Multiply a is complex operation so just because some bit of the output isn't used doesn't mean that bit of the input isn't used.
We might able to bound it, but it will require some more thought.
llvm-svn: 345241
Add X86 SimplifyDemandedBitsForTargetNode and use it to simplify PMULDQ/PMULUDQ target nodes.
This enables us to repeatedly simplify the node's arguments after the previous approach had to be reverted due to PR39398.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53643
llvm-svn: 345182
When implementing memset's today we often see this pattern:
$x0 = MOV 0xXYXYXYXYXYXYXYXY
store $x0, ...
$w1 = MOV 0xXYXYXYXY
store $w1, ...
We first create a 64bit constant in a 64bit register with all bytes the
same and then create a 32bit constant with all bytes the same in a 32bit
register. In many targets we could just access the lower byte of the
64bit register instead.
- Ideally this would be handled by the ConstantHoist pass but it runs
too early when memset isn't expanded yet.
- The memset expansion code already had this optimization implemented,
however SelectionDAG constantfolding would constantfold the
"trunc(bigconstnat)" pattern to "smallconstant".
- This patch makes the memset expansion mark the constant as Opaque and
stop DAGCombiner from constant folding in this situation. (Similar to
how ConstantHoisting marks things as Opaque to avoid folding
ADD/SUB/etc.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53181
llvm-svn: 345102
We can't add the MULDQ node back to the worklist after the demanded bits change has been committed in case the node has been removed entirely. This will have to wait until we have SimplifyDemandedBitsForTargetNode.
llvm-svn: 345070
Matches the approach taken in the constant pool shuffle decoders, and uses an UndefElts mask instead of uint64_t(-1) raw mask values, which doesn't work safely for i32/i64 shuffle mask sizes (as the -1 value is legal).
This allows us to remove the constant pool shuffle decoders from most of the getTargetShuffleMask variable shuffle cases (X86ISD::VPERMV3 will be handled in a future commit).
llvm-svn: 345018
I've included a fix to DAGCombiner::ForwardStoreValueToDirectLoad that I believe will prevent the previous miscompile.
Original commit message:
Theoretically this was done to simplify the amount of isel patterns that were needed. But it also meant a substantial number of our isel patterns have to match an explicit bitcast. By making the vXi32/vXi16/vXi8 types legal for loads, DAG combiner should be able to change the load type to rem
I had to add some additional plain load instruction patterns and a few other special cases, but overall the isel table has reduced in size by ~12000 bytes. So it looks like this promotion was hurting us more than helping.
I still have one crash in vector-trunc.ll that I'm hoping @RKSimon can help with. It seems to relate to using getTargetConstantFromNode on a load that was shrunk due to an extract_subvector combine after the constant pool entry was created. So we end up decoding more mask elements than the lo
I'm hoping this patch will simplify the number of patterns needed to remove the and/or/xor promotion.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits, RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53306
llvm-svn: 344965
We can't safely assume that certain RawMask entries are UNDEF as most variable shuffles ignore non-index bits - PSHUFB only works on i8 elts so it'd be safe to use but I'm intending to come up with an alternative approach that works for all.
........
Enable this for PSHUFB constant mask decoding and remove the ConstantPool DecodePSHUFBMask
llvm-svn: 344937
We can't safely assume that certain RawMask entries are UNDEF as most variable shuffles ignore non-index bits.
........
Add support for UNDEF raw mask elements and remove the ConstantPool DecodeVPERMILPMask usage in X86ISelLowering.cpp
llvm-svn: 344936
Summary:
As discussed in D52304 / IRC, we now have pattern matching for
'bit extract' in two places - tablegen and `X86DAGToDAGISel`.
There are 4 patterns.
And we will have a problem with `x & (-1 >> (32 - y))` pattern.
* If the mask is one-use, then it is always unfolded into `x << (32 - y) >> (32 - y)` first.
Thus, the existing test coverage is already broken.
* If it is not one-use, then it is not unfolded, and is matched as BZHI.
* If it is not one-use, we will not match it as BEXTR. And if it is one-use, it will have been unfolded already.
So we will either not handle that pattern for BEXTR, or not have test coverage for it.
This is bad.
As discussed with @craig.topper, let's unify this matching, and do everything in `X86DAGToDAGISel`.
Then we will not have code duplication, and will have proper test coverage.
This indeed does not affect any tests, and this is great.
It means that for these two patterns, the `X86DAGToDAGISel` is identical to the tablegen version.
Please review carefully, i'm not fully sure about that intrinsic change, and introduction of the new `X86ISD` opcode.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53164
llvm-svn: 344904
Summary:
Theoretically this was done to simplify the amount of isel patterns that were needed. But it also meant a substantial number of our isel patterns have to match an explicit bitcast. By making the vXi32/vXi16/vXi8 types legal for loads, DAG combiner should be able to change the load type to remove the bitcast.
I had to add some additional plain load instruction patterns and a few other special cases, but overall the isel table has reduced in size by ~12000 bytes. So it looks like this promotion was hurting us more than helping.
I still have one crash in vector-trunc.ll that I'm hoping @RKSimon can help with. It seems to relate to using getTargetConstantFromNode on a load that was shrunk due to an extract_subvector combine after the constant pool entry was created. So we end up decoding more mask elements than the load size.
I'm hoping this patch will simplify the number of patterns needed to remove the and/or/xor promotion.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits, RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53306
llvm-svn: 344877
Summary:
These nodes exist to overcome an isel problem where we can generate a zero extend of an AH register followed by an extract subreg, and another zero extend. The first zero extend exists to avoid a partial register update copying the AH register into the low 8-bits. The second zero extend exists if the user wanted the remainder zero extended.
To make this work we had a DAG combine to morph the DIVREM opcode to a special opcode that included the extend. But then we had to add the new node to computeKnownBits and computeNumSignBits to process the extension portion.
This patch instead removes all of that and adds a late peephole to detect the two extends.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53449
llvm-svn: 344874
D53306 exposes an issue where we sometimes use constant pool data from bigger vectors than the target shuffle mask. This should be safe to do, but we have to be certain that we're using the bottom most part of the vector as the shuffle mask decoders have no way to peek into subvectors with non-zero offsets.
llvm-svn: 344867
Summary:
I've noticed that the bitcasts we introduce for these make computeKnownBits and computeNumSignBits not work well in LegalizeVectorOps. LegalizeVectorOps legalizes bottom up while LegalizeDAG legalizes top down. The bottom up strategy for LegalizeVectorOps means operands are legalized before their uses. So we promote and/or/xor before we legalize the operands that use them making computeKnownBits/computeNumSignBits in places like LowerTruncate suboptimal. I looked at changing LegalizeVectorOps to be top down as well, but that was more disruptive and caused some regressions. I also looked at just moving promotion of binops to LegalizeDAG, but that had a few issues one around matching AND,ANDN,OR into VSELECT because I had to create ANDN as vXi64, but the other nodes hadn't legalized yet, I didn't look too hard at fixing that.
This patch seems to produce better results overall than my other attempts. We now form broadcasts of constants better in some cases. For at least some of them the AND was being introduced in LegalizeDAG, promoted to vXi64, and the BUILD_VECTOR was also legalized there. I think we got bad ordering of that. Now the promotion is out of the legalizer so we handle this better.
In the longer term I think we really should evaluate whether we should be doing this promotion at all. It's really there to reduce isel pattern count, but I'm wondering if we'd be better served just eating the pattern cost or doing C++ based isel for vector and/or/xor in X86ISelDAGToDAG. The masked and/or/xor will definitely be difficult in patterns if a bitcast gets between the vselect and the and/or/xor node. That becomes a lot of permutations to cover.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53107
llvm-svn: 344487
Summary: This is similar to what D52528 did for loads. It should match what generic type legalization does in 64-bit mode where it uses a v2i64 cast and an i64 store.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53173
llvm-svn: 344470
There is one remnant - AVX1 custom splitting of 256-bit vectors - which is due to a regression where the X86ISD::ANDNP is still performed as a YMM.
I've also tightened the CTLZ or CTPOP lowering in SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandBitCount to require a legal CTLZ - it doesn't affect existing users and fixes an issue with AVX512 codegen.
llvm-svn: 344457
Use isConstantSplat instead of ISD::isConstantSplatVector to let us us peek through to illegal types (in this case for i686 targets to recognise i64 constants)
llvm-svn: 344452
If we have better CTLZ support than CTPOP, then use cttz(x) = width - ctlz(~x & (x - 1)) - and remove the CTTZ_ZERO_UNDEF handling as it no longer gives better codegen.
Similar to rL344447, this is also closer to LegalizeDAG's approach
llvm-svn: 344448
This patch changes the vector CTTZ lowering from:
cttz(x) = ctpop((x & -x) - 1)
to:
cttz(x) = ctpop(~x & (x - 1))
Not only does this make better use of the PANDN instruction, but it also matches the LegalizeDAG method which should allow us to remove the x86 specific code at some point in the future (we need to fix some issues with the bitcasted logic ops and CTPOP lowering first).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53214
llvm-svn: 344447
Add shuffle lowering for the case where we can shuffle the lanes into place followed by an in-lane permute.
This is mainly for cases where we can have non-repeating permutes in each lane, but for now I've just enabled it for v4f64 unary shuffles to fix PR39161 - there is no test coverage for other shuffles that might benefit yet.
We now have several cross-lane shuffle lowering methods that all do something similar - I've looked at merging some of these (notably by making the repeated mask mechanism in lowerVectorShuffleByMerging128BitLanes optional), but there is a lot of assertions/assumptions in the way that makes this tricky - I ended up going for adding yet another relatively simple method instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53148
llvm-svn: 344446
Generic legalization should be able to finish legalizing the EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR probably by turning it into a BUILD_VECTOR. But we should emit the simplest sequence.
llvm-svn: 344424
The algorithm we would do previously was identical to generic legalization. If we ever switch to legalizing integer vectors via widening we'll be able to kill off the code since it now only runs for promotion.
llvm-svn: 344423
This is the planned follow-up to D52997. Here we are reducing horizontal vector math codegen
by default. AMD Jaguar (btver2) should have no difference with this patch because it has
fast-hops. (If we want to set that bit for other CPUs, let me know.)
The code changes are small, but there are many test diffs. For files that are specifically
testing for hops, I added RUNs to distinguish fast/slow, so we can see the consequences
side-by-side. For files that are primarily concerned with codegen other than hops, I just
updated the CHECK lines to reflect the new default codegen.
To recap the recent horizontal op story:
1. Before rL343727, we were producing hops for all subtargets for a variety of patterns.
Hops were likely not optimal for all targets though.
2. The IR improvement in r343727 exposed a hole in the backend hop pattern matching, so
we reduced hop codegen for all subtargets. That was bad for Jaguar (PR39195).
3. We restored the hop codegen for all targets with rL344141. Good for Jaguar, but
probably bad for other CPUs.
4. This patch allows us to distinguish when we want to produce hops, so everyone can be
happy. I'm not sure if we have the best predicate here, but the intent is to undo the
extra hop-iness that was enabled by r344141.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53095
llvm-svn: 344361
Pull out repeated byte sum stage for popcount of vector elements > 8bits.
This allows us to simplify the LUT/BITMATH popcnt code to always assume vXi8 vectors, and also improves avx512bitalg codegen which only has access to vpopcntb/vpopcntw.
llvm-svn: 344348
Fixes PR32160 by reducing the size of PSHUFB if we only use one of the lanes.
This approach can probably be generalized to handle any target shuffle (and any subvector index) but we have no test coverage at the moment.
llvm-svn: 344336
On 64-bit targets the generic legalize will use an i64 load and a scalar_to_vector for us. But on 32-bit targets i64 isn't legal and the generic legalizer will end up emitting two 32-bit loads. We have DAG combines that try to put those two loads back together with pretty good success.
This patch instead uses f64 to avoid the splitting entirely. I've made it do the same for 64-bit mode for consistency and to keep the load in the fp domain.
There are a few things in here that look like regressions in 32-bit mode, but I believe they bring us closer to the 64-bit mode codegen. And that the 64-bit mode code could be better. I think those issues should be looked at separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52528
llvm-svn: 344291
This is an alternative to D53080 since I think using a BEXTR for a shifted mask is definitely an improvement when the shl can be absorbed into addressing mode. The other cases I'm less sure about.
We already have several tricks for handling an and of a shift in address matching. This adds a new case for BEXTR.
I've moved the BEXTR matching code back to X86ISelDAGToDAG to allow it to match. I suppose alternatively we could directly emit a X86ISD::BEXTR node that isel could pattern match. But I'm trying to view BEXTR matching as an isel concern so DAG combine can see 'and' and 'shift' operations that are well understood. We did lose a couple cases from tbm_patterns.ll, but I think there are ways to recover that.
I've also put back the manual load folding code in matchBEXTRFromAnd that I removed a few months ago in r324939. This gives us some more freedom to make decisions based on the ability to fold a load. I haven't done anything with that yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53126
llvm-svn: 344270
Summary:
As discussed in [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38938 | PR38938 ]],
we fail to emit `BEXTR` if the mask is shifted.
We can't deal with that in `X86DAGToDAGISel` `before the address mode for the inc is selected`,
and we can't really do it in the normal DAGCombine, because we don't have generic `ISD::BitFieldExtract` node,
and if we simply turn the shifted mask into a normal mask + shift-left, it will be folded back.
So it would seem X86ISelLowering is the place to handle this.
This patch only moves the matchBEXTRFromAnd()
from X86DAGToDAGISel to X86ISelLowering.
It does not add support for the 'shifted mask' pattern.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52426
llvm-svn: 344179
This is intended to restore horizontal codegen to what it looked like before IR demanded elements improved in:
rL343727
As noted in PR39195:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39195
...horizontal ops can be worse for performance than a shuffle+regular binop, so I've added a TODO. Ideally, we'd
solve that in a machine instruction pass, but a quicker solution will be adding a 'HasFastHorizontalOp' feature
bit to deal with it here in the DAG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52997
llvm-svn: 344141
Similar to what already happens in the DAGCombiner wrappers, this patch adds the root nodes back onto the worklist if the DCI wrappers' SimplifyDemandedBits/SimplifyDemandedVectorElts were successful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53026
llvm-svn: 344132
This may give slightly better opportunities for DAG combine to simplify with the operations before the setcc. It also matches the type the xors will eventually be promoted to anyway so it saves a legalization step.
Almost all of the test changes are because our constant pool entry is now v2i64 instead of v4i32 on 64-bit targets. On 32-bit targets getConstant should be emitting a v4i32 build_vector and a v4i32->v2i64 bitcast.
There are a couple test cases where it appears we now combine a bitwise not with one of these xors which caused a new constant vector to be generated. This prevented a constant pool entry from being shared. But if that's an issue we're concerned about, it seems we need to address it another way that just relying a bitcast to hide it.
This came about from experiments I've been trying with pushing the promotion of and/or/xor to vXi64 later than LegalizeVectorOps where it is today. We run LegalizeVectorOps in a bottom up order. So the and/or/xor are promoted before their users are legalized. The bitcasts added for the promotion act as a barrier to computeKnownBits if we try to use it during vector legalization of a later operation. So by moving the promotion out we can hopefully get better results from computeKnownBits/computeNumSignBits like in LowerTruncate on AVX512. I've also looked at running LegalizeVectorOps in a top down order like LegalizeDAG, but thats showing some other issues.
llvm-svn: 344071
As noted in D52747, if we prefer IR to use trunc for bool vectors rather
than and+icmp, we can expose codegen shortcomings as seen here with masked store.
Replace a hard-coded PCMPGT simplification with the more general demanded bits call
to improve things.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52964
llvm-svn: 344048
As discussed on D52964, this adds 256-bit *_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG lowering support for AVX1 targets to help improve SimplifyDemandedBits handling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52980
llvm-svn: 344019
Simple types are a superset of what all in tree targets in LLVM could possibly have a legal type. This means the behavior of using isSimple to check for a supported type for X86 could change over time. For example, this could would change if a v256i1 type was added to MVT in the future.
llvm-svn: 343995
Some necessary yak shaving before lowering *_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG 256-bit vectors on AVX1 targets as suggested by D52964.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52970
llvm-svn: 343991
The instructions are complicated, so this code will
probably never be very obvious, but hopefully this
makes it better.
As shown in PR39195:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39195
...we need to improve the matching to not miss cases
where we're h-opping on 1 source vector, and that
should be a small patch after this rearranging.
llvm-svn: 343989
Prevents missing other simplifications that may occur deep in the operand chain where CommitTargetLoweringOpt won't add the PMULDQ back to the worklist itself
llvm-svn: 343922
Attempt to simplify PSHUFB masks (even non-constant ones) - we should probably be able to simplify other variable shuffles as well as the need arises.
llvm-svn: 343919
rL343853 didn't limit the number of subinputs, but we don't currently support faux shuffles with more than 2 total inputs, so put a limiter in place until this is fixed.
Found by Artem Dergachev.
llvm-svn: 343891
The comments in this code say we were trying to avoid 16-bit immediates, but if the immediate fits in 8-bits this isn't an issue. This avoids creating a zero extend that probably won't go away.
The movmskb related changes are interesting. The movmskb instruction writes a 32-bit result, but fills the upper bits with 0. So the zero_extend we were previously emitting was free, but we turned a -1 immediate that would fit in 8-bits into a 32-bit immediate so it was still bad.
llvm-svn: 343871
Decode subvector shuffles from INSERT_SUBVECTOR(SRC0, SHUFFLE(EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR(SRC1))
This was found necessary while investigating PR39161
llvm-svn: 343853
Previously we replaced the chain use ourself and return the data result. LegalizeVectorOps then detected that we'd done this and assumed the chain had already been handled.
This commit instead returns a MERGE_VALUES node with two results joined from nodes. This allows LegalizeVectorOps to do all the replacements for us without any special casing. The MERGE_VALUES will be removed by DAG combine.
llvm-svn: 343817
The additional patterns needed for this aren't overwhelming and introducing extra bitcasts during lowering limits our ability to do computeNumSignBits. Not that I have a good example of that for select. I'm just becoming increasingly grumpy about promotion of AND/OR/XOR. SELECT was just a lot easier to fix.
llvm-svn: 343723
Fix use of SSE1 registers for f32 ops in no-x87 mode.
Notably, allow use of SSE instructions for f32 operations in 64-bit
mode (but not 32-bit which is disallowed by callign convention).
Also avoid translating memset/memcopy/memmove into SSE registers
without X87 for 32-bit mode.
This fixes PR38738.
Reviewers: nickdesaulniers, craig.topper
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52555
llvm-svn: 343689
By removing demanded target shuffles that simplify to zero/undef/identity before simplifying its inputs we improve chances of further simplification, as only the immediate parent user of the combined is added back to the work list - this still doesn't help us if its passed through other ops though (bitcasts....).
llvm-svn: 343390
The shift amount might have peeked through a extract_subvector, altering the number of vector elements in the 'Amt' variable - so we were incorrectly calculating the ratio when peeking through bitcasts, resulting in incorrectly detecting splats.
llvm-svn: 343373
Similar to the existing ISD::SRL constant vector shifts from D49562, this patch adds ISD::SRA support with ISD::MULHS.
As we're dealing with signed values, we have to handle shift by zero and shift by one special cases, so XOP+AVX2/AVX512 splitting/extension is still a better solution - really we should still use ISD::MULHS if one of the special cases are used but for now I've just left a TODO and filtered by isKnownNeverZero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52171
llvm-svn: 343093
This removes an int->fp bitcast between the surrounding code and the movmsk. I had already added a hack to combineMOVMSK to try to look through this bitcast to improve the SimplifyDemandedBits there.
But I found an additional issue where the bitcast was preventing combineMOVMSK from being called again after earlier nodes in the DAG are optimized. The bitcast gets revisted, but not the user of the bitcast. By using integer types throughout, the bitcast doesn't get in the way.
llvm-svn: 343046
This is the final (I hope!) problem pattern mentioned in PR37749:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37749
We are trying to avoid an AVX1 sinkhole caused by having 256-bit bitwise logic ops but no other 256-bit integer ops.
We've already solved the simple logic ops, but 'andn' is an x86 special. I looked at alternative solutions like
extending the generic DAG combine or trying to wait until the ANDNP node is created, but those are bigger patches
that can over-reach. Ie, splitting to 128-bit does not look like a win in most cases with >1 256-bit op.
The pattern matching is cluttered with bitcasts because of our i64 element canonicalization. For the affected test,
we have this vector-type-legalized sequence:
t29: v8i32 = concat_vectors t27, t28
t30: v4i64 = bitcast t29
t18: v8i32 = BUILD_VECTOR Constant:i32<-1>, Constant:i32<-1>, ...
t31: v4i64 = bitcast t18
t32: v4i64 = xor t30, t31
t9: v8i32 = BUILD_VECTOR Constant:i32<255>, Constant:i32<255>, ...
t34: v4i64 = bitcast t9
t35: v4i64 = and t32, t34
t36: v8i32 = bitcast t35
t37: v4i32 = extract_subvector t36, Constant:i64<0>
t38: v4i32 = extract_subvector t36, Constant:i64<4>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52318
llvm-svn: 343008
This is an alternative to https://reviews.llvm.org/D37896. We can't decompose
multiplies generically without a target hook to tell us when it's profitable.
ARM and AArch64 may be able to remove some existing code that overlaps with
this transform.
This extends D52195 and may resolve PR34474:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34474
(still an open question about transforming legal vector multiplies, but we
could open another bug report for those)
llvm-svn: 342844
We don't have a vXi8 shift left so we need to bitcast to a vXi16 vector to perform the shift. If we let lowering legalize the vXi8 shift we get an extra and that we don't need and fail to remove.
llvm-svn: 342795
x86 had 2 versions of peekThroughBitcast. DAGCombiner had 1. Plus, it had a 1-off implementation for the one-use variant.
Move the x86 versions of the code to SelectionDAG, so we don't have different copies of the code.
No functional change intended.
I'm putting this next to isBitwiseNot() because I am planning to use it in there. Another option is next to the
helpers in the ISD namespace (eg, ISD::isConstantSplatVector()). But if there's no good reason for those to be
there, I'd prefer to pull other helpers over to SelectionDAG in follow-up steps.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52285
llvm-svn: 342669
As the code comments suggest, these are about splitting, and they
are not necessarily limited to lowering, so that misled me.
There's nothing that's actually x86-specific in these either, so
they might be better placed in a common header so any target can
use them.
llvm-svn: 342575
This patch adds an initial x86 SimplifyDemandedVectorEltsForTargetNode implementation to handle target shuffles.
Currently the patch only decodes a target shuffle, calls SimplifyDemandedVectorElts on its input operands and removes any shuffle that reduces to undef/zero/identity.
Future work will need to integrate this with combineX86ShufflesRecursively, add support for other x86 ops, etc.
NOTE: There is a minor regression that appears to be affecting further (extractelement?) combines which I haven't been able to solve yet - possibly something to do with how nodes are added to the worklist after simplification.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52140
llvm-svn: 342564
This is an alternative to D37896. I don't see a way to decompose multiplies
generically without a target hook to tell us when it's profitable.
ARM and AArch64 may be able to remove some duplicate code that overlaps with
this transform.
As a first step, we're only getting the most clear wins on the vector examples
requested in PR34474:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34474
As noted in the code comment, it's likely that the x86 constraints are tighter
than necessary, but it may not always be a win to replace a pmullw/pmulld.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52195
llvm-svn: 342554
Summary:
The IR reference for the `byval` attribute states:
```
This indicates that the pointer parameter should really be passed by value
to the function. The attribute implies that a hidden copy of the pointee is
made between the caller and the callee, so the callee is unable to modify
the value in the caller. This attribute is only valid on LLVM pointer arguments.
```
However, on Win64, this attribute is unimplemented and the raw pointer is
passed to the callee instead. This is problematic, because frontend authors
relying on the implicit hidden copy (as happens for every other calling
convention) will see the passed value silently (if mutable memory) or
loudly (by means of a crash) modified because the callee treats the
location as scratch memory space it is allowed to mutate.
At this point, it's worth taking a step back to understand the context.
In most calling conventions, aggregates that are too large to be passed
in registers, instead get *copied* to the stack at a fixed (computable
from the signature) offset of the stack pointer. At the LLVM, we hide
this hidden copy behind the byval attribute. The caller passes a pointer
to the desired data and the callee receives a pointer, but these pointers
are not the same. In particular, the pointer that the callee receives
points to temporary stack memory allocated as part of the call lowering.
In most calling conventions, this pointer is never realized in registers
or memory. The temporary memory is simply defined by an implicit
offset from the stack pointer at function entry.
Win64, uniquely, works differently. The structure is still passed in
memory, but instead of being stored at an implicit memory offset, the
caller computes a pointer to the temporary memory and passes it to
the callee as a regular pointer (taking up a register, or if all
registers are taken up, an additional stack slot). Presumably, this
was done to allow eliding the copy when passing aggregates through
several functions on the stack.
This explains why ignoring the `byval` attribute mostly works on Win64.
The argument simply gets passed as a pointer and as long as we're ok
with the callee trampling all over that memory, there are no ill effects.
However, it does contradict the documentation of the `byval` attribute
which specifies that there is to be an implicit copy.
Frontends can of course work around this by never emitting the `byval`
attribute for Win64 and creating `alloca`s for the requisite temporary
stack slots (and that does appear to be what frontends are doing).
However, the presence of the `byval` attribute is not a trap for
frontend authors, since it seems to work, but silently modifies the
passed memory contrary to documentation.
I see two solutions:
- Disallow the `byval` attribute in the verifier if using the Win64
calling convention.
- Make it work by simply emitting a temporary stack copy as we would
with any other calling convention (frontends can of course always
not use the attribute if they want to elide the copy).
This patch implements the second option (make it work), though I would
be fine with the first also.
Ref: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/28338
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51842
llvm-svn: 342402
For constant non-uniform cases we'll never introduce more and/andn/or selects than already occur in generic pre-SSE41 ISD::SRL lowering.
llvm-svn: 342352
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38949
It's not clear to me that we even need a one-use check in this fold.
Ie, 2 independent loads might be better than a load+dependent shuffle.
Note that the existing re-use tests are not affected. We actually do form a
broadcast node in those tests now because there's no extra use of the
insert_subvector node in those cases. But something later in isel pattern
matching decides that it is not worth using a broadcast for the full load in
those tests:
Legalized selection DAG: %bb.0 'test_broadcast_2f64_4f64_reuse:'
t7: v2f64,ch = load<(load 16 from %ir.p0)> t0, t2, undef:i64
t4: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %1
t10: ch = store<(store 16 into %ir.p1)> t7:1, t7, t4, undef:i64
t18: v4f64 = insert_subvector undef:v4f64, t7, Constant:i64<0>
t20: v4f64 = insert_subvector t18, t7, Constant:i64<2>
Becomes:
t7: v2f64,ch = load<(load 16 from %ir.p0)> t0, t2, undef:i64
t4: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %1
t10: ch = store<(store 16 into %ir.p1)> t7:1, t7, t4, undef:i64
t21: v4f64 = X86ISD::SUBV_BROADCAST t7
ISEL: Starting selection on root node: t21: v4f64 = X86ISD::SUBV_BROADCAST t7
...
Created node: t27: v4f64 = INSERT_SUBREG IMPLICIT_DEF:v4f64, t7, TargetConstant:i32<7>
Morphed node: t21: v4f64 = VINSERTF128rr t27, t7, TargetConstant:i8<1>
llvm-svn: 342347
Summary: This unfortunately adds a move, but isn't that better than going to the int domain and back?
Reviewers: RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52134
llvm-svn: 342327
Craig Topper