The patch fixes emitting flags and the debug_line_offset field in
the header, as well as the reference to the macro string for
a pre-standard GNU .debug_macro extension.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87024
The transition is done by using methods of AsmPrinter which
automatically emit values in compliance with the selected DWARF format.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87013
The patch fixes calculating the size of the table and emitting
the fields which depend on the DWARF format by using methods that
choose appropriate sizes automatically.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87012
The patch also adds a method to choose an appropriate DWARF form
to represent section offsets according to the version and the format
of producing debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87014
The patch adds a switch to enable emitting debug info in the 64-bit
DWARF format. Most emitter for sections will be updated in the subsequent
patches, whereas for .debug_line and .debug_frame the emitters are in
the MC library, which is already updated.
For now, the switch is enabled only for 64-bit ELF targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87011
This reverts commit b9d977b0ca.
This cutoff is no longer required. The commit 34ffa7fc501 (D86153) introduces a
performance improvement which was tested against the motivating case for this
patch.
Discussed in differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86153
Almost NFC (see end).
The backwards scan in validThroughout significantly contributed to compile time
for a pathological case, causing the 'X86 Assembly Printer' pass to account for
roughly 70% of the run time. This patch guards the loop against running
unnecessarily, bringing the pass contribution down to 4%.
Almost NFC: There is a hack in validThroughout which promotes single constant
value DBG_VALUEs in the prologue to be live throughout the function. We're more
likely to hit this code path with this patch applied. Similarly to the parent
patches there is a small coverage change reported in the order of 10s of bytes.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86153
With the changes introduced in D86151 we can now check for single locations
which span multiple blocks for inlined scopes and blocks.
D86151 introduced the InstructionOrdering parameter, replacing a scan through
MBB instructions. The functionality to compare instruction positions across
blocks was add there, and this patch just removes the exit checks that were
previously (but no longer) required.
CTMark shows a geomean binary size reduction of 2.2% for RelWithDebInfo builds.
llvm-locstats (using D85636) shows a very small variable location coverage
change in 5 of 10 binaries, but just like in D86151 it is only in the order of
10s of bytes.
Reviewed By: djtodoro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86152
With this patch we're now accounting for two more cases which should be
considered 'valid throughout': First, where RangeEnd is ScopeEnd. Second, where
RangeEnd comes before ScopeEnd when including meta instructions, but are both
preceded by the same non-meta instruction.
CTMark shows a geomean binary size reduction of 1.5% for RelWithDebInfo builds.
`llvm-locstats` (using D85636) shows a very small variable location coverage
change in 2 of 10 binaries, but it is in the order of 10s of bytes which lines
up with my expectations.
I've added a test which checks both of these new cases. The first check in the
test isn't strictly necessary for this patch. But I'm not sure that it is
explicitly tested anywhere else, and is useful for the final patch in the
series.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86151
This patch was reverted in 7c182663a8 due to some failures
observed on PCC based machines. Failures were due to Endianness issue and
long double representation issues.
Patch is revised to address Endianness issue. Furthermore, support
for emission of `DW_OP_implicit_value` for `long double` has been removed
(since it was unclean at the moment). Planning to handle this in
a clean way soon!
For more context, please refer to following review link.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83560
llvm is missing support for DW_OP_implicit_value operation.
DW_OP_implicit_value op is indispensable for cases such as
optimized out long double variables.
For intro refer: DWARFv5 Spec Pg: 40 2.6.1.1.4 Implicit Location Descriptions
Consider the following example:
```
int main() {
long double ld = 3.14;
printf("dummy\n");
ld *= ld;
return 0;
}
```
when compiled with tunk `clang` as
`clang test.c -g -O1` produces following location description
of variable `ld`:
```
DW_AT_location (0x00000000:
[0x0000000000201691, 0x000000000020169b): DW_OP_constu 0xc8f5c28f5c28f800, DW_OP_stack_value, DW_OP_piece 0x8, DW_OP_constu 0x4000, DW_OP_stack_value, DW_OP_bit_piece 0x10 0x40, DW_OP_stack_value)
DW_AT_name ("ld")
```
Here one may notice that this representation is incorrect(DWARF4
stack could only hold integers(and only up to the size of address)).
Here the variable size itself is `128` bit.
GDB and LLDB confirms this:
```
(gdb) p ld
$1 = <invalid float value>
(lldb) frame variable ld
(long double) ld = <extracting data from value failed>
```
GCC represents/uses DW_OP_implicit_value in these sort of situations.
Based on the discussion with Jakub Jelinek regarding GCC's motivation
for using this, I concluded that DW_OP_implicit_value is most appropriate
in this case.
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-July/233057.html
GDB seems happy after this patch:(LLDB doesn't have support
for DW_OP_implicit_value)
```
(gdb) p ld
p ld
$1 = 3.14000000000000012434
```
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83560
Theory was that we should never reach a non-type unit (eg: type in an
anonymous namespace) when we're already in the invalid "encountered an
address-use, so stop emitting types for now, until we throw out the
whole type tree to restart emitting in non-type unit" state. But that's
not the case (prior commit cleaned up one reason this wasn't exposed
sooner - but also makes it easier to test/demonstrate this issue)
Allow the GNU .debug_macro extension to be emitted for DWARF versions
earlier than 5. The extension is basically what became DWARF 5's format,
except that a DW_AT_GNU_macros attribute is emitted, and some entries
like the strx entries are missing. In this patch I emit GNU's indirect
entries, which are the same as DWARF 5's strp entries.
This patch adds the extension behind a hidden LLVM flag,
-use-gnu-debug-macro. I would later want to enable it by default when
tuning for GDB and targeting DWARF versions earlier than 5.
The size of a Clang 8.0 binary built with RelWithDebInfo and the flags
"-gdwarf-4 -fdebug-macro" reduces from 1533 MB to 1349 MB with
.debug_macro (compared to 1296 MB without -fdebug-macro).
Reviewed By: SouraVX, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82975
Broken out from a review comment on D82975. This is an NFC expect for
that the Macinfo macro string is now emitted using a single emitBytes()
invocation, so it can be done using a single string directive.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83557
Move the Dwarf version checks that determine if the .debug_macro section
should be emitted, into a DwarfDebug member. This is a preparatory
refactoring for allowing the GNU .debug_macro extension, which is a
precursor to the DWARF 5 format, to be emitted by LLVM for earlier DWARF
versions.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82971
SONY debugger does not prefer debug entry values feature, so
the plan is to avoid production of the entry values
by default when the tuning is SCE debugger.
The feature still can be enabled with the -debug-entry-values
option for the testing/development purposes.
This patch addresses PR46643.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83462
Test case `test/CodeGen/WebAssembly/stackified-debug.ll`
was failing due to malformed DwarfExpression.
This failure has been seen in lot of bots, for instance in:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lld-x86_64-ubuntu-fast/builds/18794
: 'RUN: at line 1'
/home/buildbot/as-builder-4/lld-x86_64-ubuntu-fast/build/bin/llc
/home/buildbot/as-builder-4/lld-x86_64-ubuntu-fast/build/bin/FileCheck /home/buildbot/as-builder-4/lld-x86_64-ubuntu-fast/llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/WebAssembly/stackified-debug.ll
home/buildbot/as-builder-4/lld-x86_64-ubuntu-fast/llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/WebAssembly/stackified-debug.ll:26:10: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input
CHECK: .int16 4 # Loc expr size
^
<stdin>:34:2: note: scanning from here
.int16 3 # Loc expr size
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83560
This patch was reverted in 9d2da6759b due to assertion failure seen
in `test/DebugInfo/Sparc/subreg.ll`. Assertion failure was happening
due to malformed/unhandeled DwarfExpression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83560
Summary:
llvm is missing support for DW_OP_implicit_value operation.
DW_OP_implicit_value op is indispensable for cases such as
optimized out long double variables.
For intro refer: DWARFv5 Spec Pg: 40 2.6.1.1.4 Implicit Location Descriptions
Consider the following example:
```
int main() {
long double ld = 3.14;
printf("dummy\n");
ld *= ld;
return 0;
}
```
when compiled with tunk `clang` as
`clang test.c -g -O1` produces following location description
of variable `ld`:
```
DW_AT_location (0x00000000:
[0x0000000000201691, 0x000000000020169b): DW_OP_constu 0xc8f5c28f5c28f800, DW_OP_stack_value, DW_OP_piece 0x8, DW_OP_constu 0x4000, DW_OP_stack_value, DW_OP_bit_piece 0x10 0x40, DW_OP_stack_value)
DW_AT_name ("ld")
```
Here one may notice that this representation is incorrect(DWARF4
stack could only hold integers(and only up to the size of address)).
Here the variable size itself is `128` bit.
GDB and LLDB confirms this:
```
(gdb) p ld
$1 = <invalid float value>
(lldb) frame variable ld
(long double) ld = <extracting data from value failed>
```
GCC represents/uses DW_OP_implicit_value in these sort of situations.
Based on the discussion with Jakub Jelinek regarding GCC's motivation
for using this, I concluded that DW_OP_implicit_value is most appropriate
in this case.
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-July/233057.html
GDB seems happy after this patch:(LLDB doesn't have support
for DW_OP_implicit_value)
```
(gdb) p ld
p ld
$1 = 3.14000000000000012434
```
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83560
This is an alternative proposal to D81476 (and D82084) - the details were sufficiently confusing to me it seemed easier to write some code and see how it looks.
Reviewers: SouraVX
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84278
Occasionally we see absolutely massive basic blocks, typically in global
constructors that are vulnerable to heavy inlining. When these blocks are
dense with DBG_VALUE instructions, we can hit near quadratic complexity in
DwarfDebug's validThroughout function. The problem is caused by:
* validThroughout having to step through all instructions in the block to
examine their lexical scope,
* and a high proportion of instructions in that block being DBG_VALUEs
for a unique variable fragment,
Leading to us stepping through every instruction in the block, for (nearly)
each instruction in the block.
By adding this guard, we force variables in large blocks to use a location
list rather than a single-location expression, as shown in the added test.
This shouldn't change the meaning of the output DWARF at all: instead we
use a less efficient DWARF encoding to avoid a poor-performance code path.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83236
This patch uses ranges for debug information when a function contains basic block sections rather than using [lowpc, highpc]. This is also the first in a series of patches for debug info and does not contain the support for linker relaxation. That will be done as a follow up patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78851
Following on from this RFC[0] from a while back, this is the first patch towards
implementing variadic debug values.
This patch specifically adds a set of functions to MachineInstr for performing
operations specific to debug values, and replacing uses of the more general
functions where appropriate. The most prevalent of these is replacing
getOperand(0) with getDebugOperand(0) for debug-value-specific code, as the
operands corresponding to values will no longer be at index 0, but index 2 and
upwards: getDebugOperand(x) == getOperand(x+2). Similar replacements have been
added for the other operands, along with some helper functions to replace
oft-repeated code and operate on a variable number of value operands.
[0] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-February/139376.html<Paste>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81852
This adds call site info support for call instructions with delay slot.
Search for instructions inside call delay slot, which load value
into parameter forwarding registers.
Return address of the call points to instruction after call delay slot,
which is not the one, immediately after the call instruction.
Patch by Nikola Tesic
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78107
The collectCallSiteParameters() method searches for instructions
which load values into registers used for parameters passing.
Previously, interpretation of those values, loaded by one such
instruction, was implemented inside collectCallSiteParameters() method.
This patch moves the interpretation code from collectCallSiteParameters()
method into a separate static method named interpretValue. New method is
called from collectCallSiteParameters() to process each instruction from
targeted instruction scope.
The collectCallSiteParameters() searches for loaded parameter value
among instructions which precede the call instruction, inside the same
basic block. When needed, new method (interpretValue) could be used for
searching any instruction scope.
This is preparation for search of parameter value, loaded inside call
delay slot.
Patch by Nikola Tesic
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78106
This patch adds support for emission of following DWARFv5 macro
forms in .debug_macro.dwo section:
- DW_MACRO_start_file
- DW_MACRO_end_file
- DW_MACRO_define_strx
- DW_MACRO_undef_strx
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78866
DW_MACRO_define_strx forms are supported now in llvm-dwarfdump and these
forms can be used in both debug_macro[.dwo] sections. An added advantage
for using strx forms over strp forms is that it uses indices
approach instead of a relocation to debug_str section.
This patch unify the emission for debug_macro section.
Reviewed by: dblaikie, ikudrin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78865
Summary:
A struct argument can be passed-by-value to a callee via a pointer to a
temporary stack copy. Add support for emitting an entry value DBG_VALUE
when an indirect parameter DBG_VALUE becomes unavailable. This is done
by omitting DW_OP_stack_value from the entry value expression, to make
the expression describe the location of an object.
rdar://63373691
Reviewers: djtodoro, aprantl, dstenb
Subscribers: hiraditya, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80345
for variables in nested scopes (including inlined functions) if there is a
single location which covers the entire scope and the scope is contained in a
single block.
Based on work by @jmorse.
Reviewed By: vsk, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79571
This is a no-op/NFC at the moment & generally makes the code /somewhat/
cleaner/less reliant on assumptions about what will produce a debug_addr
section.
It's still a bit "spooky action at a distance" - the add ranges code
pre-emptively inserts addresses into the address pool it knows will
eventually be used by the range emission code (or low/high pc).
The 'ideal' would be either to actually compute the addresses needed for
range (& loc) emission earlier - which would mean decanonicalizing the
range/loc representation earlier to account for whether it was going to
use addrx encodings or not (which would be unfortunate, but could be
refactored to be relatively unobtrusive).
Alternatively, emitting the range/loc sections earlier would cause them
to request the needed addresses sooner - but then you endup having to
split finalizeModuleInfo because some things need to be handled there
before the ranges/locs are emitted, I think...
It is bad practice to capture by default (via [&] in this case) when
using lambdas, so we should avoid that as much as possible.
This patch fixes that in the getForwardingRegsDefinedByMI
from DwarfDebug module.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79616
We should use explicit type instead of auto type deduction when
the type is so obvious. In addition, we remove ambiguity, since auto
type deduction sometimes is not that intuitive, so that could lead
us to some unwanted behavior.
This patch fixes that in the collectCallSiteParameters() from
DwarfDebug module.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79624
With a fix to uninitialized EndOffset.
DW_OP_call_ref is the only operation that has an operand which depends
on the DWARF format. The patch fixes handling that operation in DWARF64
units.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79501
DW_OP_call_ref is the only operation that has an operand which depends
on the DWARF format. The patch fixes handling that operation in DWARF64
units.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79501
It can be used to avoid passing the begin and end of a range.
This makes the code shorter and it is consistent with another
wrappers we already have.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78016
This is a performance patch that hoists two conditions in DwarfDebug's
validThroughout to avoid a linear-scan of all instructions in a block. We
now exit early if validThrougout will never return true for the variable
location.
The first added clause filters for the two circumstances where
validThroughout will return true. The second added clause should be
identical to the one that's deleted from after the linear-scan.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77639
Summary:
This patch adds support for emission of following DWARFv5 macro forms
in .debug_macro section.
1. DW_MACRO_start_file
2. DW_MACRO_end_file
3. DW_MACRO_define_strp
4. DW_MACRO_undef_strp.
Reviewed By: dblaikie, ikudrin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72828
Record the address of a tail-calling branch instruction within its call
site entry using DW_AT_call_pc. This allows a debugger to determine the
address to use when creating aritificial frames.
This creates an extra attribute + relocation at tail call sites, which
constitute 3-5% of all call sites in xnu/clang respectively.
rdar://60307600
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76336
When compiling
```
struct S {
float w;
};
void f(long w, long b);
void g(struct S s) {
int w = s.w;
f(w, w*4);
}
```
I get Assertion failed: ((!CombinedExpr || CombinedExpr->isValid()) && "Combined debug expression is invalid").
That's because we combine two epxressions that both end in DW_OP_stack_value:
```
(lldb) p Expr->dump()
!DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 32, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 64, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_stack_value)
(lldb) p Param.Expr->dump()
!DIExpression(DW_OP_constu, 4, DW_OP_mul, DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 32, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 64, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_stack_value)
(lldb) p CombinedExpr->isValid()
(bool) $0 = false
(lldb) p CombinedExpr->dump()
!DIExpression(4097, 32, 5, 4097, 64, 5, 16, 4, 30, 4097, 32, 5, 4097, 64, 5, 159, 159)
```
I believe that in this particular case combining two stack values is
safe, but I didn't want to sink the special handling into
DIExpression::append() because I do want everyone to think about what
they are doing.
Patch by Adrian Prantl.
Fixes PR45181.
rdar://problem/60383095
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76164
This is part of PR44213 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44213
When importing (system) Clang modules, LLDB needs to know which SDK
(e.g., MacOSX, iPhoneSimulator, ...) they came from. While the sysroot
attribute contains the absolute path to the SDK, this doesn't work
well when the debugger is run on a different machine than the
compiler, and the SDKs are installed in different directories. It thus
makes sense to just store the name of the SDK instead of the absolute
path, so it can be found relative to LLDB.
rdar://problem/51645582
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75646
```
// clang -c -gdwarf-5 a.s -o a.o
.section .init; ret
.text; ret
```
.debug_info contains DW_AT_ranges and llvm-dwarfdump will report
a verification error because .debug_rnglists does not exist (not
implemented).
This patch generates .debug_rnglists for assembly files.
emitListsTableHeaderStart() in DwarfDebug.cpp can be shared with
MCDwarf.cpp. Because CodeGen depends on MC, I move the function to
MCDwarf.cpp
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75375
Summary:
If the describeLoadedValue() hook produced a DIExpression when
describing a instruction, and it was not possible to emit a call site
entry directly (the value operand was not an immediate nor a preserved
register), then that described value could not be inserted into the
worklist, and would instead be dropped, meaning that the parameter's
call site value couldn't be described.
This patch extends the worklist so that each entry has an DIExpression
that is built up when iterating through the instructions.
This allows us to describe instruction chains like this:
$reg0 = mv $fp
$reg0 = add $reg0, offset
call @call_with_offseted_fp
Since DW_OP_LLVM_entry_value operations can't be combined with any other
expression, such call site entries will not be emitted. I have added a
test, dbgcall-site-expr-entry-value.mir, which verifies that we don't
assert or emit broken DWARF in such cases.
Reviewers: djtodoro, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: djtodoro, vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75036
Summary:
This is a preparatory patch for D75036, in which a debug expression is
associated with each parameter register in the worklist. In that patch
the two lambda functions addToWorklist() and finishCallSiteParams() grow
a bit, so move those out to separate functions. This patch also prepares
for each parameter register having their own expression moving the
creation of the DbgValueLoc into finishCallSiteParams().
Reviewers: djtodoro, vsk
Reviewed By: djtodoro, vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75050
This patch enables the debug entry values feature.
- Remove the (CC1) experimental -femit-debug-entry-values option
- Enable it for x86, arm and aarch64 targets
- Resolve the test failures
- Leave the llc experimental option for targets that do not
support the CallSiteInfo yet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73534
This patch enables the debug entry values feature.
- Remove the (CC1) experimental -femit-debug-entry-values option
- Enable it for x86, arm and aarch64 targets
- Resolve the test failures
- Leave the llc experimental option for targets that do not
support the CallSiteInfo yet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73534
Instructions marked as FrameSetup do not cause requestLabelAfterInsn to
be called and so no such label is generated. Call instructions which
require call site entries to be generated require this label to be
present in order to calculate the return PC offset/address, but the
check for whether the call instruction is marked as FrameSetup was not
present.
Therefore in the case where a call instruction is marked as FrameSetup,
an assertion failure occurs if a call site entry is to be generated.
This is the case with RISC-V's implementation of save/restore via
library calls.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71593
Add the isCandidateForCallSiteEntry predicate to MachineInstr to
determine whether a DWARF call site entry should be created for an
instruction.
For now, it's enough to have any call instruction that doesn't belong to
a blacklisted set of opcodes. For these opcodes, a call site entry isn't
meaningful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74159
Summary:
This patch reorders the emission of debug_str section, so that
string can come after macros.
This is necessary for macro forms like DW_MACRO_define_strp,
which emits macro as a string in debug_str section.
Originally committed in: 1ced28cbe7
Reverted in: f75301d16d
(reverted due to tests failing on non-linux/x86 targets, tests have since been
generalized and specialized... since Split DWARF isn't supported on non-elf
targets anyway and we have no way to run on "whatever elf target is available"
so they fail on MacOS without an explicit target triple)
This code was incorrectly emitting extra bytes into arbitrary parts of
the object file when it was meant to be hashing them to compute the DWO
ID.
Follow-up patch(es) will refactor this API somewhat to make such bugs
harder to introduce, hopefully.
This code was incorrectly emitting extra bytes into arbitrary parts of
the object file when it was meant to be hashing them to compute the DWO
ID.
Follow-up patch(es) will refactor this API somewhat to make such bugs
harder to introduce, hopefully.
This is a revert-of-revert (i.e. this reverts commit 802bec89, which
itself reverted fa4701e1 and 79daafc9) with a fix folded in. The problem
was that call site tags weren't emitted properly when LTO was enabled
along with split-dwarf. This required a minor fix. I've added a reduced
test case in test/DebugInfo/X86/fission-call-site.ll.
Original commit message:
This allows a call site tag in CU A to reference a callee DIE in CU B
without resorting to creating an incomplete duplicate DIE for the callee
inside of CU A.
We already allow cross-CU references of subprogram declarations, so it
doesn't seem like definitions ought to be special.
This improves entry value evaluation and tail call frame synthesis in
the LTO setting. During LTO, it's common for cross-module inlining to
produce a call in some CU A where the callee resides in a different CU,
and there is no declaration subprogram for the callee anywhere. In this
case llvm would (unnecessarily, I think) emit an empty DW_TAG_subprogram
in order to fill in the call site tag. That empty 'definition' defeats
entry value evaluation etc., because the debugger can't figure out what
it means.
As a follow-up, maybe we could add a DWARF verifier check that a
DW_TAG_subprogram at least has a DW_AT_name attribute.
Update #1:
Reland with a fix to create a declaration DIE when the declaration is
missing from the CU's retainedTypes list. The declaration is left out
of the retainedTypes list in two cases:
1) Re-compiling pre-r266445 bitcode (in which declarations weren't added
to the retainedTypes list), and
2) Doing LTO function importing (which doesn't update the retainedTypes
list).
It's possible to handle (1) and (2) by modifying the retainedTypes list
(in AutoUpgrade, or in the LTO importing logic resp.), but I don't see
an advantage to doing it this way, as it would cause more DWARF to be
emitted compared to creating the declaration DIEs lazily.
Update #2:
Fold in a fix for call site tag emission in the split-dwarf + LTO case.
Tested with a stage2 ThinLTO+RelWithDebInfo build of clang, and with a
ReleaseLTO-g build of the test suite.
rdar://46577651, rdar://57855316, rdar://57840415, rdar://58888440
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70350
The Version was used only to determine the size of an operand of
DW_OP_call_ref. The size was 4 for all versions apart from 2, but
the DW_OP_call_ref operation was introduced only in DWARF3. Thus,
the code may be simplified and using of Version may be eliminated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73264
Summary:
This fixes PR44118. For cases where we have a chain like this:
R8 = R1 (entry value)
R0 = R8
call @foo R0
the code that emits call site entries using entry values would not
follow that chain, instead emitting a call site entry with R8 as
location rather than R0. Such a case was discovered when originally
adding dbgcall-site-orr-moves.mir. This patch fixes that issue. This is
done by changing the ForwardedRegWorklist set to a map in which the
worklist registers always map to the parameter registers that they
describe.
Another thing this patch fixes is that worklist registers now can
describe more than one parameter register at a time. Such a case
occurred in dbgcall-site-interpretation.mir, resulting in a call site
entry not being emitted for one of the parameters.
Reviewers: djtodoro, NikolaPrica, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73168
Summary:
Since D70431 the describeLoadedValue() hook takes a parameter register,
meaning that it can now be asked to describe any register. This means
that we can drop the difference between explicit and implicit defines
that we previously had in collectCallSiteParameters().
I have not found any case for any upstream targets where a parameter
register is only implicitly defined, and does not overlap with any
explicit defines. I don't know if such a case would even make sense. So
as far as I have tested, this patch should be a non-functional change.
However, this reduces the complexity of the code a bit, and it will
simplify the implementation of an upcoming patch which solves PR44118.
Reviewers: djtodoro, NikolaPrica, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: djtodoro, vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73167
... as well as:
Revert "[DWARF] Defer creating declaration DIEs until we prepare call site info"
This reverts commit fa4701e197.
This reverts commit 79daafc903.
There have been reports of this assert getting hit:
CalleeDIE && "Could not find DIE for call site entry origin
This makes the SectionLabel handling more resilient - specifically for
future PROPELLER work which will have more CU ranges (rather than just
one per function).
Ultimately it might be nice to make this more general/resilient to
arbitrary labels (rather than relying on the labels being created for CU
ranges & then being reused by ranges, loclists, and possibly other
addresses). It's possible that other (non-rnglist/loclist) uses of
addresses will need the addresses to be in SectionLabels earlier (eg:
move the CU.addRange to be done on function begin, rather than function
end, so during function emission they are already populated for other
use).
[this re-applies c0176916a4
with the correct commit message and phabricator link]
This addresses point 1 of PR44213.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44213
The DW_AT_LLVM_sysroot attribute is used for Clang module debug info,
to allow LLDB to import a Clang module from source. Currently it is
part of each DW_TAG_module, however, it is the same for all modules in
a compile unit. It is more efficient and less ambiguous to store it
once in the DW_TAG_compile_unit.
This should have no effect on DWARF consumers other than LLDB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71732
This is a purely cosmetic change that is NFC in terms of the binary
output. I bugs me that I called the attribute DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot
since the "i" is an artifact of GCC command line option syntax
(-isysroot is in the category of -i options) and doesn't carry any
useful information otherwise.
This attribute only appears in Clang module debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71722
This reverts D53469, which changed llvm's DWARF emission to emit
DW_AT_call_return_pc as a function-local offset. Such an encoding is not
compatible with post-link block re-ordering tools and isn't standards-
compliant.
In addition to reverting back to the original DW_AT_call_return_pc
encoding, teach lldb how to fix up DW_AT_call_return_pc when the address
comes from an object file pointed-to by a debug map. While doing this I
noticed that lldb's support for tail calls that cross a DSO/object file
boundary wasn't covered, so I added tests for that. This latter case
exercises the newly added return PC fixup.
The dsymutil changes in this patch were originally included in D49887:
the associated test should be sufficient to test DW_AT_call_return_pc
encoding purely on the llvm side.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72489
It isn't necessary to create DIEs for all of the declaration subprograms
in a CU's retainedTypes list. We can defer creating these subprograms
until we need to prepare a call site tag that refers to one.
This cleanup was mentioned in passing in D70350.
This allows a call site tag in CU A to reference a callee DIE in CU B
without resorting to creating an incomplete duplicate DIE for the callee
inside of CU A.
We already allow cross-CU references of subprogram declarations, so it
doesn't seem like definitions ought to be special.
This improves entry value evaluation and tail call frame synthesis in
the LTO setting. During LTO, it's common for cross-module inlining to
produce a call in some CU A where the callee resides in a different CU,
and there is no declaration subprogram for the callee anywhere. In this
case llvm would (unnecessarily, I think) emit an empty DW_TAG_subprogram
in order to fill in the call site tag. That empty 'definition' defeats
entry value evaluation etc., because the debugger can't figure out what
it means.
As a follow-up, maybe we could add a DWARF verifier check that a
DW_TAG_subprogram at least has a DW_AT_name attribute.
Update:
Reland with a fix to create a declaration DIE when the declaration is
missing from the CU's retainedTypes list. The declaration is left out
of the retainedTypes list in two cases:
1) Re-compiling pre-r266445 bitcode (in which declarations weren't added
to the retainedTypes list), and
2) Doing LTO function importing (which doesn't update the retainedTypes
list).
It's possible to handle (1) and (2) by modifying the retainedTypes list
(in AutoUpgrade, or in the LTO importing logic resp.), but I don't see
an advantage to doing it this way, as it would cause more DWARF to be
emitted compared to creating the declaration DIEs lazily.
Tested with a stage2 ThinLTO+RelWithDebInfo build of clang, and with a
ReleaseLTO-g build of the test suite.
rdar://46577651, rdar://57855316, rdar://57840415
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70350
Extends DWARF expression language to express locals/globals locations. (via
target-index operands atm) (possible variants are: non-virtual registers
or address spaces)
The WebAssemblyExplicitLocals can replace virtual registers to targertindex
operand type at the time when WebAssembly backend introduces
{get,set,tee}_local instead of corresponding virtual registers.
Reviewed By: aprantl, dschuff
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52634
Since the address pool doesn't get populated in this case (due to the
lack of inlining, no child DIEs are added to the CU - so no addresses
are needed for the DIEs themselves) until the range list is emitted - at
the time the attributes are added to the CU, the address pool is empty.
So check whether the address pool will be used for the range lists & add
an addr_base if that's the case.
Move these data structures closer together so their emission code can
eventually share more of its implementation.
Was an egregious bug (completely untested, evidently) where I hadn't
inverted a DWARFv5 test as needed, so it was doing the exact opposite of
what was required & thus tried to emit a DWARFv5 range list header in
DWARFv4.
Reapply 8e04896288 which was
reverted in a8154e5e0c.
Igor Kudrin