This is a cleanup patch for SSP support in LLVM. There is no functional change.
llvm.stackprotectorcheck is not needed, because SelectionDAG isn't
actually lowering it in SelectBasicBlock; rather, it adds check code in
FinishBasicBlock, ignoring the position where the intrinsic is inserted
(See FindSplitPointForStackProtector()).
llvm-svn: 265851
Re-apply r265450 which caused PR27245 and was reverted in r265559
because of a wrong generalization: the fetch_and_add->add_and_fetch
combine only works in specific, but pretty common, cases:
(icmp slt x, 0) -> (icmp sle (add x, 1), 0)
(icmp sge x, 0) -> (icmp sgt (add x, 1), 0)
(icmp sle x, 0) -> (icmp slt (sub x, 1), 0)
(icmp sgt x, 0) -> (icmp sge (sub x, 1), 0)
Original Message:
We only generate LOCKed versions of add/sub when the result is unused.
It often happens that the result is used, but only by a comparison. We
can optimize those out by reusing EFLAGS, which lets us use the proper
instructions, instead of having to fallback to LXADD.
Instead of doing this as an MI peephole (as we do for the other
non-LOCKed (really, non-MR) forms), do it in ISel. It becomes quite
tricky later.
This also makes it eventually possible to stop expanding and/or/xor
if the only user is an icmp (also see D18141).
This uses the LOCK ISD opcodes added by r262244.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17633
llvm-svn: 265636
Summary:
In the context of http://wg21.link/lwg2445 C++ uses the concept of
'stronger' ordering but doesn't define it properly. This should be fixed
in C++17 barring a small question that's still open.
The code currently plays fast and loose with the AtomicOrdering
enum. Using an enum class is one step towards tightening things. I later
also want to tighten related enums, such as clang's
AtomicOrderingKind (which should be shared with LLVM as a 'C++ ABI'
enum).
This change touches a few lines of code which can be improved later, I'd
like to keep it as NFC for now as it's already quite complex. I have
related changes for clang.
As a follow-up I'll add:
bool operator<(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator<=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
This is separate so that clang and LLVM changes don't need to be in sync.
Reviewers: jyknight, reames
Subscribers: jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18775
llvm-svn: 265602
Bionic has a defined thread-local location for the stack protector
cookie. Emit a direct load instead of going through __stack_chk_guard.
llvm-svn: 265481
We only generate LOCKed versions of add/sub when the result is unused.
It often happens that the result is used, but only by a comparison. We
can optimize those out by reusing EFLAGS, which lets us use the proper
instructions, instead of having to fallback to LXADD.
Instead of doing this as an MI peephole (as we do for the other
non-LOCKed (really, non-MR) forms), do it in ISel. It becomes quite
tricky later.
This also makes it eventually possible to stop expanding and/or/xor
if the only user is an icmp (also see D18141).
This uses the LOCK ISD opcodes added by r262244.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17633
llvm-svn: 265450
We can only perform a tail call to a callee that preserves all the
registers that the caller needs to preserve.
This situation happens with calling conventions like preserver_mostcc or
cxx_fast_tls. It was explicitely handled for fast_tls and failing for
preserve_most. This patch generalizes the check to any calling
convention.
Related to rdar://24207743
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18680
llvm-svn: 265329
Implemented truncstore for KNL and skylake-avx512.
Covered vectors from v2i1 to v64i1. We save the value in bits (not in bytes) - v32i1 is saved in 4 bytes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18740
llvm-svn: 265283
Add support for lowering with the MOVMSK instruction to extract vector element signbits to a GPR.
This is an early step towards more optimal handling of vector comparison results.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18741
llvm-svn: 265266
Follow-up to http://reviews.llvm.org/D18566 and http://reviews.llvm.org/D18676 -
where we noticed that an intermediate splat was being generated for memsets of
non-zero chars.
That was because we told getMemsetStores() to use a 32-bit vector element type,
and it happily obliged by producing that constant using an integer multiply.
The 16-byte test that was added in D18566 is now equivalent for AVX1 and AVX2
(no splats, just a vector load), but we have PR27141 to track that splat difference.
Note that the SSE1 path is not changed in this patch. That can be a follow-up.
This patch should resolve PR27100.
llvm-svn: 265161
Follow-up to D18566 - where we noticed that an intermediate splat was being
generated for memsets of non-zero chars.
That was because we told getMemsetStores() to use a 32-bit vector element type,
and it happily obliged by producing that constant using an integer multiply.
The tests that were added in the last patch are now equivalent for AVX1 and AVX2
(no splats, just a vector load), but we have PR27141 to track that splat difference.
In the new tests, the splat via shuffling looks ok to me, but there might be some
room for improvement depending on uarch there.
Note that the SSE1/2 paths are not changed in this patch. That can be a follow-up.
This patch should resolve PR27100.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18676
llvm-svn: 265148
Change isConsecutiveLoads to check that loads are non-volatile as this
is a requirement for any load merges. Propagate change to two callers.
Reviewers: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18546
llvm-svn: 265013
Fix for issue introduced D17297, where we were breaking early from the loop detecting consecutive loads which could leave us thinking a consecutive load with zeros was possible.
llvm-svn: 264922
XOP's VPPERM has some great 'permute operations' that it can do as well as part of shuffling the bytes of a 128-bit vector - in this case we use it to perform BITREVERSE in a single instruction.
llvm-svn: 264870
operations.
Specifically, we had code that tried to badly approximate reconstructing
all of the possible variations on addressing modes in two x86
instructions based on those in one pseudo instruction. This is not the
first bug uncovered with doing this, so stop doing it altogether.
Instead generically and pedantically copy every operand from the address
over to both new instructions, and strip kill flags from any register
operands.
This fixes a subtle bug seen in the wild where we would mysteriously
drop parts of the addressing mode, causing for example the index
argument in the added test case to just be completely ignored.
Hypothetically, this was an extremely bad miscompile because it actually
caused a predictable and leveragable write of a 64bit quantity to an
unintended offset (the first element of the array intead of whatever
other element was intended). As a consequence, in theory this could even
have introduced security vulnerabilities.
However, this was only something that could happen with an atomic
floating point add. No other operation could trigger this bug, so it
seems extremely unlikely to have occured widely in the wild.
But it did in fact occur, and frequently in scientific applications
which were using relaxed atomic updates of a floating point value after
adding a delta. Those would end up being quite badly miscompiled by
LLVM, which is how we found this. Of course, this often looks like
a race condition in the code, but it was actually a miscompile.
I suspect that this whole RELEASE_FADD thing was a complete mistake.
There is no such operation, and I worry that anything other than add
will get remarkably worse codegeneration. But that's not for this
change....
llvm-svn: 264845
If all a BUILD_VECTOR's source elements are the same bit (AND/XOR/OR) operation type and each has one constant operand, lower to a pair of BUILD_VECTOR and just apply the bit operation to the vectors.
The constant operands will form a constant vector meaning that we still only have a single BUILD_VECTOR to lower and we will have replaced all the scalarized operations with a single SSE equivalent.
Its not in our interest to start make a general purpose vectorizer from this, but I'm seeing enough of these scalar bit operations from the later legalization/scalarization stages to support them at least.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18492
llvm-svn: 264666
ICMP instruction selection fails on SKX and KNL for i1 operand.
I use XOR to resolve:
(A == B) is equivalent to (A xor B) == 0
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18511
llvm-svn: 264566
Currently this is to mainly to prevent scalarization of integer division by constants.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18307
llvm-svn: 264511
LowerMul v32i8 on AVX2 needs to split the 256-bit sources to allow sign-extension back to v16i16 to occur. Since this is basically the same as Lower256IntArith we simplify by using that here instead.
llvm-svn: 264506
LowerShift was using the same code as Lower256IntArith to split 256-bit vectors into 2 x 128-bit vectors, so now we just call Lower256IntArith.
llvm-svn: 264403
KTEST instruction may be used instead of TEST in this case:
%int_sel3 = bitcast <8 x i1> %sel3 to i8
%res = icmp eq i8 %int_sel3, zeroinitializer
br i1 %res, label %L2, label %L1
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18444
llvm-svn: 264298
This patch begins adding support for lowering to the XOP VPPERM instruction - adding the X86ISD::VPPERM opcode.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18189
llvm-svn: 264260
This should be hoisted further up so it can be used in DAGCombiner and other backends,
but I'm limiting the scope in the interest of patch minimalism.
It's not quite NFC because some of the replaced code was using an 'if' check rather
than a 'while' loop, so those cases would only look through a single bitcast.
llvm-svn: 264186
Improve vector extension of vectors on hardware without dedicated VSEXT/VZEXT instructions.
We already convert these to SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG/ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG but can further improve this by using the legalizer instead of prematurely splitting into legal vectors in the combine as this only properly helps for lowering to VSEXT/VZEXT.
Removes a lot of unnecessary any_extend + mask pattern - (Fix for PR25718).
Reapplied with a fix for PR26953 (missing vector widening legalization).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17932
llvm-svn: 264062
Improve computeZeroableShuffleElements to be able to peek through bitcasts to extract zero/undef values from BUILD_VECTOR nodes of different element sizes to the shuffle mask.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14261
llvm-svn: 263906
We were being too aggressive in trying to combine a shuffle into a blend-with-zero pattern, often resulting in a endless loop of contrasting combines
This patch stops the combine if we already have a blend in place (means we miss some domain corrections)
llvm-svn: 263717
Converting masked vector loads to regular vector loads for x86 AVX should always be a win.
I raised the legality issue of reading the extra memory bytes on llvm-dev. I did not see any
objections.
1. x86 already does this kind of optimization for multiple scalar loads -> vector load.
2. If other targets have the same flexibility, we could move this transform up to CGP or DAGCombiner.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18094
llvm-svn: 263446
The SSE41 v8i16 shift lowering using (v)pblendvb is great for non-constant shift amounts, but if it is constant then we can efficiently reduce the VSELECT to shuffles with the pre-SSE41 lowering.
llvm-svn: 263383
cmpxchg[8|16]b uses RBX as one of its argument.
In other words, using this instruction clobbers RBX as it is defined to hold one
the input. When the backend uses dynamically allocated stack, RBX is used as a
reserved register for the base pointer.
Reserved registers have special semantic that only the target understands and
enforces, because of that, the register allocator don’t use them, but also,
don’t try to make sure they are used properly (remember it does not know how
they are supposed to be used).
Therefore, when RBX is used as a reserved register but defined by something that
is not compatible with that use, the register allocator will not fix the
surrounding code to make sure it gets saved and restored properly around the
broken code. This is the responsibility of the target to do the right thing with
its reserved register.
To fix that, when the base pointer needs to be preserved, we use a different
pseudo instruction for cmpxchg that save rbx.
That pseudo takes two more arguments than the regular instruction:
- One is the value to be copied into RBX to set the proper value for the
comparison.
- The other is the virtual register holding the save of the value of RBX as the
base pointer. This saving is done as part of isel (i.e., we emit a copy from
rbx).
cmpxchg_save_rbx <regular cmpxchg args>, input_for_rbx_reg, save_of_rbx_as_bp
This gets expanded into:
rbx = copy input_for_rbx_reg
cmpxchg <regular cmpxchg args>
rbx = save_of_rbx_as_bp
Note: The actual modeling of the pseudo is a bit more complicated to make sure
the interferes that appears after the pseudo gets expanded are properly modeled
before that expansion.
This fixes PR26883.
llvm-svn: 263325
Improve vector extension of vectors on hardware without dedicated VSEXT/VZEXT instructions.
We already convert these to SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG/ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG but can further improve this by using the legalizer instead of prematurely splitting into legal vectors in the combine as this only properly helps for lowering to VSEXT/VZEXT.
Removes a lot of unnecessary any_extend + mask pattern - (Fix for PR25718).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17932
llvm-svn: 263303
Its not enough that we test for SSSE3 - that's only OK for 128-bit vectors - we also need to test for AVX2 / AVX512BW for 256/512 bit vector cases.
llvm-svn: 263239
Looking at the IR definition of a masked load made me realize
there was no reason to use a shuffle here, so we don't need
to convert the format of the mask at all.
llvm-svn: 263167
Generalise the existing SIGN_EXTEND to SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG combine to support zero extension as well and get rid of a lot of unnecessary ANY_EXTEND + mask patterns.
Reapplied with a fix for PR26870 (avoid premature use of TargetConstant in ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG expansion).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17691
llvm-svn: 263159
This patch reorders the combining of target shuffle masks so that when a unary shuffle takes a binary shuffle as its input but only references one of its inputs it can correctly combine into a unary shuffle mask.
This is starting to encroach on the purpose of resolveTargetShuffleInputs, but I don't want to remove it until we definitely know we won't need it for full binary shuffle combining.
There is a lot more work before we can properly support binary target shuffle masks but this was an easy case to add support for.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17858
llvm-svn: 263102
Operation SCALAR_TO_VECTOR for v64i8 and v32i16 should be lowered if BW feature is "on".
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17994
llvm-svn: 263097
Instead of a variable-blend instruction, form a blend with immediate because those are always cheaper.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17899
llvm-svn: 263067
The fix consisting in using the library call for atomic compare and swap when
the instruction is not safe to use may be incorrect. Indeed the library call may
not exist on all platform. In other words, we need a better fix!
llvm-svn: 262943
Patch to add support for target shuffle combining of X86ISD::VPERMV3 nodes, including support for detecting unary shuffles.
This uncovered several issues with the X86ISD::VPERMV3 shuffle mask decoding of non-64 bit shuffle mask elements - the bit masking wasn't being correctly computed.
Removed non-constant pool mask decode path as we have no way of testing it right now.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17916
llvm-svn: 262809
Added support for decoding VPERMILPS variable shuffle masks that aren't in the constant pool.
Added target shuffle mask decoding for SCALAR_TO_VECTOR+VZEXT_MOVL cases - these can happen for v2i64 constant re-materialization
Followup to D17681
llvm-svn: 262784
When the lowering of the setjmp intrinsic requires
a global base pointer to be set, make sure such pointer
gets defined by the CGBR pass.
This fixes PR26742.
llvm-svn: 262762
cmpxchgXXb uses RBX as one of its implicit argument. I.e., when
we use that instruction we need to clobber RBX. This is generally
fine, expect when RBX is a reserved register because in that case,
the register allocator will not track its value and will not
save and restore it when interferences occur.
rdar://problem/24851412
llvm-svn: 262759
The x86 ret instruction has a 16 bit immediate indicating how many bytes
to pop off of the stack beyond the return address.
There is a problem when extremely large structs are passed by value: we
might not be able to fit the number of bytes to pop into the return
instruction.
To fix this, expand RET_FLAG a little later and use a special sequence
to clean the stack:
pop %ecx ; return address is now in %ecx
add $n, %esp ; clean the stack
push %ecx ; bring the return address back on the stack
ret ; pop the return address and jmp to it's value
llvm-svn: 262755
The variable mask form of VPERMILPD/VPERMILPS were only partially implemented, with much of it still performed as an intrinsic.
This patch properly defines the instructions in terms of X86ISD::VPERMILPV, permitting the opcode to be easily combined as a target shuffle.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17681
llvm-svn: 262635
That's not the case for VPERMV/VPERMV3, which cover all possible
combinations (the C intrinsics use a different order; the AVX vs
AVX512 intrinsics are different still).
Since:
r246981 AVX-512: Lowering for 512-bit vector shuffles.
VPERMV is recognized in getTargetShuffleMask.
This breaks assumptions in most callers, as they expect
the non-mask operands to start at index 0.
VPERMV has the mask as operand #0; VPERMV3 has it in the middle.
Instead of the faulty assumption, have getTargetShuffleMask return
its operands as well.
One alternative we considered was to change the operand order of
VPERMV, but we agreed to stick to the instruction order, as there
are more AVX512 weirdness to cover (vpermt2/vpermi2 in particular).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17041
llvm-svn: 262627
Generalise the existing SIGN_EXTEND to SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG combine to support zero extension as well and get rid of a lot of unnecessary ANY_EXTEND + mask patterns.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17691
llvm-svn: 262599
The code was previously not able to track a boolean argument
at a call site back to the formal argument of the caller.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17786
llvm-svn: 262575
Catch objects with a displacement of zero do not initialize a catch
object. The displacement is relative to %rsp at the end of the
function's prologue for x86_64 targets.
If we place an object at the top-of-stack, we will end up wit a
displacement of zero resulting in our catch object remaining
uninitialized.
Address this by creating our catch objects as fixed objects. We will
ensure that the UnwindHelp object is created after the catch objects so
that no catch object will have a displacement of zero.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17823
llvm-svn: 262546
This reverts commit r262370.
It turns out there is code out there that does sequences of allocas
greater than 4K: http://crbug.com/591404
The goal of this change was to improve the code size of inalloca call
sequences, but we got tangled up in the mess of dynamic allocas.
Instead, we should come back later with a separate MI pass that uses
dominance to optimize the full sequence. This should also be able to
remove the often unneeded stacksave/stackrestore pairs around the call.
llvm-svn: 262505
We have a number of useful lowering strategies for VBROADCAST instructions (both from memory and register element 0) which the 128-bit form of the MOVDDUP instruction can make use of.
This patch tweaks lowerVectorShuffleAsBroadcast to enable it to broadcast 2f64 args using MOVDDUP as well.
It does require a slight tweak to the lowerVectorShuffleAsBroadcast mechanism as the existing MOVDDUP lowering uses isShuffleEquivalent which can match binary shuffles that can lower to (unary) broadcasts.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17680
llvm-svn: 262478
We modeled the RDFLAGS{32,64} operations as "using" {E,R}FLAGS.
While technically correct, this is not be desirable for folks who want
to examine aspects of the FLAGS register which are not related to
computation like whether or not CPUID is a valid instruction.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17782
llvm-svn: 262465
This isn't quite NFC because some of the SDLocs may change which could
cause scheduling differences. But no regression tests are affected and
there is no functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 262391
The _chkstk function is called by the compiler to probe the stack in an
order consistent with Windows' expectations. However, it is possible to
elide the call to _chkstk and manually adjust the stack pointer if we
can prove that the allocation is fixed size and smaller than the probe
size.
This shrinks chrome.dll, chrome_child.dll and chrome.exe by a
cummulative ~133 KB.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17679
llvm-svn: 262370
In the code below on 32-bit targets, x would previously get forwarded to g()
without sign-extension to 32 bits as required by the parameter attribute.
void g(signed short);
void f(unsigned short x) {
g(x);
}
llvm-svn: 262352
This is long-standing dirtiness, as acknowledged by r77582:
The current trick is to select it into a merge_values with
the first definition being an implicit_def. The proper solution is
to add new ISD opcodes for the no-output variant.
Doing this before selection will let us combine away some constructs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17659
llvm-svn: 262244
Sanjay Patel