This is a followup to rL362981, in which I moved GetObjCLanguageRuntime
from Process to ObjCLanguageRuntime, renaming it to Get along the way.
llvm-svn: 362984
Summary:
I want to remove this method because I think that Process should be
language agnostic, or at least, not have knowledge about specific language
runtimes. There is "GetLanguageRuntime()" which should be used instead. If the
caller a CPPLanguageRuntime, they should cast it as needed. Ideally, this
should only happen in plugins that need C++ specific knowledge.
The next step I would like to do is remove "GetObjCLanguageRuntime()" as well.
There are a lot more instances of that function being used, so I wanted to
upload this one first to get the general reception to this idea.
Reviewers: compnerd, davide, JDevlieghere, jingham, clayborg, labath, aprantl
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62755
llvm-svn: 362544
There is likely also an underlying bug in all code that calls
CPlusPlusNameParser with nullptrs, but this patch can also stand for
itself.
rdar://problem/49072829
llvm-svn: 362177
Summary:
According to [C128] "Virtual functions should specify exactly one
of `virtual`, `override`, or `final`", I've added override where a
virtual function is overriden but the explicit `override` keyword
was missing. Whenever both `virtual` and `override` were specified,
I removed `virtual`. As C.128 puts it:
> [...] writing more than one of these three is both redundant and
> a potential source of errors.
I anticipate a discussion about whether or not to add `override` to
destructors but I went for it because of an example in [ISOCPP1000].
Let me repeat the comment for you here:
Consider this code:
```
struct Base {
virtual ~Base(){}
};
struct SubClass : Base {
~SubClass() {
std::cout << "It works!\n";
}
};
int main() {
std::unique_ptr<Base> ptr = std::make_unique<SubClass>();
}
```
If for some odd reason somebody removes the `virtual` keyword from the
`Base` struct, the code will no longer print `It works!`. So adding
`override` to destructors actively protects us from accidentally
breaking our code at runtime.
[C128]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#c128-virtual-functions-should-specify-exactly-one-of-virtual-override-or-final
[ISOCPP1000]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/issues/1000#issuecomment-476951555
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, davide, shafik
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: kwk, arphaman, kadircet, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61440
llvm-svn: 359868
Summary:
When we want to compare a ConstString against a string literal (or any other non-ConstString),
we currently have to explicitly turn the other string into a ConstString. This makes sense as
comparing ConstStrings against each other is only a fast pointer comparison.
However, currently we (rather incorrectly) use in several places in LLDB temporary ConstStrings when
we just want to compare a given ConstString against a hardcoded value, for example like this:
```
if (extension != ConstString(".oat") && extension != ConstString(".odex"))
```
Obviously this kind of defeats the point of ConstStrings. In the comparison above we would
construct two temporary ConstStrings every time we hit the given code. Constructing a
ConstString is relatively expensive: we need to go to the StringPool, take a read and possibly
an exclusive write-lock and then look up our temporary string in the string map of the pool.
So we do a lot of heavy work for essentially just comparing a <6 characters in two strings.
I initially wanted to just fix these issues by turning the temporary ConstString in static variables/
members, but that made the code much less readable. Instead I propose to add a new overload
for the ConstString comparison operator that takes a StringRef. This comparison operator directly
compares the ConstString content against the given StringRef without turning the StringRef into
a ConstString.
This means that the example above can look like this now:
```
if (extension != ".oat" && extension != ".odex")
```
It also no longer has to unlock/lock two locks and call multiple functions in other TUs for constructing
the temporary ConstString instances. Instead this should end up just being a direct string comparison
of the two given strings on most compilers.
This patch also directly updates all uses of temporary and short ConstStrings in LLDB to use this new
comparison operator. It also adds a some unit tests for the new and old comparison operator.
Reviewers: #lldb, JDevlieghere, espindola, amccarth
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, amccarth
Subscribers: amccarth, clayborg, JDevlieghere, emaste, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60667
llvm-svn: 359281
Summary:
This previous fix 5469bda296 did not have a test since we did not have a reproducer.
This is related to how formatters deal with pointers and references. The added tests both the new behavior and covers the previous bug fix as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60588
llvm-svn: 359118
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
There's a single report of a crash coming from this current_sp being NULL. I don't
have a repro case, and I couldn't get it to happen by hand-corrupting a list. We
always get an error instead. So I don't have a test case. But checking for null
is clearly right here.
<rdar://problem/48503320>
llvm-svn: 355957
My apologies for the large patch. With the exception of ConstString.h
itself it was entirely produced by sed.
ConstString has exactly one const char * data member, so passing a
ConstString by reference is not any more efficient than copying it by
value. In both cases a single pointer is passed. But passing it by
value makes it harder to accidentally return the address of a local
object.
(This fixes rdar://problem/48640859 for the Apple folks)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59030
llvm-svn: 355553
libc++ has programmable ABI versioning controllable with the _LIBCPP_ABI_VERSION
macro. Currently there are at least 3 settings used in real systems (1 as the
default, ndk1 for Anroid, Cr for Chromium).
Only the 1 and ndk1 cases were handled. This change relaxes the check to allow
any ABI version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57466
llvm-svn: 352899
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The code in LLDB assumes that CompilerType and friends use the size 0
as a sentinel value to signal an error. This works for C++, where no
zero-sized type exists, but in many other programming languages
(including I believe C) types of size zero are possible and even
common. This is a particular pain point in swift-lldb, where extra
code exists to double-check that a type is *really* of size zero and
not an error at various locations.
To remedy this situation, this patch starts by converting
CompilerType::getBitSize() and getByteSize() to return an optional
result. To avoid wasting space, I hand-rolled my own optional data
type assuming that no type is larger than what fits into 63
bits. Follow-up patches would make similar changes to the ValueObject
hierarchy.
rdar://problem/47178964
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56688
llvm-svn: 351214
This patch simplifies boolean expressions acorss LLDB. It was generated
using clang-tidy with the following command:
run-clang-tidy.py -checks='-*,readability-simplify-boolean-expr' -format -fix $PWD
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55584
llvm-svn: 349215
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
Summary:
Now that llvm demangler supports more generic customization, we can
implement type substitution directly on top of this API. This will allow
us to remove the specialized hooks which were added to the demangler to
support this use case.
Reviewers: sgraenitz, erik.pilkington, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54074
llvm-svn: 346233
This patch introduces the simple MSVCUndecoratedNameParser. It is needed for
parsing names of PDB symbols corresponding to template instantiations. For
example, for the name `operator<<A>'::`2'::B::operator> we can't just split the
name with :: (as it is implemented for now) to retrieve its scopes. This parser
processes such names in a more correct way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52461
llvm-svn: 346213
Clang recently improved its DWARF support for C VLA types. The DWARF
now looks like this:
0x00000051: DW_TAG_variable [4]
DW_AT_location( fbreg -32 )
DW_AT_name( "__vla_expr" )
DW_AT_type( {0x000000d3} ( long unsigned int ) )
DW_AT_artificial( true )
...
0x000000da: DW_TAG_array_type [10] *
DW_AT_type( {0x000000cc} ( int ) )
0x000000df: DW_TAG_subrange_type [11]
DW_AT_type( {0x000000e9} ( __ARRAY_SIZE_TYPE__ ) )
DW_AT_count( {0x00000051} )
Without this patch LLDB will naively interpret the DIE offset 0x51 as
the static size of the array, which is clearly wrong. This patch
extends ValueObject::GetNumChildren to query the dynamic properties of
incomplete array types.
See the testcase for an example:
4 int foo(int a) {
5 int vla[a];
6 for (int i = 0; i < a; ++i)
7 vla[i] = i;
8
-> 9 pause(); // break here
10 return vla[a-1];
11 }
(lldb) fr v vla
(int []) vla = ([0] = 0, [1] = 1, [2] = 2, [3] = 3)
(lldb) quit
rdar://problem/21814005
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53530
llvm-svn: 346165
- Added LibcxxFunctionSummaryProvider
- Removed LibcxxFunctionFrontEnd
- Modified data formatter tests to test new summary functionality
Patch by Shafik Yaghmour!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50864
llvm-svn: 340543
Patch by Shafik Yaghmour!
This reapplies an earlier version after addressing some post-commit feedback.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49271
llvm-svn: 339828
Summary:
Removing FastDemangle will greatly reduce maintenance efforts. This patch replaces the last point of use in LLDB. Semantics should be kept intact.
Once this is agreed upon, we can:
* Remove the FastDemangle sources
* Add more features e.g. substitutions in template parameters, considering all variations, etc.
Depends on LLVM patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D50586
Reviewers: erik.pilkington, friss, jingham, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, chrib, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50587
llvm-svn: 339583
Summary:
This patch adds syntax highlighting support to LLDB. When enabled (and lldb is allowed
to use colors), printed source code is annotated with the ANSI color escape sequences.
So far we have only one highlighter which is based on Clang and is responsible for all
languages that are supported by Clang. It essentially just runs the raw lexer over the input
and then surrounds the specific tokens with the configured escape sequences.
Reviewers: zturner, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: labath, teemperor, llvm-commits, mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49334
llvm-svn: 338662
This broke a linux bot which doesn't support -std=c++17. The solution
is to add a decorator to skip these tests on machines with older compilers.
llvm-svn: 338162
This should have all the correct files now.
<rdar://problem/41471112>
Patch by Shafik Yaghmour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49271
llvm-svn: 338156
The synthetic child providers for these classes had a type expression that matched
pointers & references to the type, but the Front End only worked on the actual object.
I fixed this by adding a way for the Synthetic Child FrontEnd provider to request dereference,
and then had these formatters use that mode.
<rdar://problem/40849836>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49279
llvm-svn: 337035
Summary: Check case when _M_t child member is not present.
Reviewers: labath, tberghammer
Reviewed By: labath, tberghammer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47932
Patch by Aleksandr Urakov <aleksandr.urakov@jetbrains.com>.
llvm-svn: 334411
Summary:
FastDemangle gives us a C-string that we own (which is allocated in SymbolDemangler::GetDemangledCopy).
As we are not deleting the string, we leak memory whenever we call SubsPrimitiveParmItanium.
Reviewers: javed.absar
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, chrib, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47418
llvm-svn: 333353
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
Now incorrect type argument that looks like T<A><B> doesn't
cause an assert, but just a parsing error.
Bug: 36224
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42939
llvm-svn: 324380
Alex Langford