missing the opening bracket '[', e.g.,
NSArray <CC>
at function scope. Previously, we would only give trivial completions
(const, volatile, etc.), because we're in a "declaration name"
scope. Now, we also provide completions for class methods of NSArray,
e.g.,
alloc
Note that we already had support for this after the first argument,
e.g.,
NSArray method:x <CC>
would get code completion for class methods of NSArray whose selector
starts with "method:". This was already present because we recover
as if NSArray method:x were a class message send missing the opening
bracket (which was committed in r114057).
llvm-svn: 114078
sends. These are far trickier than instance messages, because we
typically have something like
NSArray alloc]
where it appears to be a declaration of a variable named "alloc" up
until we see the ']' (or a ':'), and at that point we can't backtrace.
So, we use a combination of syntactic and semantic disambiguation to
treat this as a message send only when the type is an Objective-C type
and it has the syntax of a class message send (which would otherwise
be ill-formed).
llvm-svn: 114057
used in the default function argument as "used". Instead, when we
actually use the default argument, make another pass over the
expression to mark any used declarations as "used" at that point. This
addresses two kinds of related problems:
1) We were marking some declarations "used" that shouldn't be,
because we were marking them too eagerly.
2) We were failing to mark some declarations as "used" when we
should, if the first time it was instantiated happened to be an
unevaluated context, we wouldn't mark them again at a later point.
I've also added a potentially-handy visitor class template
EvaluatedExprVisitor, which only visits the potentially-evaluated
subexpressions of an expression. I bet this would have been useful for
noexcept...
Fixes PR5810 and PR8127.
llvm-svn: 113700
with comma-separated lists. We never actually used the comma
locations, nor did we store them in the AST, but we did manage to
waste time during template instantiation to produce fake locations.
llvm-svn: 113495
One who seeks the Tao unlearns something new every day.
Less and less remains until you arrive at non-action.
When you arrive at non-action,
nothing will be left undone.
llvm-svn: 112244
declarator. Here, we can only see a few things (e.g., cvr-qualifiers,
nested name specifiers) and we do not want to provide other non-macro
completions. Previously, we would end up in recovery mode and would
provide a large number of non-relevant completions.
llvm-svn: 111818
- move DeclSpec &c into the Sema library
- move ParseAST into the Parse library
Reflect this change in a thousand different includes.
Reflect this change in the link orders.
llvm-svn: 111667
lexed method declarations.
This avoid interference with tokens coming after the point where the default arg tokens were 'injected', e.g. for
typedef struct Inst {
void m(int x=0);
} *InstPtr;
when parsing '0' the next token would be '*' and things would be messed up.
llvm-svn: 110436
a function prototype is followed by a declarator if we
aren't parsing a K&R style identifier list.
Also, avoid skipping randomly after a declaration if a
semicolon is missing. Before we'd get:
t.c:3:1: error: expected function body after function declarator
void bar();
^
Now we get:
t.c:1:11: error: invalid token after top level declarator
void foo()
^
;
llvm-svn: 108105
allows Sema some limited access to the current scope, which we only
use in one way: when Sema is performing some kind of declaration that
is not directly driven by the parser (e.g., due to template
instantiatio or lazy declaration of a member), we can find the Scope
associated with a DeclContext, if that DeclContext is still in the
process of being parsed.
Use this to make the implicit declaration of special member functions
in a C++ class more "scope-less", rather than using the NULL Scope hack.
llvm-svn: 107491
In a line like:
(;
the semicolon leaves Parser:ParenCount unbalanced (it's 1 even though we stopped looking for a right paren).
This may affect later parsing and result in bad recovery for parsing errors.
llvm-svn: 106213
type that we expect to see at a given point in the grammar, e.g., when
initializing a variable, returning a result, or calling a function. We
don't prune the candidate set at all, just adjust priorities to favor
things that should type-check, using an ultra-simplified type system.
llvm-svn: 105128
1) Suppress diagnostics as soon as we form the code-completion
token, so we don't get any error/warning spew from the early
end-of-file.
2) If we consume a code-completion token when we weren't expecting
one, go into a code-completion recovery path that produces the best
results it can based on the context that the parser is in.
llvm-svn: 104585
declarator is incorrect. Not being a typename causes the parser to
dive down into the K&R identifier list handling stuff, which is almost
never the right thing to do.
Before:
r.c:3:17: error: expected ')'
void bar(intptr y);
^
r.c:3:9: note: to match this '('
void bar(intptr y);
^
r.c:3:10: error: a parameter list without types is only allowed in a function definition
void bar(intptr y);
^
After:
r.c:3:10: error: unknown type name 'intptr'; did you mean 'intptr_t'?
void bar(intptr y);
^~~~~~
intptr_t
r.c:1:13: note: 'intptr_t' declared here
typedef int intptr_t;
^
This fixes rdar://7980651 - poor recovery for bad type in the first arg of a C function
llvm-svn: 103783
when they are not complete (since we could not match them up to
anything) and ensuring that enum parsing can cope with dependent
elaborated-type-specifiers. Fixes PR6915 and PR6649.
llvm-svn: 102247
ConsumeAndStoreUntil would stop at tok::unknown when caching an inline method
definition while SkipUntil would go past it while parsing the method.
Fixes PR 6903.
llvm-svn: 102214
intended for redeclarations, fixing those that need it. Fixes PR6831.
This uncovered an issue where the C++ type-specifier-seq parsing logic
would try to perform name lookup on an identifier after it already had
a type-specifier, which could also lead to spurious ambiguity errors
(as in PR6831, but with a different test case).
llvm-svn: 101419
template definition. Do this both by being more tolerant of errors in
our asserts and by not dropping a variable declaration completely when
its initializer is ill-formed. Fixes the crash-on-invalid in PR6375,
but not the original issue.
llvm-svn: 97463
signal an error. This can happen even when the current token is '::' if
this is a ::new or ::delete expression.
This was an oversight in my recent parser refactor; fixes PR 5825.
llvm-svn: 97462
an *almost* always incorrect case. This only does the lookahead
in the insanely unlikely case, so it shouldn't impact performance.
On this testcase:
struct foo {
}
typedef int x;
Before:
t.c:3:9: error: cannot combine with previous 'struct' declaration specifier
typedef int x;
^
After:
t.c:2:2: error: expected ';' after struct
}
^
;
llvm-svn: 97403
propagating error conditions out of the various annotate-me-a-snowflake
routines. Generally (but not universally) removes redundant diagnostics
as well as, you know, not crashing on bad code. On the other hand,
I have just signed myself up to fix fiddly parser errors for the next
week. Again.
llvm-svn: 97221
or that's been hidden by a non-type (in C++).
The ideal C++ diagnostic here would note the hiding declaration, but this
is a good start.
llvm-svn: 96141
we would just leak them all over the place, with no clear ownership of
these objects at all. AttributeList objects would get leaked on both
error and non-error paths.
Note: I introduced the usage of llvm::OwningPtr<AttributeList> to
manage these objects, which is particularly useful for methods with
multiple return sites. In at least one method I used them even when
they weren't strictly necessary because it clarified the ownership
semantics and made the code easier to read. Should the excessive
'take()' and 'reset()' calls become a performance issue we can always
re-evaluate.
Note+1: I believe I have not introduced any double-frees, but it would
be nice for someone to review this.
This fixes <rdar://problem/7635046>.
llvm-svn: 95847
t.c:4:3: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int y;
^
t.c:4:8: warning: extra ';' inside a struct or union
int y;
^
t.c:6:1: warning: expected ';' at end of declaration list
};
^
After:
t.c:3:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int x // expected-error {{expected ';' at end of declaration list}}
^
;
t.c:5:8: warning: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int z
^
;
llvm-svn: 95038
the tag kind (union, struct, class, enum) over to the name of the tag,
if there is a name, since most clients want to point at the name.
llvm-svn: 94424
provide completions for @ keywords. Previously, we only provided
@-completions after an @ was actually typed, which is useful but
probably not the common case.
Also, make sure a few Objective-C 2.0 completions only show up when
Objective-C 2.0 support is enabled (the default).
llvm-svn: 93354
that name constructors, the endless joys of out-of-line constructor
definitions, and various other corner cases that the previous hack
never imagined. Fixes PR5688 and tightens up semantic analysis for
constructor names.
Additionally, fixed a problem where we wouldn't properly enter the
declarator scope of a parenthesized declarator. We were entering the
scope, then leaving it when we saw the ")"; now, we re-enter the
declarator scope before parsing the parameter list.
Note that we are forced to perform some tentative parsing within a
class (call it C) to tell the difference between
C(int); // constructor
and
C (f)(int); // member function
which is rather unfortunate. And, although it isn't necessary for
correctness, we use the same tentative-parsing mechanism for
out-of-line constructors to improve diagnostics in icky cases like:
C::C C::f(int); // error: C::C refers to the constructor name, but
// we complain nicely and recover by treating it as
// a type.
llvm-svn: 93322
C++ grammatical constructs that show up in top-level (namespace-level)
declarations, member declarations, template declarations, statements,
expressions, conditions, etc. For example, we now provide a pattern
for
static_cast<type>(expr)
when we can have an expression, or
using namespace identifier;
when we can have a using directive.
Also, improves the results of code completion at the beginning of a
top-level declaration. Previously, we would see value names (function
names, global variables, etc.); now we see types, namespace names,
etc., but no values.
llvm-svn: 93134
Magically fixes all the terrible lookup problems associated with not pushing
a new scope. Resolves an ancient xfail and an LLVM misparse.
llvm-svn: 91769
The following attributes are currently supported in C++0x attribute
lists (and in GNU ones as well):
- align() - semantics believed to be conformant to n3000, except for
redeclarations and what entities it may apply to
- final - semantics believed to be conformant to CWG issue 817's proposed
wording, except for redeclarations
- noreturn - semantics believed to be conformant to n3000, except for
redeclarations
- carries_dependency - currently ignored (this is an optimization hint)
llvm-svn: 89543
handling template template parameters properly. This refactoring:
- Parses template template arguments as id-expressions, representing
the result of the parse as a template name (Action::TemplateTy)
rather than as an expression (lame!).
- Represents all parsed template arguments via a new parser-specific
type, ParsedTemplateArgument, which stores the kind of template
argument (type, non-type, template) along with all of the source
information about the template argument. This replaces an ad hoc
set of 3 vectors (one for a void*, which was either a type or an
expression; one for a bit telling whether the first was a type or
an expression; and one for a single source location pointing at
the template argument).
- Moves TemplateIdAnnotation into the new Parse/Template.h. It never
belonged in the Basic library anyway.
llvm-svn: 86708
appears in a deprecated context. In the new strategy, we emit the warnings
as usual unless we're currently parsing a declaration, where "declaration" is
restricted to mean a decl group or a few special cases in Objective C. If
we *are* parsing a declaration, we queue up the deprecation warnings until
the declaration has been completely parsed, and then emit them only if the
decl is not deprecated.
We also standardize the bookkeeping for deprecation so as to avoid special cases.
llvm-svn: 85998
"->" with a use of ParseUnqualifiedId. Collapse
ActOnMemberReferenceExpr, ActOnDestructorReferenceExpr (both of them),
ActOnOverloadedOperatorReferenceExpr,
ActOnConversionOperatorReferenceExpr, and
ActOnMemberTemplateIdReferenceExpr into a single, new action
ActOnMemberAccessExpr that does the same thing more cleanly (and can
keep more source-location information).
llvm-svn: 85930
declarators are parsed primarily within a single function (at least for
these cases). Remove some excess diagnostics arising during parse failures.
llvm-svn: 85924
representation of a C++ unqualified-id, along with a single parsing
function (Parser::ParseUnqualifiedId) that will parse all of the
various forms of unqualified-id in C++.
Replace the representation of the declarator name in Declarator with
the new UnqualifiedId class, simplifying declarator-id parsing
considerably and providing more source-location information to
Sema. In the future, I hope to migrate all of the other
unqualified-id-parsing code over to this single representation, then
begin to merge actions that are currently only different because we
didn't have a unqualified notion of the name in the parser.
llvm-svn: 85851
unknown type name, e.g.,
foo::bar x;
when "bar" does not refer to a type in "foo".
With this change, the parser now calls into the action to perform
diagnostics and can try to recover by substituting in an appropriate
type. For example, this allows us to easily diagnose some missing
"typename" specifiers, which we now do:
test/SemaCXX/unknown-type-name.cpp:29:1: error: missing 'typename'
prior to dependent type name 'A<T>::type'
A<T>::type A<T>::f() { return type(); }
^~~~~~~~~~
typename
Fixes PR3990.
llvm-svn: 84053
template void f<int>(int);
~~~~~~
Previously, we silently dropped the template arguments. With this
change, we now use the template arguments (when available) as the
explicitly-specified template arguments used to aid template argument
deduction for explicit template instantiations.
llvm-svn: 82806
member functions of class template specializations, and static data
members. The mechanics are (mostly) present, but the semantic analysis
is very weak.
llvm-svn: 82789
John McCall