Here we let non-intrinsic calls be considered legal and valid for
similarity only if the call is not indirect, and has a name.
For two calls to be considered similar, they must have the same name,
the same function types, and the same set of parameters, including tail
calls and calling conventions.
Tests are found in unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp.
Reviewers: jroelofs, paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87312
This might also make it easier to adapt if we want
to match min/max intrinsics rather than cmp+sel idioms.
The 'const' part is to potentially avoid confusion
in calling code. There's some surprising and possibly
wrong behavior related to matching min/max reductions
differently than other reductions.
GetElementPtr instructions require the extra check that all operands
after the first must only be constants and be exactly the same to be
considered similar.
Tests are found in unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp.
This patch makes SCEV recognize 'select A, B, false' and 'select A, true, B'.
This is a performance improvement that will be helpful after unsound select -> and/or transformation is removed, as discussed in D93065.
SCEV's answers for the select form should be a bit more conservative than the equivalent `and A, B` / `or A, B`.
Take this example: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/NsP9ue .
To check whether it is valid for SCEV's computeExitLimit to return min(n, m) as ExactNotTaken value, I put llvm.assume at tgt.
It fails because the exit limit becomes poison if n is zero and m is poison. This is problematic if e.g. the exit value of i is replaced with min(n, m).
If either n or m is constant, we can revive the analysis again. I added relevant tests and put alive2 links there.
If and is used instead, this is okay: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/K9rbJk . Hence the existing analysis is sound.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93882
The last use of the function, located in RemovePredecessorAndSimplify,
was removed on Dec 25, 2020 in commit
46bea9b297.
The last use of RemovePredecessorAndSimplify was removed on Sep 29,
2010 in commit 99c985c37d.
As mentioned in D93793, there are quite a few places where unary `IRBuilder::CreateShuffleVector(X, Mask)` can be used
instead of `IRBuilder::CreateShuffleVector(X, Undef, Mask)`.
Let's update them.
Actually, it would have been more natural if the patches were made in this order:
(1) let them use unary CreateShuffleVector first
(2) update IRBuilder::CreateShuffleVector to use poison as a placeholder value (D93793)
The order is swapped, but in terms of correctness it is still fine.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93923
The x86_amx is used for AMX intrisics. <256 x i32> is bitcast to x86_amx when
it is used by AMX intrinsics, and x86_amx is bitcast to <256 x i32> when it
is used by load/store instruction. So amx intrinsics only operate on type x86_amx.
It can help to separate amx intrinsics from llvm IR instructions (+-*/).
Thank Craig for the idea. This patch depend on https://reviews.llvm.org/D87981.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91927
This PR adds impliesPoison(ValAssumedPoison, V) that returns true if V is
poison under the assumption that ValAssumedPoison is poison.
For example, impliesPoison('icmp X, 10', 'icmp X, Y') return true because
'icmp X, Y' is poison if 'icmp X, 10' is poison.
impliesPoison can be used for sound optimization of select, as discussed in
D77868.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78152
Confusingly, BinaryOperator is not an Operator,
OverflowingBinaryOperator is... We were implicitly assuming that
the multiply is an Instruction here.
This fixes the assertion failure reported in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92726#2472827.
This patch updates isImpliedCondition/isKnownNonZero to look into select form of
and/or as well.
See llvm.org/pr48353 and D93065 for more context
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93845
Following the discussion in D93065, this adds m_LogicalAnd() and
m_LogicalOr() matchers, that match A && B and A || B logical
operations, either as bitwise operations or select expressions.
As an example usage, LVI is adapted to use these matchers for its
condition reasoning.
The plan here is to switch other parts of LLVM that reason about
and/or of conditions to also support the select forms, and then
merge D93065 (or a variant thereof) to disable the poison-unsafe
select to and/or transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93827
In 35676a4f9a I've added handling for
non-trivial dominating conditions that imply non-zero on the true
branch. This adds the same support for the false branch.
The changes in pr45360.ll change block ordering and naming, but
don't change the control flow. The urem is still guaraded by a
non-zero check correctly.
The dominating condition handling in isKnownNonZero() currently
only takes into account conditions of the form "x != 0" or "x == 0".
However, there are plenty of other conditions that imply non-zero,
a common one being "x s> 0".
Peculiarly, the handling for assumes was already dealing with more
general non-zero-ness conditions, so this just reuses the same
logic for the dominating condition case.
D71264 started using a context instruction in a computeKnownBits()
call. However, if aliasing between two GEPs is checked, then the
choice of context instruction will be different for alias(GEP1, GEP2)
and alias(GEP2, GEP1), which is not supposed to happen.
Resolve this by remembering which GEP a certain VarIndex belongs to,
and use that as the context instruction. This makes the choice of
context instruction predictable and symmetric.
It should be noted that this choice of context instruction is
non-optimal (just like the previous choice): The AA query result is
only valid at points that are reachable from *both* instructions.
Using either one of them is conservatively correct, but a larger
context may also be valid to use.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93183
Some predicates, can be considered the same as long as the operands are
flipped. For example, a > b gives the same result as b > a. This maps
instructions in a greater than form, to their appropriate less than
form, swapping the operands in the IRInstructionData only, allowing for
more flexible matching.
Tests:
llvm/test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-isomorphic-predicates.ll
llvm/unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp
Reviewers: jroelofs, paquette
Recommit of commit 0503926602
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87310
Some predicates, can be considered the same as long as the operands are
flipped. For example, a > b gives the same result as b > a. This maps
instructions in a greater than form, to their appropriate less than
form, swapping the operands in the IRInstructionData only, allowing for
more flexible matching.
Tests:
llvm/test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-isomorphic-predicates.ll
llvm/unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp
Reviewers: jroelofs, paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87310
Certain instructions, such as adds and multiplies can have the operands
flipped and still be considered the same. When we are analyzing
structure, this gives slightly more flexibility to create a mapping from
one region to another. We can add both operands in a corresponding
instruction to an operand rather than just the exact match. We then try
to eliminate items from the set, until there is only one valid mapping
between the regions of code.
We do this for adds, multiplies, and equality checking. However, this is
not done for floating point instructions, since the order can still
matter in some cases.
Tests:
llvm/test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-commutative-fp.ll
llvm/test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-commutative.ll
llvm/unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp
Reviewers: jroelofs, paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87311
Current approach doesn't work well in cases when multiple paths are predicted to be "cold". By "cold" paths I mean those containing "unreachable" instruction, call marked with 'cold' attribute and 'unwind' handler of 'invoke' instruction. The issue is that heuristics are applied one by one until the first match and essentially ignores relative hotness/coldness
of other paths.
New approach unifies processing of "cold" paths by assigning predefined absolute weight to each block estimated to be "cold". Then we propagate these weights up/down IR similarly to existing approach. And finally set up edge probabilities based on estimated block weights.
One important difference is how we propagate weight up. Existing approach propagates the same weight to all blocks that are post-dominated by a block with some "known" weight. This is useless at least because it always gives 50\50 distribution which is assumed by default anyway. Worse, it causes the algorithm to skip further heuristics and can miss setting more accurate probability. New algorithm propagates the weight up only to the blocks that dominates and post-dominated by a block with some "known" weight. In other words, those blocks that are either always executed or not executed together.
In addition new approach processes loops in an uniform way as well. Essentially loop exit edges are estimated as "cold" paths relative to back edges and should be considered uniformly with other coldness/hotness markers.
Reviewed By: yrouban
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79485
When __builtin_dynamic_object_size returns a non-constant expression, it cannot
be -1 since that is an invalid return value for object size. However since
passes running after the substitution don't know this, they are unable to
optimize away the comparison and hence the comparison and branch stays in there.
This change generates an appropriate call to llvm.assume to help the optimizer
folding the test.
glibc is considering adopting __builtin_dynamic_object_size for additional
protection[1] and this change will help reduce branching overhead in fortified
implementations of all of the functions that don't have the __builtin___*_chk
type builtins, e.g. __ppoll_chk.
Also remove the test limit-max-iterations.ll because it was deemed unnecessary
during review.
[1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-November/120191.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93015
byval arguments should mostly get the same treatment as noalias
arguments in alias analysis. This was not the case for the
isIdentifiedFunctionLocal() function.
Marking byval arguments as identified function local means that
they cannot alias with other arguments, which I believe is correct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93602
The transform wasn't checking that the LHS of the comparison
*is* the `X` in question...
This is the miscompile that was holding up D87188.
Thanks to Dave Green for producing an actionable reproducer!
Temporarily revert commit 8b1c4e310c.
After 8b1c4e310c the compile-time for `MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame`
dramatically increases with -O3 & LTO, causing issues for builders with
that configuration.
I filed PR48553 with a smallish reproducer that shows a 10-100x compile
time increase.
This is split off from D91718 and adds a new target hook
supportsScalableVectors that can be queried to check if scalable vectors
are supported by the backend. For AArch64 this returns true if SVE is
enabled.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93060
This patch adds an alternative cost metric for the inliner to take
into account both the cost (i.e. size) and cycle count savings into
account.
Without this patch, we decide to inline a given call site if the size
of inlining the call site is below the threshold that is computed
according to the hotness of the call site.
This patch adds a new cost metric, turned off by default, to take over
the handling of hot call sites. Specifically, with the new cost
metric, we decide to inline a given call site if the ratio of cycle
savings to size exceeds a threshold. The cycle savings are computed
from call site costs, parameter propagation, folded conditional
branches, etc, all weighted by their respective profile counts. The
size is primarily the callee size, but we subtract call site costs and
the size of basic blocks that are never executed.
The new cost metric implicitly takes advantage of the machine function
splitter recently introduced by Snehasish Kumar, which dramatically
reduces the cost of duplicating (e.g. inlining) cold basic blocks by
placing cold basic blocks of hot functions in the .text.split
section.
We evaluated the new cost metric on clang bootstrap and SPECInt 2017.
For clang bootstrap, we observe 0.69% runtime improvement.
For SPECInt we report the change in IntRate the C/C++ benchmarks. All
benchmarks apart from perlbench and omnetpp improve, on average by
0.21% with the max for mcf at 1.96%.
Benchmark % Change
500.perlbench_r -0.45
502.gcc_r 0.13
505.mcf_r 1.96
520.omnetpp_r -0.28
523.xalancbmk_r 0.49
525.x264_r 0.00
531.deepsjeng_r 0.00
541.leela_r 0.35
557.xz_r 0.21
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92780
The last use of the function was removed on Sep 18, 2016 in commit
5f8cc0c346.
The function was later moved to llvm/lib/Analysis/IVDescriptors.cpp on
Sep 12, 2018 in commit 7e98d69847.
This is being recommitted to try and address the MSVC complaint.
This patch implements a DDG printer pass that generates a graph in
the DOT description language, providing a more visually appealing
representation of the DDG. Similar to the CFG DOT printer, this
functionality is provided under an option called -dot-ddg and can
be generated in a less verbose mode under -dot-ddg-only option.
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90159
Per http://llvm.org/OpenProjects.html#llvm_loopnest, the goal of this
patch (and other following patches) is to create facilities that allow
implementing loop nest passes that run on top-level loop nests for the
New Pass Manager.
This patch extends the functionality of LoopPassManager to handle
loop-nest passes by specializing the definition of LoopPassManager that
accepts both kinds of passes in addPass.
Only loop passes are executed if L is not a top-level one, and both
kinds of passes are executed if L is top-level. Currently, loop nest
passes should have the following run method:
PreservedAnalyses run(LoopNest &, LoopAnalysisManager &,
LoopStandardAnalysisResults &, LPMUpdater &);
Reviewed By: Whitney, ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87045
This patch implements a DDG printer pass that generates a graph in
the DOT description language, providing a more visually appealing
representation of the DDG. Similar to the CFG DOT printer, this
functionality is provided under an option called -dot-ddg and can
be generated in a less verbose mode under -dot-ddg-only option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90159
his is a preparation patch for supporting multiple exits in the loop vectorizer, by itself it should be mostly NFC. This patch moves the loop structure checks from LAA to their respective consumers (where duplicates don't already exist). Moving the checks does end up changing some of the optimization warnings and debug output slightly, but nothing that appears to be a regression.
Why do this? Well, after auditing the code, I can't actually find anything in LAA itself which relies on having all instructions within a loop execute an equal number of times. This patch simply makes this explicit so that if one consumer - say LV in the near future (hopefully) - wants to handle a broader class of loops, it can do so.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92066
D82227 has added a proper check to limit PHI vectorization to the
maximum vector register size. That unfortunately resulted in at
least a couple of regressions on SystemZ and x86.
This change reverts PHI handling from D82227 and replaces it with
a more general check in SLPVectorizerPass::tryToVectorizeList().
Moved to tryToVectorizeList() it allows to restart vectorization
if initial chunk fails.
However, this function is more general and handles not only PHI
but everything which SLP handles. If vectorization factor would
be limited to maximum vector register size it would limit much
more vectorization than before leading to further regressions.
Therefore a new TTI callback getMaximumVF() is added with the
default 0 to preserve current behavior and limit nothing. Then
targets can decide what is better for them.
The callback gets ElementSize just like a similar getMinimumVF()
function and the main opcode of the chain. The latter is to avoid
regressions at least on the AMDGPU. We can have loads and stores
up to 128 bit wide, and <2 x 16> bit vector math on some
subtargets, where the rest shall not be vectorized. I.e. we need
to differentiate based on the element size and operation itself.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92059
InstCombine canonicalizes X>C && X<C' style comparisons into
(X+C1)<C2. This type of expression is recognized by some analyses
like LVI, but currently not when used inside assumptions, because
AssumptionCache does not track affected values for it.
BasicAA currently handles cases like Scale*V0 + (-Scale)*V1 where
V0 != V1, but does not handle the simpler case of Scale*V with
V != 0. Add it based on an isKnownNonZero() call.
I'm not passing a context instruction for now, because the existing
approach of always using GEP1 for context could result in symmetry
issues.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93162
The last use of isLoop was removed on Apr 29, 2002 in commit
09bbb5c015 as part of an effort to
remove "old induction varaible cannonicalization pass built on top of
interval analysis".
If we have two unknown sizes and one GEP operand and one non-GEP
operand, then we currently simply return MayAlias. The comment says
we can't do anything useful ... but we can! We can still check that
the underlying objects are different (and do so for the GEP-GEP case).
To reduce the compile-time impact, this a) checks this early, before
doing the relatively expensive GEP decomposition that will not be
used and b) doesn't do the check if the other operand is a phi or
select. In that case, the phi/select will already recurse, so this
would just do two slightly different recursive walks that arrive at
the same roots.
Compile-time is still a bit of a mixed bag: https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=624af932a808b363a888139beca49f57313d9a3b&to=845356e14adbe651a553ed11318ddb5e79a24bcd&stat=instructions
On average this is a small improvement, but sqlite with ThinLTO has
a 0.5% regression (lencod has a 1% improvement).
The BasicAA test case checks this by using two memsets with unknown
size. However, the more interesting case where this is useful is
the LoopVectorize test case, as analysis of accesses in loops tends
to always us unknown sizes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92401
This is the first in a series of patches that attempts to migrate
existing cost instructions to return a new InstructionCost class
in place of a simple integer. This new class is intended to be
as light-weight and simple as possible, with a full range of
arithmetic and comparison operators that largely mirror the same
sets of operations on basic types, such as integers. The main
advantage to using an InstructionCost is that it can encode a
particular cost state in addition to a value. The initial
implementation only has two states - Normal and Invalid - but these
could be expanded over time if necessary. An invalid state can
be used to represent an unknown cost or an instruction that is
prohibitively expensive.
This patch adds the new class and changes the getInstructionCost
interface to return the new class. Other cost functions, such as
getUserCost, etc., will be migrated in future patches as I believe
this to be less disruptive. One benefit of this new class is that
it provides a way to unify many of the magic costs in the codebase
where the cost is set to a deliberately high number to prevent
optimisations taking place, e.g. vectorization. It also provides
a route to represent the extremely high, and unknown, cost of
scalarization of scalable vectors, which is not currently supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91174
This was separated in the past because the cl::opt was in the .cpp file
but DevirtSCCRepeatedPass::run() was in the .h file. Now that
DevirtSCCRepeatedPass::run() is in the .cpp file, get rid of the tiny
maxDevirtIterationsReached(), it's bad for readability.
This is a rework of D85812, which didn't land.
When callee coroutine function is inlined into caller coroutine function before coro-split pass, llvm will emits "coroutine should have exactly one defining @llvm.coro.begin". It seems that coro-early pass can not handle this quiet well.
So we believe that unsplited coroutine function should not be inlined.
This patch fix such issue by not inlining function if it has attribute "coroutine.presplit" (it means the function has not been splited) to fix this issue
test plan: check-llvm, check-clang
In D85812, there was suggestions on moving the macros to Attributes.td to avoid circular header dependency issue.
I believe it's not worth doing just to be able to use one constant string in one place.
Today, there are already 3 possible attribute values for "coroutine.presplit": c6543cc6b8/llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroInternal.h (L40-L42)
If we move them into Attributes.td, we would be adding 3 new attributes to EnumAttr, just to support this, which I think is an overkill.
Instead, I think the best way to do this is to add an API in Function class that checks whether this function is a coroutine, by checking the attribute by name directly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92706
Build on the work started in 8f07629, and add the multiply case. In the process, more clearly describe the requirement for the operation we're looking through.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92726
For some inputs, the constraint system can grow quite large during
solving, because it replaces complex constraints with one or more
simpler constraints. This adds a cut-off to avoid compile-time explosion
on problematic inputs.
BasicAA has some special bit of logic for "same base pointer" GEPs
that performs a structural comparison: It only looks at two GEPs
with the same base (as opposed to two GEP chains with a MustAlias
base) and compares their indexes in a limited way. I generalized
part of this code in D91027, and this patch merges the remainder
into the normal decomposed GEP logic.
What this code ultimately wants to do is to determine that
gep %base, %idx1 and gep %base, %idx2 don't alias if %idx1 != %idx2,
and the access size fits within the stride.
We can express this in terms of a decomposed GEP expression with
two indexes scale*%idx1 + -scale*%idx2 where %idx1 != %idx2, and
some appropriate checks for sizes and offsets.
This makes the reasoning slightly more powerful, and more
importantly brings all the GEP logic under a common umbrella.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92723
The basic idea is that by looking through operand instructions which don't change the equality result that we can push the existing known bits comparison down past instructions which would obscure them.
We have analogous handling in InstSimplify for most - though weirdly not all - of these cases starting from an icmp root. It's a bit unfortunate to duplicate logic, but since my actual goal is to extend BasicAA, the icmp logic doesn't help. (And just makes it hard to test here.) The BasicAA change will be posted separately for review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92698
Due to the recursion through phis basicaa does, the code needs to be extremely careful not to reason about equality between values which might represent distinct iterations. I'm generally skeptical of the correctness of the whole scheme, but this particular patch fixes one particular instance which is demonstrateable incorrect.
Interestingly, this appears to be the second attempted fix for the same issue. The former fix is incomplete and doesn't address the actual issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92694
Currently PassBuilder.cpp is by far the file that takes longest to
compile. This is due to tons of templates being instantiated per pass.
Follow PassManager by using wrappers around passes to avoid making
the adaptors templated on the pass type. This allows us to move various
adaptors' run methods into .cpp files.
This reduces the compile time of PassBuilder.cpp on my machine from 66
to 39 seconds. It also reduces the size of opt from 685M to 676M.
Reviewed By: dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92616
This changes --print-before/after to be a list of strings rather than
legacy passes. (this also has the effect of not showing the entire list
of passes in --help-hidden after --print-before/after, which IMO is
great for making it less verbose).
Currently PrintIRInstrumentation passes the class name rather than pass
name to llvm::shouldPrintBeforePass(), meaning
llvm::shouldPrintBeforePass() never functions as intended in the NPM.
There is no easy way of converting class names to pass names outside of
within an instance of PassBuilder.
This adds a map of pass class names to their short names in
PassRegistry.def within PassInstrumentationCallbacks. It is populated
inside the constructor of PassBuilder, which takes a
PassInstrumentationCallbacks.
Add a pointer to PassInstrumentationCallbacks inside
PrintIRInstrumentation and use the newly created map.
This is a bit hacky, but I can't think of a better way since the short
id to class name only exists within PassRegistry.def. This also doesn't
handle passes not in PassRegistry.def but rather added via
PassBuilder::registerPipelineParsingCallback().
llvm/test/CodeGen/Generic/print-after.ll doesn't seem very useful now
with this change.
Reviewed By: ychen, jamieschmeiser
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87216
This change should be fairly straight forward. If we've reached a call, check to see if we can tell the result is dereferenceable from information about the minimum object size returned by the call.
To control compile time impact, I'm only adding the call for base facts in the routine. getObjectSize can also do recursive reasoning, and we don't want that general capability here.
As a follow up patch (without separate review), I will plumb through the missing TLI parameter. That will have the effect of extending this to known libcalls - malloc, new, and the like - whereas currently this only covers calls with the explicit allocsize attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90341
When MemCpyOpt performs call slot optimization it will concatenate the `alias.scope` metadata between the function call and the memcpy. However, scoped AA relies on the domains in metadata to be maintained in a caller-callee relationship. Naive concatenation breaks this assumption leading to bad AA results.
The fix is to take the intersection of domains then union the scopes within those domains.
The original bug came from a case of rust bad codegen which uses this bad aliasing to perform additional memcpy optimizations. As show in the added test case `%src` got forwarded past its lifetime leading to a dereference of garbage data.
Testing
ninja check-llvm
Reviewed By: jeroen.dobbelaere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91576
1. Removed #include "...AliasAnalysis.h" in other headers and modules.
2. Cleaned up includes in AliasAnalysis.h.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92489
It's common for code that manipulates the stack via inline assembly or
that has to set up its own stack canary (such as the Linux kernel) would
like to avoid stack protectors in certain functions. In this case, we've
been bitten by numerous bugs where a callee with a stack protector is
inlined into an attribute((no_stack_protector)) caller, which
generally breaks the caller's assumptions about not having a stack
protector. LTO exacerbates the issue.
While developers can avoid this by putting all no_stack_protector
functions in one translation unit together and compiling those with
-fno-stack-protector, it's generally not very ergonomic or as
ergonomic as a function attribute, and still doesn't work for LTO. See also:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20200915172658.1432732-1-rkir@google.com/https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200918201436.2932360-30-samitolvanen@google.com/T/#u
SSP attributes can be ordered by strength. Weakest to strongest, they
are: ssp, sspstrong, sspreq. Callees with differing SSP attributes may be
inlined into each other, and the strongest attribute will be applied to the
caller. (No change)
After this change:
* A callee with no SSP attributes will no longer be inlined into a
caller with SSP attributes.
* The reverse is also true: a callee with an SSP attribute will not be
inlined into a caller with no SSP attributes.
* The alwaysinline attribute overrides these rules.
Functions that get synthesized by the compiler may not get inlined as a
result if they are not created with the same stack protector function
attribute as their callers.
Alternative approach to https://reviews.llvm.org/D87956.
Fixes pr/47479.
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed By: rnk, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91816
Summary:
AIX uses the existing EH infrastructure in clang and llvm.
The major differences would be
1. AIX do not have CFI instructions.
2. AIX uses a new personality routine, named __xlcxx_personality_v1.
It doesn't use the GCC personality rountine, because the
interoperability is not there yet on AIX.
3. AIX do not use eh_frame sections. Instead, it would use a eh_info
section (compat unwind section) to store the information about
personality routine and LSDA data address.
Reviewed By: daltenty, hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91455
https://llvm.org/PR48362
It's possible that we could stub this out sooner somewhere
within JumpThreading, but I'm not sure how to do that, and
then we would still have potential danger in other callers.
I can't find a way to trigger this using 'instsimplify',
however, because that already has a bailout on unreachable
blocks.
This patch replaces the attribute `unsigned VF` in the class
IntrinsicCostAttributes by `ElementCount VF`.
This is a non-functional change to help upcoming patches to compute the cost
model for scalable vector inside this class.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91532
This is the #2 of 2 changes that make remarks hotness threshold option
available in more tools. The changes also allow the threshold to sync with
hotness threshold from profile summary with special value 'auto'.
This change expands remarks hotness threshold option
-fdiagnostics-hotness-threshold in clang and *-remarks-hotness-threshold in
other tools to utilize hotness threshold from profile summary.
Remarks hotness filtering relies on several driver options. Table below lists
how different options are correlated and affect final remarks outputs:
| profile | hotness | threshold | remarks printed |
|---------|---------|-----------|-----------------|
| No | No | No | All |
| No | No | Yes | None |
| No | Yes | No | All |
| No | Yes | Yes | None |
| Yes | No | No | All |
| Yes | No | Yes | None |
| Yes | Yes | No | All |
| Yes | Yes | Yes | >=threshold |
In the presence of profile summary, it is often more desirable to directly use
the hotness threshold from profile summary. The new argument value 'auto'
indicates threshold will be synced with hotness threshold from profile summary
during compilation. The "auto" threshold relies on the availability of profile
summary. In case of missing such information, no remarks will be generated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85808
Enable performing mandatory inlinings upfront, by reusing the same logic
as the full inliner, instead of the AlwaysInliner. This has the
following benefits:
- reduce code duplication - one inliner codebase
- open the opportunity to help the full inliner by performing additional
function passes after the mandatory inlinings, but before th full
inliner. Performing the mandatory inlinings first simplifies the problem
the full inliner needs to solve: less call sites, more contextualization, and,
depending on the additional function optimization passes run between the
2 inliners, higher accuracy of cost models / decision policies.
Note that this patch does not yet enable much in terms of post-always
inline function optimization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91567
For recursive phis, we skip the recursive operands and check that
the remaining operands are NoAlias with an unknown size. Currently,
this is limited to inbounds GEPs with positive offsets, to
guarantee that the recursion only ever increases the pointer.
Make this more general by only requiring that the underlying object
of the phi operand is the phi itself, i.e. it it based on itself in
some way. To compensate, we need to use a beforeOrAfterPointer()
location size, as we no longer have the guarantee that the pointer
is strictly increasing.
This allows us to handle some additional cases like negative geps,
geps with dynamic offsets or geps that aren't inbounds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91914
The size requirement on V2 was present because it was not clear
whether an unknown size would allow an access before the start of
V2, which could then overlap. This is clarified since D91649: In
this part of BasicAA, all accesses can occur only after the base
pointer, even if they have unknown size.
This makes the positive and negative offset cases symmetric.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91482
Folding a select of vector constants that include undef elements only
applies to fixed vectors, but there's no earlier check the type is not
scalable so it crashes for scalable vectors. This adds a check so this
optimization is only attempted for fixed vectors.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92046
Add a flag that disables caching when computing aliasing results
potentially based on a phi-phi NoAlias assumption. We'll still
insert cache entries temporarily to catch infinite recursion,
but will drop them afterwards, so they won't persist in BatchAA.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91936
Currently, we have some confusion in the codebase regarding the
meaning of LocationSize::unknown(): Some parts (including most of
BasicAA) assume that LocationSize::unknown() only allows accesses
after the base pointer. Some parts (various callers of AA) assume
that LocationSize::unknown() allows accesses both before and after
the base pointer (but within the underlying object).
This patch splits up LocationSize::unknown() into
LocationSize::afterPointer() and LocationSize::beforeOrAfterPointer()
to make this completely unambiguous. I tried my best to determine
which one is appropriate for all the existing uses.
The test changes in cs-cs.ll in particular illustrate a previously
clearly incorrect AA result: We were effectively assuming that
argmemonly functions were only allowed to access their arguments
after the passed pointer, but not before it. I'm pretty sure that
this was not intentional, and it's certainly not specified by
LangRef that way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91649
Reverted because the compile time impact is still too high.
isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning is used twice, we can do it just once.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92152
Previously we tried to using isKnownPredicateAt, but it makes an
extra query to isKnownPredicate, which has negative impact on compile
time. Let's try to use more lightweight isBasicBlockEntryGuardedByCond.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92152
A piece of code in `isLoopBackedgeGuardedByCond` basically duplicates
the dominators traversal from `isBlockEntryGuardedByCond` called from
`isKnownPredicateAt`, but it's less powerful because it does not give context
to `isImpliedCond`. This patch reuses the `isKnownPredicateAt `function there,
reducing the amount of code duplication and making it more powerful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92152
Reviewed By: skatkov
Use more context to prove contextual facts about the last iteration. It is
only executed when the backedge is taken, so we can use `isLoopBackedgeGuardedByCond`
to make this check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91535
Reviewed By: skatkov
The TypeSize warning would occur because RuntimePointerChecking::insert
was not scalable vector aware. The fix is to use
ScalarEvolution::getSizeOfExpr to grab the size of types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90171
MaxSafeRegisterWidth is a misnomer since it actually returns the maximum
safe vector width. Register suggests it relates directly to a physical
register where it could be a vector spanning one or more physical
registers.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91727
This reverts commit 7dcc889917.
This patch introduced a logical error that breaks whole logic of this analysis.
All checks we are making are supposed to be loop-independent, so that we could
safely remove the range check. The 'nw' fact is loop-dependent, so we can remove
the check basing on facts from this very check.
Motivating examples will follow-up.
Some older code - and code copied from older code - still directly tested against the singelton result of SE::getCouldNotCompute. Using the isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute> form is both shorter, and more readable.
Andrew Litteken