Because diagnostics and their notes are not connected at the API level,
if the error message for an overload is emitted, then the overload
candidates are completed - if a diagnostic is emitted during that work,
the notes related to overload candidates would be attached to the latter
diagnostic, not the original error. Sort of worse, if the latter
diagnostic was disabled, the notes are disabled.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61357
llvm-svn: 359854
__builtin_constant_p.
If the operand of __builtin_constant_p is not constant and has
side-effects, then code controlled by a branch on it is unreachable and
we should not emit runtime behavior warnings in such code.
llvm-svn: 359844
If an address_space attribute is defined in a macro, print the macro instead
when diagnosing a warning or error for incompatible pointers with different
address_spaces.
We allow this for all attributes (not just address_space), and for multiple
attributes declared in the same macro.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51329
llvm-svn: 359826
explicit function specialization with the MemberSpecializationInfo used
everywhere else.
Not NFC: the ad-hoc pattern tracking was not being serialized /
deserialized properly. That's fixed here.
llvm-svn: 359747
According to alignment section in below ARM64 ABI document, MSVC could increase
alignment of global data based on its total size. Clang doesn't do this. Compile
the same symbol into different alignments by Clang and MSVC could cause link
error because some instruction encodings, like 64-bit LDR/STR with immediate,
require the target to be 8 bytes aligned, and linker could choose code stream
with such LDR/STR instruction from MSVC and 4 bytes aligned data from Clang into
final image, which actually cannot be linked together
(see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41506 for more details).
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/arm64-windows-abi-conventions?view=vs-2019#alignment
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61225
llvm-svn: 359744
Summary:
We are currently implementing support in LLDB that reconstructs the STL templates from
the target program in the expression evaluator. This reconstruction happens during the
import process from our debug info AST into the expression evaluation AST, which means
we need a way to intercept the ASTImporter import process.
This patch adds an protected ImportImpl method that we can overwrite in LLDB to implement
our special importing logic (which is essentially just looking into a C++ module that is attached to
the target context). Because ImportImpl has to call MapImported/AddToLookup for the decls it
creates, this patch also exposes those via a new unified method and checks that we call it when
importing decls.
Reviewers: martong, balazske, a.sidorin, shafik, a_sidorin
Reviewed By: martong, a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, cfe-commits, lldb-commits, aprantl
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59485
llvm-svn: 359502
us emitting the operand of __builtin_constant_p if it has side-effects.
Original commit message:
Fix interactions between __builtin_constant_p and constexpr to match
current trunk GCC.
GCC permits information from outside the operand of
__builtin_constant_p (but in the same constant evaluation context) to be
used within that operand; clang now does so too. A few other minor
deviations from GCC's behavior showed up in my testing and are also
fixed (matching GCC):
* Clang now supports nullptr_t as the argument type for
__builtin_constant_p
* Clang now returns true from __builtin_constant_p if called with a
null pointer
* Clang now returns true from __builtin_constant_p if called with an
integer cast to pointer type
llvm-svn: 359367
Summary:
For a CXXRecordDecl the RecordDeclBits are stored in the DeclContext. Currently when we import the definition of a CXXRecordDecl via the ASTImporter we do not copy over this data.
This change will add support for copying the ArgPassingRestrictions from RecordDeclBits to fix an LLDB expression parsing bug where we would set it to not pass in registers.
Note, we did not copy over any other of the RecordDeclBits since we don't have tests for those. We know that copying over LoadedFieldsFromExternalStorage would be a error and that may be the case for others as well.
The companion LLDB review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61146
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61140
llvm-svn: 359338
const-qualified type is not implicitly given internal linkage. But a
variable template declared 'static' is.
This reinstates part of r359048, reverted in r359076.
llvm-svn: 359260
The change breaks libc++ with the follwing error:
In file included from valarray:4:
.../include/c++/v1/valarray:1062:60: error: explicit instantiation declaration of 'valarray<_Tp>' with internal linkage
_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE(_LIBCPP_FUNC_VIS valarray<size_t>::valarray(size_t))
^
.../include/c++/v1/valarray:1063:60: error: explicit instantiation declaration of '~valarray<_Tp>' with internal linkage
_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE(_LIBCPP_FUNC_VIS valarray<size_t>::~valarray())
llvm-svn: 359076
Summary:
This patch implements `__builtin_is_constant_evaluated` as specifier by [P0595R2](https://wg21.link/p0595r2). It is built on the back of Bill Wendling's work for `__builtin_constant_p()`.
More tests to come, but early feedback is appreciated.
I plan to implement warnings for common mis-usages like those belowe in a following patch:
```
void foo(int x) {
if constexpr (std::is_constant_evaluated())) { // condition is always `true`. Should use plain `if` instead.
foo_constexpr(x);
} else {
foo_runtime(x);
}
}
```
Reviewers: rsmith, MaskRay, bruno, void
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: dexonsmith, zoecarver, fdeazeve, kristina, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55500
llvm-svn: 359067
current trunk GCC.
GCC permits information from outside the operand of
__builtin_constant_p (but in the same constant evaluation context) to be
used within that operand; clang now does so too. A few other minor
deviations from GCC's behavior showed up in my testing and are also
fixed (matching GCC):
* Clang now supports nullptr_t as the argument type for
__builtin_constant_p
* Clang now returns true from __builtin_constant_p if called with a
null pointer
* Clang now returns true from __builtin_constant_p if called with an
integer cast to pointer type
llvm-svn: 359059
Exposed by a related bug about visibility of default arguments of nested
templates - without the correct decl context, default template
parameters of variable templates nested in classes would have incorrect
visibility computed.
llvm-svn: 358796
Systematically add the const-qualified version of children()
to all statement/expression nodes. Previously the const-qualified
variant was only defined for some nodes. NFC.
Patch by: Nicolas Manichon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60029
Reviewed By: riccibruno
llvm-svn: 358288
Summary:
Prepares ground for printing template arguments as written in the
source code, part of re-landing rC356541 with D59599 applied.
Reviewers: ioeric, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: mgorny, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59639
llvm-svn: 358272
Loading external comments is expensive. This change probably doesn't apply to common cases but is almost for free and would save some work in case none of the declaration needs external comments to be loaded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60493
llvm-svn: 358133
Summary:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D51633 added error handling to the ASTNodeImporter::VisitEnumDecl(...) for the conflicting names case. This could lead to erroneous return of an error in that case since we should have been using SearchName. Name may be empty in the case where we find the name via getTypedefNameForAnonDecl(...).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59665
llvm-svn: 357940
ObjCPropertyDecl should use the category interface as a context similar to what is done for methods.
Previously category methods would be printed as `::property`; now they are printed as `Class::property`.
llvm-svn: 357720
Improved classification of address space cast when qualification
conversion is performed - prevent adding addr space cast for
non-pointer and non-reference types. Take address space correctly
from the pointee.
Also pass correct address space from 'this' object using
AggValueSlot when generating addrspacecast in the constructor
call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59988
llvm-svn: 357682
Summary:
ASTStructuralEquivalence uses a flag to indicate whether ODR diagnostics
should be considered errors or warnings as module Sema is more strict than
ASTMerge. The implementation of ASTImporter should allso follow
along the same lines.
Reviewers: martong, a.sidorin, shafik, a_sidorin
Reviewed By: shafik, a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, martong, dkrupp, Szelethus, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59761
Patch by Endre Fulop!
llvm-svn: 357402
Summary:
ODR errors are not necessarily true errors during the import of ASTs.
ASTMerge and CrossTU should use the warning equivalent of every CTU error,
while Sema should emit errors as before.
Reviewers: martong, a_sidorin, shafik, a.sidorin
Reviewed By: a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58897
Patch by Endre Fulop!
llvm-svn: 357394
Summary:
We may try and re-import an EnumDecl while trying to complete it in IsStructuralMatch(...) specialization for EnumDecl. This change mirrors a similar fix for the specialization for RecordDecl.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59845
llvm-svn: 357100
Summary:
`OMPClause` is the base class, it is not descendant from **any**
other class, therefore for it to work with e.g.
`VariadicDynCastAllOfMatcher<>`, it needs to be handled here.
Reviewers: sbenza, bkramer, pcc, klimek, hokein, gribozavr, aaron.ballman, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: gribozavr, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: guansong, jdoerfert, alexfh, ABataev, cfe-commits
Tags: #openmp, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57112
llvm-svn: 356675
Summary:
`ASTImporter::Imported` currently returns a Decl, but that return value is not used by the ASTImporter (or anywhere else)
nor is it documented.
Reviewers: balazske, martong, a.sidorin, shafik
Reviewed By: balazske, martong
Subscribers: rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59595
llvm-svn: 356592
Summary:
https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/OpenMP-API-Specification-5.0.pdf, page 3:
```
structured block
For C/C++, an executable statement, possibly compound, with a single entry at the
top and a single exit at the bottom, or an OpenMP construct.
COMMENT: See Section 2.1 on page 38 for restrictions on structured
blocks.
```
```
2.1 Directive Format
Some executable directives include a structured block. A structured block:
• may contain infinite loops where the point of exit is never reached;
• may halt due to an IEEE exception;
• may contain calls to exit(), _Exit(), quick_exit(), abort() or functions with a
_Noreturn specifier (in C) or a noreturn attribute (in C/C++);
• may be an expression statement, iteration statement, selection statement, or try block, provided
that the corresponding compound statement obtained by enclosing it in { and } would be a
structured block; and
Restrictions
Restrictions to structured blocks are as follows:
• Entry to a structured block must not be the result of a branch.
• The point of exit cannot be a branch out of the structured block.
C / C++
• The point of entry to a structured block must not be a call to setjmp().
• longjmp() and throw() must not violate the entry/exit criteria.
```
Of particular note here is the fact that OpenMP structured blocks are as-if `noexcept`,
in the same sense as with the normal `noexcept` functions in C++.
I.e. if throw happens, and it attempts to travel out of the `noexcept` function
(here: out of the current structured-block), then the program terminates.
Now, one of course can say that since it is explicitly prohibited by the Specification,
then any and all programs that violate this Specification contain undefined behavior,
and are unspecified, and thus no one should care about them. Just don't write broken code /s
But i'm not sure this is a reasonable approach.
I have personally had oss-fuzz issues of this origin - exception thrown inside
of an OpenMP structured-block that is not caught, thus causing program termination.
This issue isn't all that hard to catch, it's not any particularly different from
diagnosing the same situation with the normal `noexcept` function.
Now, clang static analyzer does not presently model exceptions.
But clang-tidy has a simplisic [[ https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-exception-escape.html | bugprone-exception-escape ]] check,
and it is even refactored as a `ExceptionAnalyzer` class for reuse.
So it would be trivial to use that analyzer to check for
exceptions escaping out of OpenMP structured blocks. (D59466)
All that sounds too great to be true. Indeed, there is a caveat.
Presently, it's practically impossible to do. To check a OpenMP structured block
you need to somehow 'get' the OpenMP structured block, and you can't because
it's simply not modelled in AST. `CapturedStmt`/`CapturedDecl` is not it's representation.
Now, it is of course possible to write e.g. some AST matcher that would e.g.
match every OpenMP executable directive, and then return the whatever `Stmt` is
the structured block of said executable directive, if any.
But i said //practically//. This isn't practical for the following reasons:
1. This **will** bitrot. That matcher will need to be kept up-to-date,
and refreshed with every new OpenMP spec version.
2. Every single piece of code that would want that knowledge would need to
have such matcher. Well, okay, if it is an AST matcher, it could be shared.
But then you still have `RecursiveASTVisitor` and friends.
`2 > 1`, so now you have code duplication.
So it would be reasonable (and is fully within clang AST spirit) to not
force every single consumer to do that work, but instead store that knowledge
in the correct, and appropriate place - AST, class structure.
Now, there is another hoop we need to get through.
It isn't fully obvious //how// to model this.
The best solution would of course be to simply add a `OMPStructuredBlock` transparent
node. It would be optimal, it would give us two properties:
* Given this `OMPExecutableDirective`, what's it OpenMP structured block?
* It is trivial to check whether the `Stmt*` is a OpenMP structured block (`isa<OMPStructuredBlock>(ptr)`)
But OpenMP structured block isn't **necessarily** the first, direct child of `OMP*Directive`.
(even ignoring the clang's `CapturedStmt`/`CapturedDecl` that were inserted inbetween).
So i'm not sure whether or not we could re-create AST statements after they were already created?
There would be other costs to a new AST node: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40563#c12
```
1. You will need to break the representation of loops. The body should be replaced by the "structured block" entity.
2. You will need to support serialization/deserialization.
3. You will need to support template instantiation.
4. You will need to support codegen and take this new construct to account in each OpenMP directive.
```
Instead, there **is** an functionally-equivalent, alternative solution, consisting of two parts.
Part 1:
* Add a member function `isStandaloneDirective()` to the `OMPExecutableDirective` class,
that will tell whether this directive is stand-alone or not, as per the spec.
We need it because we can't just check for the existance of associated statements,
see code comment.
* Add a member function `getStructuredBlock()` to the OMPExecutableDirective` class itself,
that assert that this is not a stand-alone directive, and either return the correct loop body
if this is a loop-like directive, or the captured statement.
This way, given an `OMPExecutableDirective`, we can get it's structured block.
Also, since the knowledge is ingrained into the clang OpenMP implementation,
it will not cause any duplication, and //hopefully// won't bitrot.
Great we achieved 1 of 2 properties of `OMPStructuredBlock` approach.
Thus, there is a second part needed:
* How can we check whether a given `Stmt*` is `OMPStructuredBlock`?
Well, we can't really, in general. I can see this workaround:
```
class FunctionASTVisitor : public RecursiveASTVisitor<FunctionASTVisitor> {
using Base = RecursiveASTVisitor<FunctionASTVisitor>;
public:
bool VisitOMPExecDir(OMPExecDir *D) {
OmpStructuredStmts.emplace_back(D.getStructuredStmt());
}
bool VisitSOMETHINGELSE(???) {
if(InOmpStructuredStmt)
HI!
}
bool TraverseStmt(Stmt *Node) {
if (!Node)
return Base::TraverseStmt(Node);
if (OmpStructuredStmts.back() == Node)
++InOmpStructuredStmt;
Base::TraverseStmt(Node);
if (OmpStructuredStmts.back() == Node) {
OmpStructuredStmts.pop_back();
--InOmpStructuredStmt;
}
return true;
}
std::vector<Stmt*> OmpStructuredStmts;
int InOmpStructuredStmt = 0;
};
```
But i really don't see using it in practice.
It's just too intrusive; and again, requires knowledge duplication.
.. but no. The solution lies right on the ground.
Why don't we simply store this `i'm a openmp structured block` in the bitfield of the `Stmt` itself?
This does not appear to have any impact on the memory footprint of the clang AST,
since it's just a single extra bit in the bitfield. At least the static assertions don't fail.
Thus, indeed, we can achieve both of the properties without a new AST node.
We can cheaply set that bit right in sema, at the end of `Sema::ActOnOpenMPExecutableDirective()`,
by just calling the `getStructuredBlock()` that we just added.
Test coverage that demonstrates all this has been added.
This isn't as great with serialization though. Most of it does not use abbrevs,
so we do end up paying the full price (4 bytes?) instead of a single bit.
That price, of course, can be reclaimed by using abbrevs.
In fact, i suspect that //might// not just reclaim these bytes, but pack these PCH significantly.
I'm not seeing a third solution. If there is one, it would be interesting to hear about it.
("just don't write code that would require `isa<OMPStructuredBlock>(ptr)`" is not a solution.)
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40563 | PR40563 ]].
Reviewers: ABataev, rjmccall, hfinkel, rsmith, riccibruno, gribozavr
Reviewed By: ABataev, gribozavr
Subscribers: mgorny, aaron.ballman, steveire, guansong, jfb, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #openmp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214
llvm-svn: 356570
Summary:
The ASTNodeImporter::ImportTemplateParameterList is replaced by a
template specialization of 'import' that already exists and does
(almost) the same thing.
Reviewers: martong, a.sidorin, shafik, a_sidorin
Reviewed By: martong
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59134
llvm-svn: 356564
The attribute pass_dynamic_object_size(n) behaves exactly like
pass_object_size(n), but instead of evaluating __builtin_object_size on calls,
it evaluates __builtin_dynamic_object_size, which has the potential to produce
runtime code when the object size can't be determined statically.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58757
llvm-svn: 356515
Summary:
Redecl chains of function template specializations are not handled well
currently. We want to handle them similarly to functions, i.e. try to
keep the structure of the original AST as much as possible. The aim is
to not squash a prototype with a definition, rather we create both and
put them in a redecl chain.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, shafik, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58668
llvm-svn: 356455
David Blaikie