This is a cleanup patch for SSP support in LLVM. There is no functional change.
llvm.stackprotectorcheck is not needed, because SelectionDAG isn't
actually lowering it in SelectBasicBlock; rather, it adds check code in
FinishBasicBlock, ignoring the position where the intrinsic is inserted
(See FindSplitPointForStackProtector()).
llvm-svn: 265851
Summary:
In the context of http://wg21.link/lwg2445 C++ uses the concept of
'stronger' ordering but doesn't define it properly. This should be fixed
in C++17 barring a small question that's still open.
The code currently plays fast and loose with the AtomicOrdering
enum. Using an enum class is one step towards tightening things. I later
also want to tighten related enums, such as clang's
AtomicOrderingKind (which should be shared with LLVM as a 'C++ ABI'
enum).
This change touches a few lines of code which can be improved later, I'd
like to keep it as NFC for now as it's already quite complex. I have
related changes for clang.
As a follow-up I'll add:
bool operator<(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator<=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
This is separate so that clang and LLVM changes don't need to be in sync.
Reviewers: jyknight, reames
Subscribers: jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18775
llvm-svn: 265602
Bionic has a defined thread-local location for the stack protector
cookie. Emit a direct load instead of going through __stack_chk_guard.
llvm-svn: 265481
We can only perform a tail call to a callee that preserves all the
registers that the caller needs to preserve.
This situation happens with calling conventions like preserver_mostcc or
cxx_fast_tls. It was explicitely handled for fast_tls and failing for
preserve_most. This patch generalizes the check to any calling
convention.
Related to rdar://24207743
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18680
llvm-svn: 265329
This change adds a support for a preserve_most calling convention to the AArch64 backend, similar to how it was done for X86-64.
There is also a subsequent patch on top of this one to add a tail-calls support for this calling convention.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18016
llvm-svn: 263092
Revert r262248 in an attempt to fix the clang-native-aarch64-full
bot and to investigate a performance regression in
SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench
llvm-svn: 262388
Original message:
Get rid of the ifdefs in TargetLowering.
Introduce a new API used only by GlobalISel: CallLowering.
This API will contain target hooks dedicated to call lowering.
llvm-svn: 260998
This is just a trivial implementation:
- Support only arguments passed in registers.
- Support only "plain" arguments, i.e., no sext/zext attribute.
At this point, it is possible to play with the IRTranslator on AArch64:
llc -mtriple arm64-<vendor>-<os> -print-machineinstrs <input.ll> -o - -global-isel
For now, we only support the translation of program with adds and returns.
Follow-up patches are on their way to add a test case (the MIRParser is
not ready as it is).
llvm-svn: 260600
Summary:
This is an extension to the existing implementation of r242436 which
restricts to only select inputs. This version fixes missed opportunities
in pr26084 by attempting to lower conditional compare sequences of
and/or trees with setcc leafs. This will additionaly handle the case
when a tree with select input is not a conjunction-disjunction tree
but some of the sub trees are conjunction-disjunction trees.
Reviewers: jmolloy, t.p.northover, mcrosier, MatzeB
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits, junbuml, haicheng, mssimpso, gberry
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16291
llvm-svn: 259387
Some of the conditions necessary to produce ccmp sequences were only
checked in recursive calls to emitConjunctionDisjunctionTree() after
some of the earlier expressions were already built. Move all checks over
to isConjunctionDisjunctionTree() so they are all checked before we
start emitting instructions.
Also rename some variable to better reflect their usage.
llvm-svn: 258605
The current behavior is incorrect, as the two CCs returned by
changeFPCCToAArch64CC, intended to be OR'ed, are instead used
in an AND ccmp chain.
Consider:
define i32 @t(float %a, float %b, float %c, float %d, i32 %e, i32 %f) {
%cc1 = fcmp one float %a, %b
%cc2 = fcmp olt float %c, %d
%and = and i1 %cc1, %cc2
%r = select i1 %and, i32 %e, i32 %f
ret i32 %r
}
Assuming (%a < %b) and (%c < %d); we used to do:
fcmp s0, s1 # nzcv <- 1000
orr w8, wzr, #0x1 # w8 <- 1
csel w9, w8, wzr, mi # w9 <- 1
csel w8, w8, w9, gt # w8 <- 1
fcmp s2, s3 # nzcv <- 1000
cset w9, mi # w9 <- 1
tst w8, w9 # (w8 & w9) == 1, so: nzcv <- 0000
csel w0, w0, w1, ne # w0 <- w0
We now do:
fcmp s2, s3 # nzcv <- 1000
fccmp s0, s1, #0, mi # mi, so: nzcv <- 1000
fccmp s0, s1, #8, le # !le, so: nzcv <- 1000
csel w0, w0, w1, pl # !pl, so: w0 <- w1
In other words, we transformed:
(c < d) && ((a < b) || (a > b))
into:
(c < d) && (a u>= b) && (a u<= b)
whereas, per De Morgan's, we wanted:
(c < d) && !((a u>= b) && (a u<= b))
Note that this problem doesn't occur in the test-suite.
changeFPCCToAArch64CC produces disjunct CCs; here, one -> mi/gt.
We can't represent that in the fccmp chain; it can't express
arbitrary OR sequences, as one comment explains:
In general we can create code for arbitrary "... (and (and A B) C)"
sequences. We can also implement some "or" expressions, because
"(or A B)" is equivalent to "not (and (not A) (not B))" and we can
implement some negation operations. [...] However there is no way
to negate the result of a partial sequence.
Instead, introduce changeFPCCToANDAArch64CC, which produces the
conjunct cond codes:
- (a one b)
== ((a olt b) || (a ogt b))
== ((a ord b) && (a une b))
- (a ueq b)
== ((a uno b) || (a oeq b))
== ((a ule b) && (a uge b))
Note that, at first, one might think that, when PushNegate is true,
we should use the disjunct CCs, in effect doing:
(a || b)
= !(!a && !(b))
= !(!a && !(b1 || b2)) <- changeFPCCToAArch64CC(b, b1, b2)
= !(!a && !b1 && !b2)
However, we can take advantage of the fact that the CC is already
negated, which lets us avoid special-casing PushNegate and doing
the simpler to reason about:
(a || b)
= !(!a && (!b))
= !(!a && (b1 && b2)) <- changeFPCCToANDAArch64CC(!b, b1, b2)
= !(!a && b1 && b2)
This makes both emitConditionalCompare cases behave identically,
and produces correct ccmp sequences for the 2-CC fcmps.
llvm-svn: 258533
We verify that the op tree is eligible for CCMP emission in
isConjunctionDisjunctionTree, but it's also possible that
emitConjunctionDisjunctionTree fails later.
The initial check is useful, as it avoids building nodes
that will get discarded.
Still, make sure that inconsistencies don't happen with
an assert.
llvm-svn: 258532
Summary:
SETCC with f16 vectors has OperationAction set to Expand but still gets
lowered to FCM* intrinsics based on its result type. This patch skips
lowering of VSETCC if the operand is an f16 vector.
v4 and v8 tests included.
Reviewers: ab, jmolloy
Subscribers: srhines, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15361
llvm-svn: 258471
When we have a single basic block, the explicit copy-back instructions should
be inserted right before the terminator. Before this fix, they were wrongly
placed at the beginning of the basic block.
I will commit fixes to other platforms as well.
PR26136
llvm-svn: 257929
This patch adds a DAG combine for (any_extend (extract_vector_elt v, i)) ->
(extract_vector_elt v, i). The combine enables us to better match some SMOV
patterns.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15515
llvm-svn: 255895
The access function has a short entry and a short exit, the initialization
block is only run the first time. To improve the performance, we want to
have a short frame at the entry and exit.
We explicitly handle most of the CSRs via copies. Only the CSRs that are not
handled via copies will be in CSR_SaveList.
Frame lowering and prologue/epilogue insertion will generate a short frame
in the entry and exit according to CSR_SaveList. The majority of the CSRs will
be handled by register allcoator. Register allocator will try to spill and
reload them in the initialization block.
We add CSRsViaCopy, it will be explicitly handled during lowering.
1> we first set FunctionLoweringInfo->SplitCSR if conditions are met (the target
supports it for the given machine function and the function has only return
exits). We also call TLI->initializeSplitCSR to perform initialization.
2> we call TLI->insertCopiesSplitCSR to insert copies from CSRsViaCopy to
virtual registers at beginning of the entry block and copies from virtual
registers to CSRsViaCopy at beginning of the exit blocks.
3> we also need to make sure the explicit copies will not be eliminated.
The target independent portion was committed as r255353.
rdar://problem/23557469
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15341
llvm-svn: 255821
After much discussion, ending here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151123/315620.html
it has been decided that, instead of having the vectorizer directly generate
special absdiff and horizontal-add intrinsics, we'll recognize the relevant
reduction patterns during CodeGen. Accordingly, these intrinsics are not needed
(the operations they represent can be pattern matched, as is already done in
some backends). Thus, we're backing these out in favor of the current
development work.
r248483 - Codegen: Fix llvm.*absdiff semantic.
r242546 - [ARM] Use [SU]ABSDIFF nodes instead of intrinsics for VABD/VABA
r242545 - [AArch64] Use [SU]ABSDIFF nodes instead of intrinsics for ABD/ABA
r242409 - [Codegen] Add intrinsics 'absdiff' and corresponding SDNodes for absolute difference operation
llvm-svn: 255387
Otherwise, we think that most types that look like they'd fit in a
legal vector type are legal (so, basically, *any* vector type with a
size between 33 and 128 bits, I think, since we use pow2 alignment;
e.g., v2i25, v3f32, ...).
DataLayout::getTypeAllocSize rounds up based on alignment.
When checking for target intrinsic legality, that's not what we want:
if rounding makes a difference, the type isn't legal, and the
target intrinsics shouldn't be used, as they are always assumed legal.
One could make the argument that alloc size is ultimately the most
relevant here, since we're dealing with LD/ST intrinsics. That's only
true if we did legalize them though; that's a problem for another day.
Use DataLayout::getTypeSizeInBits instead of getTypeAllocSizeInBits.
Type::getSizeInBits can't be used because that'd gratuitously break
pointer vector support.
Some of these uses are currently fine, because we only hit them when
the type is already known legal (e.g., r114454). Update them for
consistency. It's faster to avoid the rounding anyway!
llvm-svn: 255089
Matthias Braun