This adds a few more unpredicated intrinsics to sink splats to, in order
to create more qr instruction variants. Notably this includes
saddsat/uaddsat but also some of the unpredicated mve intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110333
As we have to split blocks, we may be left in an invalid loop state
after a WLS is reverted to a DLS. Instead remember the WLS that could
not be fixed and revert them after finishing processing all other loops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110567
The ARMLowOverheadLoops pass recalculates VPT block masks when it
converts VCMP's inside VPT blocks into VPT's. The function to do so
doesn't seem to handle debug info though, leading to invalid block
creation or asserts at compile time. Make sure the function skips any
debug info between the MVE instructions it inspects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110564
We align non-fallthrough branches under Cortex-M at O3 to lead to fewer
instruction fetches. This improves that for the block after a LE or
LETP. These blocks will still have terminating branches until the
LowOverheadLoops pass is run (as they are not handled by analyzeBranch,
the branch is not removed until later), so canFallThrough will return
false. These extra branches will eventually be removed, leaving a
fallthrough, so treat them as such and don't add unnecessary alignments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107810
Given:
- A jump table
- Which jumps to the next block
- The next block ends in a WLS
- Where the WLS conditionally jumps to block earlier in the program.
The Arm block placement pass would attempt to move the block containing
the WLS earlier, as the WLS instruction can only branch forward. In
doing so it would add a branch from the jumptable block to the WLS
block, thinking it previously fell-through.
This in itself would be fine, if a little inefficient, but the constant
island pass expects all instructions after a jump-table branch to have
been removed by analyzeBranch. So it gets confused and can assign the
same labels to multiple jump table blocks.
I've changed the condition to the same as used in analyzeBranch.
This simplifies the API and addresses a FIXME in
TwoAddressInstructionPass::convertInstTo3Addr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110229
Based off a discussion on D110100, we should be avoiding default CostKinds whenever possible.
This initial patch removes them from the 'inner' target implementation callbacks - these should only be used by the main TTI calls, so this should guarantee that we don't cause changes in CostKind by missing it in an inner call. This exposed a few missing arguments in getGEPCost and reduction cost calls that I've cleaned up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110242
This allows VMOVL in tail predicated loops so long as the the vector
size the VMOVL is extending into is less than or equal to the size of
the VCTP in the tail predicated loop. These cases represent a
sign-extend-inreg (or zero-extend-inreg), which needn't block tail
predication as in https://godbolt.org/z/hdTsEbx8Y.
For this a vecsize has been added to the TSFlag bits of MVE
instructions, which stores the size of the elements that the MVE
instruction operates on. In the case of multiple size (such as a
MVE_VMOVLs8bh that extends from i8 to i16, the largest size was be
chosen). The sizes are encoded as 00 = i8, 01 = i16, 10 = i32 and 11 =
i64, which often (but not always) comes from the instruction encoding
directly. A unit test was added, and although only a subset of the
vecsizes are currently used, the rest should be useful for other cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109706
The vectorizer can sometimes make reverse shuffles from indices that
count down. In MVE, we don't have a 128bit rev instruction, but we can
select this to a VREV64 with some lane movs to swap the two halfs.
Ideally this would use VMOVD's, but only gets as far as VMOVS's at the
moment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69510
Recently a vulnerability issue is found in the implementation of VLLDM
instruction in the Arm Cortex-M33, Cortex-M35P and Cortex-M55. If the
VLLDM instruction is abandoned due to an exception when it is partially
completed, it is possible for subsequent non-secure handler to access
and modify the partial restored register values. This vulnerability is
identified as CVE-2021-35465.
The mitigation sequence varies between v8-m and v8.1-m as follows:
v8-m.main
---------
mrs r5, control
tst r5, #8 /* CONTROL_S.SFPA */
it ne
.inst.w 0xeeb00a40 /* vmovne s0, s0 */
1:
vlldm sp /* Lazy restore of d0-d16 and FPSCR. */
v8.1-m.main
-----------
vscclrm {vpr} /* Clear VPR. */
vlldm sp /* Lazy restore of d0-d16 and FPSCR. */
More details on
developer.arm.com/support/arm-security-updates/vlldm-instruction-security-vulnerability
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109157
When expanding the non-secure call instruction we are emiting code
to clear the secure floating-point registers only if the targeted
architecture has floating-point support. The potential problem is
when the source code containing non-secure calls are built with
-mfloat-abi=soft but some other part of the system has been built
with -mfloat-abi=softfp (soft and softfp are compatible as they use
the same procedure calling standard). In this case floating-point
registers could leak to non-secure state as the non-secure won't
have cleared them assuming no floating point has been used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109153
Under some situations under Thumb1, we could be stuck in an infinite
loop recombining the same instruction. This puts a limit on that, not
combining SUBC with SUBE repeatedly.
The class of instructions that write to narrow top/bottom lanes only
demand the even or odd elements of the input lanes. Which means that a
pair of VMOVNT; VMOVNB demands no lanes from the original input. This
teaches that to instcombine from the target hooks available through
ARMTTIImpl.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109325
Pass the access type to getPtrStride(), so it is not determined
from the pointer element type. Many cases still fetch the element
type at a higher level though, so this only partially addresses
the issue.
When passing an empty strides map, there's nothing to replace for
replaceSymbolicStrideSCEV and it just returns the SCEV for Ptr. There
should be no need to call the function.
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109462
Soft deprecrate isNullValue/isAllOnesValue and update in tree
callers. This matches the changes to the APInt interface from
D109483.
Reviewed By: lattner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109535
This renames the primary methods for creating a zero value to `getZero`
instead of `getNullValue` and renames predicates like `isAllOnesValue`
to simply `isAllOnes`. This achieves two things:
1) This starts standardizing predicates across the LLVM codebase,
following (in this case) ConstantInt. The word "Value" doesn't
convey anything of merit, and is missing in some of the other things.
2) Calling an integer "null" doesn't make any sense. The original sin
here is mine and I've regretted it for years. This moves us to calling
it "zero" instead, which is correct!
APInt is widely used and I don't think anyone is keen to take massive source
breakage on anything so core, at least not all in one go. As such, this
doesn't actually delete any entrypoints, it "soft deprecates" them with a
comment.
Included in this patch are changes to a bunch of the codebase, but there are
more. We should normalize SelectionDAG and other APIs as well, which would
make the API change more mechanical.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109483
On some architectures such as Arm and X86 the encoding for a nop may
change depending on the subtarget in operation at the time of
encoding. This change replaces the per module MCSubtargetInfo retained
by the targets AsmBackend in favour of passing through the local
MCSubtargetInfo in operation at the time.
On Arm using the architectural NOP instruction can have a performance
benefit on some implementations.
For Arm I've deleted the copy of the AsmBackend's MCSubtargetInfo to
limit the chances of this causing problems in the future. I've not
done this for other targets such as X86 as there is more frequent use
of the MCSubtargetInfo and it looks to be for stable properties that
we would not expect to vary per function.
This change required threading STI through MCNopsFragment and
MCBoundaryAlignFragment.
I've attempted to take into account the in tree experimental backends.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45962
In preparation for passing the MCSubtargetInfo (STI) through to writeNops
so that it can use the STI in operation at the time, we need to record the
STI in operation when a MCAlignFragment may write nops as padding. The
STI is currently unused, a further patch will pass it through to
writeNops.
There are many places that can create an MCAlignFragment, in most cases
we can find out the STI in operation at the time. In a few places this
isn't possible as we are in initialisation or finalisation, or are
emitting constant pools. When possible I've tried to find the most
appropriate existing fragment to obtain the STI from, when none is
available use the per module STI.
For constant pools we don't actually need to use EmitCodeAlign as the
constant pools are data anyway so falling through into it via an
executable NOP is no better than falling through into data padding.
This is a prerequisite for D45962 which uses the STI to emit the
appropriate NOP for the STI. Which can differ per fragment.
Note that involves an interface change to InitSections. It is now
called initSections and requires a SubtargetInfo as a parameter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45961
As an extension to D107866, this adds store(fptosisat(..)) patterns,
similar to the existing fptosi patterns, to prevent unnecessarily moving
into gpr regs where we can use fp stores directly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108378
This extends D107865 to the VFP insructions, lowering llvm.fptosi.sat
and llvm.fptoui.sat to VCVT instructions that inherently perform the
saturate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107866
The semantics of tail predication loops means that the value of LR as an
instruction is executed determines the predicate. In other words:
mov r3, #3
DLSTP lr, r3 // Start tail predication, lr==3
VADD.s32 q0, q1, q2 // Lanes 0,1 and 2 are updated in q0.
mov lr, #1
VADD.s32 q0, q1, q2 // Only first lane is updated.
This means that the value of lr cannot be spilled and re-used in tail
predication regions without potentially altering the behaviour of the
program. More lanes than required could be stored, for example, and in
the case of a gather those lanes might not have been setup, leading to
alignment exceptions.
This patch adds a new lr predicate operand to MVE instructions in order
to keep a reference to the lr that they use as a tail predicate. It will
usually hold the zeroreg meaning not predicated, being set to the LR phi
value in the MVETPAndVPTOptimisationsPass. This will prevent it from
being spilled anywhere that it needs to be used.
A lot of tests needed updating.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107638
This adds lowering of the llvm.fptosi.sat and llvm.fptoui.sat intinsics,
selecting a VCVT instruction which under MVE will inherently perform the
saturate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107865
This extends D108921 into a generic rule applied to constructing ExitLimits along all paths. The remaining paths (primarily howFarToZero) don't have the same reasoning about UB sensitivity as the howManyLessThan ones did. Instead, the remain cause for max counts being more precise than exact counts is that we apply context sensitive loop guards on the max path, and not on the exact path. That choice is mildly suspect, but out of scope of this patch.
The MVETailPredication.cpp change deserves a bit of explanation. We were previously figuring out that two SCEVs happened to be equal because the happened to be identical. When we optimized one with context sensitive information, but not the other, we lost the ability to prove them equal. So, cover this case by subtracting and then applying loop guards again. Without this, we see changes in test/CodeGen/Thumb2/mve-blockplacement.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109015
Add assert to provoke failure in object file output, not just in disassembly output.
Reviewed By: yroux
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107259
The min/max intrinsics are not yet canonical, but when they are the tail
predications analysis will change from treating them like icmp to
treating them like intrinsics. Unfortunately, they can currently produce
better code by not being tail predicated thanks to the vectorizer picking
higher VF's and the backend folding to better instructions (especially
for saturate patterns). In the long run we will need to improve the
vectorizers cost modelling, recognizing the instruction directly, but in
the meantime this treats min/max as before to prevent performance
regressions.
The backend generally uses 64-bit immediates (e.g. what
MachineOperand::getImm() returns), so use that for analyzeCompare()
and optimizeCompareInst() as well. This avoids truncation for
targets that support immediates larger 32-bit. In particular, we
can avoid the bugprone value normalization hack in the AArch64
target.
This is a followup to D108076.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108875
__has_builtin(__builtin_mul_overflow) returns true for 32b ARM targets,
but Clang is deferring to compiler RT when encountering `long long`
types. This breaks sanitizer builds of the Linux kernel that are using
__builtin_mul_overflow with these types for these targets.
If the semantics of __has_builtin mean "the compiler resolves these,
always" then we shouldn't conditionally emit a libcall.
This will still need to be worked around in the Linux kernel in order to
continue to support allmodconfig builds of the Linux kernel for this
target with older releases of clang.
Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28629
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1438
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108842
This does the same as D96259, but for ARM, just like AArch64,
using the same comment char as for ELF and MinGW mode.
As the assembly input/output of LLVM is GAS style, trying to
match what MS armasm.exe does isn't needed (because the comment
char used is the least concern when it comes to that; all
directives differ too). If a separate armasm compatible mode
is implemented, it can use its own comment style (just like
llvm-ml implements MS ml.exe compatible assembly parsing).
This fixes building compiler-rt assembly files for ARM in MSVC
mode.
The updated testcase literals-comments.s was only intended to
make sure that '#' isn't interpreted as a comment char.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107251
Add a variant of mve-vqdmulh tests that uses min/max intrinsics
directly, including a scalar test that shows it misbehaving for min
intrinsics and a fix for the combine to prevent it from misbehaving.
This enables subreg liveness in the arm backend when MVE is present,
which allows the register allocator to detect when subregister are
alive/dead, compared to only acting on full registers. This can helps
produce better code on MVE with the way MQPR registers are made up of
SPR registers, but is especially helpful for MQQPR and MQQQQPR
registers, where there are very few "registers" available and being able
to split them up into subregs can help produce much better code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107642
As a part of D107642, this adds pseudo instructions for MQQPR and
MQQQQPR register classes, that can spill and reloads entire registers
whilst keeping them combined, not splitting them into multiple D subregs
that a VLDMIA/VSTMIA would use. This can help certain analyses, and
helps to prevent verifier issues with subreg liveness.
Similar to the MQPR register class as the MVE equivalent to QPR, this
adds MQQPR and MQQQQPR register classes for the MVE equivalents of QQPR
and QQQQPR registers. The MVE MQPR seemed have worked out quite well,
and adding MQQPR and MQQQQPR allows us to a little more accurately
specify the number of registers, calculating register pressure limits a
little better.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107463
Follow-up to D107068, attempt to fold nested concat_vectors/undefs, as long as both the vector and inner subvector types are legal.
This exposed the same issue in ARM's MVE LowerCONCAT_VECTORS_i1 (raised as PR51365) and AArch64's performConcatVectorsCombine which both assumed concat_vectors only took 2 subvector operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107597
Given a constant operand, the MVE and DAGCombine combines could fight,
each redistributing in the opposite order. Add a guard to the MVE
vecreduce distribution to prevent that.
We are running into more and more cases where the liveouts of low
overhead loops do not validate. Add some extra debug messages to make it
clearer why.
David Green