The callseq_end node must be glued with the TLS calls, otherwise,
the generic code will miss the uses of the returned value and will
mark it dead.
Moreover, TLSCall 64-bit pseudo must not set an implicit-use on RDI,
the pseudo uses the symbol address at this point not RDI and the
lowering will do the right thing.
llvm-svn: 267797
This effectively adds back the extractelt combine removed by r262358:
the direct case can still occur (because x86_mmx is special, see
r262446), but it's the indirect case that's now superseded by the
generic combine.
llvm-svn: 267651
We aren't currently making use of this in any successful mask decode and its actually incorrect as it inserts the wrong number of SM_SentinelUndef mask elements.
llvm-svn: 267350
Reused the ability to split constants of a type wider than the shuffle mask to work with masks generated from scalar constants transfered to xmm.
This fixes an issue preventing PSHUFB target shuffle masks decoding rematerialized scalar constants and also exposes the XOP VPPERM bug described in PR27472.
llvm-svn: 267343
CTTZ_ZERO_UNDEF can be custom lowered specially if CTLZ is supported. Otherwise CTTZ and CTTZ_ZERO_UNDEF are handled the same way by using CTPOP and bitmath.
llvm-svn: 266952
With this change, ideally IR pass can always generate llvm.stackguard
call to get the stack guard; but for now there are still IR form stack
guard customizations around (see getIRStackGuard()). Future SSP
customization should go through LOAD_STACK_GUARD.
There is a behavior change: stack guard values are not CSEed anymore,
since we should never reuse the value in case that it has been spilled (and
corrupted). See ssp-guard-spill.ll. This also cause the change of stack
size and codegen in X86 and AArch64 test cases.
Ideally we'd like to know if the guard created in llvm.stackprotector() gets
spilled or not. If the value is spilled, discard the value and reload
stack guard; otherwise reuse the value. This can be done by teaching
register allocator to know how to rematerialize LOAD_STACK_GUARD and
force a rematerialization (which seems hard), or check for spilling in
expandPostRAPseudo. It only makes sense when the stack guard is a global
variable, which requires more instructions to load. Anyway, this seems to go out
of the scope of the current patch.
llvm-svn: 266806
Using VPERMQ/VPERMPD allows memory folding of the (repeated) input where VINSERTI128/VINSERTF128 can not.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19228
llvm-svn: 266728
no functional change.
ExtraLoad and WrapperKind are been used only if (OpFlags == X86II::MO_GOTPCREL).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18942
llvm-svn: 266557
It is very likely that the swiftself parameter is alive throughout most
functions function so putting it into a callee save register should
avoid spills for the callers with only a minimum amount of extra spills
in the callees.
Currently the generated code is correct but unnecessarily spills and
reloads arguments passed in callee save registers, I will address this
in upcoming patches.
This also adds a missing check that for tail calls the preserved value
of the caller must be the same as the callees parameter.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18902
llvm-svn: 266252
Extend the existing lowering of vXi8 multiplies to support v64i8 on avx512bw targets.
I added the Lower512IntArith helper function to help with this - not sure how often this could be used in the future, but it seemed better than putting all that logic inside LowerMUL.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18937
llvm-svn: 265902
Simon Pilgrim