Add a method for the various cases where we need to concatenate 2 KnownBits together (BUILD_PAIR and SHIFT_PARTS in particular) - uses the existing APInt::concat 'HiBits.concat(LoBits)' convention
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130557
GetDemandedBits is mainly a wrapper around SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits now, and is only used by DAGCombiner::visitSTORE so I've moved all remaining functionality there.
visitSTORE was making use of this to 'simplify' constants for a trunc-store. Just removing this code left to a mixture of regressions and gains - it came down to whether a target preferred a sign or zero extended constant for materialization/truncation. I've just moved the code over for now, but a next step would be to move this to targetShrinkDemandedConstant, but some targets that override the method expect a basic binop, and might react badly to a store node.....
I'm actually trying to get rid of GetDemandedBits - but while dismantling it I noticed that we were altering opaque constants. Fixing that causes a FP_TO_INT_SAT regression that should be addressed separately - I'll raise a bug.
This patch allows SimplifyDemandedBits to call SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits in cases where the ISD::SRL source operand has other uses, enabling us to peek through the shifted value if we don't demand all the bits/elts.
This is another step towards removing SelectionDAG::GetDemandedBits and just using TargetLowering::SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits.
There a few cases where we end up with extra register moves which I think we can accept in exchange for the increased ILP.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77804
It simplifies the code overall and removes the need for manual bookkeeping.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130447
It simplifies the code overall and removes the need for manual bookkeeping.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130444
SimplifyDemandedBits currently early-outs for multi-use values beyond the root node (just returning the knownbits), which is missing a number of optimizations as there are plenty of cases where we can still simplify when initially demanding all elements/bits.
@lenary has confirmed that the test cases in aea-erratum-fix.ll need refactoring and the current increase codegen is not a major concern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129765
This patch starts small, only detecting sequences of the form
<a, a+n, a+2n, a+3n, ...> where a and n are ConstantSDNodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125194
I think what we need is the least Log2(EltSize) significant bits are known to be ones.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130251
Optimizing (a * 0 + b) to (b) requires assuming that a is finite and not
NaN. DAGCombiner will do this optimization when the reassoc fast math
flag is set, which is not correct. Change DAGCombiner to only consider
UnsafeMath for this optimization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130232
Co-authored-by: Andrea Faulds <andrea.faulds@arm.com>
We still haven't found a solution that correctly handles 'don't care' sub elements properly - given how close it is to the next release branch, I'm making this fail safe change and we can revisit this later if we can't find alternatives.
NOTE: This isn't a reversion of D128570 - it's the removal of undef handling across bitcasts entirely
Fixes#56520
This will fix the SystemZ v3i31 memcpy regression in D77804 (with the help of D129765 as well....).
It should also allow us to /bend/ the oneuse limitation for cases where we can use demanded bits to safely peek though multiple uses of the AND ops.
As noticed on D127115, when splitting ADD/SUB nodes we often end up with cases where overflow from the lower bits is impossible - in such cases we're better off breaking the carry chain dependency as soon as possible.
This path is being exercised by llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/dsp-mlal.ll, although I haven't been able to get any codegen diff without a topological worklist.
Concat KnownBits from ISD::SHL_PARTS / ISD::SRA_PARTS / ISD::SRL_PARTS lo/hi operands and perform the KnownBits calculation by the shift amount on the extended type, before splitting the KnownBits based on the requested lo/hi result.
We were looking for loads or any_extend+load. reduceLoadWidth
hasn't known how to look through such an any_extend to find the
load since D40667 almost 5 years ago.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130333
Vector fptosi_sat and fptoui_sat were being expanded by unrolling the
vector operation. This doesn't work for scalable vector, so this patch
adds a call to TLI.expandFP_TO_INT_SAT if the vector is scalable.
Scalable tests are added for AArch64 and RISCV. Some of the AArch64
fptoi_sat operations should be legal, but that will be handled in
another patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130028
Similar to what we already do in getNode for basic ADD/SUB nodes, return the X operand directly, but here we know that there will be no/zero overflow as well.
As noted on D127115 - this path is being exercised by llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/dsp-mlal.ll, although I haven't been able to get any codegen without a topological worklist.
PromoteIntRes_BUILD_VECTOR currently always ANY_EXTENDs build vector operands, but if this is a constant boolean vector we're losing the useful ability to keep the vector matching the BooleanContents mode used by the target.
This patch extends constant boolean vectors according to target BooleanContents, allowing a number of additional all-bits folds (notable XOR -> NOT conversions) to occur.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129641
Add promotion and expansion of integer operands for
experimental_vp_strided SelectionDAG nodes; the expansion is actually
just a truncation of the stride operand.
Reviewed By: simoll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123112
When determining if an `and` should be merged into an extending load
the constant argument to the `and` is currently not checked if the
argument requires truncation. This prevents the combine happening when
the vector width is half the normal available vector width for SVE VLA
vectors.
Reviewed By: c-rhodes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129281
Unlike the name suggests this can reuse any store as a base for a
memory-based vector extract. If that store is underaligned the loads
created to extract will have an invalid alignment. Since most CPUs are
forgiving wrt alignment this is almost never an issue, on x86 this is
only reproducible by extracting a 128 bit vector out of a wider vector.
I tried making a test case in the context of
https://reviews.llvm.org/D127982 but it's really really fragile, as the
output pretty much looks like a missed optimization.
The "xor (X >> ShiftC), XorC --> (not X) >> ShiftC" fold is currently limited to the XOR mask being a shifted all-bits mask, but we can relax this to only need to match under the demanded bits.
This helps expose more bit extraction/clearing patterns and fixes the PowerPC testCompares*.ll regressions from D127115
Alive2: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/fl7T7K
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129933
This revision supports to scalarize a binary operation of two scalable splat vectors.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122791
This was stored in LiveIntervals, but not actually used for anything
related to LiveIntervals. It was only used in one check for if a load
instruction is rematerializable. I also don't think this was entirely
correct, since it was implicitly assuming constant loads are also
dereferenceable.
Remove this and rely only on the invariant+dereferenceable flags in
the memory operand. Set the flag based on the AA query upfront. This
should have the same net benefit, but has the possible disadvantage of
making this AA query nonlazy.
Preserve the behavior of assuming pointsToConstantMemory implying
dereferenceable for now, but maybe this should be changed.
The DAG Combiner unnecessarily restricts commutative CSE
to nodes with a single result value. This commit removes
that restriction.
Signed-off-by: Itay Bookstein <ibookstein@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129666
Undef tokens may appear in unreached code as result of RAUW of some optimization,
and it should not be considered as bad IR.
Patch by Dmitry Bakunevich!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128904
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
trunc (sign_ext_inreg X, iM) to iN --> sign_ext_inreg (trunc X to iN), iM
There are improvements on existing tests from this, and there are a pair
of large regressions in D127115 for Thumb2 caused by not folding this
pattern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129890
D127595 added the ability to recurse up a (one-use) INSERT_VECTOR_ELT chain to create a BUILD_VECTOR before other combines manage to break the chain, something that is particularly bad in D127115.
The patch generalises this so it doesn't have to build the chain starting from the last element insertion, instead it can now start from any insertion and will recurse up the chain until it finds all elements or finds a UNDEF/BUILD_VECTOR/SCALAR_TO_VECTOR which represents that start of the chain.
Fixes several regressions in D127115
As mentioned on D127115, this patch that attempts to recognise shuffle masks that could be simplified to a AND mask - we already have a similar transform that will fold AND -> 'clear mask' shuffle, but this patch handles cases where the referenced elements are not from the same lane indices but are known to be zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129150
combineShiftAnd1ToBitTest already matches "and (not (srl X, C)), 1 --> (and X, 1<<C) == 0" patterns, but we can end up with situations where the not is before the shift.
Part of some yak shaving for D127115 to generalise the "xor (X >> ShiftC), XorC --> (not X) >> ShiftC" fold.
SimplifyDemandedBits is called slightly later which allows the not(sext(x)) -> sext(not(x)) fold to occur via foldLogicOfShifts
As mentioned on D127115, we should be able to further generalise this based off the demanded bits.
This is similar to D125680, but for llvm.experimental.patchpoint
(instead of llvm.experimental.stackmap).
Differential review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129268
Following some recent discussions, this changes the representation
of callbrs in IR. The current blockaddress arguments are replaced
with `!` label constraints that refer directly to callbr indirect
destinations:
; Before:
%res = callbr i8* asm "", "=r,r,i"(i8* %x, i8* blockaddress(@test8, %foo))
to label %asm.fallthrough [label %foo]
; After:
%res = callbr i8* asm "", "=r,r,!i"(i8* %x)
to label %asm.fallthrough [label %foo]
The benefit of this is that we can easily update the successors of
a callbr, without having to worry about also updating blockaddress
references. This should allow us to remove some limitations:
* Allow unrolling/peeling/rotation of callbr, or any other
clone-based optimizations
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/41834)
* Allow duplicate successors
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/45248)
This is just the IR representation change though, I will follow up
with patches to remove limtations in various transformation passes
that are no longer needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129288
If we have a variable shift amount and the demanded mask has leading
zeros, we can propagate those leading zeros to not demand those bits
from operand 0. This can allow zero_extend/sign_extend to become
any_extend. This pattern can occur due to C integer promotion rules.
This transform is already done by InstCombineSimplifyDemanded.cpp where
sign_extend can be turned into zero_extend for example.
Reviewed By: spatel, foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121833
When doing scalable vectorization, the loop vectorizer uses a urem in the computation of the vector trip count. The RHS of that urem is a (possibly shifted) call to @llvm.vscale.
vscale is effectively the number of "blocks" in the vector register. (That is, types such as <vscale x 8 x i8> and <vscale x 1 x i8> both fill one 64 bit block, and vscale is essentially how many of those blocks there are in a single vector register at runtime.)
We know from the RISCV V extension specification that VLEN must be a power of two between ELEN and 2^16. Since our block size is 64 bits, the must be a power of two numbers of blocks. (For everything other than VLEN<=32, but that's already broken.)
It is worth noting that AArch64 SVE specification explicitly allows non-power-of-two sizes for the vector registers and thus can't claim that vscale is a power of two by this logic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129609
We have the same fold in InstCombine - though implemented via OrZero flag on isKnownToBePowerOfTwo. The reasoning here is that either a) the result of the lshr is a power-of-two, or b) we have a div-by-zero triggering UB which we can ignore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129606
To convert CTLZ to popcount we do
x = x | (x >> 1);
x = x | (x >> 2);
...
x = x | (x >>16);
x = x | (x >>32); // for 64-bit input
return popcount(~x);
This smears the most significant set bit across all of the bits
below it then inverts the remaining 0s and does a population count.
To support non-power of 2 types, the last shift amount must be
more than half of the size of the type. For i15, the last shift
was previously a shift by 4, with this patch we add another shift
of 8.
Fixes PR56457.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129431
Noticed while investigating the SystemZ regressions in D77804, prefer handling the knownbits analysis/simplification in the bitop nodes directly before falling back to SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits
visitInlineAsm() in SDAGBuilder was duplicating a lot of the code
in ParseConstraints(), in particular all the logic to determine the
operand value and constraint VT.
Rely on the data computed by ParseConstraints() instead, and update
its ConstraintVT implementation to match getCallOperandValEVT()
more precisely.
As far as I can tell what was happening in the original code is
that the getNode call receives the same operands as the original
node with different SDNodeFlags. The logic inside getNode detects
that the node already exists and intersects the flags into the
existing node and returns it. This results in Op and NewOp for the
TLO.CombineTo call always being the same node.
We may have already called CombineTo as part of the recursive handling.
A second call to CombineTo as we unwind the recursion overwrites
the previous CombineTo. I think this means any time we updated the
poison flags that was the only change that ends up getting made
and we relied on DAGCombiner to revisit and call SimplifyDemandedBits
again. The second time the poison flags wouldn't need to be dropped
and we would keep the CombineTo call from further down the recursion.
We can instead call setFlags to drop the poison flags and remove the
call to TLO.CombineTo. This way we keep the CombineTo from deeper in
the recursion which should be more efficient.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129511
As suggested in the post-commit feedback for D128123,
we can ease the mask constraint to ignore the MSB
(and make the code easier to read by adjusting the check).
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/bbvqWv
This patch restores calls to has_value to make it clear that we are
checking the presence of an optional value, not the underlying value.
This patch partially reverts d08f34b592.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129454
(Reapply after revert in e9ce1a5880 due to
Fuchsia test failures. Removed changes in lib/ExecutionEngine/ other
than error categories, to be checked in more detail and reapplied
separately.)
Bulk remove many of the more trivial uses of ManagedStatic in the llvm
directory, either by defining a new getter function or, in many cases,
moving the static variable directly into the only function that uses it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129120
Bulk remove many of the more trivial uses of ManagedStatic in the llvm
directory, either by defining a new getter function or, in many cases,
moving the static variable directly into the only function that uses it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129120
We already handled this case for add with a constant RHS. A
similar pattern can occur for sub with a constant left hand side.
Test cases use add and a mul representing (neg (shl X, C)) because
that's what I saw in the wild. The mul will be decomposed and then
the new transform can kick in.
Tests have not been committed, but this patch shows the changes.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128769
If all the demanded bits of the AND mask covering the inserted subvector 'X' are known to be one, then the mask isn't affecting the subvector at all.
In which case, if the base vector 'C' is undef/constant, then move the AND mask up to just (constant) fold it directly.
Addresses some of the regressions from D129150, particularly the cases where we're attempting to zero the upper elements of a widened vector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129290
This is almost the same as the abandoned D48529, but it
allows splat vector constants too.
This replaces the x86-specific code that was added with
the alternate patch D48557 with the original generic
combine.
This transform is a less restricted form of an existing
InstCombine and the proposed SDAG equivalent for that
in D128080:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/OUm6N_
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128123
This is done during type legalization since the target representation of
these nodes may not be valid until after type legalization, and after
type legalization the fact that these are dealing with i1 types may be
lost.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128996
Truncates and compares require some changes to generic legalisation functions
to use ElementCount instead of getNumElements.
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129082
Prior to this change, live variable operands passed to
`llvm.experimental.stackmap` would be emitted directly to target nodes,
meaning that they don't get legalised. The upshot of this is that LLVM
may crash when encountering illegally typed target nodes.
e.g. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/21657
This change introduces a platform independent stackmap DAG node whose
operands are legalised as per usual, thus avoiding aforementioned
crashes.
Note that some kinds of argument are still not handled properly, namely
vectors, structs, and large integers, like i128s. These will need to be
addressed in follow-up changes.
Note also that this does not change the behaviour of
`llvm.experimental.patchpoint`. A follow up change will do the same for
this intrinsic.
Differential review:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D125680
This patch adds the support for `fmax` and `fmin` operations in `atomicrmw`
instruction. For now (at least in this patch), the instruction will be expanded
to CAS loop. There are already a couple of targets supporting the feature. I'll
create another patch(es) to enable them accordingly.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127041
As integer div/rem constant expressions are no longer supported,
constants can no longer trap and are always safe to speculate.
Remove the Constant::canTrap() method and its usages.
This removes the insertvalue constant expression, as part of
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179.
This is very similar to the extractvalue removal from D125795.
insertvalue is also not supported in bitcode, so no auto-ugprade
is necessary.
ConstantExpr::getInsertValue() can be replaced with
IRBuilder::CreateInsertValue() or ConstantFoldInsertValueInstruction(),
depending on whether a constant result is required (with the latter
being fallible).
The ConstantExpr::hasIndices() and ConstantExpr::getIndices()
methods also go away here, because there are no longer any constant
expressions with indices.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128719
One motivation to add support for these types are the LD1Q/ST1Q
instructions in SME, for which we have defined a number of load/store
intrinsics which at the moment still take a `<vscale x 16 x i1>` predicate
regardless of their element type.
This patch adds basic support for the nxv1i1 type such that it can be passed/returned
from functions, as well as some basic support to support some existing tests that
result in a nxv1i1 type. It also adds support for splats.
Other operations (e.g. insert/extract subvector, logical ops, etc) will be
supported in follow-up patches.
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm, efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128665
`commonAlignment` is a shortcut to pick the smallest of two `Align`
objects. As-is it doesn't bring much value compared to `std::min`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128345
These intrinsics are now fundemental for SVE code generation and have been
present for a year and a half, hence move them out of the experimental
namespace.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127976
Simon Pilgrim