This function should only be called with instructions that are really convertible. And all
convertible instructions need to be handled by the switch. So nothing should use the default.
llvm-svn: 357529
Haswell CPUs have special support for SHLD/SHRD with the same register for both sources. Such an instruction will go to the rotate/shift unit on port 0 or 6. This gives it 1 cycle latency and 0.5 cycle reciprocal throughput. When the register is not the same, it becomes a 3 cycle operation on port 1. Sandybridge and Ivybridge always have 1 cyc latency and 0.5 cycle reciprocal throughput for any SHLD.
When FastSHLDRotate feature flag is set, we try to use SHLD for rotate by immediate unless BMI2 is enabled. But MachineCopyPropagation can look through a copy and change one of the sources to be different. This will break the hardware optimization.
This patch adds psuedo instruction to hide the second source input until after register allocation and MachineCopyPropagation. I'm not sure if this is the best way to do this or if there's some other way we can make this work.
Fixes PR41055
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59391
llvm-svn: 357096
These are used to help convert OR->LEA when needed to avoid avoid a copy. They
aren't need after register allocation.
Happens to remove an ugly goto from X86MCCodeEmitter.cpp
llvm-svn: 356356
We already do this for 16/32/64 as well as 8-bit add with register/immediate. Might as well do it for 8-bit INC/DEC too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58869
llvm-svn: 355424
We already support 8-bits adds in convertToThreeAddress. But we can also support 8-bit OR if the bits are disjoint. We already do this for 16/32/64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58863
llvm-svn: 355423
Conversion from ConstantSDNode to MachineInstr sign extends immediates from their APInt representation to int64_t.
This commit makes sure we do the same for commuting. The tests changes show how this improves CSE. This issue was made worse by the MachineCSE using commuteInstruction to undo a commute. So we virtually guarantee the sign extend from isel would be lost.
The improved CSE also occurred with r354363, but that was reverted. I'm working to undo the revert, but wanted to get this fix in while it was easy to see the results.
llvm-svn: 354724
Preventing the load fold won't fix the partial register update since the
input we can fold is a GPR. So it will do nothing to prevent a false dependency
on an XMM register.
llvm-svn: 354193
Summary: These instructions update FPSW so they aren't generically safe to rematerialize into any location if FPSW is live for a comparison result. They also use FPCW for exception masking control. Though the only exception they can generate is stack overflow and we manage the stack ourselves so that's not really going to occur.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57934
llvm-svn: 353536
When we are inserting 1 "inline" element, and zeroing 2 of the other elements then we can safely commute the insertps source inputs to improve memory folding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56843
llvm-svn: 351807
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The BEXTR instruction documents the SF bit as undefined.
The TBM BEXTR instruction has the same issue, but I'm not sure how to test it. With the control being an immediate we can determine the sign bit is 0 or the BEXTR would have been removed.
Fixes PR40060
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55807
llvm-svn: 349956
We already had BSF here as part of __builtin_ffs improvements and I was just wondering yesterday whether we should have BSR there.
This addresses one issue from PR40090.
llvm-svn: 349531
This extends the code that handles 16-bit add promotion to form LEA to also allow 8-bit adds.
That allows us to combine add ops with register moves and save some instructions. This is
another step towards allowing add truncation in generic DAGCombiner (see D54640).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55494
llvm-svn: 348946
As discussed in D55494, we want to extend this to handle 8-bit
ops too, but that could be extended further to enable this on
32-bit systems too.
llvm-svn: 348851
As discussed in:
D55494
...this code has been disabled/dead for a long time (the code references
Athlon and Pentium 4), and there's almost no chance that it will be used
given the last decade of uarch evolution. Also, in SDAG we promote 16-bit
ops to 32-bit, so there's almost no way to test this code any more.
llvm-svn: 348845
The existing code tries to handle an undef operand while transforming an add to an LEA,
but it's incomplete because we will crash on the i16 test with the debug output shown below.
It's better to just give up instead. Really, GlobalIsel should have folded these before we
could get into trouble.
# Machine code for function add_undef_i16: NoPHIs, TracksLiveness, Legalized, RegBankSelected, Selected
bb.0 (%ir-block.0):
liveins: $edi
%1:gr32 = COPY killed $edi
%0:gr16 = COPY %1.sub_16bit:gr32
%5:gr64_nosp = IMPLICIT_DEF
%5.sub_16bit:gr64_nosp = COPY %0:gr16
%6:gr64_nosp = IMPLICIT_DEF
%6.sub_16bit:gr64_nosp = COPY %2:gr16
%4:gr32 = LEA64_32r killed %5:gr64_nosp, 1, killed %6:gr64_nosp, 0, $noreg
%3:gr16 = COPY killed %4.sub_16bit:gr32
$ax = COPY killed %3:gr16
RET 0, implicit killed $ax
# End machine code for function add_undef_i16.
*** Bad machine code: Reading virtual register without a def ***
- function: add_undef_i16
- basic block: %bb.0 (0x7fe6cd83d940)
- instruction: %6.sub_16bit:gr64_nosp = COPY %2:gr16
- operand 1: %2:gr16
LLVM ERROR: Found 1 machine code errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54710
llvm-svn: 348722
Currently, instructions doing memory accesses through a base operand that is
not a register can not be analyzed using `TII::getMemOpBaseRegImmOfs`.
This means that functions such as `TII::shouldClusterMemOps` will bail
out on instructions using an FI as a base instead of a register.
The goal of this patch is to refactor all this to return a base
operand instead of a base register.
Then in a separate patch, I will add FI support to the mem op clustering
in the MachineScheduler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54846
llvm-svn: 347746
Change the type in a couple of lists and sets that only store physical
registers from unsigned to MCPhysRegs. The later is only 16bits and
saves us a bit of memory.
llvm-svn: 346254
Before this patch, class PredicateExpander only knew how to expand simple
predicates that performed checks on instruction operands.
In particular, the new scheduling predicate syntax was not rich enough to
express checks like this one:
Foo(MI->getOperand(0).getImm()) == ExpectedVal;
Here, the immediate operand value at index zero is passed in input to function
Foo, and ExpectedVal is compared against the value returned by function Foo.
While this predicate pattern doesn't show up in any X86 model, it shows up in
other upstream targets. So, being able to support those predicates is
fundamental if we want to be able to modernize all the scheduling models
upstream.
With this patch, we allow users to specify if a register/immediate operand value
needs to be passed in input to a function as part of the predicate check. Now,
register/immediate operand checks all derive from base class CheckOperandBase.
This patch also changes where TIIPredicate definitions are expanded by the
instructon info emitter. Before, definitions were expanded in class
XXXGenInstrInfo (where XXX is a target name).
With the introduction of this new syntax, we may want to have TIIPredicates
expanded directly in XXXInstrInfo. That is because functions used by the new
operand predicates may only exist in the derived class (i.e. XXXInstrInfo).
This patch is a non functional change for the existing scheduling models.
In future, we will be able to use this richer syntax to better describe complex
scheduling predicates, and expose them to llvm-mca.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53880
llvm-svn: 345714
Instead of using the MOVGOT64r pseudo, use the existing
MO_PIC_BASE_OFFSET support on symbol operands. Now I don't have to
create a "scratch register operand" for the pseudo to use, and the
register allocator can make better decisions.
Fixes some X86 verifier errors tracked in PR27481.
llvm-svn: 345219
This patch brings back the MOV64r0 pseudo instruction for zeroing a 64-bit register. This replaces the SUBREG_TO_REG MOV32r0 sequence we use today. Post register allocation we will rewrite the MOV64r0 to a 32-bit xor with an implicit def of the 64-bit register similar to what we do for the various XMM/YMM/ZMM zeroing pseudos.
My main motivation is to enable the spill optimization in foldMemoryOperandImpl. As we were seeing some code that repeatedly did "xor eax, eax; store eax;" to spill several registers with a new xor for each store. With this optimization enabled we get a store of a 0 immediate instead of an xor. Though I admit the ideal solution would be one xor where there are multiple spills. I don't believe we have a test case that shows this optimization in here. I'll see if I can try to reduce one from the code were looking at.
There's definitely some other machine CSE(and maybe other passes) behavior changes exposed by this patch. So it seems like there might be some other deficiencies in SUBREG_TO_REG handling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52757
llvm-svn: 345165
analyzeBranch()/insertBranch() etc. do not properly deal with an undef
flag on the eflags input and used to produce invalid MIR. I don't see
this ever affecting real world inputs (I don't think it is possible to
produce undef flags with llvm IR), so I simply changed the code to bail
out in this case.
rdar://42122367
llvm-svn: 344970
This rebases and recommits r343520. hwasan should be fixed now and this
shouldn't break the tests anymore.
Spill/reload instructions are artificially generated by the compiler and
have no relation to the original source code. So the best thing to do is
not attach any debug location to them (instead of just taking the next
debug location we find on following instructions).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52125
llvm-svn: 343895
Spill/reload instructions are artificially generated by the compiler and
have no relation to the original source code. So the best thing to do is
not attach any debug location to them (instead of just taking the next
debug location we find on following instructions).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52125
llvm-svn: 343520
There's a conditional report_fatal_error just above this llvm_unreachable. The optimizer when seeing the unreachable removes the conditional and just makes any other error trigger the existing report_fatal_error.
llvm-svn: 343428
This removes the FrameAccess struct that was added to the interface
in D51537, since the PseudoValue from the MachineMemoryOperand
can be safely casted to a FixedStackPseudoSourceValue.
Reviewers: MatzeB, thegameg, javed.absar
Reviewed By: thegameg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51617
llvm-svn: 341454
For instructions that spill/fill to and from multiple frame-indices
in a single instruction, hasStoreToStackSlot and hasLoadFromStackSlot
should return an array of accesses, rather than just the first encounter
of such an access.
This better describes FI accesses for AArch64 (paired) LDP/STP
instructions.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, gberry, thegameg, rengolin, javed.absar, MatzeB
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51537
llvm-svn: 341301
..Move all target-dependent checks into new isCopyInstrImpl method.
This change allows us to treat MoveReg-type instructions and generic
COPY instruction in the same way
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49913
llvm-svn: 341072
Variables declared with the dllimport attribute are accessed via a
stub variable named __imp_<var>. In MinGW configurations, variables that
aren't declared with a dllimport attribute might still end up imported
from another DLL with runtime pseudo relocs.
For x86_64, this avoids the risk that the target is out of range
for a 32 bit PC relative reference, in case the target DLL is loaded
further than 4 GB from the reference. It also avoids having to make the
text section writable at runtime when doing the runtime fixups, which
makes it worthwhile to do for i386 as well.
Add stub variables for all dso local data references where a definition
of the variable isn't visible within the module, since the DLL data
autoimporting might make them imported even though they are marked as
dso local within LLVM.
Don't do this for variables that actually are defined within the same
module, since we then know for sure that it actually is dso local.
Don't do this for references to functions, since there's no need for
runtime pseudo relocations for autoimporting them; if a function from
a different DLL is called without the appropriate dllimport attribute,
the call just gets routed via a thunk instead.
GCC does something similar since 4.9 (when compiling with -mcmodel=medium
or large; from that version, medium is the default code model for x86_64
mingw), but only for x86_64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51288
llvm-svn: 340942
a generically extensible collection of extra info attached to
a `MachineInstr`.
The primary change here is cleaning up the APIs used for setting and
manipulating the `MachineMemOperand` pointer arrays so chat we can
change how they are allocated.
Then we introduce an extra info object that using the trailing object
pattern to attach some number of MMOs but also other extra info. The
design of this is specifically so that this extra info has a fixed
necessary cost (the header tracking what extra info is included) and
everything else can be tail allocated. This pattern works especially
well with a `BumpPtrAllocator` which we use here.
I've also added the basic scaffolding for putting interesting pointers
into this, namely pre- and post-instruction symbols. These aren't used
anywhere yet, they're just there to ensure I've actually gotten the data
structure types correct. I'll flesh out support for these in
a subsequent patch (MIR dumping, parsing, the works).
Finally, I've included an optimization where we store any single pointer
inline in the `MachineInstr` to avoid the allocation overhead. This is
expected to be the overwhelmingly most common case and so should avoid
any memory usage growth due to slightly less clever / dense allocation
when dealing with >1 MMO. This did require several ergonomic
improvements to the `PointerSumType` to reasonably support the various
usage models.
This also has a side effect of freeing up 8 bits within the
`MachineInstr` which could be repurposed for something else.
The suggested direction here came largely from Hal Finkel. I hope it was
worth it. ;] It does hopefully clear a path for subsequent extensions
w/o nearly as much leg work. Lots of thanks to Reid and Justin for
careful reviews and ideas about how to do all of this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50701
llvm-svn: 339940
`MachineMemOperand` pointers attached to `MachineSDNodes` and instead
have the `SelectionDAG` fully manage the memory for this array.
Prior to this change, the memory management was deeply confusing here --
The way the MI was built relied on the `SelectionDAG` allocating memory
for these arrays of pointers using the `MachineFunction`'s allocator so
that the raw pointer to the array could be blindly copied into an
eventual `MachineInstr`. This creates a hard coupling between how
`MachineInstr`s allocate their array of `MachineMemOperand` pointers and
how the `MachineSDNode` does.
This change is motivated in large part by a change I am making to how
`MachineFunction` allocates these pointers, but it seems like a layering
improvement as well.
This would run the risk of increasing allocations overall, but I've
implemented an optimization that should avoid that by storing a single
`MachineMemOperand` pointer directly instead of allocating anything.
This is expected to be a net win because the vast majority of uses of
these only need a single pointer.
As a side-effect, this makes the API for updating a `MachineSDNode` and
a `MachineInstr` reasonably different which seems nice to avoid
unexpected coupling of these two layers. We can map between them, but we
shouldn't be *surprised* at where that occurs. =]
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50680
llvm-svn: 339740
Now we switch to the subregister in expandPostRAPseudos where we already switched the opcode.
This simplifies a few isel patterns that used the pseudo directly. And magically seems to have improved our ability to CSE it in the undef-label.ll test.
llvm-svn: 339496
These instructions perform the same operation, but the semantic of which operand is destroyed is reversed. If the same register is used as both operands we can change the execution domain without worrying about this difference.
Unfortunately, this really only works in cases where the input register is killed by the instruction. If its not killed, the two address isntruction pass inserts a copy that will become a move instruction. This makes the instruction use different physical registers that contain the same data at the time the unpck/movhlps executes. I've considered using a unary pseudo instruction with tied operand to trick the two address instruction pass. We could then expand the pseudo post regalloc to get the same physical register on both inputs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50157
llvm-svn: 338735
The machine verifier asserts with:
Assertion failed: (isMBB() && "Wrong MachineOperand accessor"), function getMBB, file ../include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineOperand.h, line 542.
It calls analyzeBranch which tries to call getMBB if the opcode is
JMP_1, but in this case we do:
JMP_1 @OUTLINED_FUNCTION
I believe we have to use TAILJMPd64 instead of JMP_1 since JMP_1 is used
with brtarget8.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49299
llvm-svn: 338237
Just some gardening here.
Similar to how we moved call information into Candidates, this moves outlined
frame information into OutlinedFunction. This allows us to remove
TargetCostInfo entirely.
Anywhere where we returned a TargetCostInfo struct, we now return an
OutlinedFunction. This establishes OutlinedFunctions as more of a general
repeated sequence, and Candidates as occurrences of those repeated sequences.
llvm-svn: 337848
Summary:
Enabling this fully exposes a latent bug in the instruction folding: we
never update the register constraints for the register operands when
fusing a load into another operation. The fused form could, in theory,
have different register constraints on its operands. And in fact,
TCRETURNm* needs its memory operands to use tailcall compatible
registers.
I've updated the folding code to re-constrain all the registers after
they are mapped onto their new instruction.
However, we still can't enable folding in the general case from
TCRETURNr* to TCRETURNm* because doing so may require more registers to
be available during the tail call. If the call itself uses all but one
register, and the folded load would require both a base and index
register, there will not be enough registers to allocate the tail call.
It would be better, IMO, to teach the register allocator to *unfold*
TCRETURNm* when it runs out of registers (or specifically check the
number of registers available during the TCRETURNr*) but I'm not going
to try and solve that for now. Instead, I've just blocked the forward
folding from r -> m, leaving LLVM free to unfold from m -> r as that
doesn't introduce new register pressure constraints.
The down side is that I don't have anything that will directly exercise
this. Instead, I will be immediately using this it my SLH patch. =/
Still worse, without allowing the TCRETURNr* -> TCRETURNm* fold, I don't
have any tests that demonstrate the failure to update the memory operand
register constraints. This patch still seems correct, but I'm nervous
about the degree of testing due to this.
Suggestions?
Reviewers: craig.topper
Subscribers: sanjoy, mcrosier, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49717
llvm-svn: 337845
Before this, TCI contained all the call information for each Candidate.
This moves that information onto the Candidates. As a result, each Candidate
can now supply how it ought to be called. Thus, Candidates will be able to,
say, call the same function in cheaper ways when possible. This also removes
that information from TCI, since it's no longer used there.
A follow-up patch for the AArch64 outliner will demonstrate this.
llvm-svn: 337840
Don't try to generate large PIC code for non-ELF targets. Neither COFF
nor MachO have relocations for large position independent code, and
users have been using "large PIC" code models to JIT 64-bit code for a
while now. With this change, if they are generating ELF code, their
JITed code will truly be PIC, but if they target MachO or COFF, it will
contain 64-bit immediates that directly reference external symbols. For
a JIT, that's perfectly fine.
llvm-svn: 337740
Craig Topper