MSVC's pragma optimize turns optimizations on or off based on the list
passed. At the moment, we only support an empty optimization list.
i.e. `#pragma optimize("", on | off)`
From MSVC's docs:
| Parameter | Type of optimization |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------|
| g | Enable global optimizations. Deprecated |
| s or t | Specify short or fast sequences of machine code |
| y | Generate frame pointers on the program stack |
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/preprocessor/optimize?view=msvc-170
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125723
Some code [0] consider that trailing arrays are flexible, whatever their size.
Support for these legacy code has been introduced in
f8f6324983 but it prevents evaluation of
__builtin_object_size and __builtin_dynamic_object_size in some legit cases.
Introduce -fstrict-flex-arrays=<n> to have stricter conformance when it is
desirable.
n = 0: current behavior, any trailing array member is a flexible array. The default.
n = 1: any trailing array member of undefined, 0 or 1 size is a flexible array member
n = 2: any trailing array member of undefined or 0 size is a flexible array member
n = 3: any trailing array member of undefined size is a flexible array member (strict c99 conformance)
Similar patch for gcc discuss here: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101836
[0] https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/developers-handbook/sockets/#sockets-essential-functions
Use the if/while statement right paren location instead of the end of the
condition expression to determine if the semicolon is on its own line, for the
purpose of not warning about code like this:
while (foo())
;
Using the condition location meant that we would also not report a warning on
code like this:
while (MACRO(a,
b));
body();
The right paren loc wasn't stored in the AST or passed into Sema::ActOnIfStmt
when this logic was first written.
Reviewed By: rnk, gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128406
Fixes#54629.
The crash is is caused by the double template instantiation.
See the added test. Here is what happens:
- Template arguments for the partial specialization get instantiated.
- This causes instantitation into the corrensponding requires
expression.
- `TemplateInsantiator` correctly handles instantiation of parameters
inside `RequiresExprBody` and instantiates the constraint expression
inside the `NestedRequirement`.
- To build the substituted `NestedRequirement`, `TemplateInsantiator`
calls `Sema::BuildNestedRequirement` calls
`CheckConstraintSatisfaction`, which results in another template
instantiation (with empty template arguments). This seem to be an
implementation detail to handle constraint satisfaction and is not
required by the standard.
- The recursive template instantiation tries to find the parameter
inside `RequiresExprBody` and fails with the corresponding assertion.
Note that this only happens as both instantiations happen with the class
partial template specialization set as `Sema.CurContext`, which is
considered a dependent `DeclContext`.
To fix the assertion, avoid doing the recursive template instantiation
and instead evaluate resulting expressions in-place.
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127487
Previously `#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON` always set dynamic rounding
mode and strict exception handling. It is not correct in the presence
of other pragmas that also modify rounding mode and exception handling.
For example, the effect of previous pragma FENV_ROUND could be
cancelled, which is not conformant with the C standard. Also
`#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS OFF` turned off only FEnvAccess flag, leaving
rounding mode and exception handling unchanged, which is incorrect in
general case.
Concrete rounding and exception mode depend on a combination of several
factors like various pragmas and command-line options. During the review
of this patch an idea was proposed that the semantic actions associated
with such pragmas should only set appropriate flags. Actual rounding
mode and exception handling should be calculated taking into account the
state of all relevant options. In such implementation the pragma
FENV_ACCESS should not override properties set by other pragmas but
should set them if such setting is absent.
To implement this approach the following main changes are made:
- Field `FPRoundingMode` is removed from `LangOptions`. Actually there
are no options that set it to arbitrary rounding mode, the choice was
only `dynamic` or `tonearest`. Instead, a new boolean flag
`RoundingMath` is added, with the same meaning as the corresponding
command-line option.
- Type `FPExceptionModeKind` now has possible value `FPE_Default`. It
does not represent any particular exception mode but indicates that
such mode was not set and default value should be used. It allows to
distinguish the case:
{
#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON
...
}
where the pragma must set FPE_Strict, from the case:
{
#pragma clang fp exceptions(ignore)
#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON
...
}
where exception mode should remain `FPE_Ignore`.
- Class `FPOptions` has now methods `getRoundingMode` and
`getExceptionMode`, which calculates the respective properties from
other specified FP properties.
- Class `LangOptions` has now methods `getDefaultRoundingMode` and
`getDefaultExceptionMode`, which calculates default modes from the
specified options and should be used instead of `getRoundingMode` and
`getFPExceptionMode` of the same class.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126364
In HLSL vectors are ext_vectors in all respects except that they
support a constructor style syntax for initializing vectors. This
change adds a translation of vector constructor arguments into
initializer lists.
This supports two oddities of HLSL syntax:
(1) HLSL vectors support constructor syntax
(2) HLSL vectors are expanded to constituate components in constructors
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127802
This patch implements a necessary part of P0848, the overload resolution for destructors.
It is now possible to overload destructors based on constraints, and the eligible destructor
will be selected at the end of the class.
The approach this patch takes is to perform the overload resolution in Sema::ActOnFields
and to mark the selected destructor using a new property in FunctionDeclBitfields.
CXXRecordDecl::getDestructor is then modified to use this property to return the correct
destructor.
This closes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/45614.
Reviewed By: #clang-language-wg, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126194
Instead, just pop the cleanups at the end of the asm statement.
This fixes an assertion failure in BuildStmtExpr. It also fixes a bug
where blocks and C compound literals were destructed at the end of the
asm statement instead of at the end of the enclosing scope.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125936
From [class.copy.ctor]:
```
A non-template constructor for class X is a copy constructor if its first
parameter is of type X&, const X&, volatile X& or const volatile X&, and
either there are no other parameters or else all other parameters have
default arguments (9.3.4.7).
A copy/move constructor for class X is trivial if it is not user-provided and if:
- class X has no virtual functions (11.7.3) and no virtual base classes (11.7.2), and
- the constructor selected to copy/move each direct base class subobject is trivial, and
- or each non-static data member of X that is of class type (or array thereof),
the constructor selected to copy/move that member is trivial;
otherwise the copy/move constructor is non-trivial.
```
So `T(T&) = default`; should be trivial assuming that the previous
provisions are met.
This works in GCC, but not in Clang at the moment:
https://godbolt.org/z/fTGe71b6P
Reviewed By: royjacobson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127593
This patch is the last prerequisite to switch the default behaviour to -fno-lax-vector-conversions in the future.
The first path ;D124093; fixed the altivec implicit castings.
Reviewed By: amyk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126540
XL considers different vector types to be incompatible with each other.
For example assignment between variables of types vector float and vector
long long or even vector signed int and vector unsigned int are diagnosed.
clang, however does not diagnose such cases and does a simple bitcast between
the two types. This could easily result in program errors. This patch is to
fix the implicit casts in altivec.h so that there is no incompatible vector
type errors whit -fno-lax-vector-conversions, this is the prerequisite patch
to switch the default to -fno-lax-vector-conversions later.
Reviewed By: nemanjai, amyk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124093
For backwards compatiblity, we emit only a warning instead of an error if the
attribute is one of the existing type attributes that we have historically
allowed to "slide" to the `DeclSpec` just as if it had been specified in GNU
syntax. (We will call these "legacy type attributes" below.)
The high-level changes that achieve this are:
- We introduce a new field `Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` (with appropriate
accessors) to store C++11 attributes occurring in the attribute-specifier-seq
at the beginning of a simple-declaration (and other similar declarations).
Previously, these attributes were placed on the `DeclSpec`, which made it
impossible to reconstruct later on whether the attributes had in fact been
placed on the decl-specifier-seq or ahead of the declaration.
- In the parser, we propgate declaration attributes and decl-specifier-seq
attributes separately until we can place them in
`Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` or `DeclSpec::Attrs`, respectively.
- In `ProcessDeclAttributes()`, in addition to processing declarator attributes,
we now also process the attributes from `Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` (except
if they are legacy type attributes).
- In `ConvertDeclSpecToType()`, in addition to processing `DeclSpec` attributes,
we also process any legacy type attributes that occur in
`Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` (and emit a warning).
- We make `ProcessDeclAttribute` emit an error if it sees any non-declaration
attributes in C++11 syntax, except in the following cases:
- If it is being called for attributes on a `DeclSpec` or `DeclaratorChunk`
- If the attribute is a legacy type attribute (in which case we only emit
a warning)
The standard justifies treating attributes at the beginning of a
simple-declaration and attributes after a declarator-id the same. Here are some
relevant parts of the standard:
- The attribute-specifier-seq at the beginning of a simple-declaration
"appertains to each of the entities declared by the declarators of the
init-declarator-list" (https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.dcl#dcl.pre-3)
- "In the declaration for an entity, attributes appertaining to that entity can
appear at the start of the declaration and after the declarator-id for that
declaration." (https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.dcl#dcl.pre-note-2)
- "The optional attribute-specifier-seq following a declarator-id appertains to
the entity that is declared."
(https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.dcl#dcl.meaning.general-1)
The standard contains similar wording to that for a simple-declaration in other
similar types of declarations, for example:
- "The optional attribute-specifier-seq in a parameter-declaration appertains to
the parameter." (https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.fct#3)
- "The optional attribute-specifier-seq in an exception-declaration appertains
to the parameter of the catch clause" (https://eel.is/c++draft/except.pre#1)
The new behavior is tested both on the newly added type attribute
`annotate_type`, for which we emit errors, and for the legacy type attribute
`address_space` (chosen somewhat randomly from the various legacy type
attributes), for which we emit warnings.
Depends On D111548
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126061
This patch allows the same implicit conversions for vector-scalar
operations in SVE that are allowed for NEON.
Depends on D126377
Reviewed By: c-rhodes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126380
In the same spirit as D73543 and in reply to https://reviews.llvm.org/D126768#3549920 this patch is adding support for `__builtin_memset_inline`.
The idea is to get support from the compiler to easily write efficient memory function implementations.
This patch could be split in two:
- one for the LLVM part adding the `llvm.memset.inline.*` intrinsics.
- and another one for the Clang part providing the instrinsic as a builtin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126903
This patch corrects some diagnostics for the SVE sizeless vector
operators, including correctly diagnosing when the vectors are
different sizes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126377
We should not mark a function as "referenced" if we call it within a
ConstantExpr, because the expression will be folded to a value in LLVM
IR. To prevent emitting consteval function declarations, we should not "jump
over" a ConstantExpr when it is a top-level ParmVarDecl's subexpression.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/48230
Reviewed By: erichkeane, aaron.ballman, ChuanqiXu
Differenitial Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119646
Our rules to determine if the throw expression are within the variable
scope were giving a false negative result in case the throw expression
would appear within a decltype in a nested function declaration.
Per P2266R3, the relevant rule is: [expr.prim.id.unqual]/2
```
if the id-expression (possibly parenthesized) is the operand of a throw-expression, and names an implicitly movable entity that belongs to a scope that does not contain the compound-statement of the innermost lambda-expression, try-block , or function-try-block (if any) whose compound-statement or ctor-initializer encloses the throw-expression.
```
This fixes PR54341.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127075
Currently, Clang accepts this code in C mode (where the tag is required
to be used) but rejects it in C++ mode thinking that the association is
defining a new type.
void foo(void) {
struct S { int a; };
_Generic(something, struct S : 1);
}
Clang thinks this in C++ because it sees struct S : when parsing the
class specifier and decides that must be a type definition (because the
colon signifies the presence of a base class type). This patch adds a
new declarator context to represent a _Generic association so that we
can distinguish these situations properly.
Fixes#55562
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126969
This patch adds the codegen support for `atomic compare capture` in clang.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120290
brace-init-list containing a single element of a different scoped
enumeration type
It is rejected because it doesn't satisfy the condition that the element
has to be implicitly convertible to the underlying type of the
enumeration.
http://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.init.list#3.8
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126084
This patch removes all `IgnoreImpCasts` in Sema, and only uses it if necessary. If the expression is not of the same type as the pointer value, a cast is inserted.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126602
While it's not as robust as using the attribute on enums/classes (the
type information may be lost through a function pointer, a declaration
or use of the underlying type without using the typedef, etc) but I
think there's still value in being able to attribute a typedef and have
all return types written with that typedef pick up the
warn_unused_result behavior.
Specifically I'd like to be able to annotate LLVMErrorRef (a wrapper for
llvm::Error used in the C API - the underlying type is a raw pointer, so
it can't be attributed itself) to reduce the chance of unhandled errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102122
This reverts commit d374b65f2d.
The changes lose AST fidelity (reported in #55778), but also may be
improperly dropping _Atomic qualifiers. I am rolling the changes back
until I've finished discussions in WG14 about the proper resolution to
DR423.
`isExternCContext()` is returning false for functions in C files
Reviewed By: rnk, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126559
This reverts commit 3988bd1398.
Did not build on this bot:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot#builders/215/builds/6372
/usr/include/c++/9/bits/predefined_ops.h:177:11: error: no match for call to
‘(llvm::less_first) (std::pair<long unsigned int, llvm::bolt::BinaryBasicBlock*>&, const std::pair<long unsigned int, std::nullptr_t>&)’
177 | { return bool(_M_comp(*__it, __val)); }
One could reuse this functor instead of rolling out your own version.
There were a couple other cases where the code was similar, but not
quite the same, such as it might have an assertion in the lambda or other
constructs. Thus, I've not touched any of those, as it might change the
behavior in some way.
As per https://discourse.llvm.org/t/submitting-simple-nfc-patches/62640/3?u=steakhal
Chris Lattner
> LLVM intentionally has a “yes, you can apply common sense judgement to
> things” policy when it comes to code review. If you are doing mechanical
> patches (e.g. adopting less_first) that apply to the entire monorepo,
> then you don’t need everyone in the monorepo to sign off on it. Having
> some +1 validation from someone is useful, but you don’t need everyone
> whose code you touch to weigh in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126068
OpenMP 5.2, sec. 10.2 "teams Construct", p. 232, L9-12 restricts what
regions can be strictly nested within a `teams` construct. This patch
relaxes Clang's enforcement of this restriction in the case of nested
`atomic` constructs unless `-fno-openmp-extensions` is specified.
Cases like the following then seem to work fine with no additional
implementation changes:
```
#pragma omp target teams map(tofrom:x)
#pragma omp atomic update
x++;
```
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126323
Post-commit feedback on https://reviews.llvm.org/D122895 pointed out
that the diagnostic wording for some code was using "declaration" in a
confusing way, such as:
int foo(); // warning: a function declaration without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C2x
int foo(int arg) { // warning: a function declaration without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C2x
return 5;
}
And that we had other minor issues with the diagnostics being somewhat
confusing.
This patch addresses the confusion by reworking the implementation to
be a bit more simple and a bit less chatty. Specifically, it changes
the warning and note diagnostics to be able to specify "declaration" or
"definition" as appropriate, and it changes the function merging logic
so that the function without a prototype is always what gets warned on,
and the function with a prototype is sometimes what gets noted.
Additionally, when diagnosing a K&R C definition that is preceded by a
function without a prototype, we don't note the prior declaration, we
warn on it because it will also be changing behavior in C2x.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125814
This ensures that a deduced type like __auto_type matches the correct
association instead of matching all associations.
This addresses a regression from e4a42c5b64Fixes#55702
Const class members may be initialized with a defaulted default
constructor under the same conditions it would be allowed for a const
object elsewhere.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126170
Warns when end-of-file is reached without seeing all matching
'omp end declare target' directives. The diagnostic shows the
location of the related begin directive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126331
This would allow more AST nodes being preserved for broken code, and
have a more consistent valid bit for ref-type var decl (currently, a
ref-type var decl with a broken initializer is valid).
Per https://reviews.llvm.org/D76831#1973053, the initializer of a variable
should play no part in its "invalid" bit.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122935
This is a support for " #pragma omp atomic compare fail ". It has Parser & AST support for now.
Reviewed By: tianshilei1992
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123235
Adds support for the reserved locator 'omp_all_memory' for use
in depend clauses with 'out' or 'inout' dependence-types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125828
This commit builds upon recently added indexing support for C++ concepts
from https://reviews.llvm.org/D124441 by extending libclang to
support indexing and visiting concepts, constraints and requires
expressions as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126031
Clang has recently started diagnosing prototype redeclaration errors like [rG385e7df33046](https://reviews.llvm.org/rG385e7df33046d7292612ee1e3ac00a59d8bc0441)
This flagged legitimate issues in a codebase but was confusing to resolve because it actually conflicted with a function declaration from a system header and not from the one emitted with "note: ".
This patch updates the error handling to use the canonical declaration's source location instead to avoid misleading errors like the one described.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126258
Even though the comment description is ".unroll_inner.iv < NumIterations", the code emitted a BO_LE ('<=') operator for the inner loop that is to be unrolled. This lead to one additional copy of the body code in a partially unrolled. It only manifests when the unrolled loop is consumed by another loop-associated construct. Fix by using the BO_LT operator instead.
The condition for the outer loop and the corresponding code for tiling correctly used BO_LT already.
Fixes#55236
Previously, clangd would filter completions only on the first part of
the selector (first typed chunk) instead of all remaining selector
fragments (all typed chunks).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124637
Allows emitting define amdgpu_kernel void @func() IR from C or C++.
This replaces the current workflow which is to write a stub in opencl that
calls an external C function implemented in C++ combined through llvm-link.
Calling the resulting function still requires a manual implementation of the
ABI from the host side. The primary application is for more rapid debugging
of the amdgpu backend by permuting a C or C++ test file instead of manually
updating an IR file.
Implementation closely follows D54425. Non-amd reviewers from there.
Reviewed By: yaxunl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125970
WG14 DR423 (https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2148.htm#dr_423),
resolved during the C11 time frame, changed the way qualifiers are
handled on function return types and in cast expressions after it was
noted that these types are now directly observable via generic
selection expressions. In C, the function declarator is adjusted to
ignore all qualifiers (including _Atomic qualifiers).
Clang already handles the cast expression case correctly (by performing
the lvalue conversion, which drops the qualifiers as well), but with
these changes it will now also handle function declarations
appropriately.
Fixes#39595
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125919
Most clients only used these methods because they wanted to be able to
extend or truncate to the same bit width (which is a no-op). Now that
the standard zext, sext and trunc allow this, there is no reason to use
the OrSelf versions.
The OrSelf versions additionally have the strange behaviour of allowing
extending to a *smaller* width, or truncating to a *larger* width, which
are also treated as no-ops. A small amount of client code relied on this
(ConstantRange::castOp and MicrosoftCXXNameMangler::mangleNumber) and
needed rewriting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125557
New diagnostics were added for unreachable generic selection expression
associations in ca75ac5f04, but it did
not account for a difference in behavior between C and C++ regarding
lvalue to rvalue conversions. So we would issue diagnostics about a
selection being unreachable and then reach it. This corrects the
diagnostic behavior in that case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125882
The standard says:
The optional requires-clause ([temp.pre]) in an init-declarator or
member-declarator shall be present only if the declarator declares a
templated function ([dcl.fct]).
This implements that limitation, and updates the tests to the best of my
ability to capture the intent of the original checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125711
Previously the Expr returned by getOperand() was actually the
subexpression common to the "ready", "suspend", and "resume"
expressions, which often isn't just the operand but e.g.
await_transform() called on the operand.
It's important for the AST to expose the operand as written
in the source for traversals and tools like clangd to work
correctly.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/939
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115187
The vload*_half* and vstore*_half* builtins do not require the
cl_khr_fp16 extension: pointers to `half` can be declared without the
extension and the _half variants of vload and vstore should be
available without the extension.
This aligns the guards for these builtins for
`-fdeclare-opencl-builtins` with `opencl-c.h`.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55275
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125401
function in promise_type
According to https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2585.html, this
fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54881
Simply, the clang tried to found (do lookup and overload resolution. Is
there any better word to use than found?) allocation function in
promise_type and global scope. However, this is not consistent with the
standard. The standard behavior would be that the compiler shouldn't
lookup in global scope in case we lookup the allocation function name in
promise_type. In other words, the program is ill-formed if there is
incompatible allocation function in promise type.
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125517
Before issuing the warning about use of a strict prototype, check if
the declarator is required to have a prototype through some other means
determined at parse time.
This silences false positives in OpenCL code (where the functions are
forced to have a prototype) and block literal expressions.
This allows using any recognized kind of string for any
__attribute__((format)) archetype. Before this change, for instance,
the printf archetype would only accept char pointer types and the
NSString archetype would only accept NSString pointers. This is
more restrictive than necessary as there exist functions to
convert between string types that can be annotated with
__attribute__((format_arg)) to transfer format information.
Reviewed By: ahatanak
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125254
rdar://89060618
The controlling expression of a _Generic selection expression undergoes
lvalue conversion, array conversion, and function conversion before
picking the association. This means that array types, function types,
and qualified types are all unreachable code if they're used as an
association. I've been caught by this twice in the past few months and
I figure that if a WG14 member can't seem to remember this rule, users
are also likely to struggle with it. So this adds an on-by-default
unreachable code diagnostic for generic selection expression
associations.
Note, we don't have to worry about function types as those are already
a constraint violation which generates an error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125259
Ensures an -Wenum-conversion warning happens when one of the enums is
signed and the other is unsigned. Also adds a test file to verify these
warnings.
This warning would not happen since the -Wsign-conversion would make a
diagnostic then return, never allowing the -Wenum-conversion checks.
For example:
C
enum PE { P = -1 };
enum NE { N };
enum NE conv(enum PE E) { return E; }
Before this would only create a diagnostic with -Wsign-conversion and
never on -Wenum-conversion. Now it will create a diagnostic for both
-Wsign-conversion and -Wenum-conversion.
I could change it to just warn on -Wenum-conversion as that was what I
initially did. Seeing PR35200 (or GitHub Issue 316268), I let both
diagnostics check so that the sign conversion could generate a warning.
This includes a fix for the libc++ issue I ran across with friend
declarations not properly being identified as overloads.
This reverts commit 45c07db31c.
Similar to the existing bitwise reduction builtins, this lowers to a llvm.vector.reduce.mul intrinsic call.
For other reductions, we've tried to share builtins for float/integer vectors, but the fmul reduction intrinsic also take a starting value argument and can either do unordered or serialized, but not reduction-trees as specified for the builtins. However we address fmul support this shouldn't affect the integer case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117829
Compared to the old implementation:
* In C++, we only recurse into aggregate classes.
* Unnamed bit-fields are not printed.
* Constant evaluation is supported.
* Proper conversion is done when passing arguments through `...`.
* Additional arguments are supported and are injected prior to the
format string; this directly supports use with `fprintf`, for example.
* An arbitrary callable can be passed rather than only a function
pointer. In particular, in C++, a function template or overload set is
acceptable.
* All text generated by Clang is printed via `%s` rather than directly;
this avoids issues where Clang's pretty-printing output might itself
contain a `%` character.
* Fields of types that we don't know how to print are printed with a
`"*%p"` format and passed by address to the print function.
* No return value is produced.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, erichkeane, yihanaa
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124221
If the operand to `sizeof` is an expression of VLA type, the operand is
still evaluated, so we should not issue a diagnostic about ignoring the
side effects in this case, as they're not actually ignored.
Fixes#48010
The flag was added when the C++20 draft did not allow for concept
caching. The final C++20 standard permits the caching, so flag is
redundant. See http://wg21.link/p2104r0.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125014
Before C++20, MSVC was supporting not mentioning the template argument of the base class when initializing a class inheriting a templated base class.
So the following code compiled correctly:
```
template <class T>
class Base {
};
template <class T>
class Derived : public Base<T> {
public:
Derived() : Base() {}
};
void test() {
Derived<int> d;
}
```
See https://godbolt.org/z/Pxxe7nccx for a conformance view.
This patch adds support for such construct when in MSVC compatibility mode.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124666
We'd nondeterministically assert (and later crash) when calculating the size or
alignment of a __bf16 type when the type isn't supported on a target because of
reading uninitialized values. Now we check whether the type is supported first.
Fixes#50171
We were failing to check if the controlling expression is dependent or
not when testing whether it has side effects. This would trigger an
assertion. Instead, if the controlling expression is dependent, we
suppress the check and diagnostic.
This fixes Issue 50227.
- Exit early when constraint caching is disabled.
- Use unique_ptr to manage temporary lifetime.
- Fix a typo in a comment (InsertPos instead of InsertNode).
The new code duplicates the forwarding call to CheckConstraintSatisfaction,
but reduces the number of interconnected if statements and simplifies lifetime
management.
This increases the overall readability.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124923
C89 allowed a type specifier to be elided with the resulting type being
int, aka implicit int behavior. This feature was subsequently removed
in C99 without a deprecation period, so implementations continued to
support the feature. Now, as with implicit function declarations, is a
good time to reevaluate the need for this support.
This patch allows -Wimplicit-int to issue warnings in C89 mode (off by
default), defaults the warning to an error in C99 through C17, and
disables support for the feature entirely in C2x. It also removes a
warning about missing declaration specifiers that really was just an
implicit int warning in disguise and other minor related cleanups.
PseudoObjectExpr is only used for ObjC properties and subscripts.
For now, these assumptions are generally correct, but that's not part of
the design of PseudoObjectExpr. No functionality change intended.
If a randomized structure has an initializer with a dedicated
initializer in it, the field initialzed by that dedicated initializer
may end up at the end of the RecordDecl. This however may skip the
random layout initization check.
struct t {
int a, b, c, d, e;
} x = { .a = 2, 4, 5, 6 };
Let's say that "a" is lands as the last field after randomization. The
call to CheckDesignatedInitializer sets the iterator to the end of the
initializer list. During the next iteration of the initializer list
check, it detects that and fails to issue the error about initializing
a randomized struct with non-designated initializer. Instead, it issues
an error about "excess elements in struct initializer", which is
confusing under these circumstances.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124694
This patch adds support for the conditional (ternary) operator on SVE
scalable vector types in C++, matching the behaviour for NEON vector
types. Like the conditional operator for NEON types, this is disabled in
C mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124091
Before C++20, MSVC treated any friend function declaration as a function declaration, so the following code would compile despite funGlob being declared after its first call:
```
class Glob {
public:
friend void funGlob();
void test() {
funGlob();
}
};
void funGlob() {}
```
This proposed patch mimics the MSVC behavior when in MSVC compatibility mode
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124613
This reverts commit a97899108e.
The patch caused some problems with the libc++ `__range_adaptor_closure`
that I haven't been able to figure out the cause of, so I am reverting
while I figure out whether this is a solvable problem/issue with the
CFE, or libc++ depending on an older 'incorrect' behavior.
This reverts commit 0c31da4838.
I've solved the issue with the PointerUnion by making the
`FunctionTemplateDecl` pointer be a NamedDecl, that could be a
`FunctionDecl` or `FunctionTemplateDecl` depending. This is enforced
with an assert.
This reverts commit 4b6c2cd647.
The patch caused numerous ARM 32 bit build failures, since we added a
5th item to the PointerUnion, and went over the 2-bits available in the
32 bit pointers.
As reported here: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/44178
Concepts are not supposed to be instantiated until they are checked, so
this patch implements that and goes through significant amounts of work
to make sure we properly re-instantiate the concepts correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119544
Similar to the existing bitwise reduction builtins, this lowers to a llvm.vector.reduce.add intrinsic call.
For other reductions, we've tried to share builtins for float/integer vectors, but the fadd reduction intrinsics also take a starting value argument and can either do unordered or serialized, but not reduction-trees as specified for the builtins. However we address fadd support this shouldn't affect the integer case.
(Split off from D117829)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124741
In C++ and C2x, we would avoid calling ImplicitlyDefineFunction at all,
but in OpenCL mode we would still call the function and have it produce
an error diagnostic. Instead, we now have a helper function to
determine when implicit function definitions are allowed and we use
that to determine whether to call ImplicitlyDefineFunction so that the
behavior is more consistent across language modes.
This changes the diagnostic behavior from telling the users that an
implicit function declaration is not allowed in OpenCL to reporting use
of an unknown identifier and going through typo correction, as done in
C++ and C2x.
If no capability is held, or the capability expression is invalid, there
is obviously no capability kind and so none would be reported.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124132
Strutures of function pointers are a good surface area for attacks. We
should therefore randomize them unless explicitly told not to.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123544
This flag is redundant -- it's true iff `savedAttrs` is empty.
Querying `savedAttrs.empty()` should not take any more time than querying the
`trivial` flag, so this should not have a performance impact either.
I noticed this while working on https://reviews.llvm.org/D111548.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123783
A record may have more than just FieldDecls in it. If so, then we're
likely to drop them if we only randomize the FieldDecls.
We need to be careful about anonymous structs/unions. Their fields are
made available in the RecordDecl as IndirectFieldDecls, which are listed
after the anonymous struct/union. The ordering doesn't appear to be
super important, however we place them unrandomized at the end of the
RecordDecl just in case. There's also the possiblity of
StaticAssertDecls. We also want those at the end.
All other non-FieldDecls we place at the top, just in case we get
something like:
struct foo {
enum e { BORK };
enum e a;
};
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/185
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123958
HLSL doesn't support access specifiers. This change has two components:
1) Make default access for classes public
2) Diagnose the use of access specifiers as a clang HLSL extension
As long as the default behavior for access specifiers matches HLSL,
allowing them to be used doesn't cause sourece incompatability with
valid code. As such enabling them as a clang extension seems like a
reasonable approach.
Fixes#55124
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124487
This reverts commit b0bc93da92.
Changes: `s/_WIN32/_WIN64/g` in clang/test/SemaCXX/attr-trivial-abi.cpp.
The calling convention is specific to 64-bit windows. It's even in the name: `CCK_MicrosoftWin64`.
After this, the test passes with both `-triple i686-pc-win32` and `-triple x86_64-pc-win32`. Phew!
Reviewed By: gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123059
When doing overload resolution, we have to check that candidates' parameter types are equal before trying to find a better candidate through checking which candidate is more constrained.
This revision adds this missing check and makes us diagnose those cases as ambiguous calls when the types are not equal.
Fixes GitHub issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53640
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123182
Shader attribute is for shader library identify entry functions.
Here's an example,
[shader("pixel")]
float ps_main() : SV_Target {
return 1;
}
When compile this shader to library target like -E lib_6_3, compiler needs to know ps_main is an entry function for pixel shader. Shader attribute is to offer the information.
A new attribute HLSLShader is added to support shader attribute. It has an EnumArgument which included all possible shader stages.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123907
Now the implementation would accept following code:
```
//--- impl.cppm
module M:impl;
class A {};
//--- M.cppm
export module M;
import :impl;
//--- Use.cpp
import M;
void test() {
A a; // Expected error. A is not visible here.
}
```
which is clearly wrong. The root cause is the implementation of
`isInCurrentModule` would return true if the module is a partition! So
in the above example, although Use.cpp is not a module unit,
`isInCurrentModule ` would still return true when the compiler tries to
see if the owning module of `A` is the current module. I believe this is
an oversight. This patch tries to fix this problem.
Reviewed By: iains
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123837
This is extended to all `std::` functions that take a reference to a
value and return a reference (or pointer) to that same value: `move`,
`forward`, `move_if_noexcept`, `as_const`, `addressof`, and the
libstdc++-specific function `__addressof`.
We still require these functions to be declared before they can be used,
but don't instantiate their definitions unless their addresses are
taken. Instead, code generation, constant evaluation, and static
analysis are given direct knowledge of their effect.
This change aims to reduce various costs associated with these functions
-- per-instantiation memory costs, compile time and memory costs due to
creating out-of-line copies and inlining them, code size at -O0, and so
on -- so that they are not substantially more expensive than a cast.
Most of these improvements are very small, but I measured a 3% decrease
in -O0 object file size for a simple C++ source file using the standard
library after this change.
We now automatically infer the `const` and `nothrow` attributes on these
now-builtin functions, in particular meaning that we get a warning for
an unused call to one of these functions.
In C++20 onwards, we disallow taking the addresses of these functions,
per the C++20 "addressable function" rule. In earlier language modes, a
compatibility warning is produced but the address can still be taken.
The same infrastructure is extended to the existing MSVC builtin
`__GetExceptionInfo`, which is now only recognized in namespace `std`
like it always should have been.
This is a re-commit of
fc30901096,
a571f82a50,
64c045e25b, and
de6ddaeef3,
and reverts aa643f455a.
This change also includes a workaround for users using libc++ 3.1 and
earlier (!!), as apparently happens on AIX, where std::move sometimes
returns by value.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123345
Revert "Fixup D123950 to address revert of D123345"
This reverts commit aa643f455a.
Under the hood this prints the same as `QualType::getAsString()` but cuts out the middle-man when that string is sent to another raw_ostream.
Also cleaned up all the call sites where this occurs.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123926
This reverts commit 69dd89fdcb.
This reverts commit 04000c2f92.
The current states breaks libstdc++ usage (https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136#3455423).
The fixup has been reverted as it caused other valid code to be disallowed.
I think we should start from the clean state by reverting all relevant commits.
The previous code unneccessarily duplicated the creation of a diagnostic
where the only difference was the `AssignmentAction` being passed.
rdar://88664722
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124054
WG14 has elected to remove support for K&R C functions in C2x. The
feature was introduced into C89 already deprecated, so after this long
of a deprecation period, the committee has made an empty parameter list
mean the same thing in C as it means in C++: the function accepts no
arguments exactly as if the function were written with (void) as the
parameter list.
This patch implements WG14 N2841 No function declarators without
prototypes (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2841.htm)
and WG14 N2432 Remove support for function definitions with identifier
lists (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2432.pdf).
It also adds The -fno-knr-functions command line option to opt into
this behavior in other language modes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123955
C89 had a questionable feature where the compiler would implicitly
declare a function that the user called but was never previously
declared. The resulting function would be globally declared as
extern int func(); -- a function without a prototype which accepts zero
or more arguments.
C99 removed support for this questionable feature due to severe
security concerns. However, there was no deprecation period; C89 had
the feature, C99 didn't. So Clang (and GCC) both supported the
functionality as an extension in C99 and later modes.
C2x no longer supports that function signature as it now requires all
functions to have a prototype, and given the known security issues with
the feature, continuing to support it as an extension is not tenable.
This patch changes the diagnostic behavior for the
-Wimplicit-function-declaration warning group depending on the language
mode in effect. We continue to warn by default in C89 mode (due to the
feature being dangerous to use). However, because this feature will not
be supported in C2x mode, we've diagnosed it as being invalid for so
long, the security concerns with the feature, and the trivial
workaround for users (declare the function), we now default the
extension warning to an error in C99-C17 mode. This still gives users
an easy workaround if they are extensively using the extension in those
modes (they can disable the warning or use -Wno-error to downgrade the
error), but the new diagnostic makes it more clear that this feature is
not supported and should be avoided. In C2x mode, we no longer allow an
implicit function to be defined and treat the situation the same as any
other lookup failure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122983
The checkBuiltinArgument helper takes an integer ArgIndex and is
documented as performing normal type-checking on that argument. However,
it mistakenly hardcodes the argument index to zero when retrieving the
argument from the call expression.
This hadn't been noticed previously as all in-tree uses typecheck the
0th argument anyway.
D119136 changed how captures are handled in a lambda call operator
declaration, but did not properly handled dependant context,
which led to crash when refering to init-captures in
a trailing return type.
We fix that bug by making transformations more symetric with parsing,
ie. we first create the call operator, then transform the capture,
then compute the type of the lambda call operaror.
This ensures captures exist and have the right type when
we parse a trailing requires-clause / return type.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124012
Motivation: The intent here is for use in Swift.
When building a clang module for swift consumption, swift adds an
extension block to the module for name lookup purposes. Swift calls
this a SwiftLookupTable. One purpose that this serves is to handle
conflicting names between ObjC classes and ObjC protocols. They exist in
different namespaces in ObjC programs, but in Swift they would exist in
the same namespace. Swift handles this by appending a suffix to a
protocol name if it shares a name with a class. For example, if you have
an ObjC class named "Foo" and a protocol with the same name, the
protocol would be renamed to "FooProtocol" when imported into swift.
When constructing the previously mentioned SwiftLookupTable, we use
Sema::LookupName to look up name conflicts for the previous problem.
By this time, the Parser has long finished its job so the call to
LookupName gets nullptr for its Scope (TUScope will be nullptr
by this point). The C/ObjC path does not have this problem because it
only uses the Scope in specific scenarios. The C++ codepath uses the
Scope quite extensively and will fail early on if the Scope it gets is
null. In our very specific case of looking up ObjC classes with a
specific name, we want to force sema::LookupName to take the C/ObjC
codepath even if C++ or ObjC++ is enabled.
When doing overload resolution, we have to check that candidates' parameter types are equal before trying to find a better candidate through checking which candidate is more constrained.
This revision adds this missing check and makes us diagnose those cases as ambiguous calls when the types are not equal.
Fixes GitHub issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53640
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123182
Partially implement the proposed resolution to CWG2569.
D119136 broke some libstdc++ code, as P2036R3, implemented as a DR to
C++11 made ill-formed some previously valid and innocuous code.
We resolve this issue to allow decltype(x) - but not decltype((x)
to appear in the parameter list of a lambda that capture x by copy.
Unlike CWG2569, we do not extend that special treatment to
sizeof/noexcept yet, as the resolution has not been approved yet
and keeping the review small allows a quicker fix of impacted code.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123909
This is extended to all `std::` functions that take a reference to a
value and return a reference (or pointer) to that same value: `move`,
`forward`, `move_if_noexcept`, `as_const`, `addressof`, and the
libstdc++-specific function `__addressof`.
We still require these functions to be declared before they can be used,
but don't instantiate their definitions unless their addresses are
taken. Instead, code generation, constant evaluation, and static
analysis are given direct knowledge of their effect.
This change aims to reduce various costs associated with these functions
-- per-instantiation memory costs, compile time and memory costs due to
creating out-of-line copies and inlining them, code size at -O0, and so
on -- so that they are not substantially more expensive than a cast.
Most of these improvements are very small, but I measured a 3% decrease
in -O0 object file size for a simple C++ source file using the standard
library after this change.
We now automatically infer the `const` and `nothrow` attributes on these
now-builtin functions, in particular meaning that we get a warning for
an unused call to one of these functions.
In C++20 onwards, we disallow taking the addresses of these functions,
per the C++20 "addressable function" rule. In earlier language modes, a
compatibility warning is produced but the address can still be taken.
The same infrastructure is extended to the existing MSVC builtin
`__GetExceptionInfo`, which is now only recognized in namespace `std`
like it always should have been.
This is a re-commit of
fc30901096,
a571f82a50, and
64c045e25b
which were reverted in
e75d8b7037
due to a crasher bug where CodeGen would emit a builtin glvalue as an
rvalue if it constant-folds.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123345
A randomized structure needs to use a designated or default initializer.
Using a non-designated initializer will result in values being assigned
to the wrong fields.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123763
std::addressof, plus the libstdc++-specific std::__addressof.
This brings us to parity with the corresponding GCC behavior.
Remove STDBUILTIN macro that ended up not being used.
We still require these functions to be declared before they can be used,
but don't instantiate their definitions unless their addresses are
taken. Instead, code generation, constant evaluation, and static
analysis are given direct knowledge of their effect.
This change aims to reduce various costs associated with these functions
-- per-instantiation memory costs, compile time and memory costs due to
creating out-of-line copies and inlining them, code size at -O0, and so
on -- so that they are not substantially more expensive than a cast.
Most of these improvements are very small, but I measured a 3% decrease
in -O0 object file size for a simple C++ source file using the standard
library after this change.
We now automatically infer the `const` and `nothrow` attributes on these
now-builtin functions, in particular meaning that we get a warning for
an unused call to one of these functions.
In C++20 onwards, we disallow taking the addresses of these functions,
per the C++20 "addressable function" rule. In earlier language modes, a
compatibility warning is produced but the address can still be taken.
The same infrastructure is extended to the existing MSVC builtin
`__GetExceptionInfo`, which is now only recognized in namespace `std`
like it always should have been.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123345
A randomized structure needs to use a designated or default initializer.
Using a non-designated initializer will result in values being assigned
to the wrong fields.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123763
Given the declaration:
typedef void func_t(unsigned);
__attribute__((noreturn)) func_t func;
we would incorrectly determine that `func` had no prototype because the
`noreturn` attribute would convert the underlying type directly into a
FunctionProtoType, but the declarator for `func` itself was not one for
a function with a prototype. This adds an additional check for when the
declarator is a type representation for a function with a prototype.
When emitting a "conflicting types" warning for a function declaration,
it's more clear to diagnose the previous declaration specifically as
being a builtin if it one.
Implement P2036R3.
Captured variables by copy (explicitely or not), are deduced
correctly at the point we know whether the lambda is mutable,
and ill-formed before that.
Up until now, the entire lambda declaration up to the start of the body would be parsed in the parent scope, such that capture would not be available to look up.
The scoping is changed to have an outer lambda scope, followed by the lambda prototype and body.
The lambda scope is necessary because there may be a template scope between the start of the lambda (to which we want to attach the captured variable) and the prototype scope.
We also need to introduce a declaration context to attach the captured variable to (and several parts of clang assume captures are handled from the call operator context), before we know the type of the call operator.
The order of operations is as follow:
* Parse the init capture in the lambda's parent scope
* Introduce a lambda scope
* Create the lambda class and call operator
* Add the init captures to the call operator context and the lambda scope. But the variables are not capured yet (because we don't know their type).
Instead, explicit captures are stored in a temporary map that conserves the order of capture (for the purpose of having a stable order in the ast dumps).
* A flag is set on LambdaScopeInfo to indicate that we have not yet injected the captures.
* The parameters are parsed (in the parent context, as lambda mangling recurses in the parent context, we couldn't mangle a lambda that is attached to the context of a lambda whose type is not yet known).
* The lambda qualifiers are parsed, at this point We can switch (for the second time) inside the lambda context, unset the flag indicating that we have not parsed the lambda qualifiers,
record the lambda is mutable and capture the explicit variables.
* We can parse the rest of the lambda type, transform the lambda and call operator's types and also transform the call operator to a template function decl where necessary.
At this point, both captures and parameters can be injected in the body's scope. When trying to capture an implicit variable, if we are before the qualifiers of a lambda, we need to remember that the variables are still in the parent's context (rather than in the call operator's).
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg, ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136
Clang should no longer incorrectly diagnose a variable declaration inside of a
lambda expression that shares the name of a variable in a containing
if/while/for/switch init statement as a redeclaration.
After this patch, clang is supposed to accept code below:
void foo() {
for (int x = [] { int x = 0; return x; }(); ;) ;
}
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54913
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123840
This patch changes the return type of `PreprocessorLexer::getFileEntry()` so that its clients may stop using the deprecated APIs of `FileEntry`.
Reviewed By: bnbarham
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123772
This catches places where a function without a prototype is
accidentally used, potentially passing an incorrect number of
arguments, and is a follow-up to the work done in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D122895 and described in the RFC
(https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-enabling-wstrict-prototypes-by-default-in-c).
The diagnostic is grouped under the new -Wdeprecated-non-prototypes
warning group and is enabled by default.
The diagnostic is disabled if the function being called was implicitly
declared (the user already gets an on-by-default warning about the
creation of the implicit function declaration, so no need to warn them
twice on the same line). Additionally, the diagnostic is disabled if
the declaration of the function without a prototype was in a location
where the user explicitly disabled deprecation warnings for functions
without prototypes (this allows the provider of the API a way to
disable the diagnostic at call sites because the lack of prototype is
intentional).
Flexible array initialization is a C/C++ extension implemented in many
compilers to allow initializing the flexible array tail of a struct type
that contains a flexible array. In clang, this is currently restricted
to C. But this construct is used in the Microsoft SDK headers, so I'd
like to extend it to C++.
For now, this doesn't handle dynamic initialization; probably not hard
to implement, but it's extra code, and I don't think it's necessary for
the expected uses. And we explicitly fail out of constant evaluation.
I've added some additional code to assert that initializers have the
correct size, with or without flexible array init. This might catch
issues unrelated to flexible array init.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123649
HLSL does not support pointers or references. This change generates
errors in sema for generating pointer, and reference types as well as
common operators (address-of, dereference, arrow), which are used with
pointers and are unsupported in HLSL.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123167
HLSL has a language feature called Semantics which get attached to
declarations like attributes and are used in a variety of ways.
One example of semantic use is here with the `SV_GroupIndex` semantic
which, when applied to an input for a compute shader is pre-populated
by the driver with a flattened thread index.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122699
# Conflicts:
# clang/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td
# clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td
This patch enables shift operators on SVE vector types, as well as
supporting vector-scalar shift operations.
Shifts by a scalar that is wider than the contained type in the
vector are permitted but as in the C standard if the value is larger
than the width of the type the behavior is undefined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123303
Undefined behaviour is just passed on to extract_element when the
index is out of bounds. Subscript on svbool_t is not allowed as
this doesn't really have meaningful semantics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122732
This is the template version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251.
This patch introduces a new template name kind (UsingTemplateName). The
UsingTemplateName stores the found using-shadow decl (and underlying
template can be retrieved from the using-shadow decl). With the new
template name, we can be able to find the using decl that a template
typeloc (e.g. TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc) found its underlying template,
which is useful for tooling use cases (include cleaner etc).
This patch merely focuses on adding the node to the AST.
Next steps:
- support using-decl in qualified template name;
- update the clangd and other tools to use this new node;
- add ast matchers for matching different kinds of template names;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123127
Implement P2036R3.
Captured variables by copy (explicitely or not), are deduced
correctly at the point we know whether the lambda is mutable,
and ill-formed before that.
Up until now, the entire lambda declaration up to the start
of the body would be parsed in the parent scope, such that
captures would not be available to look up.
The scoping is changed to have an outer lambda scope,
followed by the lambda prototype and body.
The lambda scope is necessary because there may be a template scope
between the start of the lambda (to which we want to attach
the captured variable) and the prototype scope.
We also need to introduce a declaration context to attach the captured
variable to (and several parts of clang assume captures are handled from
the call operator context), before we know the type of the call operator.
The order of operations is as follow:
* Parse the init capture in the lambda's parent scope
* Introduce a lambda scope
* Create the lambda class and call operator
* Add the init captures to the call operator context and the lambda scope.
But the variables are not capured yet (because we don't know their type).
Instead, explicit captures are stored in a temporary map that
conserves the order of capture (for the purpose of having a stable order in the ast dumps).
* A flag is set on LambdaScopeInfo to indicate that we have not yet injected the captures.
* The parameters are parsed (in the parent context, as lambda mangling recurses in the parent context,
we couldn't mangle a lambda that is attached to the context of a lambda whose type is not yet known).
* The lambda qualifiers are parsed, at this point,
we can switch (for the second time) inside the lambda context,
unset the flag indicating that we have not parsed the lambda qualifiers,
record the lambda is mutable and capture the explicit variables.
* We can parse the rest of the lambda type, transform the lambda and call operator's types and also
transform the call operator to a template function decl where necessary.
At this point, both captures and parameters can be injected in the body's scope.
When trying to capture an implicit variable, if we are before the qualifiers of a lambda,
we need to remember that the variables are still in the parent's context (rather than in the call operator's).
This is a recommit of adff142dc2 after a fix in d8d793f29b
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg, ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136
This reverts commit adff142dc2.
This broke clang bootstrap: it made existing C++ code in LLVM invalid:
llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/LiveInterval.h:630:53: error: captured variable 'Idx' cannot appear here
[=](std::remove_reference_t<decltype(*Idx)> V,
^
Implement P2036R3.
Captured variables by copy (explicitely or not), are deduced
correctly at the point we know whether the lambda is mutable,
and ill-formed before that.
Up until now, the entire lambda declaration up to the start of the body would be parsed in the parent scope, such that capture would not be available to look up.
The scoping is changed to have an outer lambda scope, followed by the lambda prototype and body.
The lambda scope is necessary because there may be a template scope between the start of the lambda (to which we want to attach the captured variable) and the prototype scope.
We also need to introduce a declaration context to attach the captured variable to (and several parts of clang assume captures are handled from the call operator context), before we know the type of the call operator.
The order of operations is as follow:
* Parse the init capture in the lambda's parent scope
* Introduce a lambda scope
* Create the lambda class and call operator
* Add the init captures to the call operator context and the lambda scope. But the variables are not capured yet (because we don't know their type).
Instead, explicit captures are stored in a temporary map that conserves the order of capture (for the purpose of having a stable order in the ast dumps).
* A flag is set on LambdaScopeInfo to indicate that we have not yet injected the captures.
* The parameters are parsed (in the parent context, as lambda mangling recurses in the parent context, we couldn't mangle a lambda that is attached to the context of a lambda whose type is not yet known).
* The lambda qualifiers are parsed, at this point We can switch (for the second time) inside the lambda context, unset the flag indicating that we have not parsed the lambda qualifiers,
record the lambda is mutable and capture the explicit variables.
* We can parse the rest of the lambda type, transform the lambda and call operator's types and also transform the call operator to a template function decl where necessary.
At this point, both captures and parameters can be injected in the body's scope. When trying to capture an implicit variable, if we are before the qualifiers of a lambda, we need to remember that the variables are still in the parent's context (rather than in the call operator's).
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg, ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136
Currently, clang crashes with i386 target on the following code:
```
void f() {
f + 0xdead000000000000UL;
}
```
This problem is similar to the problem fixed in D104424, but that fix can't handle function pointer case, because `getTypeSizeInCharsIfKnown()` says that size is known and equal to 0 for function type.
This patch prevents bounds checking for function pointer, thus fixes the crash.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/50463
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122748
For -fgpu-rdc, a host function may call an external kernel
which is defined in an archive of bitcode. Since this external
kernel is only referenced in host function, the device
bitcode does not contain reference to this external
kernel, then the linker will not try to resolve this external
kernel in the archive.
To fix this issue, host-used external kernels and device
variables are tracked. A global array containing pointers
to these external kernels and variables is emitted which
serves as an artificial references to the external kernels
and variables used by host.
Reviewed by: Artem Belevich
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123441
We did not implement C99 6.7.5.3p15 fully in that we missed the rule
for compatible function types where a prior declaration has a prototype
and a subsequent definition (not just declaration) has an empty
identifier list or an identifier list with a mismatch in parameter
arity. This addresses that situation by issuing an error on code like:
void f(int);
void f() {} // type conflicts with previous declaration
(Note: we already diagnose the other type conflict situations
appropriately, this was the only situation we hadn't covered that I
could find.)
It breaks arm build, there is no free bit for the extra
UsingShadowDecl in TemplateName::StorageType.
Reverting it to build the buildbot back until we comeup with a fix.
This reverts commit 5a5be4044f.
This is the template version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251.
This patch introduces a new template name kind (UsingTemplateName). The
UsingTemplateName stores the found using-shadow decl (and underlying
template can be retrieved from the using-shadow decl). With the new
template name, we can be able to find the using decl that a template
typeloc (e.g. TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc) found its underlying template,
which is useful for tooling use cases (include cleaner etc).
This patch merely focuses on adding the node to the AST.
Next steps:
- support using-decl in qualified template name;
- update the clangd and other tools to use this new node;
- add ast matchers for matching different kinds of template names;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123127
According to CWG 1394 and C++20 [dcl.fct.def.general]p2,
Clang should not diagnose incomplete types if function body is "= delete;".
For example:
```
struct Incomplete;
Incomplete f(Incomplete) = delete; // well-formed
```
Also close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52802
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122981
InstantiateDefaultCtorDefaultArgs() is supposed to mark default
constructor args as odr-used, since those args will be used when
emitting the constructor closure.
However, constexpr vars were not getting odr-used since
DoMarkVarDeclReferenced() defers them in MaybeODRUseExprs, and the code
was calling CleanupVarDeclMarking() which discarded those uses instead
of processing them.
(This came up in Chromium, crbug.com/1312086)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123405
Stephen Long