Including the following opcode:
Select_FPR16_Using_CC_GPR
Select_FPR32_Using_CC_GPR
Select_FPR64_Using_CC_GPR
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127871
I think it only makes sense to return true here if we aren't going
to turn around and create a constant pool for the immmediate.
I left out the check for useConstantPoolForLargeInts() thinking
that even if you don't want the commpiler to create a constant pool
you might still want to avoid materializing an integer that is
already available in a global variable.
Test file was copied from AArch64/ARM and has not been commited yet.
Will post separate review for that.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129402
Test file was taken directly from AArch64/ARM. I've added RUN
lines for aligned and unaligned since many of the test cases
are strings that aren't aligned and have an odd size.
Some of these test cases are modified by D129402.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129403
We have custom isel that tries to select the Lo12 bits using a
separate ADDI that can later folded into the load/store address
by the post-isel peephole.
This patch disables this if the load/store already had a non-zero
offset. A non-zero offset implies that CodeGenPrepare split several
large offsets used by different loads and stores into a common large
offset and multiple small offsets that could be folded. Folding more
of the lo12 bits changes this common offset by increasing the small
offsets. While this can save an instruction to materialize the common
offset, it can also prevent the small offsets from fitting in a
compressed load/store instruction.
Removing this also simplifies the last piece needed to fold the custom
isel for add into SelectAddrRegImm and remove the post-isel peephole.
This allows fixed length vectors involving splats on the LHS to commute into the _vx form of the instruction. Oddly, the generic canonicalization rules appear to catch the scalable vector cases. I haven't fully dug in to understand why, but I suspect it's because of a difference in how we represent splats (splat_vector vs build_vector).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129302
This is almost the same as the abandoned D48529, but it
allows splat vector constants too.
This replaces the x86-specific code that was added with
the alternate patch D48557 with the original generic
combine.
This transform is a less restricted form of an existing
InstCombine and the proposed SDAG equivalent for that
in D128080:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/OUm6N_
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128123
Current implementation will rename both register in store instructions if
we store base address into memory with same base register, it's OK if
the offset is 0, however that is wrong transform if offset isn't 0, give
a smalle example here:
sd a0, 808(a0)
We should not transform into:
addi a2, a0, 768
sd a2, 40(a2)
That should just rename base address like this:
addi a2, a0, 768
sd a0, 40(a2)
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128876
Use following example to demo what happened now:
li a1, 1
sd a1, 800(a0)
sd a0, 808(a0) # Store base address into base + offset
li a1, 2
sd a1, 816(a0)
Current will optimizate into:
li a1, 1
addi a2, a0, 768
sd a1, 32(a2)
sd a2, 40(a2) # Wrong replacement for the source register.
li a1, 2
sd a1, 48(a2)
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128875
Make sure we include at least one case where the vsadd/vmsltu lowering
requires only LMUL1. We should be able to generate all of the fixed
vector variants from scalar to vector idioms, but this is probably not
very important right now given the fixed length variants we'd actually
use when vectorizing with LMUL=1 are reasonable.
RVV doesn't have immediate field for memory addressing. Currently
we build MachineInstructions in PEI to computing stack offset for
RVV load store instructions. These instructions were added too late to
can be optimized by CSE, LICM... passes.
This patch makes FrameIndex SDNodes can't be matched in RVV Load Store
instruction selection patterns. So that the FrameIndex SDNodes would be
selected as `ADDI GPR, targetframeindex`.
There are 2 advantages for such change:
1. Stack objects address computing can be optimized by machine function
passes.
2. Since the ADDI instruction's destination register can be used as a
temp register, we can save an emergency spill slot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128187
This handles the code we get for this.
int foo(unsigned x, int *y) {
return y[x >> 3];
}
The srl and shl implied by the array index will be combined to
form (srl (and X, C2), C1). We need to reverse this get to back
the shl to fold into SHXADD.
Computing scalable offset needs up to two scrach registers. We add
scavenge spill slots according to the result of `RISCV::isRVVSpill`
and `RVVStackSize`. Since ADDI is not included in `RISCV::isRVVSpill`,
PEI doesn't add scavenge spill slots for scrach registers when using
ADDI to get scalable stack offsets.
The ADDI instruction has a destination register which can be used as
a scrach register. So one scavenge spil slot is sufficient for
computing scalable stack offsets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128188
This handles the code we get for
int foo(int* x, unsigned y) {
return x[y >> 1];
}
The shift right and the shl will get DAG combined into
(shl (and X, 0xfffffffe), 1). We have custom isel to match the
shl+and, but with Zba the (add (shl X, 1), Y) part will get
matched and leave the and to be iseled by itself. This commit
adds a larger pattern that includes the and.
where C2 has 32 leading zeros and C3 trailing zeros.
When the shl is used by an add C is 1,2 or 3, we end up matching
(add (shl X, C), Y) first. This leaves an and with a constant that
is harder to materialize.
Similar for SH2ADD and SH3ADD.
This is what we get from
int foo(int* x, unsigned y) {
return x[y >> 1];
}
This allows us to avoid materializing 0xFFFFFFFE into a register.
This reverts commit 7af3d4ab3d.
RISC-V reverted the shrink wrap patch for bug 53662. Since the bug is fixed
by D123679, the commit re-enable it.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128965
Only handle immediates that would produce an ADDI or ADDIW of Lo12
as the final instruction in their materialization.
As the test change show this removes immediates that materialize
with lui+addiw that is not the same as lui+addi.
Similar for a subtract with a constant left hand side.
(sra (add (shl X, 32), C1<<32), 32) is the canonical IR from InstCombine
for (sext (add (trunc X to i32), 32) to i32).
For RISCV, we should lower this as addiw which means turning it into
(sext_inreg (add X, C1)).
There is an existing DAG combine to convert back to (sext (add (trunc X
to i32), 32) to i32), but it requires isTruncateFree to return true
and for i32 to be a legal type as it used sign_extend and truncate
nodes. So that doesn't work for RISCV.
If the outer sra happens be used by a shl by constant, it will be
folded and the shift amount of the sra will be changed before we
can do our own DAG combine. This requires us to match the more
general pattern and restore the shl.
I had wanted to do this as a separate (add (shl X, 32), C1<<32) ->
(shl (add X, C1), 32) combine, but that hit an infinite loop for some
values of C1.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128869
The sext_inreg can often be folded into an earlier instruction by
using a W instruction. The sext_inreg also works better with our ABI.
This is one of the steps to improving the generated code for this https://godbolt.org/z/hssn6sPco
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128843
This test checks one of problematic cases outlined in D128006, leading
to the patch's reversal. I thought it best to add a test just in case
this sort of optimization is attempted again in the future in some
fashion.
This reverts commit 755c84c62c. A bug was reported on the original review thread (https://reviews.llvm.org/D128006), and on inspection this patch is simply wrong. It needs to be checking for VLInBytes, not MaxVL. These happen to be the same when using AVL=VLMAX (which is quite common), but this does not fold when AVL != VLMAX.
This implements known bits for READ_VALUE using any information known about minimum and maximum VLEN. There's an additional assumption that VLEN is a power of two.
The motivation here is mostly to remove the last use of getMinVLen, but while I was here, I decided to also fix the bug for VLEN < 128 and handle max from command line generically too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128758
The pass was previously limited to LUI+ADDI being used by a single
instruction.
This patch allows the pass to optimize multiple memory operations
that use the same offset. Each of them will receive a separate %lo
relocation. My main motivation is to handle a read-modify-write
where we have a load and store to the same address, but I didn't
restrict it to that case.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128599
Including the following opcode:
Select_FPR16_Using_CC_GPR
Select_FPR32_Using_CC_GPR
Select_FPR64_Using_CC_GPR
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127871
Offsets in the range [-4095,-2049] or [2048, 4094] are split into
two ADDIs. One of the ADDIs will be folded into the load/store
immediate through an post-isel peephole.
These intrinsics are now fundemental for SVE code generation and have been
present for a year and a half, hence move them out of the experimental
namespace.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127976
We currently split the immediate almost equally between two addis.
If the immediate is odd, it won't be split exactly equal.
This patch instead gives one addi an immediate of 2047 or -2048 and the
other getsthe remainder. If the original immediate is near -2049 or 2048,
this might allow the use of c.addi for the addi that receives the
smaller immediate.
Reviewed By: asb, luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128500
This patch adds 3 new _VL RISCVISD opcodes to represent VFMA_VL with
different portions negated. It also adds a DAG combine to peek
through FNEG_VL to create these new opcodes.
This is modeled after similar code from X86.
This makes the isel patterns more regular and reduces the size of
the isel table by ~37K.
The test changes look like regressions, but they point to a bug that
was already there. We aren't able to commute a masked FMA instruction
to improve register allocation because we always use a mask undisturbed
policy. Prior to this patch we matched two multiply operands in a
different order and hid this issue for these test cases, but a different
test still could have encountered it.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128310
A forward abstract state can be in the special SEWLMULRatioOnly state which means we're not allowed to inspect its fields. The scalar to vector move case was mising a guard, and we'd crash on an assert. Test cases included.
According to the vector spec, mf8 is not supported for i8 if ELEN
is 32. Similarily mf4 is not suported for i16/f16 or mf2 for i32/f32.
Since RVVBitsPerBlock is 64 and LMUL is calculated as
((MinNumElements * ElementSize) / RVVBitsPerBlock) this means we
need to disable any type with MinNumElements==1.
For generic IR, these types will now be widened in type legalization.
For RVV intrinsics, we'll probably hit a fatal error somewhere. I plan
to work on disabling the intrinsics in the riscv_vector.h header.
Reviewed By: arcbbb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128286
This adds the macrofusion plumbing and support fusing LUI+ADDI(W).
This is similar to D73643, but handles a different case. Other cases
can be added in the future.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128393
The failure that caused the previous revert has been fixed
by https://reviews.llvm.org/D126048
Original commit message:
RVV makes heavy use of subregisters due to LMUL>1 and segment
load/store tuples. Enabling subregister liveness tracking improves the quality
of the register allocation.
I've added a command line that can be used to turn it off if it causes compile
time or functional issues. I used the command line to keep the old behavior
for one interesting test case that was testing register allocation.
Reviewed By: kito-cheng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128016
The VT we want to shrink to may not be legal especially after type
legalization.
Fixes PR56110.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128135
Type legalization will convert the bitcast into a vector store and
scalar load.
Instead this patch widens the vector to v8i1 with undef, and bitcasts
it to i8. v8i1->i8 has custom handling for type legalization already to
bitcast to a v1i8 vector and use an extract_element.
The code here was lifted from X86's avx512 support.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128099
D125335 makes regsOverlap skip following control flow, which is not entended
in the original code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128039
Doing so let's the post-mutation pass leverage the demanded info to rewrite vsetvlis before a store/mask-op to eliminate later vsetvlis.
Sorry for the lack of store test change; all of my attempts to write something reasonable have been handled through existing logic.
A splat of the values 0 and -1 as sign extended 12 bit immediates are always the same bit pattern regardless of the etype used to perform the operation. As a result, we can sometimes avoid introducing a vsetvli just for the purposes of a splat.
Looking at the diffs, we don't get a huge amount of immediate value out of this. We mostly push the vsetvli one instruction down, usually in front of a vmerge. We also don't get the corresponding fixed length vector cases because VL typically is changed despite the actual bits written being the same. Both of these are areas I plan to explore in future patches.
Interestingly, this makes a great example of why we need the forward and backward implementation to be consistent. Before we merged the demanded field handling, if we implement only the forward direction, we lost the ability to mutate a prior vsetvli and eliminate a later one entirely. This resulted in practical regressions instead of improvements. It's always nice when practice matches theory. :)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128006
This allows computeKnownBits to see the constant being loaded.
This recovers the rv64zbp test case changes from D127520.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127679
MinRCSize is 4 and prevents constrainRegClass from changing the
register class if the new class has size less than 4.
IMPLICIT_DEF gets a unique vreg for each use and will be removed
by the ProcessImplicitDef pass before register allocation. I don't
think there is any reason to prevent constraining the virtual register
to whatever register class the use needs.
The attached test case was previously creating a copy of IMPLICIT_DEF
because vrm8nov0 has 3 registers in it.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128005
If we're writing to an undef vector (i.e. implicit_def), we can change the value of bits outside the requested write without consequence. This allows us to avoid a VSETVLI just for narrowing the value written.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127880
The motivating case, and the only one actually enabled by this patch, is a load or store followed by another op with the same SEW/LMUL ratio.
As an example, consider:
define void @test1(ptr %in, ptr %out) {
entry:
%0 = load <8 x i16>, ptr %in, align 2
%1 = sext <8 x i16> %0 to <8 x i32>
store <8 x i32> %1, ptr %out, align 4
ret void
}
Without this patch, we get:
vsetivli zero, 8, e16, mf4, ta, mu
vle16.v v8, (a0)
vsetvli zero, zero, e32, mf2, ta, mu
vsext.vf2 v9, v8
vse32.v v9, (a1)
ret
Whereas with the patch we get:
vsetivli zero, 8, e32, mf2, ta, mu
vle16.v v8, (a0)
vsext.vf2 v9, v8
vse32.v v9, (a1)
ret
We have rewritten the first vsetvli and thus removed the second one.
As is strongly hinted by the code structure and todos, I am planning on communing this with all (or most all?) of the cases from isCompatible used in the forward data flow. This will be done in a series of following changes - some NFC reworks, and some reviewed optimization extensions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127780
This reverts commit 7207373e1e.
We found another RISC-V bug when landing D126048, and it has been fixed
by D127642 now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126048
RISC-V expand register tuple spilling into series of register spilling after
register allocation phase by the pseudo instruction expansion, however part of
register tuple might be still undefined during spilling, machine verifier will
complain the spill instruction is using an undefined physical register.
Optimal solution should be doing liveness analysis and do not emit spill
and reload for those undefined parts, but accurate liveness info at that point
is not so easy to get.
So the suboptimal solution is still spill and reload those undefined parts, but
adding implicit-use of super register to spill function, then machine
verifier will only report report using undefined physical register if
the when whole super register is undefined, and this behavior are also
documented in MachineVerifier::checkLiveness[1].
Example for demo what happend:
```
v10m2 = xxx
# v12m2 not define yet
PseudoVSPILL2_M2 v10m2_v12m2
...
```
After expansion:
```
v10m2 = xxx
# v12m2 not define yet
# Expand PseudoVSPILL2_M2 v10m2_v12m2 to 2 vs2r
VS2R_V v10m2
VS2R_V v12m2 # Use undef reg!
```
What this patch did:
```
v10m2 = xxx
# v12m2 not define yet
# Expand PseudoVSPILL2_M2 v10m2_v12m2 to 2 vs2r
VS2R_V v10m2 implicit v10m2_v12m2
# Use undef reg (v12m2), but v10m2_v12m2 ins't totally undef, so
# that's OK.
VS2R_V v12m2 implicit v10m2_v12m2
```
[1] https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp#L2016-L2019
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127642
VSETVLIInfos right after VLEFF/VLSEGFF are currently unknown since they modify
VL. Unknown VSETVLIInfos make next vector operations needed to be inserted
VSET(I)VLI. Actually the next vector operation of VLEFF/VLSEGFF may not need to
be inserted VSET(I)VLI if it uses same VTYPE and the resulted vl of
VLEFF/VLSEGFF.
Take the below C code as an example,
vint8m4_t vec_src1 = vle8ff_v_i8m4(str1, &new_vl, vl);
vbool2_t mask1 = vmseq_vx_i8m4_b2(vec_src1, 0, new_vl);
vsetvli insertion adds a redundant vsetvli for that,
Assembly result:
vsetvli a2,a2,e8,m4,ta,mu
vle8ff.v v28,(a0)
csrr a3,vl ; redundant
vsetvli zero,a3,e8,m4,ta,mu ; redundant
vmseq.vi v25,v28,0
After D126794, VLEFF/VLSEGFF has a define having value of VL. The patch consider
there is a ghost vsetvli right after VLEFF/VLSEGFF. The ghost VSET(I)LIs use the
vl output of the VLEFF/VLSEGFF as its AVL and same VTYPE of the VLEFF/VLSEGFF.
The ghost vsetvli must be redundant, and we could use it to get the VSETVLIInfo
right after VLEFF/VLSEGFF.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127576
We were incorrectly creating a VRGATHER node with i1 vector type. We
could support this by promoting the mask to i8 and truncating it, but
for now I want to prevent the crash.
Fixes PR56007.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127681
This simplifies the isel code by removing the manual load creation.
It also improves our ability to use 0 strided loads for vector splats.
There is an assumption here that Mask and ShiftedMask constants are
cheap enough that they don't become constant pool loads so that our
isel optimizations involving And still work. I believe those constants
are 3 instructions in the worst case.
The rv64zbp-intrinsic.ll changes is a regression caused by intrinsics
being expanded to RISCVISD also occuring during lowering. So the optimizations
were only happening during the last DAGCombine, which can't see through the
load. I believe we can fix this test by implementing
TargetLowering::getTargetConstantFromLoad for RISC-V or by adding the intrinsic
to computeKnownBitsForTargetNode to enable earlier DAG combine. Since Zbp is not
a ratified extension, I don't view these as blocking this patch.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127520
Another issue unearthed by D127115
We take a long time to canonicalize an insert_vector_elt chain before being able to convert it into a build_vector - even if they are already in ascending insertion order, we fold the nodes one at a time into the build_vector 'seed', leaving plenty of time for other folds to alter it (in particular recognising when they come from extract_vector_elt resulting in a shuffle_vector that is much harder to fold with).
D127115 makes this particularly difficult as we're almost guaranteed to have the lost the sequence before all possible insertions have been folded.
This patch proposes to begin at the last insertion and attempt to collect all the (oneuse) insertions right away and create the build_vector before its too late.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127595
We need a preheader and a single latch, but we don't need a dedicated
exit.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127513
Our optimization pass checks for loop simplify form, before doing
the transform. The loops here aren't in loop simplify form because
the exit block has two predecessors.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127451
D125887 changed the ctlz/cttz despeculation transform to insert
a freeze for the introduced branch on zero. While this does fix
the "branch on poison" issue, we may still get in trouble if we
pick a different value for the branch and for the ctz argument
(i.e. non-zero for the branch, but zero for the ctz). To avoid
this, we should use the same frozen value in both positions.
This does cause a regression in RISCV codegen by introducing an
additional sext. The DAG looks like this:
t0: ch = EntryToken
t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %3
t4: i64 = AssertSext t2, ValueType:ch:i32
t23: i64 = freeze t4
t9: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 %0, t23
t16: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 %4, Constant:i64<32>
t18: ch = TokenFactor t9, t16
t25: i64 = sign_extend_inreg t23, ValueType:ch:i32
t24: i64 = setcc t25, Constant:i64<0>, seteq:ch
t28: i64 = and t24, Constant:i64<1>
t19: ch = brcond t18, t28, BasicBlock:ch<cond.end 0x8311f68>
t21: ch = br t19, BasicBlock:ch<cond.false 0x8311e80>
I don't see a really obvious way to improve this, as we can't push
the freeze past the AssertSext (which may produce poison).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126638
The patch is a replacement of D125199. PseudoReadVL with vtype has worry for
computing same vtypes of VLEFF/VLSEGFF in two different places, DAGToDAG and
InsertVSETVLI. VLEFF/VLSEGFF MI with VL output still could provide the vtype of
VLEFF/VLSEGFF to the users of its VL.
The patch names the new pseudo as original VLEFF/VLSEGFF name suffixed "_VL" and
expand them in RISCVInsertVSETVLI pass.
This patch also reverts commit 4537aae0d5,
"[RISCV] Make PseudoReadVL have the vtypes of the corresponding VLEFF/VLSEGFF.".
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126794
For an addition with simm14 and simm15 immediates with 2 or 3 trailing bits,
we can use a shXadd instruction and an addi to do the addition.
This patch teaches RISCVMergeBaseOffset to see through this pattern.
I don't think the sh1add case occurs because we use two addis for that,
but I implemented it for completeness.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127376
In order to make sure the stack point is right through the EH region,
we also need to restore stack pointer from the frame pointer if we
don't preserve stack space within prologue/epilogue for outgoing variables,
normally it's just checking the variable sized object is present or not
is enough, but we also don't preserve that at prologue/epilogue when
have vector objects in stack.
Example to show what happened:
```
try {
sp adjust for outgoing args. // 1. Sp changed.
func_call // 2. Exception raised
sp restore // Oh, not restored
} catch {
// 3. And now we are here.
}
// 4. Prepare to return!, restore return address from stack, but...sp is wrong.
// 5. Screw up!
```
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126861
This matches what we do in IR. For the RISC-V test case, this allows
us to use -8 for the AND mask instead of materializing a constant in a register.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127335
Add with immediates in the range [-4096, -2049] or [2048, 4095] get
convert to two ADDIs. Teach RISCVMergeBaseOffset to recognize this
pattern as well.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126843
LUI+ADDIW always produces a simm32. This allows us to always
fold it into a global offset.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126729
Based on D24038.
LLVM has an @llvm.eh.dwarf.cfa intrinsic, used to lower the GCC-compatible __builtin_dwarf_cfa() builtin.
Reviewed By: StephenFan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126181
Spliter will try to extend a live range into `r` slot for a use operand,
that's works on most situaion, however that not work correctly when the operand
has tied to def, and the def operand is early clobber.
Give an example to demo what's wrong:
0 %0 = ...
16 early-clobber %0 = Op %0 (tied-def 0), ...
32 ... = Op %0
Before extend:
%0 = [0r, 0d) [16e, 32d)
The point we want to extend is 0d to 16e not 16r in this case, but if
we use 16r here we will extend nothing because that already contained
in [16e, 32d).
This patch add check for detect such case and adjust the extend point.
Detailed explanation for testcase: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126047
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126048
i64 indices aren't supported on Zve32*. Scalarize gathers to prevent
generating illegal instructions.
Since InstCombine will aggressively canonicalize GEP indices to
pointer size, we're pretty much always going to have an i64 index.
Trying to predict when SelectionDAG will find a smaller index from
the TTI hook used by the ScalarizeMaskedMemIntrinPass seems fragile.
To optimize this we probably need an IR pass to rewrite it earlier.
Test RUN lines have also been added to make sure the strided load/store
optimization still works.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127179
Use the query that doesn't assert if TracksLiveness isn't set, which
needs to always be available. We also need to start printing liveins
regardless of TracksLiveness.
Move the code that was added for D126896 after the normal recursive calls
to computeKnownBits. This allows us to calculate trailing zeros.
Previously we would break out of the switch before the recursive calls.
This fixes an inconsistency between RV32 and RV64. Still considering
trying to do this peephole during isel, but wanted to fix the
inconsistency first.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126986
Test changes are because isBaseWithConstantOffset uses computeKnownBits
and that is able to see that an earlier AND instruction guaranteed
alignment so that we can treat an OR as an ADD.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126970
If the imm is out of range for an ADDI, we will materialize it in
a register using multiple instructions. If the ADD is used by a
load/store, doPeepholeLoadStoreADDI can try to pull an ADDI from
the constant materialization into the load/store offset. This only
works if the ADD has a single use, otherwise the peephole would have
to rebuild multiple nodes.
This patch instead tries to solve the problem when the add is selected.
We check that the add is only used by loads/stores and if it is
we will select it to (ADDI (ADD X, Imm-Lo12), Lo12). This will enable
the simple case in doPeepholeLoadStoreADDI that can bypass an ADDI
used as a pointer. As a result we can remove the more complicated
peephole from doPeepholeLoadStoreADDI.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126576
If C is non-negative, the result of the smax must also be
non-negative, so all sign bits of the result are 0.
This allows DAGCombiner to remove a zext_inreg in the modified test.
This zext_inreg started as a sext that became zext before type
legalization then was promoted to a zext_inreg.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126896
One of the operands of the smax is a positive value so computeKnownBits
determines the result of the smax must always be positive. This allows
DAG combiner to convert the sign extend to zero extend before type
legalization.
After type legalization the smax is promoted to i64 by sign extending
its inputs and the zero extend becomes an AND instruction. We are unable
to remove the AND at this point and it becomes a pair of shifts or a
zext.w.
The result of smax has as many sign bits as the minimum of its inputs.
Had we kept the sign extend instead of turning it into a zero extend
it would be removed by DAG combiner after type legalization.
Once we've computed the incoming predecessor state, we should use the same compatibility check with knowledge of MI as we did in phase 2 in order to be consistent across all phases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126574
Adds MVT::v128i2, MVT::v64i4, and implied MVT::i2, MVT::i4.
Keeps MVT::i2, MVT::i4 lowering actions as expand, which should be
removed once targets set this explicitly.
Adjusts 11 lit tests to reflect slightly different behavior during
DAG combine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125247
Adds MVT::v128i2, MVT::v64i4, and implied MVT::i2, MVT::i4.
Keeps MVT::i2, MVT::i4 lowering actions as `expand`, which should be
removed once targets set this explicitly.
Adjusts 11 lit tests to reflect slightly different behavior during
DAG combine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125247
We enable a custom handler to optimize conversions between scalars
and fixed vectors. Unfortunately, the custom handler picks up scalar
to scalar conversions as well. If the scalar types are both legal,
we wouldn't match any of the fixed vector cases and would return SDValue()
causing the LegalizeDAG to expand the bitcast through memory.
This patch fixes this by checking if it's a scalar to scalar conversion
and returns `Op` if both types are legal.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126739
As mentioned in D125947, we can reduce codegen results by
adding an explicit hard single-float ABI.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126640
If the adjustment doesn't fit in 12 bits, try to break it into
two 12 bit values before falling back to movImm+add/sub.
This is based on a similar idea from isel.
Reviewed By: luismarques, reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126392
The immediate for LUI is stored as 20-bit unsigned value. We need
to sign extend if after shifting by 12 to match the instruction
behavior.
If we find an LUI+ADDI on RV64, it means the constant isn't a
simm32. If it was, we would have emitted LUI+ADDIW from constant
materialization. Make sure the constant is a simm32 before folding.
This appears to match gcc.
A future patch will add support for LUI+ADDIW on RV64.
Originally, `OptLevel` isn't passed into the `MachineFunctionPass`.
This lets the default parameter of `SelectionDAGISel`, which is
`CodeGenOpt::Default`, be passed in. OptLevelChanger captures the
optimization level with the parameter, and rather not the value
within `TargetMachine`. This lets the optimization be
unintentionally overwriten if other value than `CodeGenOpt::Default`
passed.
This patch fixes this by passing the optimization level rather
than using the default value.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126641
The optimization level should not be restored into O2.
This is a pre-commit test case to show fix in D126641.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126677
This pattern is what we get after DAG combine for C code like this.
short *ptr1, *ptr2, *ptr3;
unsigned diff = ptr1 - ptr2;
return ptr3[diff];
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126588
The tests here show the codegen for something like this C code.
unsigned diff = ptr1 - ptr2;
return ptr3[diff];
The pointer difference is truncated to 32-bits before being used
again as an index. In SelectionDAG this appears as an AND between
a SRL and a SHL. DAGCombiner will remove the shifts leaving only
an AND. The Mask now has 1,2, or 3 trailing zeros and 31, 30, or 29
leading zeros. We end up falling back to constant materialization
to create this mask.
We could instead use srli followed by slli.uw. Or since
we have an add, we can use srli followed by shXadd.uw.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126589
This is a follow up to address a review comment from D124869. When deciding whether to PRE a vsetvli, we can allow non-LMUL1 vsetvlis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126563
These should be aligned to the natural alignment of the element.
Probably copy/paste mistake from the i32 tests.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126567
When lowering GlobalAddressNodes, we were removing a non-zero offset and
creating a separate ADD.
It already comes out of SelectionDAGBuilder with a separate ADD. The
ADD was being removed by DAGCombiner.
This patch disables the DAG combine so we don't have to reverse it.
Test changes all look to be instruction order changes. Probably due
to different DAG node ordering.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126558
Today, text section prefixes (none, .unlikely, .hot, and .unkown) are determined based on PGO profile. However, Propeller may deem a function hot when PGO doesn't. Besides, when `-Wl,-keep-text-section-prefix=true` Propeller cannot enforce a global section ordering as the linker can only reorder sections within each output section (.text, .text.hot, .text.unlikely).
This patch promotes all functions with Propeller profiles (functions listed in the basic-block-sections profile) to .text.hot. The feature is hidden behind the flag `--bbsections-guided-section-prefix` which defaults to `true`.
The new implementation refactors the parsing of basic block sections profile into a new `BasicBlockSectionsProfileReader` analysis pass. This allows us to use the information earlier in `CodeGenPrepare` in order to set the functions text prefix. `BasicBlockSectionsProfileReader` will be used both by `BasicBlockSections` pass and `CodeGenPrepare`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122930
A RISCV implementation can choose to implement unaligned load/store support. We currently don't have a way for such a processor to indicate a preference for unaligned load/stores, so add a subtarget feature.
There doesn't appear to be a formal extension for unaligned support. The RISCV Profiles (https://github.com/riscv/riscv-profiles/blob/main/profiles.adoc#rva20u64-profile) docs use the name Zicclsm, but a) that doesn't appear to actually been standardized, and b) isn't quite what we want here anyway due to the perf comment.
Instead, we can follow precedent from other backends and have a feature flag for the existence of misaligned load/stores with sufficient performance that user code should actually use them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126085
With a fix for an expensive checks build failure exposed by new RISC-V tests.
Something about expanding two rotates in type legalization caused a change
in the remapping tables that the expensive checks verifying wasn't expecting.
See comment in the code for how it was fixed.
Tests came from this commit that exposed the bug
[RISCV] Add test cases showing failure to remove mask on rotate amounts.
If the masking AND has multiple users we fail to remove it.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126036
During insertion of VSETVLI, we have two related bits of code which decide whether we can reuse a previous vsetvli result. As was pointed out in the original review, these cases can allow any prior state for which we know that VL is the same for any value of AVL.
This was originally separated out of a desire for separate tests and review. As it turns out, finding a test case for this has been quite challenging. Most of the cases I tried, we manage to already get through other chains of logic. We do have one correct test change, but that only exercises one of the two changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126400
reapply 62a9b36fcf and fix module build
failue:
1: remove MachineCycleInfoWrapperPass in MachinePassRegistry.def
MachineCycleInfoWrapperPass is a anylysis pass, should not be there.
2: move the definition for MachineCycleInfoPrinterPass to cpp file.
Otherwise, there are module conflicit for MachineCycleInfoWrapperPass
in MachinePassRegistry.def and MachineCycleAnalysis.h after
62a9b36fcf.
MachineCycle can handle irreducible loop. Natural loop
analysis (MachineLoop) can not return correct loop depth if
the loop is irreducible loop. And MachineSink is sensitive
to the loop depth, see MachineSinking::isProfitableToSinkTo().
This patch tries to use MachineCycle so that we can handle
irreducible loop better.
Reviewed By: sameerds, MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123995
This moves mutation entirely out of the main algorithm.
The immediate trigger is that we hit another case of the same issue I thought we'd fixed in 72925d9. It turns out we hadn't considered the cross block case.
As a brief summary, the issue being fixed is that if we mutate a previous vsetvli in phase 3, there's a possibility that some later use of that vsetvli changes "compatibility". In the cross_block_mutate test, this later vsetvli occurs in another block (and is thus visit order dependent too!). This causes us to fail strict asserts. (To be explicit, the current on by default workaround should compensate. It's only when we turn that off that we have problems.)
Now, I want to explicitly call out an alternate workaround. We could leave the mutation in phase 3, and simplify restrict it to the case where the previous vsetvli's GPR result is unused. That covers the case we've actually seen. (I'll note that codegen regressions with a simple form of this were significant. We might have to check specifically for the use outside block case to keep them reasonable, which complicates the workaround slightly.)
Personally, I'm at the point where I want the mutation pulled out just for robustness sake. I'm worried there's yet one more form of this bug we haven't thought about.
The other motivation for this change is that it does give us a couple of minor codegen wins. None appear to be hugely significant, but improvements never hurt right?
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125270
Update test to check MIR after finalize-isel instead of debug output.
This is of course not the only place we should preserve FMF, but
it's the most obvious one.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126306
This is a straight forward extension of the PRE transform introduced in D124869 to handle the VLMAX case.
The test changes here look quite positive. This surprised me until I realized that all the tests are using @llvm.vscale to figure out the VLMAX, not the llvm.riscv.vsetvlmax intrinsic. If they'd used the later, these would have been full redundancy cases and fully handled by the data flow. I'm not really sure if use of vscale here is representative or not. If it is, we should probably look at using VSETVLI to lower vscale rather than a raw read of vlenb and some math.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126338
When optimizing for size, this pass searches for instructions that are
prevented from being compressed by one of the following:
1. The use of a single uncompressed register.
2. A base register + offset where the offset is too large to be
compressed and the base register may or may not already be compressed.
In the first case, if there is a compressed register available, then the
uncompressed register is copied to the compressed register and its uses
replaced. This is only done if there are enough uses that code size
would be improved.
In the second case, if a compressed register is available, then the
original base register is copied and adjusted such that:
new_base_register = base_register + adjustment
base_register + large_offset = new_base_register + small_offset
and the uses of the base register are replaced with the new base
register. Again this is only done if there are enough uses for code size
to be improved.
This pass was authored by Lewis Revill, with large offset optimization
added by Craig Blackmore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92105
When the AVL value does not fit in 5 bits, the register in which this value is stored may be dead when we want to forward it. This patch ensure the kill flags on the register are cleared before forwarding.
Patch by: loralb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125971
This patch teaches the VSETVLI insertion pass to perform a very limited form of partial redundancy elimination. The motivating example comes from the fixed length vectorization of a simple loop such as:
for (unsigned i = 0; i < a_len; i++)
a[i] += b;
Without this change, the core vector loop and preheader is as follows:
.LBB0_3: # %vector.ph
andi a1, a6, -8
addi a4, a0, 16
mv a5, a1
.LBB0_4: # %vector.body
# =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
addi a3, a4, -16
vsetivli zero, 4, e32, m1, ta, mu
vle32.v v8, (a3)
vle32.v v9, (a4)
vadd.vx v8, v8, a2
vadd.vx v9, v9, a2
vse32.v v8, (a3)
vse32.v v9, (a4)
addi a5, a5, -8
addi a4, a4, 32
bnez a5, .LBB0_4
The key thing to note here is that, the execution of the vsetivli only needs to happen once. Since there's no tail folding happening here, the value of the vector configuration registers are invariant through the loop.
After this patch, we hoist the configuration into the preheader and perform it once.
.LBB0_3: # %vector.ph
andi a1, a6, -8
vsetivli zero, 4, e32, m1, ta, mu
addi a4, a0, 16
mv a5, a1
.LBB0_4: # %vector.body
# =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
addi a3, a4, -16
vle32.v v8, (a3)
vle32.v v9, (a4)
vadd.vx v8, v8, a2
vadd.vx v9, v9, a2
vse32.v v8, (a3)
vse32.v v9, (a4)
addi a5, a5, -8
addi a4, a4, 32
bnez a5, .LBB0_4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124869
LiaoChunyu