i32 %x, 1
%cmp = icmp ugt i32 %add, %y
Into:
%cmp = icmp uge i32 %x, %y
Previously, only signed comparisons were being handled.
Decrements could also be handled, but 'sub nuw %x, 1' is currently canonicalized to
'add %x, -1' in InstCombineAddSub, losing the nuw flag. Removing that canonicalization
seems like it might have far-reaching ramifications so I kept this simple for now.
Patch by Matti Niemenmaa!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24700
llvm-svn: 291975
Here's my second try at making @llvm.assume processing more efficient. My
previous attempt, which leveraged operand bundles, r289755, didn't end up
working: it did make assume processing more efficient but eliminating the
assumption cache made ephemeral value computation too expensive. This is a
more-targeted change. We'll keep the assumption cache, but extend it to keep a
map of affected values (i.e. values about which an assumption might provide
some information) to the corresponding assumption intrinsics. This allows
ValueTracking and LVI to find assumptions relevant to the value being queried
without scanning all assumptions in the function. The fact that ValueTracking
started doing O(number of assumptions in the function) work, for every
known-bits query, has become prohibitively expensive in some cases.
As discussed during the review, this is a pragmatic fix that, longer term, will
likely be replaced by a more-principled solution (perhaps based on an extended
SSA form).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28459
llvm-svn: 291671
Some of the callers are artificially limiting this transform to integer types;
this should make it easier to incrementally remove that restriction.
llvm-svn: 291620
We can perform the following:
(add (zext (add nuw X, C1)), C2) -> (zext (add nuw X, C1+C2))
This is only possible if C2 is negative and C2 is greater than or equal to negative C1.
llvm-svn: 290927
I wrote this patch before seeing the comment in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27114
...that suggests we should actually be canonicalizing the other way.
So just in case we decide this is the right way, we might as well
have a cleaner implementation.
llvm-svn: 290912
We correctly canonicalized (add (sext x), (sext y)) to (sext (add x, y))
where possible. However, we didn't perform the same canonicalization
for zexts or for muls.
llvm-svn: 290733
We bypassed the intrinsic and returned the passthru operand, but we should also add the intrinsic to the worklist since its now dead. This can allow DCE to find it sooner and remove it. Similar was done for InsertElement when the inserted element isn't demanded.
llvm-svn: 290704
This adds a combine that canonicalizes a chain of inserts which broadcasts
a value into a single insert + a splat shufflevector.
This fixes PR31286.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27992
llvm-svn: 290641
PMULDQ/PMULUDQ vXi64 instructions only use the even numbered v2Xi32 input elements which SimplifyDemandedVectorElts should try and use.
This builds on r290554 which added supported for 128 and 256-bit.
llvm-svn: 290582
An earlier commit added support for unmasked scalar operations. At that time isel wouldn't generate an optimal sequence for masked operations, but that has now been fixed.
llvm-svn: 290566
PMULDQ/PMULUDQ vXi64 instructions only use the even numbered v2Xi32 input elements which SimplifyDemandedVectorElts should try and use.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28119
llvm-svn: 290554
Summary:
I only do this for unmasked cases for now because isel is failing to fold the mask. I'll try to fix that soon.
I'll do the same thing for packed add/sub/mul/div in a future patch.
Reviewers: delena, RKSimon, zvi, craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27879
llvm-svn: 290535
Summary:
This patch adds support for converting the masked vpermv intrinsics into shufflevector instructions if the indices are constants.
We also need to wrap a select instruction around the shuffle to take care of the masking part. InstCombine will take care of optimizing the select if the mask is constant so I didn't bother checking for that.
Reviewers: zvi, delena, spatel, RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27825
llvm-svn: 290530
We're currently doing nearly the same thing for @llvm.objectsize in
three different places: two of them are missing checks for overflow,
and one of them could subtly break if InstCombine gets much smarter
about removing alloc sites. Seems like a good idea to not do that.
llvm-svn: 290214
Background/motivation - I was circling back around to:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28296
I made a simple patch for that and noticed some regressions, so added test cases for
those with rL281055, and this is hopefully the minimal fix for just those cases.
But as you can see from the surrounding untouched folds, we are missing commuted patterns
all over the place, and of course there are no regression tests to cover any of those cases.
We could sprinkle "m_c_" dust all over this file and catch most of the missing folds, but
then we still wouldn't have test coverage, and we'd still miss some fraction of commuted
patterns because they require adjustments to the match order.
I'm aware of the concern about the potential compile-time performance impact of adding
matches like this (currently being discussed on llvm-dev), but I don't think there's any
evidence yet to suggest that handling commutative pattern matching more thoroughly is not
a worthwhile goal of InstCombine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24419
llvm-svn: 290067
Min/max canonicalization (r287585) exposes the fact that we're missing combines for min/max patterns.
This patch won't solve the example that was attached to that thread, so something else still needs fixing.
The line between InstCombine and InstSimplify gets blurry here because sometimes the icmp instruction that
we want to fold to already exists, but sometimes it's the swapped form of what we want.
Corresponding changes for smax/umin/umax to follow.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27531
llvm-svn: 289855
A number of new patterns for simplifying and/xor of icmp:
(icmp ne %x, 0) ^ (icmp ne %y, 0) => icmp ne %x, %y if the following is true:
1- (%x = and %a, %mask) and (%y = and %b, %mask)
2- %mask is a power of 2.
(icmp eq %x, 0) & (icmp ne %y, 0) => icmp ult %x, %y if the following is true:
1- (%x = and %a, %mask1) and (%y = and %b, %mask2)
2- Let %t be the smallest power of 2 where %mask1 & %t != 0. Then for any
%s that is a power of 2 and %s & %mask2 != 0, we must have %s <= %t.
For example if %mask1 = 24 and %mask2 = 16, setting %s = 16 and %t = 8
violates condition (2) above. So this optimization cannot be applied.
llvm-svn: 289813
After r289755, the AssumptionCache is no longer needed. Variables affected by
assumptions are now found by using the new operand-bundle-based scheme. This
new scheme is more computationally efficient, and also we need much less
code...
llvm-svn: 289756
There was an efficiency problem with how we processed @llvm.assume in
ValueTracking (and other places). The AssumptionCache tracked all of the
assumptions in a given function. In order to find assumptions relevant to
computing known bits, etc. we searched every assumption in the function. For
ValueTracking, that means that we did O(#assumes * #values) work in InstCombine
and other passes (with a constant factor that can be quite large because we'd
repeat this search at every level of recursion of the analysis).
Several of us discussed this situation at the last developers' meeting, and
this implements the discussed solution: Make the values that an assume might
affect operands of the assume itself. To avoid exposing this detail to
frontends and passes that need not worry about it, I've used the new
operand-bundle feature to add these extra call "operands" in a way that does
not affect the intrinsic's signature. I think this solution is relatively
clean. InstCombine adds these extra operands based on what ValueTracking, LVI,
etc. will need and then those passes need only search the users of the values
under consideration. This should fix the computational-complexity problem.
At this point, no passes depend on the AssumptionCache, and so I'll remove
that as a follow-up change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27259
llvm-svn: 289755
If all the operands to a phi node are compares that have a RHS constant,
instcombine will try to pull them through the phi node, combining them into
a single operation. When it does this, the debug location of the new op
should be the merged debug locations of the phi node arguments.
Patch 8 of 8 for D26256. Folding of a compare that has a RHS constant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26256
llvm-svn: 289704
If all the operands to a phi node are a binop with a RHS constant, instcombine
will try to pull them through the phi node, combining them into a single
operation. When it does this, the debug location of the new op should be the
merged debug locations of the phi node arguments.
Patch 7 of 8 for D26256. Folding of a binop with RHS constant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26256
llvm-svn: 289699
If all the operands to a phi node are a cast, instcombine will try to pull
them through the phi node, combining them into a single cast. When it does
this, the debug location of the new cast should be the merged debug locations
of the phi node arguments.
Patch 6 of 8 for D26256. Folding of a cast operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26256
llvm-svn: 289693
If all the operands to a phi node are a load, instcombine will try to pull
them through the phi node, combining them into a single load. When it does
this, the debug location of the new load should be the merged debug locations
of the phi node arguments.
Patch 5 of 8 for D26256. Folding of a load operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26256
llvm-svn: 289688
If all the operands to a phi node are getelementptr, instcombine
will try to pull them through the phi node, combining them into a single
operation. When it does this, the debug location of the new getelementptr
should be the merged debug locations of the phi node arguments.
Patch 4 of 8 for D26256. Folding of a getelementptr operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26256
llvm-svn: 289684
If all the operands to a phi node are of the same operation, instcombine
will try to pull them through the phi node, combining them into a single
operation. When it does this, the debug location of the operation should
be the merged debug locations of the phi node arguments.
Patch 3 of 8 for D26256. Folding of a compare operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26256
llvm-svn: 289681
If all the operands to a phi node are of the same operation, instcombine
will try to pull them through the phi node, combining them into a single
operation. When it does this, the debug location of the operation should
be the merged debug locations of the phi node arguments.
Patch 2 of 8 for D26256. Folding of a binary operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26256
llvm-svn: 289679
At least the plugin used by the LibreOffice build
(<https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Clang_plugins>) indirectly
uses those members (through inline functions in LLVM/Clang include files in turn
using them), but they are not exported by utils/extract_symbols.py on Windows,
and accessing data across DLL/EXE boundaries on Windows is generally
problematic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26671
llvm-svn: 289647
Now we only pass bit 0 of the DemandedElts to optimize operand 1 as we recurse since the upper bits are unused. Similarly we clear bit 0 for optimizing operand 0.
Also calculate UndefElts correctly.
Simplify InstCombineCalls for these instrinics to just call SimplifyDemandedVectorElts for the call instrution to reuse this support.
llvm-svn: 289629
Now we only pass bit 0 of the DemandedElts to optimize operand 1 as we recurse since the upper bits are unused.
Also calculate UndefElts correctly.
Simplify InstCombineCalls for these instrinics to just call SimplifyDemandedVectorElts for the call instrution to reuse this support.
llvm-svn: 289628
Only the lower bits of the input element are used. And only the lower element can be undef since the upper bits are zeroed.
Have InstCombineCalls call SimplifyDemandedVectorElts for these intrinsics to reuse this support.
llvm-svn: 289523
We could truncate the condition and then try to fold the add into the
original condition value causing wrong case constants to be used.
Move the offset transform ahead of the truncate transform and return
after each transform, so there's no chance of getting confused values.
Fix for:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31260
llvm-svn: 289442
This teaches SimplifyDemandedElts that the FMA can be removed if the lower element isn't used. It also teaches it that if upper elements of the first operand aren't used then we can simplify them.
llvm-svn: 289377
These intrinsics don't read the upper elements of their first and second input. These are slightly different the the SSE version which does use the upper bits of its first element as passthru bits since the result goes to an XMM register. For AVX-512 the result goes to a mask register instead.
llvm-svn: 289371
These intrinsics don't read the upper bits of their second input. And the third input is the passthru for masking and that only uses the lower element as well.
llvm-svn: 289370
This solves a secondary problem seen in PR6137:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6137#c6
This is similar to the bitwise logic op fold added with:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL287707
And like that patch, I'm artificially restricting the
transform from vector <-> scalar types until we're sure
that the backend can handle that.
llvm-svn: 288584
Instead, expose whether the current type is an array or a struct, if an array
what the upper bound is, and if a struct the struct type itself. This is
in preparation for a later change which will make PointerType derive from
Type rather than SequentialType.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26594
llvm-svn: 288458
The instcombine code which folds loads and stores into their use types can trip up if the use is a bitcast to a type which we can't directly load or store in the IR. In principle, such types shouldn't exist, but in practice they do today. This is a workaround to avoid a bug while we work towards the long term goal.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24365
llvm-svn: 288415
Note that the non-splat lshr+lshr test folded, but that does not
work in general. Something is missing or wrong in computeKnownBits
as the non-splat shl+shl test still shows.
llvm-svn: 288005
There are other spots where we can use this; we're currently dropping
metadata in some places, and there are proposed changes where we will
want to propagate metadata.
IRBuilder's CreateSelect() already has a parameter like this, so this
change makes the regular 'Create' API line up with that.
llvm-svn: 287976
In PR27925:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27925
...we proposed adding this fold to eliminate a bitcast. In D20774, there was
some concern about changing the type of a bitwise op as well as creating
bitcasts that might not be free for a target. However, if we're strictly
eliminating an instruction (by limiting this to one-use ops), then we should
be able to do this in InstCombine.
But we're cautiously restricting the transform for now to vector types to
avoid possible backend problems. A transform to make sure the logic op is
legal for the target should be added to reverse this transform and improve
codegen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26641
llvm-svn: 287707
This is a first step towards canonicalization and improved folding/codegen
for integer min/max as discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-November/106868.html
Here, we're just matching the simplest min/max patterns and adjusting the
icmp predicate while swapping the select operands.
I've included FIXME tests in test/Transforms/InstCombine/select_meta.ll
so it's easier to see how this might be extended (corresponds to the TODO
comment in the code). That's also why I'm using matchSelectPattern()
rather than a simpler check; once the backend is patched, we can just
remove some of the restrictions to allow the obfuscated min/max patterns
in the FIXME tests to be matched.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26525
llvm-svn: 287585
This is a straightforward extension of the existing support for 32/64-bit element types. Just needed to add the additional instrinsics to the switches.
llvm-svn: 287316
This patch updates a bunch of places where add_dependencies was being explicitly called to add dependencies on intrinsics_gen to instead use the DEPENDS named parameter. This cleanup is needed for a patch I'm working on to add a dependency debugging mode to the build system.
llvm-svn: 287206
Summary: These intrinsics have been unused for clang for a while. This patch removes them. We auto upgrade them to extractelements, a scalar operation and then an insertelement. This matches the sequence used by clangs intrinsic file.
Reviewers: zvi, delena, RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26660
llvm-svn: 287083
Removing the limitation in visitInsertElementInst() causes several regressions
because we're not prepared to fold sequences of shuffles or inserts and extracts
separated by shuffles. Fixing that appears to be a difficult mission because we
are purposely trying to avoid creating shuffles with arbitrary shuffle masks
because some targets may choke on those.
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30923
llvm-svn: 286423
As the test change shows, we can increase the critical path by adding
a 'not' instruction, so make sure that we're actually removing an
instruction if we do this transform.
This transform could also cause us to miss folds of min/max pairs.
llvm-svn: 286315
This was reverted at r285866 because there was a crash handling a scalar
select of vectors. I added a check for that pattern and a test case based
on the example provided in the post-commit thread for r285732.
llvm-svn: 286113
This reverts commit r285732.
This change introduced a new assertion failure in the following
testcase at -O2:
typedef short __v8hi __attribute__((__vector_size__(16)));
__v8hi foo(__v8hi &V1, __v8hi &V2, unsigned mask) {
__v8hi Result = V1;
if (mask & 0x80)
Result[0] = V2[0];
return Result;
}
llvm-svn: 285866
This patch introduces the combine:
(C1 shift (A add C2)) -> ((C1 shift C2) shift A)
iff A and C2 are both positive
If both A and C2 are know to be positive then we can safely split into 2 shifts, permitting the folding of the Inner shift.
Fix for the spec benchmark case mentioned by @nadav on PR15141 (assuming we can prove that the inputs as positive).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26000
llvm-svn: 285696
The original patch of the A->B->A BitCast optimization was reverted by r274094 because it may cause infinite loop inside compiler https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27996.
The problem is with following code
xB = load (type B);
xA = load (type A);
+yA = (A)xB; B -> A
+zAn = PHI[yA, xA]; PHI
+zBn = (B)zAn; // A -> B
store zAn;
store zBn;
optimizeBitCastFromPhi generates
+zBn = (B)zAn; // A -> B
and expects it will be combined with the following store instruction to another
store zAn
Unfortunately before combineStoreToValueType is called on the store instruction, optimizeBitCastFromPhi is called on the new BitCast again, and this pattern repeats indefinitely.
optimizeBitCastFromPhi only generates BitCast for load/store instructions, only the BitCast before store can cause the reexecution of optimizeBitCastFromPhi, and BitCast before store can easily be handled by InstCombineLoadStoreAlloca.cpp. So the solution to the problem is if all users of a CI are store instructions, we should not do optimizeBitCastFromPhi on it. Then optimizeBitCastFromPhi will not be called on the new BitCast instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23896
llvm-svn: 285116
Prefer add/zext because they are better supported in terms of value-tracking.
Note that the backend should be prepared for this IR canonicalization
(including vector types) after:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL284015
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25135
llvm-svn: 284241
As discussed by Andrea on PR30486, we have an unsafe cast to an Instruction type in the select combine which doesn't take into account that it could be a ConstantExpr instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25466
llvm-svn: 284000
When combining an integer load with !range metadata that does not include 0 to a pointer load, make sure emit !nonnull metadata on the newly-created pointer load. This prevents the !nonnull metadata from being dropped during a ptrtoint/inttoptr pair.
This fixes PR30597.
Patch by Ariel Ben-Yehuda!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25215
llvm-svn: 283836
If we're going to canonicalize IR towards select of constants, try harder to create those.
Also, don't lose the metadata.
This is actually 4 related transforms in one patch:
// select X, (sext X), C --> select X, -1, C
// select X, (zext X), C --> select X, 1, C
// select X, C, (sext X) --> select X, C, 0
// select X, C, (zext X) --> select X, C, 0
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25126
llvm-svn: 283575
Also, make foldSelectExtConst() a member of InstCombiner, remove
unnecessary parameters from its interface, and group visitSelectInst
helpers together in the header file.
llvm-svn: 282796
The index of the new insertelement instruction was evaluated in the
wrong way, it was considered as the index of the inserted value instead
of index of the position, where the value should be inserted.
llvm-svn: 282401
This patch fixes PR30366.
Function foldUDivShl() worked under the assumption that one of the values
in input to the function was always an instance of llvm::Instruction.
However, function visitUDivOperand() (the only user of foldUDivShl) was
clearly violating that precondition; internally, visitUDivOperand() uses pattern
matches to check the operands of a udiv. Pattern matchers for binary operators
know how to handle both Instruction and ConstantExpr values.
This patch fixes the problem in foldUDivShl(). Now we use pattern matchers
instead of explicit casts to Instruction. The reduced test case from PR30366
has been added to test file InstCombine/udiv-simplify.ll.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24565
llvm-svn: 282398
If inserting more than one constant into a vector:
define <4 x float> @foo(<4 x float> %x) {
%ins1 = insertelement <4 x float> %x, float 1.0, i32 1
%ins2 = insertelement <4 x float> %ins1, float 2.0, i32 2
ret <4 x float> %ins2
}
InstCombine could reduce that to a shufflevector:
define <4 x float> @goo(<4 x float> %x) {
%shuf = shufflevector <4 x float> %x, <4 x float> <float undef, float 1.0, float 2.0, float undef>, <4 x i32><i32 0, i32 5, i32 6, i32 3>
ret <4 x float> %shuf
}
Also, InstCombine tries to convert shuffle instruction to single insertelement, if one of the vectors is a constant vector and only a single element from this constant should be used in shuffle, i.e.
shufflevector <4 x float> %v, <4 x float> <float undef, float 1.0, float
undef, float undef>, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 5, i32 undef, i32 undef> ->
insertelement <4 x float> %v, float 1.0, 1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24182
llvm-svn: 282237
We already have the udiv variant of this transform, so I think this is ok for
InstCombine too even though there is an increase in IR instructions. As the
tests and TODO comments show, the transform can lead to follow-on combines.
This should fix: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28672
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24527
llvm-svn: 282209
computeKnownBits() already works for integer vectors, so allow vector types when calling that from InstCombine.
I don't think the change to use m_APInt in computeKnownBits is strictly necessary because we do check for
ConstantVector later, but it's more efficient to handle the splat case without needing to loop on vector elements.
This should work with InstSimplify, but doesn't yet, so I made that a FIXME comment on the test for PR24942:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24942
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24677
llvm-svn: 281777
These 2 helper functions were already using APInt internally, so just
change the API and caller to allow folds for splats. The scalar
regression tests look quite thorough, so I just added a couple of
tests to prove that vectors are handled too.
These folds should be grouped with the other cmp+shift folds though.
That can be an NFC follow-up.
llvm-svn: 281663
This pattern is matched in foldICmpBinOpEqualityWithConstant() and already works
with vectors too. I changed some comments over there to point out the current
location. The tests for this transform are currently in 'sub.ll'.
Note that the remaining folds in this block all require a sub too, so they should
get grouped with the other icmp(sub) patterns.
llvm-svn: 281627
This is a big glob of transforms that probably should work for vectors,
but currently they are disallowed because of ConstantInt guards.
llvm-svn: 281614
Everything under foldICmpInstWithConstant() should now be working for
splat vectors via m_APInt matchers. Ie, I've removed all of the FIXMEs
that I added while cleaning that section up. Note that not all of the
associated FIXMEs in the regression tests are gone though, because some
of the tests require earlier folds that are still scalar-only.
llvm-svn: 281139
I introduced this potential bug by missing this diff in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL280873
...however, I'm not sure how to reach this code path with a regression test.
We may be able to remove this code and assume that the transform to a constant
is always handled by InstSimplify?
llvm-svn: 280964
This is a revert of r280676 which was a revert of r280637;
ie, this is r280637 again. It was speculatively reverted to
help debug buildbot failures.
llvm-svn: 280861
This fixes a similar issue to the one already fixed by r280804
(revieved in D24256). Revision 280804 fixed the problem with unsafe dyn_casts
in the extrq/extrqi combining logic. However, it turns out that even the
insertq/insertqi logic was affected by the same problem.
llvm-svn: 280807
This patch fixes an assertion failure caused by unsafe dynamic casts on the
constant operands of sse4a intrinsic calls to extrq/extrqi
The combine logic that simplifies sse4a extrq/extrqi intrinsic calls currently
checks if the input operands are constants. Internally, that logic relies on
dyn_casts of values returned by calls to method Constant::getAggregateElement.
However, method getAggregateElemet may return nullptr if the constant element
cannot be retrieved. So, all the dyn_casts can potentially fail. This is what
happens for example if a constexpr value is passed in input to an extrq/extrqi
intrinsic call.
This patch fixes the problem by using a dyn_cast_or_null (instead of a simple
dyn_cast) on the result of each call to Constant::getAggregateElement.
Added reproducible test cases to x86-sse4a.ll.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24256
llvm-svn: 280804
The transform in question:
icmp (and (trunc W), C2), C1 -> icmp (and W, C2'), C1'
...is still not enabled for vectors, thus no functional change intended.
It's not clear to me if this is a good transform for vectors or even
scalars in general. Changing that behavior may be a follow-on patch.
llvm-svn: 280627
memcpy with ld/st.
When InstCombine replaces a memcpy with loads+stores it does not copy over the
llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access from the memcpy instruction. This patch fixes
that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23499
llvm-svn: 280617
The motivating case occurs with SSE/AVX scalar intrinsics, so this is a first step towards
shrinking that to a single shufflevector.
Note that the transform is intentionally limited to shuffles that are equivalent to vector
selects to avoid creating arbitrary shuffle masks that may not lower well.
This should solve PR29126:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=29126
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23886
llvm-svn: 280504
While removing a scalar shackle from an icmp fold, I noticed that I couldn't find any tests to trigger
this code path.
The 'and' shrinking transform should be handled by InstCombiner::foldCastedBitwiseLogic()
or eliminated with InstSimplify. The icmp narrowing is part of InstCombiner::foldICmpWithCastAndCast().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24031
llvm-svn: 280370
This is prep work before changing the callers to also use APInt which will
allow folds for splat vectors. Currently, the callers have ConstantInt
guards in place, so no functional change intended with this commit.
llvm-svn: 280282
It's much less code and easier to read if we don't duplicate
everything between the 'Inside' and not 'Inside' cases.
As noted with the FIXME, the goal is to make this vector-friendly
in a follow-up patch.
llvm-svn: 280183
Anna Thomas