We only need to call this on floating point comparisons. In this
case these are known to be integer compares. One of them even
has a SUB opcode instead of CMP.
Summary: This is a first step before changing the types to llvm::Align and introduce functions to ease client code.
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jsji, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73785
ISD::FROUND is defined to round to nearest with ties rounding
away from 0. This mode isn't supported in hardware on X86.
But as long as we aren't compiling with trapping math, we can
emulate this with floor(X + copysign(nextafter(0.5, 0.0), X)).
We have to use nextafter to avoid some corner cases that adding
0.5 would have. For example, if X is nextafter(0.5, 0.0) it should
round to 0.0, but adding 0.5 would need one extra bit of mantissa
than can be stored so it rounds to 1.0. Adding nextafter(0.5, 0.0)
instead will just increase the exponent by 1 and leave the mantissa
as all 1s. This would be nextafter(1.0, 0.0) which will floor to 0.0.
Techically this requires -fno-trapping-math which isn't our default.
But if we care about exceptions we should be using constrained
intrinsics. Constrained intrinsics would use STRICT_FROUND which
won't go through this code.
Fixes PR42195.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73607
This code needs to map from the FPCW 2-bit encoding for rounding mode to the 2-bit encoding defined for FLT_ROUNDS. The previous implementation did some clever swapping of bits and adding 1 modulo 4 to do the mapping.
This patch instead uses an 8-bit immediate as a lookup table of four 2-bit values. Then we use the 2-bit FPCW encoding to index the lookup table by using a right shift and an AND. This requires extracting the 2-bit value from FPCW and multipying it by 2 to make it usable as a shift amount. But still results in less code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73599
Summary: X86 has instructions to calculate fma and fneg at the same time. But we combine the fneg and fma only when fneg is the source operand under strict FP.
Reviewers: craig.topper, andrew.w.kaylor, uweigand, RKSimon, LiuChen3
Subscribers: LuoYuanke, llvm-commits, cfe-commits, jdoerfert, hiraditya
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72824
Pull out combineTargetShuffle code added in rG3fd5d1c6e7db into a helper function and extend it to handle shufps(shufps(load(),x),y) and shufps(y,shufps(load(),x)) cases as well.
Every case in the switch had a string version of themselves. Two
of them had a typo that used : instead of ::
By using a macro we can automate the string creation and avoid
the possibility of typos like this.
This is similar to what is done on the AMDGPU target.
I believe for STRICT_FP I need to use a STRICT_FP_EXTEND for the extending to f80 for returning f32/f64 in 32-bit mode when SSE is enabled. The STRICT_FP_EXTEND node requires a Chain. I need to get that node onto the chain before any CopyToRegs are emitted. This is because all the CopyToRegs are glued and chained together. So I can't put a STRICT_FP_EXTEND on the chain between the glued nodes without also glueing the STRICT_ FP_EXTEND.
This patch moves all the extend creation to a first pass and then creates the copytoregs and fills out RetOps in a second pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72665
Summary:
This is a follow up on https://reviews.llvm.org/D71473#inline-647262.
There's a caveat here that `Align(1)` relies on the compiler understanding of `Log2_64` implementation to produce good code. One could use `Align()` as a replacement but I believe it is less clear that the alignment is one in that case.
Reviewers: xbolva00, courbet, bollu
Subscribers: arsenm, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jsji, Jim, kerbowa, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73099
vperm (ins ?, X, C), (ins ?, Y, C), 0x31 --> concat X, Y
This is another shuffle problem seen with PR42024:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42024
We have this small crack in legalization/lowering/combining/demanded
that allows forming a vperm2f128 of high halves with AVX1 when we
could do better by peeking through the insert_subvector nodes.
AFAICT, it requires IR as shown in the diffs - much larger than legal
vectors - to avoid all of the usual folds.
Another option would prevent forming the 256-bit vperm in lowering.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73197
Currently PromoteMaskArithemtic only looks at a single operation to
skip casts. This means we miss cases where we combine multiple masks.
This patch updates PromoteMaskArithemtic to try to recursively promote
AND/XOR/AND nodes that terminate in truncates of the right size or
constant vectors.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72524
Summary:
I think whatever problem the gluing was fixing has long since been fixed. We don't have any of the restrictions on FP stack stuff that existed back when this was first added.
I had to change which type we use for FILD in BuildFILD when X86 was enabled because most of the isel patterns block f32/f64 instructions when SSE1/SSE2 are enabled. So I needed to use the f80 pattern, but this shouldn't have an effect the generated code since there is only one FILD instruction anyway. We already use f80 explicitly in other other places.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: andrew.w.kaylor, scanon, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72805
This is another part of a problem noted in PR42024:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42024
The AVX2 code may use awkward 256-bit shuffles vs. the AVX code that gets split
into the expected 128-bit unpack instructions. We have to be selective in
matching the types where we try to do this though. Otherwise, we can end up
with more instructions (in the case of v8x32/v4x64).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72575
The code is trying to copy the i64 value to an xmm register to
use a 64-bit store so that the 64-bit fild can benefit from
store forwarding.
But this trick only works if f64 is going to be stored in an
XMM register. If we only have SSE1 then only float is in xmm
register. So this trick just causes 2 stores i32 stores, an f64
load into the x87, an f64 from x87, and a 64-bit fild. So we end
up with an extra stack temporary and still didn't get store forwarding.
We might be able to use v2f32 here instead, but I didn't check. I
just wanted the code to make sense.
Found by inspection as I continue to stare too hard at our
int_to_fp conversions.
We were performing an emulated i32->f64 in the SSE registers, then
storing that value to memory and doing a extload into the X87
domain.
After this patch we'll now just store the i32 to memory along
with an i32 0. Then do a 64-bit FILD to f80 completely in the X87
unit. This matches what we do without SSE.
Pass small FP values in GPRs or stack memory according the the normal
convention. This is what gcc -mno-sse does on Win64.
I adjusted the conditions under which we emit an error to check if the
argument or return value would be passed in an XMM register when SSE is
disabled. This has a side effect of no longer emitting an error for FP
arguments marked 'inreg' when targetting x86 with SSE disabled. Our
calling convention logic was already assigning it to FP0/FP1, and then
we emitted this error. That seems unnecessary, we can ignore 'inreg' and
compile it without SSE.
Reviewers: jyknight, aemerson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70465
This allows us to generate better code for selecting the fixup
to load.
Previously when the sign was set we had to load offset 0. And
when it was clear we had to load offset 4. This required a testl,
setns, zero extend, and finally a mul by 4. By switching the offsets
we can just shift the sign bit into the lsb and multiply it by 4.
By directly emitting the constants as a constant pool load we seem to avoid the build_vector/extract_subvector combines that resulted in the duplicate loads we had before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72307
Only perform this if we are shuffling lower and upper lane elements across the lanes (otherwise splitting to lower xmm shuffles would be better).
This is a regression if we shuffle build_vectors due to getVectorShuffle canonicalizing 'blend of splat' build vectors, for now I've set this not to shuffle build_vector nodes at all to avoid this.
This causes the STRICT_FSETCC/STRICT_FSETCCS nodes to lowered
early while lowering SELECT, but the output chain doesn't get
connected. Then we visit the node again when it is its turn
because we haven't replaced the use of the chain result. In the
case of the fp128 libcall lowering, after D72341 this will cause
the libcall to be emitted twice.
Add initial support for lowering v4f64 shuffles to SHUFPD(VPERM2F128(V1, V2), VPERM2F128(V1, V2)), eventually this could be used for v8f32 (and maybe v8f64/v16f32) but I'm being conservative for the initial implementation as only v4f64 can always succeed.
This currently is only called from lowerShuffleAsLanePermuteAndShuffle so only gets used for unary shuffles, and we limit this to cases where we use upper elements as otherwise concating 2 xmm shuffles is probably the better case.
Helps with poor shuffles mentioned in D66004.
We only use lowerShuffleAsLanePermuteAndShuffle for unary shuffles at the moment, but we should consistently handle lane index calculations for multiple inputs in both the AVX1 and AVX2 paths.
Minor (almost NFC) tidyup as I'm hoping to use lowerShuffleAsLanePermuteAndShuffle for binary shuffles soon.
Only PPC seems to be using it, and only checks some simple cases and
doesn't distinguish between FP. Just switch to using LLT to simplify
use from GlobalISel.
For v4i64->v4f32 uint_to_fp on pre-avx targets where v4i64 isn't legal we create to v2i64->v2f32 uint_to_fp that need to be shuffled together. Our codegen for v2i64->v2f32 involves detecting if the number is larger than (2^31 - 1), if so we do a special divison by 2 so we can do a signed conversion which we need to scalarize, then do a multiply by 2 at the end if we divided earlier.
When v4i64 isn't legal we need to split the checking for a larger number and dividing by 2 into two v2i64 vectors. The scalar part can extract the 4 i64 values from those 4 splits. But we can reassemble the 4 scalar f32 results directly into a single v432 vector. Then we just need to combine the fixup indications from the 2 halves and we can do the final multiply by 2 fixup on all 4 values if needed at once using a single v4f32 blend and v4f32 fadd.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72368
Now that we generate decent code for (v2i64 (setlt zero, X)) on pre-sse4.2 targets I think we can use this now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72354
Similar to D72302 but for the canonical form for the opposite case. I've changed foldVectorXorShiftIntoCmp to form a target independent setcc node instead of PCMPGT now and enabled its for v2i64 on pre-SSE4.2 targets. The setcc should eventually get lowered to PCMPGT or the new v2i64 sequence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72318
Without sse4.2 a v2i64 setlt needs to expand into a pcmpgtd, pcmpeqd, 3 shuffles, and 2 logic ops. But if we're only interested in the sign bit of the i64 elements, we can just use one pcmpgtd and shuffle the odd elements to the even elements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72302
Summary:
Based on Simon's D52965, but improved to handle strict fp and improve some of the shuffling.
Rather than use v2i1/v4i1 and let type legalization continue, just generate all the code with legal types and use an explicit shuffle.
I also added an explicit setcc to the v4i64 code to match the semantics of vselect which doesn't just use the sign bit. I'm also using a v4i64->v4i32 truncate instead of the shuffle in Simon's original code. With the setcc this will become a pack.
Future work can look into using X86ISD::BLENDV and a different shuffle that only moves the sign bit.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71956
Attempt to use combineLogicBlendIntoConditionalNegate for (select M, (sub 0, X), X) -> (sub (xor X, M), M)
We limit this to cases that can't easily replace the VSELECT with a shuffle (non-constant masks) or where a BLENDV is likely to occur (which tends to result in slower codegen).
This uses an alternative implementation of this conversion derived
from our v2i32->v2f32 handling. We can zero extend the v2i32 to
v2i64, or it with the bit representation of 2.0^52 which will give
us 2.0^52 plus the 32-bit integer since double's mantissa is 52 bits.
Then we just need to subtract 2.0^52 as a double and let the floating
point unit normalize the remaining bits into a valid double.
This is less instructions then our previous code, but does require
a port 5 shuffle for the zero extend or unpack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71945
When the "disable-tail-calls" attribute was added, checks were added for
it in various backends. Now this code has proliferated, and it is
something the target is responsible for checking. Move that
responsibility back to the ISels (fast, global, and SD).
There's no major functionality change, except for targets that never
implemented this check.
This LLVM attribute was originally added in
d9699bc7bd (2015).
Reviewers: echristo, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72118
Summary:
We previously disabled this under fast math due to aggressive
reassociation by the machine combiner. But I think we can work
around this by using a FSUB instead of FADD for the first
operation.
This matches the similar algorithm we do for uint_to_fp i64->f64
in TargetLowering::expandUINT_TO_FP. If reassociation hasn't
been a problem for that, hopefully its not a problem here.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, scanon
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71968
Summary:
After bugfix the undef value case here, we used more operations to implement inserting vxi1 sub vector into vXi1 vector, I optimize it by use less operations.
The history information at https://reviews.llvm.org/D68311
Reviewers: craig.topper, LuoYuanke, yubing, annita.zhang, pengfei, LiuChen3, RKSimon
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Patch by Xiang Zhang (xiangzhangllvm)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71917
If we just subtracted 1 and are checking if the result is -1. We can use the carry flag from the ADD instead of an explicit CMP. I'm using the same checks for the add users as EmitTest.
Fixes one case from PR44412
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72019
If the return value is a struct of 2 doubles we need two return
registers.
If SSE2 is disabled we can't return in XMM registers like the ABI says.
After logging an error we attempt to recover by using FP0 instead
of an XMM register. But if the return needs two registers, we may have
already used FP0. So if the register we were supposed to copy to is
XMM1, copy to FP1 in the recovery instead.
This seems to fix the assertion/crash in PR44413.
These nodes should only ever be formed with an i8 TargetConstant
so we don't need to check for it to be a constant. It's also
always 8-bits so we don't need to use APInt compare functions.
We had a Custom operation action for v4i32 on SSE1. But since
v4i32 isn't legal until SSE2 this was not what was intended. The
code that get executed was intended for op legalization and
creates a bunch of v4i32 nodes that all end up scalarized.
Summary:
Previously we did this with isel patterns that used garbage in
the widened part of the source. But that's not valid for strictfp.
So now we custom widen and use zeroes for the widened elemens for
strictfp.
This replaces D71864.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, andrew.w.kaylor, pengfei, LiuChen3
Reviewed By: pengfei
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71879
I believe the algorithm we use for non-strict is exception safe
for strict. The fsub won't generate any exceptions. After it we
will have an exact version of the i32 integer in a double. Then
we just round it to f32. That rounding will generate a precision
exception if it can't be represented exactly.
Previously we widened these through isel patterns, but that
didn't work for STRICT_ nodes. Those need to be padded with
zeroes in the upper bits which is harder to do in isel patterns.
Previously we were widening with isel patterns, but that wasn't
exception safe for strict FP. So now we widen to v4i32->v4f64
during type legalization. And then let op legalization further
widen to v8i32->v8f64.
The vec_int_to_fp.ll changes are caused by us no longer narrowing
extracts of strict_uint_to_fp to the v4i32->v2f64 instruction
without AVX512VL only to have isel rewiden it. Now we just keep
it wide throughout. So we don't have an opportunity to narrow
the load.
AVX512F added instruction for vector fp_to_uint conversions. With
AVX512VL we can use a specific instruction that does v2f64->v4i32 with
zeroes in the 2 extra elements. For non-strict nodes without AVX512VL
we relied on type legalization to turn it to v4f64->v4i32 which would
later be widened by op legalization to v8f64->v8i32. But type legalization
doesn't currently widen strict nodes since it doesn't know how to
safely and efficiently pad the extra elements. But for X86 we know
padding with zeroes is safe and efficient so do that ourselves.
In the worst case, this requires a 128-bit move instruction to
implicitly zero the upper bits. In the common case, we should
recognize the producing instruction already zeroed the upper bits.
On 32-bit targets we can't use the scalar instruction so we
insert the scalar into a vector and use packed conversions.
Previously we used either v4f32->v4i64 or v4f64->v4i64 to avoid
some complexity creating target specific ISD opcodes for
v4f32->v2i64. But this causes extra vzeroupper instructions and
possibly frequency throttling on Intel CPUs.
This patch changes this to create a 128-bit vector and uses a
target specific ISD opcode if needed.
Fix several several additional problems with the int <-> FP conversion
logic both in common code and in the X86 target. In particular:
- The STRICT_FP_TO_UINT expansion emits a floating-point compare. This
compare can raise exceptions and therefore needs to be a strict compare.
I've made it signaling (even though quiet would also be correct) as
signaling is the more usual default for an LT. This code exists both
in common code and in the X86 target.
- The STRICT_UINT_TO_FP expansion algorithm was incorrect for strict mode:
it emitted two STRICT_SINT_TO_FP nodes and then used a select to choose one
of the results. This can cause spurious exceptions by the STRICT_SINT_TO_FP
that ends up not chosen. I've fixed the algorithm to use only a single
STRICT_SINT_TO_FP instead.
- The !isStrictFPEnabled logic in DoInstructionSelection would sometimes do
the wrong thing because it calls getOperationAction using the result VT.
But for some opcodes, incuding [SU]INT_TO_FP, getOperationAction needs to
be called using the operand VT.
- Remove some (obsolete) code in X86DAGToDAGISel::Select that would mutate
STRICT_FP_TO_[SU]INT to non-strict versions unnecessarily.
Reviewed by: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71840
This moves the X86 specific transform from rL364407
into DAGCombiner to generically handle 'little to big' cases
(for example: extract_subvector(v2i64 bitcast(v16i8))). This
allows us to remove both the x86 implementation and the aarch64
bitcast(extract_subvector(bitcast())) combine.
Earlier patches that dealt with regressions initially exposed
by this patch:
rG5e5e99c041e4
rG0b38af89e2c0
Patch by: @RKSimon (Simon Pilgrim)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63815
The setcc operands are copied into LHS and RHS variables at the top of the function. We also capture the condition code.
A later piece of code swaps the operands and changing the CC variable as part of a canonicalization to make some other checks simpler. But we might not make the transform we canonicalized for. So we continue on through the function where we can use the swapped LHS/RHS variables and access the original condition code operand instead of the modified CC variable. This leads to a setcc being created with the original condition code, but with swapped operands.
To mitigate this, this patch does a couple things. The LHS/RHS/CC variables are made const to keep them from being modified like this again. The transform that needs the swap now uses temporary copies of the variables. And the transform that used the original condition code operand has been altered to use the CC variable we cached originally. Either of these changes are enough to fix the issue, but doing both to make this code very safe.
I also considered rewriting the swap code in some way to check both permutations without explicitly swapping or needing temporary variables, but held off on that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71736
The only thing its getting from the X86TargetLowering class is
the subtarget which we can easily pass. This function only has
one call site now since this might help the compiler inline it.
Explicitly return both the flag result and the chain result for
STRICT_FCMP nodes. This removes an assumption in the caller that
getValue(1) is the right way to get the chain.
EmitCmp will just immediately call EmitTest and discard the null
constant only to have EmitTest create it again if it doesn't fold.
So just skip all that and go directly to EmitTest.
of integers to floating point.
This includes some of Craig Topper's changes for promotion support from
D71130.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69275
Summary:
The use of a boolean isInteger flag (generally initialized using
VT.isInteger()) caused errors in our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project).
In our backend, pointers use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR) and therefore
.isInteger() returns false. This meant that getSetCCInverse() was using the
floating-point variant and generated incorrect code for us:
`(void *)0x12033091e < (void *)0xffffffffffffffff` would return false.
Committing this change will significantly reduce our merge conflicts
for each upstream merge.
Reviewers: spatel, bogner
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: wuzish, arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70917
This is an alternate fix for the bug discussed in D70595.
This also includes minimal tests for other in-tree targets
to show the problem more generally.
We check the number of uses as a predicate for whether some
value is free to negate, but that use count can change as we
rewrite the expression in getNegatedExpression(). So something
that was marked free to negate during the cost evaluation
phase becomes not free to negate during the rewrite phase (or
the inverse - something that was not free becomes free).
This can lead to a crash/assert because we expect that
everything in an expression that is negatible to be handled
in the corresponding code within getNegatedExpression().
This patch skips the use check during the rewrite phase.
So we determine that some expression isNegatibleForFree
(identically to without this patch), but during the rewrite,
don't rely on use counts to decide how to create the optimal
expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975
Summary: This is a follow up of D69281, it enables the X86 backend support for the FP comparision.
Reviewers: uweigand, kpn, craig.topper, RKSimon, cameron.mcinally, andrew.w.kaylor
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, annita.zhang, LuoYuanke, LiuChen3
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70582
This reverts 3e1aee2ba7 in favor
of a different approach.
Scalarizing isn't great codegen, but making the type illegal was
interfering with k constraint in inline assembly.
The xor'ing behaviour is only used for msvc/crt environments, when we're targeting
macho the guard load code doesn't know about the xor in the epilog. Disable xor'ing
when targeting win32-macho to be consistent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71095
D53794 introduced code to perform the FP_TO_UINT expansion via FP_TO_SINT in a way that would never expose floating-point exceptions in the intermediate steps. Unfortunately, I just noticed there is still a way this can happen. As discussed in D53794, the compiler now generates this sequence:
// Sel = Src < 0x8000000000000000
// Val = select Sel, Src, Src - 0x8000000000000000
// Ofs = select Sel, 0, 0x8000000000000000
// Result = fp_to_sint(Val) ^ Ofs
The problem is with the Src - 0x8000000000000000 expression. As I mentioned in the original review, that expression can never overflow or underflow if the original value is in range for FP_TO_UINT. But I missed that we can get an Inexact exception in the case where Src is a very small positive value. (In this case the result of the sub is ignored, but that doesn't help.)
Instead, I'd suggest to use the following sequence:
// Sel = Src < 0x8000000000000000
// FltOfs = select Sel, 0, 0x8000000000000000
// IntOfs = select Sel, 0, 0x8000000000000000
// Result = fp_to_sint(Val - FltOfs) ^ IntOfs
In the case where the value is already in range of FP_TO_SINT, we now simply compute Val - 0, which now definitely cannot trap (unless Val is a NaN in which case we'd want to trap anyway).
In the case where the value is not in range of FP_TO_SINT, but still in range of FP_TO_UINT, the sub can never be inexact, as Val is between 2^(n-1) and (2^n)-1, i.e. always has the 2^(n-1) bit set, and the sub is always simply clearing that bit.
There is a slight complication in the case where Val is a constant, so we know at compile time whether Sel is true or false. In that scenario, the old code would automatically optimize the sub away, while this no longer happens with the new code. Instead, I've added extra code to check for this case and then just fall back to FP_TO_SINT directly. (This seems to catch even slightly more cases.)
Original version of the patch by Ulrich Weigand. X86 changes added by Craig Topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67105
Summary:
musttail calls should not require allocating extra stack for arguments.
Updates to arguments passed in memory should happen in place before the
epilogue.
This bug was mostly a missed optimization, unless inalloca was used and
store to push conversion fired.
If a reserved call frame was used for an inalloca musttail call, the
call setup and teardown instructions would be deleted, and SP
adjustments would be inserted in the prologue and epilogue. You can see
these are removed from several test cases in this change.
In the case where the stack frame was not reserved, i.e. call frame
optimization fires and turns argument stores into pushes, then the
imbalanced call frame setup instructions created for inalloca calls
become a problem. They remain in the instruction stream, resulting in a
call setup that allocates zero bytes (expected for inalloca), and a call
teardown that deallocates the inalloca pack. This deallocation was
unbalanced, leading to subsequent crashes.
Reviewers: hans
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71097
We shouldn't assume that the returned result can be used to get
the other result.
This is prep-work for strict FP where we will also need to pass
the chain result along in more cases.
I suspect this became unnecessary after r354161. Prior to that
we may have been going through the default expansion of FP_TO_UINT
on 64-bit targets and then ending up back in Custom X86 handling
to handle the FP_TO_SINT for it. Now we just Custom handle the
FP_TO_UINT directly. We already need to handle it for 32-bit mode
during type legalization so we wouldn't save any code by using
the default expansion on 64-bit.
Summary:
This follows a previous patch that changes the X86 datalayout to represent
mixed size pointers (32-bit sext, 32-bit zext, and 64-bit) with address spaces
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D64931)
This patch implements the address space cast lowering to the corresponding
sign extension, zero extension, or truncate instructions.
Related to https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42359
Reviewers: rnk, craig.topper, RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69639
This is the following patch of D68854.
This patch adds basic operations of X87 instructions, including +, -, *, / , fp extensions and fp truncations.
Patch by Chen Liu(LiuChen3)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68857
MVE has a basic symmetry between it's normal loads/store operations and
the masked variants. This means that masked loads and stores can use
pre-inc and post-inc addressing modes, just like the standard loads and
stores already do.
To enable that, this patch adds all the relevant infrastructure for
treating masked loads/stores addressing modes in the same way as normal
loads/stores.
This involves:
- Adding an AddressingMode to MaskedLoadStoreSDNode, along with an extra
Offset operand that is added after the PtrBase.
- Extending the IndexedModeActions from 8bits to 16bits to store the
legality of masked operations as well as normal ones. This array is
fairly small, so doubling the size still won't make it very large.
Offset masked loads can then be controlled with
setIndexedMaskedLoadAction, similar to standard loads.
- The same methods that combine to indexed loads, such as
CombineToPostIndexedLoadStore, are adjusted to handle masked loads in
the same way.
- The ARM backend is then adjusted to make use of these indexed masked
loads/stores.
- The X86 backend is adjusted to hopefully be no functional changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70176
Returning SDValue() means we didn't handle it and the common
code should try to expand it. But its a target intrinsic so
expanding won't do anything and just leave the node alone. But
it will print confusing debug messages.
By returning Op we tell the common code that the node is legal
and shouldn't receive any further processing.
These need to emit a libcall like we do for the non-strict version.
32-bit mode needs to SoftenFloat support to be implemented for strict FP nodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70504
Add explicit setOperation actions for some to match their none
strict counterparts. This isn't required, but makes the code
self documenting that we didn't forget about strict fp. I've
used LibCall instead of Expand since that's more explicitly what
we want.
Only lrint/llrint/lround/llround are missing now.
The custom code just emits a libcall, but we can do the same
with generic code. The only difference is that the generic code
can form tail calls where the custom code couldn't. This is
responsible for the test changes.
This avoids needing to modify the Custom handling for strict fp.
The Custom handler doesn't do anything for these nodes anyway.
SelectionDAGISel won't mutate them if they are Legal or Custom.
X86 has custom code for mutating them due to missing isel patterns.
When the isel patterns are added Legal will be the right answer.
So go ahead a change it now since that's where we'll end up.
AL is only used for varargs on SysV platforms. Don't forward it on
Windows. This allows control flow guard to set up an extra hidden
parameter in RAX, as described in PR44049.
This also has the effect of freeing up RAX for use in virtual member
pointer thunks, which may also be a nice little code size improvement on
Win64.
Fixes PR44049
Reviewers: ajpaverd, efriedma, hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70413
This is a first pass at Custom lowering for these operations. I also updated some of the vector code where it was obviously easy and straightforward. More work needed in follow up.
This enables these operations to be handled with X87 where special rounding control adjustments are needed to perform a truncate.
Still need to fix Promotion in the target independent code in LegalizeDAG.
llrint/llround split into separate test file because we can't make a strict libcall properly yet either and we need to do that when i64 isn't a legal type.
This does not include any isel support. So we still rely on the mutation in SelectionDAGIsel to remove the strict from this stuff later. Except for the X87 stuff which goes through custom nodes that already had chains.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70214
AMDGPU needs to know the FP mode for the function to answer this
correctly when this is removed from the subtarget.
AArch64 had to make this more complicated by using this from an IR
hook, so add an IR typed overload.
As detailed in PR43971/D70267, the use of XFormVExtractWithShuffleIntoLoad causes issues where we end up in infinite loops of extract(targetshuffle(vecload)) -> extract(shuffle(vecload)) -> extract(vecload) -> extract(targetshuffle(vecload)), there are just too many legalization checks at every stage that we can't guarantee that extract(shuffle(vecload)) -> scalarload can occur.
At the moment we see a number of minor regressions as we don't fold extract(shuffle(vecload)) -> scalarload before legal ops, these can be addressed in future patches and extension of X86ISelLowering's combineExtractWithShuffle.
* Implements scalable size queries for MVTs, split out from D53137.
* Contains a fix for FindMemType to avoid using scalable vector type
to contain non-scalable types.
* Explicit casts for several places where implicit integer sign
changes or promotion from 32 to 64 bits caused problems.
* CodeGenDAGPatterns will treat scalable and non-scalable vector types
as different.
Reviewers: greened, cameron.mcinally, sdesmalen, rovka
Reviewed By: rovka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66871
The Promote action doesn't apply until LegalizeDAG. By the time
we get there, we would have already softened all the FP operations
if useSoftFloat was true. So there wouldn't be any operation left
to Promote.
This is no longer needed after widening legalization as we
custom legalize v8i8 ourselves.
Added entries to the cost model, but bumped the cost slightly
to account for the truncate shuffle that wasn't costed before.
Otherwise just let the v64i8/v32i16 types be split to v32i8/v16i16.
In reality this shouldn't happen because it means we have a 512-bit
vector argument, but min-legal-vector-width says a value less than
512. But a 512-bit argument should have been factored into the
preferred vector width.
MVT::i1 should be removed by type legalization before we reach
any code that would act on the promote action.
Mainly to avoid replicating this for strict FP versions of these
operations.
If we're using soft floats, then these operations shoudl be
softened during type legalization. They'll never get to
LegalizeVectorOps or LegalizeDAG so they don't need to be
Expanded there.
We had some code for this for 32-bit ARM, but this doesn't really need
to be in target-specific code; generalize it.
(I think this started showing up recently because we added an
optimization that converts pow to powi.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69013
The MMX intrinsics for shift by immediate take a 32-bit shift
amount but the hardware for shifting by immediate only encodes
8-bits. For the intrinsic we don't require the shift amount to
fit in 8-bits in the frontend because we don't check that its an
immediate in the frontend. If its is not an immediate we move it
to an MMX register and use the shift by register.
But if it is an immediate we'll use the shift by immediate
instruction. But we need to change the shift amount to 8-bits.
We were previously doing this accidentally by masking it in the
encoder. But this can make a large shift amount into a small
in bounds shift amount. Instead we should clamp larger shift
amounts to 255 so that the they don't become in bounds.
Fixes PR43922
PVS Studio noticed that we were asserting "VT.getVectorNumElements() == VT.getVectorNumElements()" instead of "VT.getVectorNumElements() == InVT.getVectorNumElements()".
When writing an email for a follow up proposal, I realized one of the diffs in the committed change was incorrect. Digging into it revealed that the fix is complicated enough to require some thought, so reverting in the meantime.
The problem is visible in this diff (from the revert):
; X64-SSE-LABEL: store_fp128:
; X64-SSE: # %bb.0:
-; X64-SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, (%rdi)
+; X64-SSE-NEXT: subq $24, %rsp
+; X64-SSE-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_offset 32
+; X64-SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, (%rsp)
+; X64-SSE-NEXT: movq (%rsp), %rsi
+; X64-SSE-NEXT: movq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rdx
+; X64-SSE-NEXT: callq __sync_lock_test_and_set_16
+; X64-SSE-NEXT: addq $24, %rsp
+; X64-SSE-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
; X64-SSE-NEXT: retq
store atomic fp128 %v, fp128* %fptr unordered, align 16
ret void
The problem here is three fold:
1) x86-64 doesn't guarantee atomicity of anything larger than 8 bytes. Some platforms observably break this guarantee, others don't, but the codegen isn't considering this, so it's wrong on at least some platforms.
2) When I started to track down the problem, I discovered that DAGCombiner had stripped the atomicity off the store entirely. This comes down to idiomatic usage of DAG.getStore passing all MMO components separately as opposed to just passing the MMO.
3) On x86 (not -64), there are cases where 8 byte atomiciy is supported, but only for floating point operations. This would seem to imply that operation typing matters for correctness, and DAGCombine happily folds away bitcasts. I'm not 100% sure there's a problem here, but I'm not entirely sure there isn't either.
I plan on returning to each issue in turn; sorry for the churn here.
If we don't demand all elements, then attempt to combine to a simpler shuffle.
At the moment we can only do this if Depth == 0 as combineX86ShufflesRecursively uses Depth to track whether the shuffle has really changed or not - we'll need to change this before we can properly start merging combineX86ShufflesRecursively into SimplifyDemandedVectorElts (see D66004).
This reapplies rL368307 (reverted at rL369167) after the fix for the infinite loop reported at PR43024 was applied at rG3f087e38a2e7b87a5adaaac1c1b61e51220e7ff3
This stops infinite loops where KnownUndef elements are converted to Zeroable, resulting in KnownZero elements which are then simplified (via SimplifyDemandedElts etc.) back to KnownUndef elements........
Prep fix for PR43024 which will allow rL368307 to be re-applied.
This doesn't affect actual codegen, but is a minor refactor toward fixing PR43024 where we need to avoid excess changes (folding zeroables etc.) to the shuffle mask at Depth == 0.
Previously we marked zeroable elements in a way that prevented
the widening check from recognizing that it could widen. Now
we only mark them zeroable if V2 is an all zeros vector. This
matches what we do for widening elements in lowerVectorShuffle.
Fixes PR43866.
Teach combineVectorSizedSetCCEquality() to handle arbitrary memcmp
expansions but do not change any default policy for now.
This also fixes a bug in the memcmp expansion itself when large
displacements are needed.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69507
Enable the new SelectionDAG representation for unordered loads and stores introduced in r371441 by default. As a reminder, the new lowering changes the representation of an unordered atomic load from an AtomicSDNode - which is essentially a black box which gets passed through without combines messing with it - to a LoadSDNode w/a atomic marker on the MMO. The later parallels the way we handle volatiles, and I've audited the code to ensure that every location which checks one checks the other.
This has been fairly heavily fuzzed, and I examined diffs in a reasonable large corpus of assembly by hand, so I'm reasonable sure this is correct for the common case. Late in the review for this, it was discovered that I hadn't correctly handled cases which could be legalized into CAS operations. This points out that there's a strong bias in the IR of the frontend I'm working with towards only legal atomics. If there are problems with this patch, the most likely area will be legalization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69219
This catches some cases. There are probably ways to improve this.
I tried doing it as a combine on the setcc, but that broke
some cases involving flag reuse in place of test.
I renamed the isX86CCUnsigned to isX86CCSigned and flipped its
polarity to make it consistent with the similar functions for
ISD::SETCC. This avoids calling EQ/NE as being signed or unsigned.
Fixes PR43823.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69499
The legalization of v2i1->i2 or v4i1->i4 bitcasts followed by a setcc can create an and after the bitcast. If we're lucky enough that the input to the bitcast is a concat_vectors where the first operand is a setcc that can natively 0 all the upper bits of ak-register, then we should replace the other operands of the concat_vectors with zero in order to remove the AND.
With the AND removed we might be able to use a kortest on the result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69205
PTEST and especially the MOVMSK instructions are slow on Knights Landing
or later. As a bonus, this patch increases instruction parallelism by
emitting:
KORTEST(PCMPNEQ(a, b), PCMPNEQ(c, d)) == 0
Instead of:
KORTEST(AND(PCMPEQ(a, b), PCMPEQ(c, d))) == ~0
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69157
tryToWidenViaDuplication lowers using the shuffle_v8i16(unpack_v16i8(shuffle_v8i16(x),shuffle_v8i16(x))) pattern, but the unpack only needs the even/odd 16i8 args if the original v16i8 shuffle mask references the even/odd elements - which isn't true for many extension style shuffles.
llvm-svn: 375342
We were always generating a single source HADDPD, but really we should only do this if shouldUseHorizontalOp says its a good idea.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69175
llvm-svn: 375341
Add generic DAG combine for extending masked loads.
Allow us to generate sext/zext masked loads which can access v4i8,
v8i8 and v4i16 memory to produce v4i32, v8i16 and v4i32 respectively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68337
llvm-svn: 375085
Exposes an issue in getFauxShuffleMask where the OR(SHUFFLE,SHUFFLE) decode should always resolve zero/undef elements.
Part of the fix for PR43024 where ideally we shouldn't call resolveTargetShuffleAndZeroables for Depth == 0
llvm-svn: 374928
The only things VBROADCAST_LOAD uses is an address and a chain
node. It has no vector inputs.
So if its a user of the source of another broadcast that could
only mean one of two things. The other broadcast is broadcasting
the address of the broadcast_load. Or the source is a load and
the use we're seeing is the chain result from that load. Neither
of these cases make sense to combine here.
This issue was reported post-commit r373871. Test case has not
been reduced yet.
llvm-svn: 374862
This prevents isel from emitting a TEST instruction that
optimizeCompareInstr will need to remove later.
In some of the modified tests, the SUB gets duplicated due to
the flags being needed in two places and being clobbered in
between. optimizeCompareInstr was able to optimize away the TEST
that was using the result of one of them, but optimizeCompareInstr
doesn't know to turn SUB into CMP after removing the TEST. It
only knows how to turn SUB into CMP if the result was already
dead.
With this change the TEST never exists, so optimizeCompareInstr
doesn't have to remove it. Then it can just turn the SUB into
CMP immediately.
Fixes PR43649.
llvm-svn: 374755
We were already controlling whether the KnownZero elements were being written to the target mask, this extends it to the KnownUndef elements as well so we can prevent the target shuffle mask being manipulated at all.
llvm-svn: 374732
This enables use of the saturating truncate instructions when the
result type is less than 128 bits. It also enables the use of
saturating truncate instructions on KNL when the input is less
than 512 bits. We can do this by widening the input and then
extracting the result.
llvm-svn: 374731
This seems to improve std::midpoint code where we have a min and
a max with the same condition. If we split the setcc we can end
up with two compares if the one of the operands is a constant.
Since we aggressively canonicalize compares with constants.
For non-constants it can interfere with our ability to share
control flow if we need to expand cmovs into control flow.
I'm also not sure I understand this min/max canonicalization code.
The motivating case talks about comparing with 0. But we don't
check for 0 explicitly.
Removes one instruction from the codegen for PR43658.
llvm-svn: 374706
Since the input type is larger than 256-bits we'll need to some
concatenating to reassemble the results. The pack instructions
ability to concatenate while packing make this a shorter/faster
sequence.
llvm-svn: 374643
We already did this for VTRUNCUS with a specific combination of
types. This extends this to VTRUNCS and handles any types where
a truncating store is legal.
llvm-svn: 374615
If we don't have VLX we won't end up selecting a saturating
truncate for 256-bit or smaller vectors so we should just use
the pack lowering.
llvm-svn: 374487
When handling the packus pattern for i32->i8 we do a two step
process using a packss to i16 followed by a packus to i8. If the
final i8 step is a type with less than 64-bits the packus step
will return SDValue(), but the i32->i16 step might have succeeded.
This leaves the nodes from the middle step dangling.
Guard against this by pre-checking that the number of elements is
at least 8 before doing the middle step.
With that check in place this should mean the only other
case the middle step itself can fail is when SSE2 is disabled. So
add an early SSE2 check then just assert that neither the middle
or final step ever fail.
llvm-svn: 374460
If we've disable zmm registers, the v16i32 will need to be split. This split will propagate through min/max the truncate. This creates two sequences that need to be concatenated back to v16i8. We can instead use packusdw to do part of the clamping, truncating, and concatenating all at once. Then we can use a vpmovuswb to finish off the clamp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68763
llvm-svn: 374431
As background, starting in D66309, I'm working on support unordered atomics analogous to volatile flags on normal LoadSDNode/StoreSDNodes for X86.
As part of that, I spent some time going through usages of LoadSDNode and StoreSDNode looking for cases where we might have missed a volatility check or need an atomic check. I couldn't find any cases that clearly miscompile - i.e. no test cases - but a couple of pieces in code loop suspicious though I can't figure out how to exercise them.
This patch adds defensive checks and asserts in the places my manual audit found. If anyone has any ideas on how to either a) disprove any of the checks, or b) hit the bug they might be fixing, I welcome suggestions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68419
llvm-svn: 374261
Gather instructions can use i32 or i64 elements for indices. If
the index is zero extended from a type smaller than i32 to i64, we
can shrink the extend to just extend to i32.
llvm-svn: 373982
When the target option GuaranteedTailCallOpt is specified, calls with
the fastcc calling convention will be transformed into tail calls if
they are in tail position. This diff adds a new calling convention,
tailcc, currently supported only on X86, which behaves the same way as
fastcc, except that the GuaranteedTailCallOpt flag does not need to
enabled in order to enable tail call optimization.
Patch by Dwight Guth <dwight.guth@runtimeverification.com>!
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, paquette, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67855
llvm-svn: 373976
If a fp scalar is loaded and then used as both a scalar and a vector broadcast, perform the load as a broadcast and then extract the scalar for 'free' from the 0th element.
This involved switching the order of the X86ISD::BROADCAST combines so we only convert to X86ISD::BROADCAST_LOAD once all other canonicalizations have been attempted.
Adds a DAGCombinerInfo::recursivelyDeleteUnusedNodes wrapper.
Fixes PR43217
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68544
llvm-svn: 373871
Replaces setTargetShuffleZeroElements with getTargetShuffleAndZeroables which reports the Zeroable elements but doesn't merge them into the decoded target shuffle mask (the merging has been moved up into getTargetShuffleInputs until we can get rid of it entirely).
This is part of the work to fix PR43024 and allow us to use SimplifyDemandedElts to simplify shuffle chains - we need to get to a point where the target shuffle mask isn't adjusted by its source inputs but instead we cache them in a parallel Zeroable mask.
llvm-svn: 373867
Summary:
The default legalization for v16i64->v16i8 tries to create a multiple stage truncate concatenating after each stage and truncating again. But avx512 implements truncates with multiple uops. So it should be better to truncate all the way to the desired element size and then concatenate the pieces using unpckl instructions. This minimizes the number of 2 uop truncates. The unpcks are all single uop instructions.
I tried to handle this by just custom splitting the v16i64->v16i8 shuffle. And hoped that the DAG combiner would leave the two halves in the state needed to make D68374 do the job for each half. This worked for the first half, but the second half got messed up. So I've implemented custom handling for v8i64->v8i8 when v8i64 needs to be split to produce the VTRUNCs directly.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68428
llvm-svn: 373864
We can make use of the Zeroable mask to indicate which elements we can safely set to zero instead of creating a target shuffle mask on the fly.
This allows us to remove createTargetShuffleMask.
This is part of the work to fix PR43024 and allow us to use SimplifyDemandedElts to simplify shuffle chains - we need to get to a point where the target shuffle masks isn't adjusted by its source inputs in setTargetShuffleZeroElements but instead we cache them in a parallel Zeroable mask.
llvm-svn: 373846
As discussed on PR42025, with more complex boolean math we can end up with many truncations/extensions of the comparison results through each bitop.
This patch handles the cases introduced in combineBitcastvxi1 by pushing the sign extension through the AND/OR/XOR ops so its just the original SETCC ops that gets extended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68226
llvm-svn: 373834
Rename some variables to match lowerShuffleAsRepeatedMaskAndLanePermute - prep work toward adding some equivalent sublane functionality.
llvm-svn: 373832
We already do this for ISD::TRUNCATE, but we can do the same for X86ISD::VTRUNC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68432
llvm-svn: 373765
This patch recognizes the shuffle pattern we get from a
v8i64->v8i8 truncate when v8i64 isn't a legal type.
With VLX we can use two VTRUNCs, unpckldq, and a insert_subvector.
Diffrential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68374
llvm-svn: 373645
We can make use of the Zeroable mask to indicate which elements we can safely set to zero instead of creating a target shuffle mask on the fly.
This only leaves one user of createTargetShuffleMask which we can hopefully get rid of in a similar manner.
This is part of the work to fix PR43024 and allow us to use SimplifyDemandedElts to simplify shuffle chains - we need to get to a point where the target shuffle masks isn't adjusted by its source inputs in setTargetShuffleZeroElements but instead we cache them in a parallel Zeroable mask.
llvm-svn: 373641
This improves broadcast load folding of i64 elements on 32-bit
targets where i64 isn't legal.
Previously we had to represent these as vXf64 vbroadcast_loads and
a bitcast to vXi64. But we didn't have any isel patterns
looking for that.
This also allows us to remove or simplify some isel patterns that
were looking for bitcasted vbroadcast_loads.
llvm-svn: 373566
The previous code tried to do a trick where we would extract the subvector from the location we were inserting. Then xor that with the new value. Take the xored value and clear out the bits above the subvector size. Then shift that xored subvector to the insert location. And finally xor that with the original vector. Since the old subvector was used in both xors, this would leave just the new subvector at the inserted location. Since the surrounding bits had been zeroed no other bits of the original vector would be modified.
Unfortunately, if the old subvector came from undef we might aggressively propagate the undef. Then we end up with the XORs not cancelling because they aren't using the same value for the two uses of the old subvector. @bkramer gave me a case that demonstrated this, but we haven't reduced it enough to make it easily readable to see what's happening.
This patch uses a safer, but more costly approach. It isolate the bits above the insertion and bits below the insert point and ORs those together leaving 0 for the insertion location. Then widens the subvector with 0s in the upper bits, shifts it into position with 0s in the lower bits. Then we do another OR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68311
llvm-svn: 373495
The gather/scatter instructions can implicitly sign extend the indices. If we're operating on 32-bit data, an v16i64 index can force a v16i32 gather to be split in two since the index needs 2 registers. If we can shrink the index to the i32 we can avoid the split. It should always be safe to shrink the index regardless of the number of elements. We have gather/scatter instructions that can use v2i32 index stored in a v4i32 register with v2i64 data size.
I've limited this to before legalize types to avoid creating a v2i32 after type legalization. We could check for it, but we'd also need testing. I'm also only handling build_vectors with no bitcasts to be sure the truncate will constant fold.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68247
llvm-svn: 373408
Summary:
This adds the ISD opcode and a DAG combine to create it. There are
probably some places where we can directly create it, but I'll
leave that for future work.
This updates all of the isel patterns to look for this new node.
I had to add a few additional isel patterns for aligned extloads
which we should probably fix with a DAG combine or something. This
does mean that the broadcast load folding for avx512 can no
longer match a broadcasted aligned extload.
There's still some work to do here for combining a broadcast of
a broadcast_load. We also need to improve extractelement or
demanded vector elements of a broadcast_load. I'll try to get
those done before I submit this patch.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68198
llvm-svn: 373349
Replace with the MachineFunction. X86 is the only user, and only uses
it for the function. This removes one obstacle from using this in
GlobalISel. The other is the more tolerable EVT argument.
The X86 use of the function seems questionable to me. It checks hasFP,
before frame lowering.
llvm-svn: 373292
The i1 scalar would have been type legalized to i8, but that
doesn't guarantee anything about the upper bits. If we're going
to use it as condition we need to make sure the upper bits are 0.
I've special cased ISD::SETCC conditions since that should
guarantee zero upper bits. We could go further and use
computeKnownBits, but we have no tests that would need that.
Fixes PR43507.
llvm-svn: 373246
ANY_EXTEND of v8i8 is marked Custom on AVX512 for handling extends
from v8i8. But the type legalization infrastructure will call
ReplaceNodeResults for v8i8 results. We should just defer it the
default handling instead of asserting in the default of the switch.
Fixes PR43509.
llvm-svn: 373234
This was added back to allow some performance regressions to be
investigated. The main perf issue was fixed shortly after adding
this back and no other major issues have been reported. So I
think its safe to remove this again.
llvm-svn: 373174
Creating new nodes is what we usually do. Have to explicitly
check that we don't update to an existing node and having
to manually manage the worklist is unusual.
We can probably add a helper function to reduce the duplication
of having to check if we should create a gather or scatter, but
I wanted to just get the simple thing done.
llvm-svn: 373137
Simon Pilgrim