The ASRL/LSRL long shifts are generated from 64bit shifts. Once we have
them, it might turn out that enough of the 64bit result was not required
that we can use a smaller shift to perform the same result. As the
smaller shift can in general be folded in more way, such as into add
instructions in one of the test cases here, we can use the demand bit
analysis to prefer the smaller shifts where we can.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75371
Summary:
Instead of generating two i32 instructions for each load or store of a volatile
i64 value (two LDRs or STRs), now emit LDRD/STRD.
These improvements cover architectures implementing ARMv5TE or Thumb-2.
The code generation explicitly deviates from using the register-offset
variant of LDRD/STRD. In this variant, the register allocated to the
register-offset cannot be reused in any of the remaining operands. Such
restriction seems to be non-trivial to implement in LLVM, thus it is
left as a to-do.
Reviewers: dmgreen, efriedma, john.brawn, nickdesaulniers
Reviewed By: efriedma, nickdesaulniers
Subscribers: danielkiss, alanphipps, hans, nathanchance, nickdesaulniers, vvereschaka, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70072
Similar to VADDV and VADDLV that have been added recently, this adds
lowering and patterns for VMLAV, VMLAVA, VMLALV and VMLALVA. They
perform the same roles as the add's, just folding a mul into the same
instruction (and so taking two inputs). As such, they need to be lowered
in the same way as the types are often not legal.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74390
Following on from the extra VADDV lowering, this extends things to
handle VADDLV which allows summing values into a pair of i32 registers,
together treated as a i64. This needs to be done in DAGCombine too as
the types are otherwise illegal, which is a fairly simple addition on
top of the existing code.
There is also a VADDLVA instruction handled here, that adds the incoming
values from the two general purpose registers. As opposed to the
non-long version where we could just add patterns for add(x, VADDV), the
long version needs to handle this early before the i64 has being split
into too many pieces.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74224
On some targets, like SPARC, forming overflow ops is only profitable if
the math result is used: https://godbolt.org/z/DxSmdB
This patch adds a new MathUsed parameter to allow the targets
to make the decision and defaults to only allowing it
if the math result is used. That is the conservative choice.
This patch also updates AArch64ISelLowering, X86ISelLowering,
ARMISelLowering.h, SystemZISelLowering.h to allow forming overflow
ops if the math result is not used. On those targets using the
overflow intrinsic for the overflow check only generates better code.
Reviewers: nikic, RKSimon, lebedev.ri, spatel
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74722
We already make use of the VADDV vector reduction instruction for cases
where the input and the output start out at the same type. The MVE
instruction however will sum into an i32, so if we are summing a v16i8
into an i32, we can still use the same instructions. In terms of IR,
this looks like a sext of a legal type (v16i8) into a very illegal type
(v16i32) and a vecreduce.add of that into the result. This means we have
to catch the pattern early in a DAG combine, producing a target VADDVs/u
node, where the signedness is now important.
This is the first part, handling VADDV and VADDVA. There are also
VADDVL/VADDVLA instructions, which are interesting because they sum into
a 64bit value. And VMLAV and VMLALV, which are interesting because they
also do a multiply of two values. It may look a little odd in places as
a result.
On it's own this will probably not do very much, as the vectorizer will
not produce this IR yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74218
These can be lowered to code sequences using CMPFP and CMPFPE which then get
selected to VCMP and VCMPE. The implementation isn't fully correct, as the chain
operand isn't handled correctly, but resolving that looks like it would involve
changes around FPSCR-handling instructions and how the FPSCR is modelled.
The fp-intrinsics test was already testing some of this but as the entire test
was being XFAILed it wasn't noticed. Un-XFAIL the test and instead leave the
cases where we aren't generating the right instruction sequences as FIXME.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73194
Summary:
In big-endian MVE, the simple vector load/store instructions (i.e.
both contiguous and non-widening) don't all store the bytes of a
register to memory in the same order: it matters whether you did a
VSTRB.8, VSTRH.16 or VSTRW.32. Put another way, the in-register
formats of different vector types relate to each other in a different
way from the in-memory formats.
So, if you want to 'bitcast' or 'reinterpret' one vector type as
another, you have to carefully specify which you mean: did you want to
reinterpret the //register// format of one type as that of the other,
or the //memory// format?
The ACLE `vreinterpretq` intrinsics are specified to reinterpret the
register format. But I had implemented them as LLVM IR bitcast, which
is specified for all types as a reinterpretation of the memory format.
So a `vreinterpretq` intrinsic, applied to values already in registers,
would code-generate incorrectly if compiled big-endian: instead of
emitting no code, it would emit a `vrev`.
To fix this, I've introduced a new IR intrinsic to perform a
register-format reinterpretation: `@llvm.arm.mve.vreinterpretq`. It's
implemented by a trivial isel pattern that expects the input in an
MQPR register, and just returns it unchanged.
In the clang codegen, I only emit this new intrinsic where it's
actually needed: I prefer a bitcast wherever it will have the right
effect, because LLVM understands bitcasts better. So we still generate
bitcasts in little-endian mode, and even in big-endian when you're
casting between two vector types with the same lane size.
For testing, I've moved all the codegen tests of vreinterpretq out
into their own file, so that they can have a different set of RUN
lines to check both big- and little-endian.
Reviewers: dmgreen, MarkMurrayARM, miyuki, ostannard
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73786
Summary: This is a first step before changing the types to llvm::Align and introduce functions to ease client code.
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jsji, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73785
Only PPC seems to be using it, and only checks some simple cases and
doesn't distinguish between FP. Just switch to using LLT to simplify
use from GlobalISel.
Summary:
Instead of generating two i32 instructions for each load or store of a volatile
i64 value (two LDRs or STRs), now emit LDRD/STRD.
These improvements cover architectures implementing ARMv5TE or Thumb-2.
Reviewers: dmgreen, efriedma, john.brawn, nickdesaulniers
Reviewed By: efriedma, nickdesaulniers
Subscribers: nickdesaulniers, vvereschaka, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70072
Summary:
Instead of generating two i32 instructions for each load or store of a volatile
i64 value (two LDRs or STRs), now emit LDRD/STRD.
These improvements cover architectures implementing ARMv5TE or Thumb-2.
Reviewers: dmgreen, efriedma, john.brawn
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70072
Now that we have the intrinsics, we can add VLD2/4 and VST2/4 lowering
for MVE. This works the same way as Neon, recognising the load/shuffles
combination and converting them into intrinsics in a pre-isel pass,
which just calls getMaxSupportedInterleaveFactor, lowerInterleavedLoad
and lowerInterleavedStore.
The main difference to Neon is that we do not have a VLD3 instruction.
Otherwise most of the code works very similarly, with just some minor
differences in the form of the intrinsics to work around. VLD3 is
disabled by making isLegalInterleavedAccessType return false for those
cases.
We may need some other future adjustments, such as VLD4 take up half the
available registers so should maybe cost more. This patch should get the
basics in though.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69392
AMDGPU needs to know the FP mode for the function to answer this
correctly when this is removed from the subtarget.
AArch64 had to make this more complicated by using this from an IR
hook, so add an IR typed overload.
The Arm backend will usually return false for isFMAFasterThanFMulAndFAdd,
where both the fused VFMA.f32 and a non-fused VMLA.f32 are usually
available for scalar code. For MVE we don't have the non-fused version
though. It makes more sense for isFMAFasterThanFMulAndFAdd to return
true, allowing us to simplify some of the existing ISel patterns.
The tests here are that non of the existing tests failed, and so we are
still selecting VFMA and VFMS. The one test that changed shows we can
now select from fast math flags, as opposed to just relying on the
isFMADLegalForFAddFSub option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69115
Lower the target independent signed saturating intrinsics to qadd8 and qadd16.
This custom lowers them from a sadd_sat, catching the node early before it is
promoted. It also adds a QADD8b and QADD16b node to mean the bottom "lane" of a
qadd8/qadd16, so that we can call demand bits on it to show that it does not
use the upper bits.
Also handles QSUB8 and QSUB16.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68974
llvm-svn: 375402
The adds both VMOVNt and VMOVNb instruction selection from the appropriate
shuffles. We detect shuffle masks of the form:
0, N, 2, N+2, 4, N+4, ...
or
0, N+1, 2, N+3, 4, N+5, ...
ISel will also try the opposite patterns, with inputs reversed. These are
selected to VMOVNt and VMOVNb respectively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68283
llvm-svn: 374781
Based on the discussion in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-October/135574.html, the
conclusion was reached that the ARM backend should produce vcmp instead
of vcmpe instructions by default, i.e. not be producing an Invalid
Operation exception when either arguments in a floating point compare
are quiet NaNs.
In the future, after constrained floating point intrinsics for floating
point compare have been introduced, vcmpe instructions probably should
be produced for those intrinsics - depending on the exact semantics
they'll be defined to have.
This patch logically consists of the following parts:
- Revert http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=294945&view=rev and
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=294968&view=rev, which
implemented fine-tuning for when to produce vcmpe (i.e. not do it for
equality comparisons). The complexity introduced by those patches
isn't needed anymore if we just always produce vcmp instead. Maybe
these patches need to be reintroduced again once support is needed to
map potential LLVM-IR constrained floating point compare intrinsics to
the ARM instruction set.
- Simply select vcmp, instead of vcmpe, see simple changes in
lib/Target/ARM/ARMInstrVFP.td
- Adapt lots of tests that tested for vcmpe (instead of vcmp). For all
of these test, the intent of what is tested for isn't related to
whether the vcmp should produce an Invalid Operation exception or not.
Fixes PR43374.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68463
llvm-svn: 374025
Replace with the MachineFunction. X86 is the only user, and only uses
it for the function. This removes one obstacle from using this in
GlobalISel. The other is the more tolerable EVT argument.
The X86 use of the function seems questionable to me. It checks hasFP,
before frame lowering.
llvm-svn: 373292
Arm 8.1-M adds a number of related CSEL instructions, including CSINC, CSNEG and CSINV. These choose between two values given the content in CPSR and a condition, performing an increment, negation or inverse of the false value.
This adds some selection for them, either from constant values or patterns. It does not include CSEL directly, which is currently not always making code better. It is still useful, but we will have to check more carefully where it should and shouldn't be used.
Code by Ranjeet Singh and Simon Tatham, with some modifications from me.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66483
llvm-svn: 370739
Push LR register before calling __gnu_mcount_nc as it expects the value of LR register to be the top value of
the stack on ARM32.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65019
llvm-svn: 369147
We don't yet know how to generate these instructions for MVE. And in the case
of VLD3, we don't even have the instruction. For the moment don't tell the
vectoriser that we have VLD4, just to end up serialising the results.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66009
llvm-svn: 369101
This is extremely specific, but saves three instructions when it's
legal. I don't think the code can be usefully generalized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65351
llvm-svn: 367492
This removes the VCEQ/VCNE/VCGE/VCEQZ/etc nodes, just using two called VCMP and
VCMPZ with an extra operand as the condition code. I believe this will make
some combines simpler, allowing us to just look at these codes and not the
operands. It also helps fill in a missing VCGTUZ MVE selection without adding
extra nodes for it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65072
llvm-svn: 366934
This adds a DeMorgan combine for OR's of compares to turn them into AND's,
helping prevent them from going into and out of gpr registers. It also fills in
the VCLE and VCLT nodes that MVE can select, allowing it to invert more
compares.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65059
llvm-svn: 366920
This adds support code for building and shuffling i1 predicate registers. It
generally uses two basic principles, either converting the predicate into an
scalar (through a PREDICATE_CAST) and doing scalar operations on it there, or
by converting the register to an full vector register and back.
Some of the code here is a not super efficient but will hopefully cover most
cases of moving i1 vectors around and can be improved in subsequent patches.
Some code by David Sherwood.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65052
llvm-svn: 366890
This adds the very basics for MVE vector predication, adding integer VCMP and
VSEL instruction support. This is done through predicate registers (MVT::v16i1,
MVT::v8i1, MVT::v4i1), but otherwise using same mechanics as NEON to custom
lower setcc's through ARMISD::VCXX nodes (VCEQ, VCGT, VCEQZ, etc).
An extra VCNE was added, as this can be handled sensibly by MVE's expanded
number of VCMP condition codes. (There are also VCLE and VCLT which are added
later).
VPSEL is also added here, simply selecting on the vselect.
Original code by David Sherwood.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65051
llvm-svn: 366885
While lowering test.set.loop.iterations, it wasn't checked how the
brcond was using the result and so the wls could branch to the loop
preheader instead of not entering it. The same was true for
loop.decrement.reg.
So brcond and br_cc and now lowered manually when using the hwloop
intrinsics. During this we now check whether the result has been
negated and whether we're using SETEQ or SETNE and 0 or 1. We can
then figure out which basic block the WLS and LE should be targeting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64616
llvm-svn: 366809
This adjusts the way that we lower NEON shifts to use a DAG target node, not
via a neon intrinsic. This is useful for handling MVE shifts operations in the
same the way. It also renames some of the immediate shift nodes for
consistency, and moves some of the processing of immediate shifts into
LowerShift allowing it to capture more cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64426
llvm-svn: 366051
This adds some handling for VMOVimm, using the same method that NEON uses. We
create VMOVIMM/VMVNIMM/VMOVFPIMM nodes based on the immediate, and select them
using the now renamed ARMvmovImm/etc. There is also an extra 64bit immediate
mode that I have not yet added here.
Code by David Sherwood
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63884
llvm-svn: 365178
Summary:
This is the backend part of [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42457 | PR42457 ]].
In middle-end, we'd want to prefer the form with two adds - D63992,
but as this diff shows, not every target will prefer that pattern.
Out of 4 targets for which i added tests all seem to be ok with inc-of-add for scalars,
but only X86 prefer that same pattern for vectors.
Here i'm adding a new TLI hook, always defaulting to the inc-of-add,
but adding AArch64,ARM,PowerPC overrides to prefer inc-of-add only for scalars.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, efriedma, t.p.northover, hfinkel
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: nemanjai, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, kbarton, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64090
llvm-svn: 365010
Passing a vector type over the soft-float ABI involves it being split
into four GPRs, so the first thing that has to happen at the start of
the function is to recombine those into a vector register. The ABI
types all vectors as v2f64, so we need to support BUILD_VECTOR for
that type, which I do in this patch by allowing it to be expanded in
terms of INSERT_VECTOR_ELT, and writing an ISel pattern for that in
turn. Similarly, I provide a rule for EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT so that a
returned vector can be marshalled back into GPRs.
While I'm here, I've also added ISD::UNDEF to the list of operations
we turn back on in `setAllExpand`, because I noticed that otherwise it
gets expanded into a BUILD_VECTOR with explicit zero inputs, leading
to pointless machine instructions to zero out a vector register that's
about to have every lane overwritten of in any case.
Reviewers: dmgreen, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63937
llvm-svn: 364910
If you compile with `-mattr=+mve` (enabling integer MVE instructions
but not floating-point ones), then the scalar FP //registers// exist
and it's legal to move things in and out of them, load and store them,
but it's not legal to do arithmetic on them.
In D60708, the calls to `addRegisterClass` in ARMISelLowering that
enable use of the scalar FP registers became conditionalised on
`Subtarget->hasFPRegs()` instead of `Subtarget->hasVFP2Base()`, so
that loads, stores and moves of those registers would work. But I
didn't realise that that would also enable all the operations on those
types by default.
Now, if the target doesn't have basic VFP, we follow up those
`addRegisterClass` calls by turning back off all the nontrivial
operations you can perform on f32 and f64. That causes several
knock-on failures, which are fixed by allowing the `VMOVDcc` and
`VMOVScc` instructions to be selected even if all you have is
`HasFPRegs`, and adjusting several checks for 'is this a double in a
single-precision-only world?' to the more general 'is this any FP type
we can't do arithmetic on?'. Between those, the whole of the
`float-ops.ll` and `fp16-instructions.ll` tests can now run in
MVE-without-FP mode and generate correct-looking code.
One odd side effect is that I had to relax the check lines in that
test so that they permit test functions like `add_f` to be generated
as tailcalls to software FP library functions, instead of ordinary
calls. Doing that is entirely legal, but the mystery is why this is
the first RUN line that's needed the relaxation: on the usual kind of
non-FP target, no tailcalls ever seem to be generated. Going by the
llc messages, I think `SoftenFloatResult` must be perturbing the code
generation in some way, but that's as much as I can guess.
Reviewers: dmgreen, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63938
llvm-svn: 364909
Backend changes to enable WLS/LE low-overhead loops for armv8.1-m:
1) Use TTI to communicate to the HardwareLoop pass that we should try
to generate intrinsics that guard the loop entry, as well as setting
the loop trip count.
2) Lower the BRCOND that uses said intrinsic to an Arm specific node:
ARMWLS.
3) ISelDAGToDAG the node to a new pseudo instruction:
t2WhileLoopStart.
4) Add support in ArmLowOverheadLoops to handle the new pseudo
instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63816
llvm-svn: 364733
MVE adds the lsll, lsrl and asrl instructions, which perform a shift on a 64 bit value separated into two 32 bit registers.
The Expand64BitShift function is modified to accept ISD::SHL, ISD::SRL and ISD::SRA and convert it into the appropriate opcode in ARMISD. An SHL is converted into an lsll, an SRL is converted into an lsrl for the immediate form and a negation and lsll for the register form, and SRA is converted into an asrl.
test/CodeGen/ARM/shift_parts.ll is added to test the logic of emitting these instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63430
llvm-svn: 364654
MVE has instructions to widen as it loads, and narrow as it stores. This adds
the required patterns and legalisation to make them work including specifying
that they are legal, patterns to select them and test changes.
Patch by David Sherwood.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63839
llvm-svn: 364636
This patch adds necessary shuffle vector and buildvector support for ARM MVE.
It essentially adds support for VDUP, VREVs and some VMOVs, which are often
required by other code (like upcoming patches).
This mostly uses the same code from Neon that already generated
NEONvdup/NEONvduplane/NEONvrev's. These have been renamed to ARMvdup/etc and
moved to ARMInstrInfo as they are common to both architectures. Most of the
selection code seems to be applicable to both, but NEON does have some more
instructions making some parts specific.
Most code originally by David Sherwood.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63567
llvm-svn: 364626
This provides the low-level support to start using MVE vector types in
LLVM IR, loading and storing them, passing them to __asm__ statements
containing hand-written MVE vector instructions, and *if* you have the
hard-float ABI turned on, using them as function parameters.
(In the soft-float ABI, vector types are passed in integer registers,
and combining all those 32-bit integers into a q-reg requires support
for selection DAG nodes like insert_vector_elt and build_vector which
aren't implemented yet for MVE. In fact I've also had to add
`arm_aapcs_vfpcc` to a couple of existing tests to avoid that
problem.)
Specifically, this commit adds support for:
* spills, reloads and register moves for MVE vector registers
* ditto for the VPT predication mask that lives in VPR.P0
* make all the MVE vector types legal in ISel, and provide selection
DAG patterns for BITCAST, LOAD and STORE
* make loads and stores of scalar FP types conditional on
`hasFPRegs()` rather than `hasVFP2Base()`. As a result a few
existing tests needed their llc command lines updating to use
`-mattr=-fpregs` as their method of turning off all hardware FP
support.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60708
llvm-svn: 364329
As discussed on D62910, we need to check whether particular types of memory access are allowed, not just their alignment/address-space.
This NFC patch adds a MachineMemOperand::Flags argument to allowsMemoryAccess and allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses, and wires up calls to pass the relevant flags to them.
If people are happy with this approach I can then update X86TargetLowering::allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses to handle misaligned NT load/stores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63075
llvm-svn: 363179
Summary:
- pr42062
When compiling for MinSize,
ARMTargetLowering::LowerCall decides to indirect
multiple calls to a same function. However,
it disconsiders the limitation that thumb1
indirect calls require the callee to be in a
register from r0 to r3 (llvm limiation).
If all those registers are used by arguments, the
compiler dies with "error: run out of registers
during register allocation".
This patch tells the function
IsEligibleForTailCallOptimization if we intend to
perform indirect calls, as to avoid tail call
optimization.
Reviewers: dmgreen, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62683
llvm-svn: 362366
Details: To make instruction selection really divergence driven it is necessary to assign
the correct register classes to the cross block values beforehand. For the divergent targets
same value type requires different register classes dependent on the value divergence.
Reviewers: rampitec, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59990
This commit was reverted because of the build failure.
The reason was mlformed patch.
Build failure fixed.
llvm-svn: 361741
Details: To make instruction selection really divergence driven it is necessary to assign
the correct register classes to the cross block values beforehand. For the divergent targets
same value type requires different register classes dependent on the value divergence.
Reviewers: rampitec, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59990
llvm-svn: 361644
The MachineFunction wasn't used in getOptimalMemOpType, but more importantly,
this allows reuse of findOptimalMemOpLowering that is calling getOptimalMemOpType.
This is the groundwork for the changes in D59766 and D59787, that allows
implementation of TTI::getMemcpyCost.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59785
llvm-svn: 359537
As discussed on PR41359, this patch renames the pair of shift-mask target feature functions to make their purposes more obvious.
shouldFoldShiftPairToMask -> shouldFoldConstantShiftPairToMask
preferShiftsToClearExtremeBits -> shouldFoldMaskToVariableShiftPair
llvm-svn: 358526
These changes are related to PR37743 and include:
SelectionDAGBuilder::visitSelect handles the unary SelectPatternFlavor::SPF_ABS case to build ABS node.
Delete the redundant recognizer of the integer ABS pattern from the DAGCombiner.
Add promoting the integer ABS node in the LegalizeIntegerType.
Expand-based legalization of integer result for the ABS nodes.
Expand-based legalization of ABS vector operations.
Add some integer abs testcases for different typesizes for Thumb arch
Add the custom ABS expanding and change the SAD pattern recognizer for X86 arch: The i64 result of the ABS is expanded to:
tmp = (SRA, Hi, 31)
Lo = (UADDO tmp, Lo)
Hi = (XOR tmp, (ADDCARRY tmp, hi, Lo:1))
Lo = (XOR tmp, Lo)
The "detectZextAbsDiff" function is changed for the recognition of pattern with the ABS node. Given a ABS node, detect the following pattern:
(ABS (SUB (ZERO_EXTEND a), (ZERO_EXTEND b))).
Change integer abs testcases for codegen with the ABS node support for AArch64.
Indicate that the ABS is legal for the i64 type when the NEON is supported.
Change the integer abs testcases to show changing of codegen.
Add combine and legalization of ABS nodes for Thumb arch.
Extend 'matchSelectPattern' to recognize the ABS patterns with ICMP_SGE condition.
For discussion, see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37743
Patch by: @ikulagin (Ivan Kulagin)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49837
llvm-svn: 356468
This allows better code size for aarch64 floating point materialization
in a future patch.
Reviewers: evandro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58690
llvm-svn: 356389
This uses the infrastructure added in rL353152 to sink zext and sexts to
sub/add users, to enable vsubl/vaddl generation when NEON is available.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40025.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover, samparker, efriedma
Reviewed By: samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58063
llvm-svn: 355460
In many places in the backend, we like to know whether we're
optimising for code size and this is performed by checking the
current machine function attributes. A subtarget is created on a
per-function basis, so it's possible to know when we're compiling for
code size on construction so record this in the new object.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57812
llvm-svn: 353501
And instead just generate a libcall. My motivating example on ARM was a simple:
shl i64 %A, %B
for which the code bloat is quite significant. For other targets that also
accept __int128/i128 such as AArch64 and X86, it is also beneficial for these
cases to generate a libcall when optimising for minsize. On these 64-bit targets,
the 64-bits shifts are of course unaffected because the SHIFT/SHIFT_PARTS
lowering operation action is not set to custom/expand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57386
llvm-svn: 352736
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This saves materializing the immediate. The additional forms are less
common (they don't usually show up for bitfield insert/extract), but
they're still relevant.
I had to add a new target hook to prevent DAGCombine from reversing the
transform. That isn't the only possible way to solve the conflict, but
it seems straightforward enough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55630
llvm-svn: 349857
This has two positive effects. First, using a custom node prevents
recombination leading to an infinite loop since the output DAG is notionally a
little more complex than the input one. Using a flag-setting instruction also
allows the subtraction to be folded with the related comparison more easily.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53190
llvm-svn: 348122
Don't expand SDIV with an immediate that is a power of 2 if we optimise for
minimum code size. For example:
sdiv %1, i32 4
gets expanded to a sequence of 3 instructions, but this is suboptimal for
minimum code size so instead we just generate a MOV and a SDIV if integer
division is supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54546
llvm-svn: 347965
This involves changing the shouldExpandAtomicCmpXchgInIR interface, but I have
updated the in-tree backends using this hook (ARM, AArch64, Hexagon) so they
will see no functional change. Previously this hook returned bool, but it now
returns AtomicExpansionKind.
This hook allows targets to select how a given cmpxchg is to be expanded.
D48131 uses this to expand part-word cmpxchg to a target-specific intrinsic.
See my associated RFC for more info on the motivation for this change
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-June/123993.html>.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48130
llvm-svn: 342550
The Technical Reference Manuals for these two CPUs state that branching
to an unaligned 32-bit instruction incurs an extra pipeline reload
penalty. That's bad.
This also enables the optimization at -Os since it costs on average one
byte per loop in return for 1 cycle per iteration, which is pretty good
going.
llvm-svn: 342127
It has essentially the same benefit it has on 64-bit ARM: it
substantially reduces the number of constants used by large GEP
operations. Seems to be generally helpful across a few different
codebases I've tried.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51462
llvm-svn: 341136
Intentionally excluding nodes from the DAGCombine worklist is likely to
lead to weird optimizations and infinite loops, so it's generally a bad
idea.
To avoid the infinite loops, fix DAGCombine to use the
isDesirableToCommuteWithShift target hook before performing the
transforms in question, and implement the target hook in the ARM backend
disable the transforms in question.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38530 . (I don't have a
reduced testcase for that bug. But we should have sufficient test
coverage for PerformSHLSimplify given that we're not playing weird
tricks with the worklist. I can try to bugpoint it if necessary,
though.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50667
llvm-svn: 339734
LLVM normally prefers to minimize the number of bits set in an AND
immediate, but that doesn't always match the available ARM instructions.
In Thumb1 mode, prefer uxtb or uxth where possible; otherwise, prefer
a two-instruction sequence movs+ands or movs+bics.
Some potential improvements outlined in
ARMTargetLowering::targetShrinkDemandedConstant, but seems to work
pretty well already.
The ARMISelDAGToDAG fix ensures we don't generate an invalid UBFX
instruction due to a larger-than-expected mask. (It's orthogonal, in
some sense, but as far as I can tell it's either impossible or nearly
impossible to reproduce the bug without this change.)
According to my testing, this seems to consistently improve codesize by
a small amount by forming bic more often for ISD::AND with an immediate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50030
llvm-svn: 339472
By default LLVM thinks very large vectors get aligned to their size when
passed across functions. Unfortunately no-one told the ARM backend so it
doesn't trigger stack realignment and so accesses can cause the usual
misalignment issues (e.g. a data abort).
This changes the ABI alignment to the stack alignment, which in practice
(and as a bonus) also coincides with the alignment "natural" vectors get.
llvm-svn: 331451
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290
llvm-svn: 331272
Currently EVT is in the IR layer only because of Function.cpp needing a very small piece of the functionality of EVT::getEVTString(). The rest of EVT is used in codegen making CodeGen a better place for it.
The previous code converted a Type* to EVT and then called getEVTString. This was only expected to handle the primitive types from Type*. Since there only a few primitive types, we can just print them as strings directly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45017
llvm-svn: 328806
This is used by llvm tblgen as well as by LLVM Targets, so the only
common place is Support for now. (maybe we need another target for these
sorts of things - but for now I'm at least making them correct & we can
make them better if/when people have strong feelings)
llvm-svn: 328395
When targeting execute-only and fp-armv8, float constants in a compare
resulted in instruction selection failures. This is now fixed by using
vmov.f32 where possible, otherwise the floating point constant is
lowered into a integer constant that is moved into a floating point
register.
This patch also restores using fpcmp with immediate 0 under fp-armv8.
Change-Id: Ie87229706f4ed879a0c0cf66631b6047ed6c6443
llvm-svn: 328313
This adds most of the FP16 codegen support, but these areas need further work:
- FP16 literals and immediates are not properly supported yet (e.g. literal
pool needs work),
- Instructions that are generated from intrinsics (e.g. vabs) haven't been
added.
This will be addressed in follow-up patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42849
llvm-svn: 324321
Half-precision arguments and return values are passed as if it were an int or
float for ARM. This results in truncates and bitcasts to/from i16 and f16
values, which are legalized very early to stack stores/loads. When FullFP16 is
enabled, we want to avoid codegen for these bitcasts as it is unnecessary and
inefficient.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42580
llvm-svn: 323861
This patch teaches the Arm back-end to generate the SMMULR, SMMLAR and SMMLSR
instructions from equivalent IR patterns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41775
llvm-svn: 322361
The AArch64 backend contains code to optimize {s,u}{add,sub}.with.overflow during SelectionDAG. This commit ports that code to the ARM backend.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35635
llvm-svn: 321224
Summary:
Implement lower of unsigned saturation on an interval [0, k] where k + 1 is a power of two using USAT instruction in a similar way to how [~k, k] is lowered using SSAT on ARM models that supports it.
Patch by Marten Svanfeldt
Reviewers: t.p.northover, pbarrio, eastig, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar, fhahn
Reviewed By: fhahn
Subscribers: fhahn, aemerson, javed.absar, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41348
llvm-svn: 321164
This is a preparatory step for D34515.
This change:
- makes nodes ISD::ADDCARRY and ISD::SUBCARRY legal for i32
- lowering is done by first converting the boolean value into the carry flag
using (_, C) ← (ARMISD::ADDC R, -1) and converted back to an integer value
using (R, _) ← (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C). An ARMISD::ADDE between the two
operations does the actual addition.
- for subtraction, given that ISD::SUBCARRY second result is actually a
borrow, we need to invert the value of the second operand and result before
and after using ARMISD::SUBE. We need to invert the carry result of
ARMISD::SUBE to preserve the semantics.
- given that the generic combiner may lower ISD::ADDCARRY and
ISD::SUBCARRYinto ISD::UADDO and ISD::USUBO we need to update their lowering
as well otherwise i64 operations now would require branches. This implies
updating the corresponding test for unsigned.
- add new combiner to remove the redundant conversions from/to carry flags
to/from boolean values (ARMISD::ADDC (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C), -1) → C
- fixes PR34045
- fixes PR34564
- fixes PR35103
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35192
llvm-svn: 320355
Partially reverting enabling of post-legalization store merge
(r319036) for just ARM backend as it is causing incorrect code
in some Thumb2 cases.
llvm-svn: 319331
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
This is a preparatory step for D34515.
This change:
- makes nodes ISD::ADDCARRY and ISD::SUBCARRY legal for i32
- lowering is done by first converting the boolean value into the carry flag
using (_, C) ← (ARMISD::ADDC R, -1) and converted back to an integer value
using (R, _) ← (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C). An ARMISD::ADDE between the two
operations does the actual addition.
- for subtraction, given that ISD::SUBCARRY second result is actually a
borrow, we need to invert the value of the second operand and result before
and after using ARMISD::SUBE. We need to invert the carry result of
ARMISD::SUBE to preserve the semantics.
- given that the generic combiner may lower ISD::ADDCARRY and
ISD::SUBCARRYinto ISD::UADDO and ISD::USUBO we need to update their lowering
as well otherwise i64 operations now would require branches. This implies
updating the corresponding test for unsigned.
- add new combiner to remove the redundant conversions from/to carry flags
to/from boolean values (ARMISD::ADDC (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C), -1) → C
- fixes PR34045
- fixes PR34564
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35192
llvm-svn: 313618
Implement the isTruncateFree hooks, lifted from AArch64, that are
used by TargetTransformInfo. This allows simplifycfg to reduce the
test case into a single basic block.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37516
llvm-svn: 313533
This was causing PR34045 to fire again.
> This is a preparatory step for D34515 and also is being recommitted as its
> first version caused PR34045.
>
> This change:
> - makes nodes ISD::ADDCARRY and ISD::SUBCARRY legal for i32
> - lowering is done by first converting the boolean value into the carry flag
> using (_, C) ← (ARMISD::ADDC R, -1) and converted back to an integer value
> using (R, _) ← (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C). An ARMISD::ADDE between the two
> operations does the actual addition.
> - for subtraction, given that ISD::SUBCARRY second result is actually a
> borrow, we need to invert the value of the second operand and result before
> and after using ARMISD::SUBE. We need to invert the carry result of
> ARMISD::SUBE to preserve the semantics.
> - given that the generic combiner may lower ISD::ADDCARRY and
> ISD::SUBCARRYinto ISD::UADDO and ISD::USUBO we need to update their lowering
> as well otherwise i64 operations now would require branches. This implies
> updating the corresponding test for unsigned.
> - add new combiner to remove the redundant conversions from/to carry flags
> to/from boolean values (ARMISD::ADDC (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C), -1) → C
> - fixes PR34045
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35192
Also revert follow-up r313010:
> [ARM] Fix typo when creating ISD::SUB nodes
>
> In D35192, I accidentally introduced a typo when creating ISD::SUB nodes,
> giving them two values instead of one.
>
> This fails when the merge_values combiner finds one of these nodes.
>
> This change fixes PR34564.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37690
llvm-svn: 313044
This is a preparatory step for D34515 and also is being recommitted as its
first version caused PR34045.
This change:
- makes nodes ISD::ADDCARRY and ISD::SUBCARRY legal for i32
- lowering is done by first converting the boolean value into the carry flag
using (_, C) ← (ARMISD::ADDC R, -1) and converted back to an integer value
using (R, _) ← (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C). An ARMISD::ADDE between the two
operations does the actual addition.
- for subtraction, given that ISD::SUBCARRY second result is actually a
borrow, we need to invert the value of the second operand and result before
and after using ARMISD::SUBE. We need to invert the carry result of
ARMISD::SUBE to preserve the semantics.
- given that the generic combiner may lower ISD::ADDCARRY and
ISD::SUBCARRYinto ISD::UADDO and ISD::USUBO we need to update their lowering
as well otherwise i64 operations now would require branches. This implies
updating the corresponding test for unsigned.
- add new combiner to remove the redundant conversions from/to carry flags
to/from boolean values (ARMISD::ADDC (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C), -1) → C
- fixes PR34045
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35192
llvm-svn: 313009
It caused PR34564.
> This is a preparatory step for D34515 and also is being recommitted as its
> first version caused PR34045.
>
> This change:
> - makes nodes ISD::ADDCARRY and ISD::SUBCARRY legal for i32
> - lowering is done by first converting the boolean value into the carry flag
> using (_, C) ← (ARMISD::ADDC R, -1) and converted back to an integer value
> using (R, _) ← (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C). An ARMISD::ADDE between the two
> operations does the actual addition.
> - for subtraction, given that ISD::SUBCARRY second result is actually a
> borrow, we need to invert the value of the second operand and result before
> and after using ARMISD::SUBE. We need to invert the carry result of
> ARMISD::SUBE to preserve the semantics.
> - given that the generic combiner may lower ISD::ADDCARRY and
> ISD::SUBCARRYinto ISD::UADDO and ISD::USUBO we need to update their lowering
> as well otherwise i64 operations now would require branches. This implies
> updating the corresponding test for unsigned.
> - add new combiner to remove the redundant conversions from/to carry flags
> to/from boolean values (ARMISD::ADDC (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C), -1) → C
> - fixes PR34045
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35192
llvm-svn: 312980
This is a preparatory step for D34515 and also is being recommitted as its
first version caused PR34045.
This change:
- makes nodes ISD::ADDCARRY and ISD::SUBCARRY legal for i32
- lowering is done by first converting the boolean value into the carry flag
using (_, C) ← (ARMISD::ADDC R, -1) and converted back to an integer value
using (R, _) ← (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C). An ARMISD::ADDE between the two
operations does the actual addition.
- for subtraction, given that ISD::SUBCARRY second result is actually a
borrow, we need to invert the value of the second operand and result before
and after using ARMISD::SUBE. We need to invert the carry result of
ARMISD::SUBE to preserve the semantics.
- given that the generic combiner may lower ISD::ADDCARRY and
ISD::SUBCARRYinto ISD::UADDO and ISD::USUBO we need to update their lowering
as well otherwise i64 operations now would require branches. This implies
updating the corresponding test for unsigned.
- add new combiner to remove the redundant conversions from/to carry flags
to/from boolean values (ARMISD::ADDC (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C), -1) → C
- fixes PR34045
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35192
llvm-svn: 312898
ARMTargetLowering::isLegalAddressingMode can accept illegal addressing modes
for the Thumb1 target. This causes generation of redundant code and affects
performance.
This fixes PR34106: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34106
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36467
llvm-svn: 311649
Summary:
Without the SrcVT its hard to know what is really being asked for. For example if your target has 128, 256, and 512 bit vectors. Maybe extracting 128 from 256 is cheap, but maybe extracting 128 from 512 is not.
For x86 we do support extracting a quarter of a 512-bit register. But for i1 vectors we don't have isel patterns for extracting arbitrary pieces. So we need this to have a correct implementation of isExtractSubvectorCheap for mask vectors.
Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, efriedma
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36649
llvm-svn: 310793
This patch:
- makes nodes ISD::ADDCARRY and ISD::SUBCARRY legal for i32
- lowering is done by first converting the boolean value into the carry flag
using (_, C) <- (ARMISD::ADDC R, -1) and converted back to an integer value
using (R, _) <- (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C). An ARMISD::ADDE between the two
operations does the actual addition.
- for subtraction, given that ISD::SUBCARRY second result is actually a
borrow, we need to invert the value of the second operand and result before
and after using ARMISD::SUBE. We need to invert the carry result of
ARMISD::SUBE to preserve the semantics.
- given that the generic combiner may lower ISD::ADDCARRY and
ISD::SUBCARRY into ISD::UADDO and ISD::USUBO we need to update their lowering
as well otherwise i64 operations now would require branches. This implies
updating the corresponding test for unsigned.
- add new combiner to remove the redundant conversions from/to carry flags
to/from boolean values (ARMISD::ADDC (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C), -1) -> C
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35192
llvm-svn: 309923
Changing mask argument type from const SmallVectorImpl<int>& to
ArrayRef<int>.
This came up in D35700 where a mask is received as an ArrayRef<int> and
we want to pass it to TargetLowering::isShuffleMaskLegal().
Also saves a few lines of code.
llvm-svn: 309085
David Green